Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

Syjefroi posted:

Oh my god that old lady, she went from a fan to heartbroken in an instant.

Yeah, Kasich essentially communicated "I don't care that you supported me and are disappointed now, get hosed!".

It's sad. No loyalty or dedication at all. :smith:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Syjefroi
Oct 6, 2003

I'll play it first and tell you what it is later.

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Gonna quote myself to ask a follow-up question:


Why do Americans seem to throw efficiency/pragmatism under the bus with public policy in place of "working hard for the sake of working hard"? It's probably a rhetorical question at this point, but is there a similar sentiment outside of America of punishing ourselves and others who don't seem to meet an arbitrary bar of what it means to have hard work ethic and stripping benefits for those deemed to have not paid their dues to society?

Countries like Norway tend to have a reputation of cold emotionless pragmatism in public policy decisions that seem the inverse of American attitudes.

It's projecting. Up until the New Deal, more or less, folks had to work until they died, and it sucked. Even though things got better, there was still a new bar that was set for how much you had to work. So with each new generation, there's this idea of "well drat, I had to work really hard, it's not fair that you don't have to work as hard, my brain doesn't have the emotional intelligence to allow myself to experience pain so I will instead try to make this other person feel it for me." And the reason why we don't have that emotional intelligence in America is because of a history of "go out and make your own success" that most other countries don't, and that creates so many folk heroes and success stories and then we get into this issue of people wanting it, shaming others, oh and then combine that with our habit of not taking care of our mental health, etc etc.

So a guy like that who thinks young people should have to go through what he went through, dude is just experiencing a lot of pain from his life and literally his brain isn't wired to accept that, so it's easier to be outspoken about free college, because it also makes it easier to blend in with the rest of society (or the micro-society he lives in, his neighborhood, etc) that says that only hippie socialists want free college.


Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Yeah, Kasich essentially communicated "I don't care that you supported me and are disappointed now, get hosed!".

It's sad. No loyalty or dedication at all. :smith:

It's hilarious that Kasich is the 2016 "he's the least worst of the bunch!" guy for Democrats. I don't even see how that's a statement worth making. When you have a dozen rotten apples, you don't bother pointing to the one with a little patch of red on it and say "hey, this one still has some amount of edible flesh on it!", you throw them all the gently caress out.

the moose
Nov 7, 2009

Type: Electric Swing

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Gonna quote myself to ask a follow-up question:


Why do Americans seem to throw efficiency/pragmatism under the bus with public policy in place of "working hard for the sake of working hard"? It's probably a rhetorical question at this point, but is there a similar sentiment outside of America of punishing ourselves and others who don't seem to meet an arbitrary bar of what it means to have hard work ethic and stripping benefits for those deemed to have not paid their dues to society?

Countries like Norway tend to have a reputation of cold emotionless pragmatism in public policy decisions that seem the inverse of American attitudes.
Pragmatism does not matter when the goal of work is to work. The ultimate sin to a lot of older people I've talked to is not working, even if you don't have to. Like even your hobbies should be productive and require hard work. Its very strange.

DeusExMachinima
Sep 2, 2012

:siren:This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!:siren:

Put this loser on ignore immediately!

Zombie Samurai posted:

Explain how operating an illegal super PAC is equivalent to a democratically-elected public official attempting to legislate.

I don't acknowledge or respect someone (or voters) attempting to keep people from hitching a ride in order to protect an industry. Some industries go extinct sometimes and that's how it works. That the riders happen to use their phones to set it all up is incidental to me. It's glorified hitchhiking with tipping. Ask them to pay the taxes everyone else does, sure. Prohibit it, good luck enforcing it and get hosed.

tl;dr Uber is good at loving over fuckers, do what you're good at.

DeusExMachinima fucked around with this message at 02:47 on Feb 11, 2016

Syjefroi
Oct 6, 2003

I'll play it first and tell you what it is later.

the moose posted:

Pragmatism does not matter when the goal of work is to work. The ultimate sin to a lot of older people I've talked to is not working, even if you don't have to. Like even your hobbies should be productive and require hard work. Its very strange.

Oh also, being a workaholic is a defense mechanism, an avoidant technique to repress a foundational emotional pain. Older people had no choice but to work, and even though we consider them heroes or whatever, they loving hated it and took out their anger on everyone else, so the next oldest generation was hardwired to both work and to correlate hard work with having an identity. Work hard = American Hero. So when you suggest to someone like that that maybe you don't have to work so much to be happy, you're actually puncturing their identity, and that's a much more terrible pain to deal with.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Zeroisanumber posted:

Loretta Lynch has apparently had enough of Missouri's poo poo.

well they hosed now. good job dipshits, you had an out and you didnt take it.




wait, are they seriously charging the family money for their time waiting around while the kid bled out?. jesus.



Samurai Sanders posted:

what possessed the Ferguson police department to look at Lynch, look at the political situation right now, and think she was bluffing?

Because the feds dont sue unless they are sure they can win. so they dont act on it often. usualy the mere mention of the feds bring the hammer down would get people inline. they honestly probably did think it was a bluff.

RevKrule posted:

The town is too poor to implement the changes but not poor enough to withstand a lawsuit from the federal loving government. Yup, that seems to track.

Edit: the way I understand it, these idiots already went to the bargaining table with the feds, agreed on the changes and now want the fed back at the bargaining table. It's obviously a case that they want to delay this as long as possible but c'mon son.

the fed is going to use this as an example for small poo poo towns to clean up their act.

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler

Dapper_Swindler posted:


wait, are they seriously charging the family money for their time waiting around while the kid bled out?. jesus.




And then sued them for it. America!

Syjefroi
Oct 6, 2003

I'll play it first and tell you what it is later.

RevKrule posted:

The town is too poor to implement the changes but not poor enough to withstand a lawsuit from the federal loving government. Yup, that seems to track.

Edit: the way I understand it, these idiots already went to the bargaining table with the feds, agreed on the changes and now want the fed back at the bargaining table. It's obviously a case that they want to delay this as long as possible but c'mon son.

Although, it's hard to make the case that the town is too poor considering how many tickets they handed out to black citizens, as documented in the DoJ report last year.

This is really just Yonkers all over again.

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

Dapper_Swindler posted:

Because the feds dont sue unless they are sure they can win. so they dont act on it often. usualy the mere mention of the feds bring the hammer down would get people inline. they honestly probably did think it was a bluff.

the fed is going to use this as an example for small poo poo towns to clean up their act.
Do they have any plan to deal with the problem that all the towns like this have to have their own independent police force in the first place? I thought all the budget and hiring and accountability problems mostly flowed from that.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

DeusExMachinima posted:

I don't acknowledge or respect someone (or voters) attempting to keep people from hitching a ride in order to protect an industry. Some industries go extinct sometimes and that's how it works. That the riders happen to use their phones to set it all up is incidental to me. It's glorified hitchhiking with tipping. Ask them to pay the taxes everyone else does, sure. Prohibit it, good luck enforcing it and get hosed.

tl;dr Uber is good at loving over fuckers, do what you're good at.

TLDR. Its fine when my side is evil.

free basket of chips
Sep 7, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
I'm mad about superdelegates

foobardog
Apr 19, 2007

There, now I can tell when you're posting.

-- A friend :)

Red Suit posted:

I'm mad about superdelegates

Welcome to the Party for Socialism and Liberation.

SgtScruffy
Dec 27, 2003

Babies.


Fun little tool to play with the President's Proposed Budget:

https://budget2017.whitehouse.gov/#!/year/2017/operating/0/agency_name

Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

the moose posted:

Pragmatism does not matter when the goal of work is to work. The ultimate sin to a lot of older people I've talked to is not working, even if you don't have to. Like even your hobbies should be productive and require hard work. Its very strange.

Yeah, it's pretty distressing of how foundational and rockbed these beliefs are. It really underlies everything else and can't really be (easily) broken through, it's practically woven into the American cultural DNA.

Unfortunately, I see it as a huge avenue that politically active companies/1-percenters can exploit and space to wedge in to continue to destroy worker protections/the welfare state/benefits since the general belief of "work yourself out of poverty"/"BOOTSTRAPS!" is so strong and so pervasive.

Blindeye
Sep 22, 2006

I can't believe I kissed you!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOlrSain0lk

Posted elsewhere but behold: the real-time thinking of the remaining militia in Oregon.

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


DeusExMachinima posted:

Most tech companies we take for granted post losses more often than not. Eventually Uber and Lyft will come to equilibrium either way. Some locations they may not be profitable in and decide to cut out of eventually. They'll stay in areas in which they are profitable. Smaller companies like them with lower operating costs will take their place in those areas and that's great because competition is the greatest, despite what taxi unions might think. :)
I struggle to understand how Uber can lose money, at all. They have zero risk, zero assets and need to pay a few coders to make an app that sends push notifications and mapping software. I understand good coders are expensive, but they aren't $700m expensive, and it's not like Uber needs to maintain a fleet of vehicles or pay the vast majority of their employeesedit: "contractors" a living wage.

Don't get me wrong, I loving hate the gig economy, but Uber seems like it's impossible to be not profitable.

Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 04:30 on Feb 11, 2016

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx
Hard to make money constantly fighting back regulations in typical libertarian fashion of pants making GBS threads.

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Why do Americans seem to throw efficiency/pragmatism under the bus with public policy in place of "working hard for the sake of working hard"? It's probably a rhetorical question at this point, but is there a similar sentiment outside of America of punishing ourselves and others who don't seem to meet an arbitrary bar of what it means to have hard work ethic and stripping benefits for those deemed to have not paid their dues to society?

No why.

Seriously, you can write books on how we got here, but American work culture is fundamentally illogical and self-defeating. People buy into it because it's what their parents taught them and because it's what society rewards (although not in any monetary sense, for the most part). There's no way to confront this attitude in a reasonable way because it's not actually grounded in reality.

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Paradoxish posted:

No why.

Seriously, you can write books on how we got here, but American work culture is fundamentally illogical and self-defeating. People buy into it because it's what their parents taught them and because it's what society rewards (although not in any monetary sense, for the most part). There's no way to confront this attitude in a reasonable way because it's not actually grounded in reality.

Toughness and grit and perseverance and Rocky and

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010

Everblight posted:

I struggle to understand how Uber can lose money, at all. They have zero risk, zero assets and need to pay a few coders to make an app that sends push notifications and mapping software. I understand good coders are expensive, but they aren't $700m expensive, and it's not like Uber needs to maintain a fleet of vehicles or pay the vast majority of their employeesedit: "contractors" a living wage.

Don't get me wrong, I loving hate the gig economy, but Uber seems like it's impossible to be not profitable.

The prices they charge are too low.

They have been operating on investor-storytime funds for ages and thats not a sustainable way to run a business (its sure as hell a sustainable way to retire rich though)

blackguy32
Oct 1, 2005

Say, do you know how to do the walk?

Everblight posted:

I struggle to understand how Uber can lose money, at all. They have zero risk, zero assets and need to pay a few coders to make an app that sends push notifications and mapping software. I understand good coders are expensive, but they aren't $700m expensive, and it's not like Uber needs to maintain a fleet of vehicles or pay the vast majority of their employeesedit: "contractors" a living wage.

Don't get me wrong, I loving hate the gig economy, but Uber seems like it's impossible to be not profitable.

I think at some point the poo poo is going to hit the fan and either the drivers are going to realize that it is ultimately a losing bargain or their vehicles will begin to break down, or some heinous poo poo will happen and government is going to step in.

I do like Uber and Lyft, but I would be perfectly be willing to pay more for the convenience of the services it provides, but I think a lot of the people who currently use it, would not.

DeusExMachinima
Sep 2, 2012

:siren:This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!:siren:

Put this loser on ignore immediately!

Crowsbeak posted:

TLDR. Its fine when my side is evil.

If it's a valid criticism of Uber, it's a valid criticism of anyone nominally defending a (rapidly crumbling) state of regulatory capture by taxis. The difference is the latter sinner is a) worse and b) started it. Fortunately, after Uber and Lyft are done crushing whiny bitches who spent six or seven figures on taxi medallions, the rideshare PACs won't be necessary any longer.

A big flaming stink posted:

The prices they charge are too low.

They have been operating on investor-storytime funds for ages and thats not a sustainable way to run a business (its sure as hell a sustainable way to retire rich though)

They're still relatively young and still have to dedicate a disproportionate amount of funds to making sure it's legal for people to commit the revolting crime of share their cars with each other if they so wish. Over time as they win legal battles and have to dedicate fewer resources to lawyers or as they pull out of less profitable areas long-term, you'll see a better picture of their future, succeed or fail.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Everblight posted:

I struggle to understand how Uber can lose money, at all. They have zero risk, zero assets and need to pay a few coders to make an app that sends push notifications and mapping software. I understand good coders are expensive, but they aren't $700m expensive, and it's not like Uber needs to maintain a fleet of vehicles or pay the vast majority of their employeesedit: "contractors" a living wage.

Don't get me wrong, I loving hate the gig economy, but Uber seems like it's impossible to be not profitable.

The way you do it is you charge $1 and pay the drivers $2. And then you have 10 million drivers and 70 rides from each of them in three months (made up numbers).

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Everblight posted:

I struggle to understand how Uber can lose money, at all. They have zero risk, zero assets and need to pay a few coders to make an app that sends push notifications and mapping software. I understand good coders are expensive, but they aren't $700m expensive, and it's not like Uber needs to maintain a fleet of vehicles or pay the vast majority of their employeesedit: "contractors" a living wage.

Don't get me wrong, I loving hate the gig economy, but Uber seems like it's impossible to be not profitable.
You do realize that they are spending out the rear end on legal fees and lobbying to try and get permission to operate in cities, right? That costs a lot of money. They are going to continue to run into resistance from taxi unions and local officials all over the place.

alpha_destroy
Mar 23, 2010

Billy Butler: Fat Guy by Day, Doubles Machine by Night
Not as big of news as the Ferguson news, but in other Missouri news the UM board of curators have determined that graduate instructors are not employees (despite the fact that we all have to fill out W-2s like employees, are considered mandatory reports like employees of a public institution, and had the uni threaten to take away our health insurance subsidy because the federal government considers us employees) so they have no constitutional right to organization. The Missouri NEA is almost certainly going to file suit. So if labor disputes interest you keep an eye on that I guess.

RevKrule
Jul 9, 2001

Thrilling the forums since 2001

They're trying to talk down the remaining idiots up in Oregon. Michele Fiore (state rep from loving Nevada) decided she's the only one who can play negotiator (or more likely, she's looking to raise her profile for larger office) so she's injected herself into the poo poo sandwich. You can listen live.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOlrSain0lk

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Yeah, it's pretty distressing of how foundational and rockbed these beliefs are. It really underlies everything else and can't really be (easily) broken through, it's practically woven into the American cultural DNA.

Unfortunately, I see it as a huge avenue that politically active companies/1-percenters can exploit and space to wedge in to continue to destroy worker protections/the welfare state/benefits since the general belief of "work yourself out of poverty"/"BOOTSTRAPS!" is so strong and so pervasive.

Oligarchies construct ideologies to justify their continued existence comrade

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx

alpha_destroy posted:

Not as big of news as the Ferguson news, but in other Missouri news the UM board of curators have determined that graduate instructors are not employees (despite the fact that we all have to fill out W-2s like employees, are considered mandatory reports like employees of a public institution, and had the uni threaten to take away our health insurance subsidy because the federal government considers us employees) so they have no constitutional right to organization. The Missouri NEA is almost certainly going to file suit. So if labor disputes interest you keep an eye on that I guess.

Does that mean you don't pay taxes? Or are you a poo poo contractor?

alpha_destroy
Mar 23, 2010

Billy Butler: Fat Guy by Day, Doubles Machine by Night

DemeaninDemon posted:

Does that mean you don't pay taxes? Or are you a poo poo contractor?

It is amazing but it appears that the definition of employee magically shifts around so I am only an employee when it benefits my overlords. Amazing how that works.

Edit: Some people are tempted to make a public display of shredding (dummy) W2's though because of this.

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx
Seriously could you make an uproar through that channel to gain public eye?

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

DemeaninDemon posted:

Does that mean you don't pay taxes? Or are you a poo poo contractor?

lol

It gets better — certain classes of fellowship income are considered taxable income, but not earned income. That makes me ineligible to contribute to tax-sheltered retirement accounts at age 30. Yay!

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

DeusExMachinima posted:

If it's a valid criticism of Uber, it's a valid criticism of anyone nominally defending a (rapidly crumbling) state of regulatory capture by taxis.
No, it isn't. Reason being, uber generates massive negative externalities whereas the existent system has adapted to address those

quote:

The difference is the latter sinner is a) worse and b) started it.
Because you say so. Amazing how you can make a moral judgement on who is worse simply by virtue of your "team" rather than considering societal and human costs within a system of ethics like everyone else

quote:

Fortunately, after Uber and Lyft are done crushing whiny bitches who spent six or seven figures on taxi medallions,
you realize that's how retirement works for these guys, right? They buy it, spend 20 years paying it off, 20 years building in equity, hit old age they sell the medallion to he next guy, retire and live off the cash. You are complaining "how dare the working poor be able to retire". Which is just one of the massive problems with it.

quote:

the rideshare PACs won't be necessary any longer.
right, because they won't then put the PACs to use to solidify their own position.

quote:

They're still relatively young and still have to dedicate a disproportionate amount of funds to making sure it's legal for people to commit the revolting crime of share their cars with each other if they so wish.
so you actually have no idea the problems and lawsuits uber is generating if you think it comes down to this. Or the market valuation and current state of the market. Or how to valuations and returns work.

quote:

Over time as they win legal battles and have to dedicate fewer resources to lawyers or as they pull out of less profitable areas long-term, you'll see a better picture of their future, succeed or fail.
hrm yes, a company currently valued at 62 bln in a 40 bln global market will clearly do better in the future, and isn't clearly headed for trouble now. I mean, it isn't like you had VCs howling to take it public so they could get paid and get out just Monday, right?

Mauser
Dec 16, 2003

How did I even get here, son?!

RevKrule posted:

They're trying to talk down the remaining idiots up in Oregon. Michele Fiore (state rep from loving Nevada) decided she's the only one who can play negotiator (or more likely, she's looking to raise her profile for larger office) so she's injected herself into the poo poo sandwich. You can listen live.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOlrSain0lk

Cliven Bundy is heading out there. Doesn't he still have active warrants for his arrest?

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
Wow, this is loving crazy town.

RevKrule
Jul 9, 2001

Thrilling the forums since 2001

Democrats may get an easy pickup in the Senate in a seat that seemed otherwise secure.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article59529686.html

quote:

Sen. Roy Blunt’s claims about his Vietnam-era draft record emerged Wednesday as an issue in his re-election campaign against Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, a Democrat.

In a news story posted online Wednesday morning, The Star reported Blunt received three draft deferments while a college student in the late 1960s. Blunt’s office did not disclose the deferments in 2015, when the newspaper specifically asked Blunt’s office about the senator’s draft history.

In a weekly telephone news conference with Missouri reporters later Wednesday, Blunt said he had not hidden the deferments. “Anytime anybody ever asked me about that, I would have said I had student deferments, and was then included in the first year of the lottery,” he said.

But Blunt’s office did not disclose the deferments in February 2015, when The Star directly asked if he had ever received one. The newspaper was researching a story about the relevance of military service to political campaigns.

“Senator Blunt was 1A status in 1969, the year of the first draft lottery,” the office had replied in an email. “He was 19 years old at the time. His number was in the low 300s, and was never called.”

Federal draft records provided to The Star show Blunt’s draft status in 1969 wasn’t 1-A, or eligible for service. Instead, he was classified as 2-S, which is a student deferment.

That deferment, not a high lottery number, protected Blunt from the draft in 1969.

Blunt’s staff said this week that poor memories and difficult-to-obtain draft records may have contributed to the confusion over the senator’s deferments.

Wednesday, Kander accused Blunt of misleading voters. “I don’t sit in judgment of anyone who chose not to serve in Vietnam,” his statement said, “but hiding three deferments and saying you couldn’t remember them is completely inexcusable.”

Draft records show Blunt received student deferments twice in 1968, including one that was in effect at the time of the nation’s first draft lottery in December 1969. He received a third deferment on Dec. 22, 1969, three weeks after the lottery.

The holder of a student deferment could not be conscripted, according to the law in effect at the time. Blunt was an undergraduate student at Southwest Baptist College through the spring of 1970.

The law also required the registrant to request the deferment.

All three deferments were legal and not unusual. The draft board re-classified Blunt as 1-A in July 1970, after his graduation and seven months after he was assigned the number 325 in the draft lottery.

The high number made it virtually certain Blunt would not be drafted, reducing the impact of the reclassification.

Military service may become a larger issue in the 2016 Senate race. Kander served in Afghanistan, while Blunt has never served in the military. And Vietnam-era draft and service records have become issues in other campaigns, including those of presidential candidates Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Blunt sharply rejected Kander’s criticism of the statements about the draft. “I don’t have anything to say in response to anything Secretary Kander has to say about most things,” Blunt said, “including this.”

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

RevKrule posted:

They're trying to talk down the remaining idiots up in Oregon. Michele Fiore (state rep from loving Nevada) decided she's the only one who can play negotiator (or more likely, she's looking to raise her profile for larger office) so she's injected herself into the poo poo sandwich. You can listen live.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOlrSain0lk

I like her promise she won't let them die there and she's 3 hours away by car.

Way to gamble 4 lives for an election stunt


Also their list of grievances is still like listening to a Freep thread being read aloud

alpha_destroy
Mar 23, 2010

Billy Butler: Fat Guy by Day, Doubles Machine by Night

RevKrule posted:

Democrats may get an easy pickup in the Senate in a seat that seemed otherwise secure.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article59529686.html

Missouri is such a weird place in 2016. poo poo, remember that guy that killed himself last year because perceived antisemitism? Missouri is a weird place in the 2010's.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost
:lol: everyone who's talking to those militia idiots is doing it with an FBI agent standing right next to them.

Tiler Kiwi
Feb 26, 2011

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

Gonna quote myself to ask a follow-up question:


Why do Americans seem to throw efficiency/pragmatism under the bus with public policy in place of "working hard for the sake of working hard"? It's probably a rhetorical question at this point, but is there a similar sentiment outside of America of punishing ourselves and others who don't seem to meet an arbitrary bar of what it means to have hard work ethic and stripping benefits for those deemed to have not paid their dues to society?

Countries like Norway tend to have a reputation of cold emotionless pragmatism in public policy decisions that seem the inverse of American attitudes.

puritans were jerks

e: google "puritan work ethic". to be clear, these were folks that had the slogan "God put you on this earth as a work horse, not a play horse." and those humorless fun bashing assholes had a big impact on the American psyche, unfortunately enough.

Tiler Kiwi fucked around with this message at 06:39 on Feb 11, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

Tiler Kiwi posted:

puritans were jerks

e: google "puritan work ethic". to be clear, these were folks that had the slogan "God put you on this earth as a work horse, not a play horse." and those humorless fun bashing assholes had a big impact on the American psyche, unfortunately enough.

Yep, this one is Plymouth's fault. You can blame Jamestown for slavery. Between the two it pretty much explains all our lingering social ills.

  • Locked thread