Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Svanja posted:

From the NY Times article on Grayson:


That makes me ill. Even if Grayson swears its just a small hedgefund for "friends and family" it all feels really slimy.

Hedgefunds are a blight on modern society.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Lemming posted:

I like how Frustrated Parent doesn't seem to understand that the point is that Jack did it wrong.

"what did jack do wrong?"

"what jack did wrong was fail to meet the basic qualifications of the job. if this twelve year old were under my employ i would fire him for poor performance and negligence. there is no excuse for shoddy work"

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!

Zelder posted:

That's a weird dichotomy of concern trolls

The point is they have a lot of time on their hands.

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Noam Chomsky posted:

I don't really cheer-lead either candidate or any candidate but I do find it funny that the only time anyone complains about election chat in USPol it just happens to be when anything pro-Bernie or anti-Hillary is posted. I'm not necessarily cheer leading so much as mocking certain posters' timeless devotion to a less-than-progressive candidate.

I think Hillary and Bernie would both govern well. However, Hillary would definitely bargain away things like Social Security, just like Obama (who I also really like and admire), in order to make a deal with our permanent Republican rulers.

It's just kind of funny that a few USPol regulars crow and crow about progressive ideals and preserving our social safety net and then support a candidate who is married to the mascot for third-way Democrats and triangulation. There are tons of reasons to like Hillary and support her but she will absolutely sell off progressive sacred cows due to the pressure to govern well, especially as the first woman president. The best thing we'll get from her is supreme court nominations.

It's also kind of sad to see certain posters hate on Bernie and his supporters for not falling in line, and bowing their head to Hillary, after I have seen those same people, over the last few years, whine about voter turnout and apathy and the lack of a real progressive candidate and here one is, getting people excited to vote and getting unlikely voters to vote for him, and these posters just laugh at him and their supporters while deflecting any real and tangible criticisms of Hillary.

It's cool with me if you support Hillary but I know I will see her biggest fans here whining in 2017 or 2018 when another Grand Bargain(tm) is made.

What I'm saying is many USPol regulars are psuedointellectual hypocrites who continually waffle between progressiveness and realpolitik very-serious-person-ness.

Hey, remember when the thread got moved to YCS and then gassed because of the poo poo you've stated you're intentionally trying to do? Stop it you dipshit rear end in a top hat.

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

ComradeCosmobot posted:

Same, except I did quite well at math. Not that it's all great but take for example the "bad problem" that convinced me:



The whole point of the problem is building up the logical foundations for the long-form algorithm by emphasizing how subtracting each digit independently is the same as subtracting that many hundreds, that many tens, etc.

I bet Frustrated Parent hated slogging through the proofs in his Calculus class in college, too.

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

Svanja
Sep 19, 2009

Shageletic posted:

Hedgefunds are a blight on modern society.

I really do need to learn what hedgefunds actually are... I've just assumed its like 'hedging a bet' on things and that its like the hyena or vulture of the stock market. I'm sorry, economics has never, ever been my strong suit.

Goatman Sacks
Apr 4, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

pathetic little tramp posted:

West Virginia's governor vetoed Right to Work, but was overridden today by a simple majority of the House of Delegates. This marks the 26th state where unions will be devoid of any real power. As a former West Virginian, I can tell you that the chucklefucks in that state who have blamed everything from blacks to mexicans to 'dem fuckin queers *spits out chaw*' to political correctness for their cheques getting smaller and smaller will rally behind this as the thing that will finally let them make more money at their jobs.

The few remaining coal barons will lower their wages even more as they try to wring the last few dollars out of the dying coal industry that the market has decided is not worth buying from anymore and then they'll retire to California.

There is no industry in West Virginia, it s a failed state, run by incompetents and we will be supporting it for the next hundred years easily.

It's such a cool state, full of such loving idiots.

Well at least now I don't have to feel bad about workers dying in mine collapses, since they were class traitors anyway.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

How dare homework not include all the knowledge required to solve it on the same page! When I was in school the answers were written upside down on the bottom and we liked it!

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

The "number line poo poo" is so you can do the subtraction in your head instead of needing to write it out on paper. 427 minus 316 becomes "ok, take away 300, I get 127, then take away 10, I get 117, take away 6, I get 111." The point is to try to teach the "tricks" that people develop once they have a good understanding directly instead of just teaching the rote solution.

Edit: Also you should always be suspicious of yourself if "at a glance" something looks dumb, because that often will just mean you lack some key information that makes it not dumb. You probably aren't the only smart person in the world.

Lemming fucked around with this message at 22:16 on Feb 12, 2016

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Svanja posted:

I really do need to learn what hedgefunds actually are... I've just assumed its like 'hedging a bet' on things and that its like the hyena or vulture of the stock market. I'm sorry, economics has never, ever been my strong suit.

That's more or less correct - they're investment funds that tend towards complex portfolios to try and minimize the chance that they'll realize big losses despite making risky bets. Also, no leverage cap, so that can get real exciting.

They're more a finance topic than an economics topic, by which I mean they use slightly fewer pentagrams and have a lower expenditure on sacrificial goats.

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

It's to wire the kid's brain in such a way that they're more susceptible to anti-god socialism by teaching them that the discrete little objects you call numbers are connected in a great continuum of socialistic harmony.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July

Lemming posted:

The "number line poo poo" is so you can do the subtraction in your head instead of needing to write it out on paper. 427 minus 316 becomes "ok, take away 300, I get 127, then take away 10, I get 117, take away 6, I get 111." The point is to try to teach the "tricks" that people develop once they have a good understanding directly instead of just teaching the rote solution.

"Tricks" that, as I've explained, are actually more representative of the actual mechanics than the rote pen-and-paper algorithm is.

Mystery Goomba
Jun 4, 2011

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

It's just a different way of visualizing and conceptualizing distances between numbers using a number line, typically by using units of 10, 100 etc because they're easy to work with in your head. I find it funny that the person who did differential equations can't figure out the difference between moving 6 units to the left (which is what the mistake is) instead of moving 6 groups of 10.

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

Lemming posted:

The "number line poo poo" is so you can do the subtraction in your head instead of needing to write it out on paper. 427 minus 316 becomes "ok, take away 300, I get 127, then take away 10, I get 117, take away 6, I get 111." The point is to try to teach the "tricks" that people develop once they have a good understanding directly instead of just teaching the rote solution.

Edit: Also you should always be suspicious of yourself if "at a glance" something looks dumb, because that often will just mean you lack some key information that makes it not dumb. You probably aren't the only smart person in the world.

Awesome, thank you for a actual reply explaining what this is rather than the condescending replies that seem to try to make me feel like a loving caveman for using *gasp* a pencil and paper to solve math.

Is long division still something that is taught? I showed my nephews and niece that before and they acted like I just showed them fire for the first time.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Svanja posted:

I really do need to learn what hedgefunds actually are... I've just assumed its like 'hedging a bet' on things and that its like the hyena or vulture of the stock market. I'm sorry, economics has never, ever been my strong suit.

To my limited knowledge, they are basically mutual funds (entities that, to put it simply, invest monies into a variety of stocks and bonds for their clients) without the disclosure or regulation. So think of a lot of money, wielded by a lot of sociopaths. Among the many ills they are responsible for (including crucial roles in the GFC of 08), is bankrupting and causing widespread misery in the poorest and most desperate of countries and territories. Including right here, in the territory of Puerto Rico!

quote:

This is a distress call from a ship of 3.5 million American citizens that have been lost at sea,” Puerto Rico Governor Alejandro García Padilla said on December 1, begging the Senate Judiciary Committee to help protect his homeland from an unspooling disaster. After issuing bonds for over a decade on everything not nailed down, Puerto Rico now carries $73 billion in debt, a sum that García Padilla had termed “not payable” in June. Successive governments have enacted punishing austerity measures to service the debt, despite a stubbornly depressed economy and poverty rates near 50 percent. Now, after defaulting on smaller loans, it’s likely that much of the $957 million due January 1 will go unpaid, bringing more chaos and suffering at the hands of Puerto Rico’s creditors.

quote:

“They see Puerto Rico as an opportunity for huge earnings, just like in Greece.” Poor performance by other recent hedge fund plays makes them even more desperate for a payday from Puerto Rico.

Hedge funds also became the sole investors willing to lend to the commonwealth, making up nearly all the participants in the 2014 sale of $3.5 billion in low-rated, 8.7 percent general obligation bonds, the biggest U.S. municipal junk bond sale in history. Hedge funds were prepared to lend even more to Puerto Rico in the summer of 2015, until the governor warned about inability to pay. But vulture funds DoubleLine Capital and Avenue Capital were still buying up discounted debt as recently as November. Jeffrey Gundlach of DoubleLine recently called Puerto Rican debt his “best idea” for investors.

The situation is similar to vulture investors who bought Argentina’s discounted debt and tried to force repayment. Argentina refused, despite a U.S. court order, creating a stalemate. But a newly elected conservative government in Argentina will likely renegotiate a debt deal, giving the vultures their windfall of close to full valuation of debt bought for pennies on the dollar.

quote:

To pay back the debt, Puerto Rico has delayed tax refunds and payments to suppliers, cut back on health care and public transportation services, fired 30,000 public-sector workers, closed 100 schools, increased the sales tax by more than 50 percent, and even forced community credit unions to take IOUs in exchange for cash. The poverty rate on the island is around 45 percent, and only 40 percent of the labor force has a job. Trapped in an economic death spiral, the tax base has eroded, amid massive out-migration to the U.S.: Puerto Rico has lost 300,000 citizens since 2006. “In Puerto Rico today, the hardest thing to find is a suitcase,” says Eric LeCompte of the faith organization Jubilee USA. “They can’t keep them on the shelves.”

http://prospect.org/article/how-hedge-funds-are-pillaging-puerto-rico

EDIT: Don't forget they only pay taxes a fraction, percentwise, of what you and I do, for some reason.

Svanja
Sep 19, 2009

Lemming posted:

The "number line poo poo" is so you can do the subtraction in your head instead of needing to write it out on paper. 427 minus 316 becomes "ok, take away 300, I get 127, then take away 10, I get 117, take away 6, I get 111." The point is to try to teach the "tricks" that people develop once they have a good understanding directly instead of just teaching the rote solution.

The second I see my son (he's 10) has math homework, I get out of the way. Luckily my husband has no problems figuring this new way out, but I never learned 'tricks'-- always need to write stuff out (I'm 45). I understand Common Core is supposed to make things easier for kids, but I've been that frustrated parent. The first time I saw a question ask my son to explain how he came to an answer, I told him "Uh, you used subtraction?" and he rolled his eyes at me.

axeil
Feb 14, 2006

SumYungGui posted:

I know I shouldn't, I really, really shouldn't but it's almost pathological. One topic I absolutely cannot resist on Face-space-twitter is those mouth breathing poo poo heads spewing the memes about the common core math homework assignment their kids got and just :shrek: in their own smugly superior ignorance about how smart they are that they can understand how stupid and useless this technique is. It hits every one of my buttons and just drives me up a god drat wall to see someone be so completely assured that their existence as the Platonic ideal of 'Ignorant rear end in a top hat' means that obviously this thing is wrong, why should I spend ten seconds trying to learn about it? It's so obviously wrong because I'm right so we shouldn't even bother understanding what it is and what it can do.

The hilarious part is that common core arithmetic techniques make it easier to do math as they actually teach you why weird bullshit tricks work instead of just saying "do this because I say it works." Tally marks while doing subtraction make no more sense than the stuff common core teaches for doing subtraction problems. If you teach kids numeracy from a young age math won't be this big scary thing, it'll just be another tool that you have.

But no, people are doing things differently so we have to get mad!!!!

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

He didn't move over ten first, the small hops were right

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

I think a lot more people would get the number line if it went from left to right, not right to left.

edit: at least to me anyway, makes sense going from hundreds to tens to whatever.

Doctor Butts fucked around with this message at 22:28 on Feb 12, 2016

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Lemming posted:

The "number line poo poo" is so you can do the subtraction in your head instead of needing to write it out on paper. 427 minus 316 becomes "ok, take away 300, I get 127, then take away 10, I get 117, take away 6, I get 111." The point is to try to teach the "tricks" that people develop once they have a good understanding directly instead of just teaching the rote solution.

Edit: Also you should always be suspicious of yourself if "at a glance" something looks dumb, because that often will just mean you lack some key information that makes it not dumb. You probably aren't the only smart person in the world.

I always sucked at math but did some self teaching years ago to improve a bit and that sounds somehwat like how I do mental math. Not exactly like that, but dividing up the numbers into easier handled numbers.
400-300 = 100
20-10=10
7-6=1
1+10+100 = 111

This sounds more streamlined than what I do.

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

Svanja posted:

The second I see my son (he's 10) has math homework, I get out of the way. Luckily my husband has no problems figuring this new way out, but I never learned 'tricks'-- always need to write stuff out (I'm 45). I understand Common Core is supposed to make things easier for kids, but I've been that frustrated parent. The first time I saw a question ask my son to explain how he came to an answer, I told him "Uh, you used subtraction?" and he rolled his eyes at me.

I explained to my niece once about the trick to multiplying nines and she looked at me like I was a loving wizard. I guess our tricks are outdated :(

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!
Number line for +-*/ to grid for algebra to calc to geometry is actually a super easy and intuitive way to convey the material, even if it is very different from how we do it today, so stop hating

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.
loving.....AAAAAAAH you made me do this. Remember that.

Yes one example exercise entirely divorced from context and not even attempting to understand what it is conveying looks strange. This should not come as a shocker to anyone but welp here we are so of course context means zero point jack poo poo. AS AN ILLUSTRATION (seriously that part right there is really important) I'll set up an example based on the rote memorization mathematics philosophy most people were probably taught under. THIS WILL BE AN ILLUSTRATION and that context can hopefully be expanded on to explain why this approach to mathematics takes the steps it does and how, when given in context, they make a lot more sense.

Imagine if you will you're first or second grader or something who has zero concept of what multiplication is because you're still a kid, glue tastes good and you learned to tie your shoes last year. You've just completed a section of mathematics explaining how you can take one number, put it next to another number and "add" them to get a bigger number. This was probably illustrated with blocks or something because you're a kid and the world is new to you. So you've got this addition stuff down and now the teacher starts talking about multiplication. Through some wizardry that means precisely nothing to you yet, 7 and 7 can equal 49. Well that makes no sense because 7 and 7 makes 14 while 4 and 9 makes 13 so what's all this stuff about? Then the teacher explains it to you as 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = 49. Hey that makes sense you're basically doing a lot of that adding stuff you figured out not too long ago. So when you get 32 * 17 just add 32 + 32 + 32..... Wait that sucks. So you learn how to multiply numbers. You used the concept that was given to you before, expanded on it to absorb a new technique of dealing with numbers and now you've progressed as a student.

But you're parents are so god drat stupid with no loving clue about anything they run to Face-space-twitter and poo poo out a meme onto the world how 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 is such a dumb way to do math why would anyone bother with that it's complicated and useless and takes too long and anyone who tries to do things that way is dumb and stupid and we're so much better than them because we don't do things that way.

Well congratu-loving-lations on latching on to 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7, now get out of the room and let the people who are smarter than their shoe size teach your children because you're not qualified to do a drat thing.

edit: this has a harsh tone but it's not direct towards you. It's directed towards the parents who don't even begin to ask the questions you just did attempting to figure out what is going on and just get all :smuggo: about how they're right

bird food bathtub fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Feb 12, 2016

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx
The 'new' math thing from the perspective of someone who didn't learn math that way is sort of like a 'see it or you don't' puzzle. It doesn't mean you suck at math or suck as a person. Just means your brain didn't pick up the thing buried in the number line.

Teaching math like this really does own though.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDD5n0eweBk

Svanja
Sep 19, 2009

Shageletic posted:

http://prospect.org/article/how-hedge-funds-are-pillaging-puerto-rico

EDIT: Don't forget they only pay taxes a fraction, percentwise, of what you and I do, for some reason.

My god, that article is horrifying. And the "millionaire invasion" part makes me want to throw up. Thank you for helping me learn about this!!!

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

I explained to my niece once about the trick to multiplying nines and she looked at me like I was a loving wizard. I guess our tricks are outdated :(

Yeah, I hear you. I was mortified that I felt stupid over his 4th grade homework. Now that he's in 5th, I just tell him how happy I am that he loves math and walk away slowly. hahaha

Svanja fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Feb 12, 2016

foobardog
Apr 19, 2007

There, now I can tell when you're posting.

-- A friend :)

His Divine Shadow posted:

I always sucked at math but did some self teaching years ago to improve a bit and that sounds somehwat like how I do mental math. Not exactly like that, but dividing up the numbers into easier handled numbers.
400-300 = 100
20-10=10
7-6=1
1+10+100 = 111

This sounds more streamlined than what I do.

Well the point isn't even to just teach one algorithm for doing this, but to teach many and be able to train students on generating their own through comparison. This particularly applies to programming.

I don't use arithmetic itself all that much as a programmer, but I do need to be able to understand how to generate solutions to problems through the commonalities to them.

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

axeil posted:

The hilarious part is that common core arithmetic techniques make it easier to do math as they actually teach you why weird bullshit tricks work instead of just saying "do this because I say it works." Tally marks while doing subtraction make no more sense than the stuff common core teaches for doing subtraction problems. If you teach kids numeracy from a young age math won't be this big scary thing, it'll just be another tool that you have.

But no, people are doing things differently so we have to get mad!!!!

I've never really looked at alternative ways of learning/teaching math but it wasn't particularly difficult to see what they were doing after looking at that problem for a bit. It's kind of funny seeing an EE go off on a rant which basically boils down to them thinking they way they learned how to do a task is the one, true, correct way. In EE you often come across problems that have numerous possible solutions, so that sort of thinking isn't very helpful.

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

Aside from the lighter regulatory and disclosure requirements, hedge funds differ from mutual funds wrt to the incentive problem. Mutual fund managers tend to chase peer/benchmark performance and have less of their comp tied to fund performance. Hedge fund managers live or die on their performance. Put another way, mutual fees charge based on how much money they manage, hedge funds have a performance fee structure (old 2/20).

A lot of systemic issues fall out of that although financial academics argue that the fee structure of hedge funds reduce the principal-agent problem.

Questions like this make me wish there's a mega-finance thread but they always get shitted up.

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

DemeaninDemon posted:

The 'new' math thing from the perspective of someone who didn't learn math that way is sort of like a 'see it or you don't' puzzle. It doesn't mean you suck at math or suck as a person. Just means your brain didn't pick up the thing buried in the number line.

Teaching math like this really does own though.

Apparently it does because the temperament of the replies so far are as if I insulted their mothers as well as questioned the math. It still seems odd that this particular method is somehow easier than simply writing out x-y=z, which itself is just a written expression than can be done in your head anyways.

BUT, BUT, I acknowledge the lone image isn't a full representation of what they are trying to teach.

vvvvv Quite true, my poor choice of words betrayed me vvvvv

BetterToRuleInHell fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Feb 12, 2016

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Apparently it does because the temperament of the replies so far are as if I insulted their mothers as well as questioned the math.

You didn't exactly set out a good precedent yourself:

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Hold on, what is this number line poo poo. Also what grade is this?

Just at a glance this looks dumb. I'm in agreement with 'frustrated parent', at least with the information only provided in this image.

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Apparently it does because the temperament of the replies so far are as if I insulted their mothers as well as questioned the math. It still seems odd that this particular method is somehow easier than simply writing out x-y=z, which itself is just a written expression than can be done in your head anyways.

BUT, BUT, I acknowledge the lone image isn't a full representation of what they are trying to teach.

Partially we can blame the people who get all huffy puffy and refuse to admit they're wrong after learning that the bag o tricks math method owns. They suck and make math nerds mad.

Surprised no one brought up how that EE's example gets shot out the water when doing 1000 - 999.

Submarine Sandpaper
May 27, 2007


It's also much more intuitive when subtracting a negative.

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
Excuse me I think you mean Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering.

twodot
Aug 7, 2005

You are objectively correct that this person is dumb and has said dumb things

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Apparently it does because the temperament of the replies so far are as if I insulted their mothers as well as questioned the math. It still seems odd that this particular method is somehow easier than simply writing out x-y=z, which itself is just a written expression than can be done in your head anyways.

BUT, BUT, I acknowledge the lone image isn't a full representation of what they are trying to teach.

vvvvv Quite true, my poor choice of words betrayed me vvvvv
Failing to immediately understand a mathematical algorithm you were never taught doesn't make you suck as a person. Calling an algorithm dumb or poo poo that you don't even understand instead of seeking education on how it works does make you suck as a person.

Mystery Goomba
Jun 4, 2011
Frustrated Parent Uses One Weird Trick to Solve Math Problem. Washington Bureaucrats Hate Him!

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Apparently it does because the temperament of the replies so far are as if I insulted their mothers as well as questioned the math. It still seems odd that this particular method is somehow easier than simply writing out x-y=z, which itself is just a written expression than can be done in your head anyways.

BUT, BUT, I acknowledge the lone image isn't a full representation of what they are trying to teach.

One of the more awe inspiring things to realize about math, and something that would seriously never have happened to me if it weren't for one specific amazingly good teacher, is that at some point it transitions into what feels like learning a language, not learning math. There comes a point where things just click together and you realize you're not just memorizing another stupid pointless formula, you're figuring out the alphabet of an entirely different language that can show you some really mind-blowing things.

People are messy though and, if they manage to get lucky enough to have a really amazing teacher, they come to that realization internally and based on the methods of learning that they employ. These methods can be wildly, HUGELY different from one person to the next. It's almost like those seeing eye "3D" images. You kinda either get them or you don't based on how you view the world. For some people learning the classic method really is how they grasp it the best. For others the techniques being included in common core will just 'click' and unlock the concept for them so, sooooo much faster while the classic methods are so odious that they will just shut down and ignore mathematics for the rest of the entire lives thinking they're the problem.

That last fact is completely ignored by some in favor of making GBS threads out :smuggo: memes and their children will pay for it.

Radbot
Aug 12, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
This thread is the teacher and BetterToRuleInHell is the little girl:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2MHDOiT8Ak

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

Radbot posted:

This thread is the teacher and BetterToRuleInHell is the little girl:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2MHDOiT8Ak

Well now I'm definitely saying gently caress Common Core now!

p.s. my math is better

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Radbot posted:

This thread is the teacher and BetterToRuleInHell is the little girl:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2MHDOiT8Ak

Yay for charter schools

  • Locked thread