|
Sleeveless posted:much like dance movies, stuntman porn is a genre that has sadly been lacking as of late.  Also lol, that guy on the right looks like a cosplayer Bionic Barry from Archer: 
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 10:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 10:45
|
|
|
Palpek posted:Also: Eh? 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 10:49
|
|
|
And that triangle seems to be pretty fundamental to the architecture in high-rise, it's not just something the graphic designer pulled out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 11:04
|
|
Mister Chief posted:The sequel to a movie called Now You See Me isn't called Now You Don't. gently caress that movie. Strongly agreed.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 12:02
|
|
|
I'm not saying it's new, it just got really popular for a while because of the music video and nowadays comes back from time to time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 12:17
|
|
|
The worst part (of a long list) of Now You See Me is that half of what they do is literally unexplainable magic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
That's actually the best part tho.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
Palpek posted:From a few pages ago but hey, good news for you: I saw a trailer for this during the lovely 20 - minute lead up that some theaters do before the trailers. It looks worse than any Disney Channel movie. Also, YouTube Red is awfully close to RedTube. Someone either didn't think that through or knew exactly what they were doing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Lady Naga posted:That's actually the best part tho. You can't do both. You can't have the montage explaining half the tricks and then have them able to jump off a building and turn into money. There are rules, drat it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
More films need to be as bold and daring as Now You See Me and feature just straight-up no question magic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:The sequel to a movie called Now You See Me isn't called Now You Don't. gently caress that movie. That was definitely the working title. I know a bunch of movie news websites were using that for any news about it (which wasn't much because who cares). Lady Naga posted:More films need to be as bold and daring as Now You See Me and feature just straight-up no question magic.  Aphrodite posted:There are rules, drat it. Nope.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
Lady Naga posted:More films need to be as bold and daring as Now You See Me and feature just straight-up no question magic. I want to agree with you so bad, but NYSM and The goddamn Illusionist are such severe strikes against this that not even the cape segment from VHS viral can make up for them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Shanty posted:I want to agree with you so bad, but NYSM and The goddamn Illusionist are such severe strikes against this that not even the cape segment from VHS viral can make up for them. I love the cape segment from VHS Viral. I accidentally typed that as "I live the cape segment from VHS Viral," which would be cool.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:I love the cape segment from VHS Viral. That WOULD be cool.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
who cares? if i want to see magicians do some magic poo poo onscreen they better be loving magical
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
The only reason you would ever want to see a magician heist movie is to see how they pulled off the tricks. Otherwise go watch Harry Potter or Merlin or something.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
Shanty posted:I want to agree with you so bad, but NYSM and The goddamn Illusionist are such severe strikes against this that not even the cape segment from VHS viral can make up for them. The Prestige was pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:22
|
|
Aphrodite posted:The only reason you would ever want to see a magician heist movie is to see how they pulled off the tricks. Yeah, pretty much.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:The only reason you would ever want to see a magician heist movie is to see how they pulled off the tricks. at the very least i hope they don't do the "make Common play an invisible fiddle upon hearing a word" again
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Otherwise go watch Harry Potter or Merlin or something.  Also the best magic trick in the posters is the little Michael Caine between Michael Caine's legs: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
Okay you got me there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
Aren't they being a little overconfident by assuming Now You See Me is enough of a pop culture presence that these posters can just use an acronym? How many people that walk by that poster are going to be able to remember/figure out what NYSM is? Edit: Haha I just saw someone asked this exact question on the last page. It really makes no sense though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
The sequel to New York Sex Monsters is looking pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
ruddiger posted:The Prestige was pretty good. The Prestige is Nolan's best film and an even better movie the second time you watch it knowing the "twists".
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
I have no desire to see Now You See Me and it bothers me that millions of others did enough to warrant a sequel. Give me a sequel to The Incredible Burt Wonderstone!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:The only reason you would ever want to see a magician heist movie is to see how they pulled off the tricks. I though Sherlock Holmes (the first one) did a pretty good job of this idea.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
Speaking of undesirable sequels, it was pretty funny that somebody casually mentioned Jarhead 2 here this week (or perhaps it was in the trailer thread) and today I just happened to stumble upon a Jarhead 3 DVD in a store. What the hell. The cover made it look like a serious action romp too. I'm guessing the main character fires his weapon many a time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
Now You See Me was a movie clearly designed to be carried off by a lead character with overwhelming charisma and then they cast Jesse Eisenberg. Really I just hated all the protagonists and hadn't been given any motivation to want them to get away with poo poo. The movie just kinda assumed I'd be on their side because they were the leads without actually doing anything to get me on their side. MikeJF fucked around with this message at 22:29 on Feb 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
I thought Jessie Eisenberg was great in things like Adventureland and Social Network. What happened I can't even stand to hear him utter one word these days Dave Franco is cool in my book though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Good god. Dave Franco blows.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Now You See Me was one of the few movies that I've activly hated. The protagonists were smug untouchable jerks so I ended up rooting for the antagonists ala the Tom & Jerry effect. Also they framed and ruined the life of Everyone's Black Grandpa / God without even trying to make us dislike him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 22:48
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Good god. Dave Franco blows. You hate everything though. Dave Franco makes me laugh.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Dave Franco was good in Neighbors I'll hang up and listen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:Speaking of undesirable sequels, it was pretty funny that somebody casually mentioned Jarhead 2 here this week (or perhaps it was in the trailer thread) and today I just happened to stumble upon a Jarhead 3 DVD in a store. What the hell. The cover made it look like a serious action romp too. I'm guessing the main character fires his weapon many a time. Unwatchable military movie sequels are how professional wrestlers put food on their tables.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Dave Franco is cool and good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I thought Jessie Eisenberg was great in things like Adventureland and Social Network. He's good for roles he's suited for but they keep shoving him in things he's awful for and he's just insufferable in then.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:42
|
|
Tomero_the_Great posted:Now You See Me was one of the few movies that I've activly hated. The protagonists were smug untouchable jerks so I ended up rooting for the antagonists ala the Tom & Jerry effect. That's almost every modern heist movie. Ocean's 11 remake kinda kicked off the smug untouchable heist thing and the smugness only grew from there.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Tomero_the_Great posted:Now You See Me was one of the few movies that I've activly hated. The protagonists were smug untouchable jerks so I ended up rooting for the antagonists ala the Tom & Jerry effect. Yeah, they say he ruined Mark Ruffalo's dad's career but he wasn't even indirectly responsible for the death. I guess he's also supposed to be a bad guy because he reveals magic tricks but the movie spends a ton of time doing that itself. MikeJF posted:Now You See Me was a movie clearly designed to be carried off by a lead character with overwhelming charisma and then they cast Jesse Eisenberg. Jesse Eisenberg isn't the lead, you spend the majority of the movie with Mark Ruffalo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:25 |
|
|
I can't wait to see Jesse Eisenberg play Michael Cera playing Lex Luthor in the Superbat.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2016 00:13
|
|
