|
I'm not against the idea of turbocharging it, I just think that should be saved for next year so as to increase my odds of surviving this year.Adiabatic posted:YOU MUST ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL VORTECS YOU REQUIRE MORE NITROUS GAS E: oh god new page
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 08:56 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 07:31 |
|
literally a fish posted:I'm not against the idea of turbocharging it, I just think that should be saved for next year so as to increase my odds of surviving this year. Supercharge it, conversion van with blower whine would be amazing.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 13:33 |
|
NitroSpazzz posted:Supercharge it, conversion van with blower whine would be amazing. Toothed-belt-driven twin-screw. HNGGGG!
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 13:35 |
|
NitroSpazzz posted:Supercharge it, conversion van with blower whine would be amazing. I offered a pair of Eaton M90s off late supercharged 3800s but he kept blathering about how he wanted it to run sometime this year or something, I dunno what his problem is
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 15:59 |
|
sharkytm posted:Toothed-belt-driven twin-screw. HNGGGG! Supercharger would take up the space where the radio was. ...then again if there were a supercharger in the cabin, a radio would be pretty useless anyway.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 16:05 |
|
kastein posted:I offered a pair of Eaton M90s off late supercharged 3800s but he kept blathering about how he wanted it to run sometime this year or something, I dunno what his problem is
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 19:37 |
|
A blower is a lot easier to ship than a block...
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 23:06 |
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:Supercharger would take up the space where the radio was. Heheh, we thought the same thing... That's an unmodified G20 engine bay
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 23:23 |
|
There's enough room in the back of a van to permanently install a stereo system of such proportion that you could pop your own head from the pressure whilst driving. ...and that is something I'd like to do in life (death?).
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 23:29 |
|
I wasn't sure what a Vortec was exactly so I googled it and saw this gem: WHAT SIZE ENGINE IS A 5.3 LITER?!?!?! Well...I would guess it's 5.3 liters.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:28 |
|
Terrible Robot posted:Heheh, we thought the same thing... In the UK, we never mention "American V8s", it's always "BIG American V8s". Yet your V8s are actually fekking tiny! I am jealous of your small yet large V8s. Cramming a DOHC motor in that engine bay would mean sacrificing the supercharger, which is a pretty horrible thing to do.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:31 |
|
ShittyPostmakerPro posted:I wasn't sure what a Vortec was exactly so I googled it and saw this gem: 327ci
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 02:08 |
|
ShittyPostmakerPro posted:In the UK, we never mention "American V8s", it's always "BIG American V8s". Yet your V8s are actually fekking tiny! I am jealous of your small yet large V8s. I'm convinced that GM has struck a deal with Satan to allow them to make pushrod V-8s that have power outputs that rival the most technologically advanced 32-valve motors out there. Not to mention you can squeeze them into drat near anything. Maybe Satan gave them the motors in exchange for 90's cheap plastics and the Cavalier/Cobalt?
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 04:09 |
|
You Am I posted:327ci 325ci.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 05:53 |
|
ShittyPostmakerPro posted:In the UK, we never mention "American V8s", it's always "BIG American V8s". Yet your V8s are actually fekking tiny! I am jealous of your small yet large V8s. Requesting the block be painted in tardis blue thanks.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 08:04 |
|
Cakefool posted:Requesting the block be painted in tardis blue thanks. No.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 23:33 |
|
Elmnt80 posted:325ci. Really? I always thought the 5.3lt would be 327ci, considering it is a classic Chevy V8 size
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 00:56 |
|
iForge posted:No. VB Green then.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 03:38 |
|
Ferremit posted:VB Green then. Acceptable
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 04:52 |
|
Ferremit posted:VB Green then. John Deere green.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 05:44 |
|
You Am I posted:Really? I always thought the 5.3lt would be 327ci, considering it is a classic Chevy V8 size The only LS to hit a "classic" displacement is the LS7, and they fudged it a bit because it's something like 427.9 cubic inches and they can't possibly call a Chevy engine a 428. The LS1/LS6 are 346 cubic inches, not the good old tree-fiddy.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 06:20 |
You Am I posted:Really? I always thought the 5.3lt would be 327ci, considering it is a classic Chevy V8 size It's not, but rednecks will call it that all day long.
|
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 06:21 |
|
If anyone needs a cheap conversion van, here's one you can have for less than $600 in Philly http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/cto/5449756021.html
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 06:46 |
|
Nitrox posted:If anyone needs a cheap conversion van, here's one you can have for less than $600 in Philly http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/cto/5449756021.html It's a dodge! I'm told the transmissions on those are glass.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 12:07 |
|
wallaka posted:It's not, but rednecks will call it that all day long. Likewise I see the LS1 called a 350 all the time too.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 19:50 |
|
opengl128 posted:Likewise I see the LS1 called a 350 all the time too. I mostly see the 6.0 truck motor being called a "350"... loving truck guys. It's a 6 Litre, not a tree-fiddy.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 20:52 |
|
You Am I posted:327ci Elmnt80 posted:325ci. Lol I posted it because 'who would be dumb to ask how big 5.3 litres is' but hey, I guess it's one of life's great mysteries! Speaking of 5.3's, where's the one for this van? Are you still snowed under in the US?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 21:15 |
|
sharkytm posted:I mostly see the 6.0 truck motor being called a "350"... loving truck guys. It's a 6 Litre, not a tree-fiddy. That's just loving retarded, especially since 6.0L is 366 cubic inches, not 350. That's not even close. Calling a 5.7 a 350 is retarded, but nowhere near as retarded as calling a 6.0 a 350. SPEAKING OF WHICH Who is up for some junkyard trolling? I might make a scouting run this weekend if I have a chance. Likely Worcester, Cumberland, and Johnston. Might hit Blackstone too.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 21:31 |
|
kastein posted:That's just loving retarded, especially since 6.0L is 366 cubic inches, not 350. That's not even close. Calling a 5.7 a 350 is retarded, but nowhere near as retarded as calling a 6.0 a 350. Saturday, early, I'm available. Sunday is a no-go, got a combined birthday party for like 4 family members in CT to go to.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 22:33 |
|
Elmnt80 posted:325ci. 5328 cubic centimetres. So by German standards that's a 5.4 litre, right?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 22:38 |
|
It's more reliable than a german engine, that's for sure.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 23:10 |
|
MrChips posted:5328 cubic centimetres. So by German standards that's a 5.4 litre, right? I had a 1.3 Panda, which was 1248cc. The 1.2 was 1242cc.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 23:17 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:I had a 1.3 Panda, which was 1248cc. See, that's justifiable to me since you have to differentiate between the two.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 23:32 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:I had a 1.3 Panda, which was 1248cc. Any idea where I can get a 72CI badge?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 23:34 |
|
The bling aisle of your local auto parts store has all the letters and numbers sharkytm posted:Saturday, early, I'm available. Sunday is a no-go, got a combined birthday party for like 4 family members in CT to go to. I think the gate opens at 8. If I aim for 6-7, I might make it there for 8... doesn't matter what order the yards are in as far as I'm concerned, you wanna start closer and end up further from home or vise versa?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 23:36 |
|
Look, you dumbarses chose the imperial system, loving stick to it. Dont be all english and mix the two up just for shits and giggles.... I wonder how many people in the USA hear 6.0L and then spend the rest of the day trying to get their head around the concept of a "Litre"
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 00:45 |
|
Ferremit posted:Look, you dumbarses chose the imperial system, loving stick to it. Dont be all english and mix the two up just for shits and giggles.... Soda comes in 2L bottles, so I'd imagine it's not as foreign as you think. Just not preferred. Plus, a liter is about a quart, right?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 00:55 |
|
Ferremit posted:I wonder how many people in the USA hear 6.0L and then spend the rest of the day trying to get their head around the concept of a "Litre" None. Because we spell it "liter"
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 00:57 |
|
Raluek posted:Soda comes in 2L bottles, so I'd imagine it's not as foreign as you think. Just not preferred. In Canada they're trying to megafuck us on the smaller bottles of pop by "metricating" them. So a bottle that used to be 20oz/591mL is now exactly 500mL, for the same price as before. Dicks.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 02:05 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 07:31 |
|
kastein posted:That's just loving retarded, especially since 6.0L is 366 cubic inches, not 350. That's not even close. Calling a 5.7 a 350 is retarded, but nowhere near as retarded as calling a 6.0 a 350. Can you keep an eye out for MN12s? There are none to be found here in Texas.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 02:17 |