|
Pretty sure only Soviet ships have a red star on the side of them.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:06 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 10:22 |
|
MaliciousOnion posted:I'm pretty sure that tank is a WW2 Nazi Panther. Nope, T34 mod. '43 The Chopper is a yank Apache Longbow, but the jet... Some bastard child of a Tomcat, Hornet, Fulcrum and this cute little guy
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:09 |
|
This is Australia's chance to bring back the battleship. It'll go great with our F-35's.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:20 |
|
If I looked harder I might find one closer. At least these guys don't look like inhuman death machines unlike the dude at the centre of our signal of hate. Imagine if the Indonesians published something like this. Yeah that's right. OUTRAGED OUTRAGE!!!!!!!!!!
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:21 |
|
Paingod556 posted:Nope, T34 mod. '43 The jet's an Su35 isn't it? I hope so anyway, they are probably a shitload more airworthy than the F35
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:25 |
|
My brother reckons Jarrod Bleijie is a shoe in for Mal Broughs vacancy - talk about failing upwards..
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:28 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:The jet's an Su35 isn't it? I'd say the wings aren't big enough and it doesn't have the droopy nose. They're also loving massive in general and the mainstay of our biggest rivals (India, China, Indo and Malaysia) so using it for 'Straya Strong is stupid on every level
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:30 |
|
Paingod556 posted:I'd say the wings aren't big enough and it doesn't have the droopy nose. They're also loving massive in general and the mainstay of our biggest rivals (India, China, Indo and Malaysia) so using it for 'Straya Strong is stupid on every level
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:33 |
|
Maybe the poster is just highly stylised propaganda art that wasn't really intended to represent reality or particular models of jets/helicopters etc.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:39 |
|
Cartoon posted:You can detect actual levels of not stupid in that poster? They remembered to photoshop the top half of an Australian flag onto the guys shoulder?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:41 |
|
Cartoon posted:You can detect actual levels of not stupid in that poster? The T-34 is an extremely good tank?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:58 |
|
Cartoon posted:You can detect actual levels of not stupid in that poster? Aside from the tank, it's vague enough or specifically Western enough not to be obvious that the designer did zero research and put zero thought into the implications. At least the sub is definitely a Collins class, so there's that
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 10:10 |
|
Skellybones posted:The T-34 is an extremely good tank?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 10:13 |
|
Tokamak posted:It is an open secret that hand picking produce is performed by vulnerable workers who are taken advantage of. This happens all across the western world, and not only in Australia. In the US picking is largely done by illegal immigrants, which leads to hilarity when politicians in southern states crack down without thinking it through and the crops rot. http://mic.com/articles/8272/alabama-illegal-immigrant-crackdown-destroys-farm-business#.85iC4PP6Q
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 10:56 |
|
I think the jet is Starscream.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 11:54 |
|
quote:Former prime minister Tony Abbott takes a swipe at China, saying the communist nation does not share the same "values" as Australia. he still wants to start a war.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 13:05 |
|
Tony Abbott probably dreams about British Imperialism.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 14:08 |
|
Hey people who've done uni recently, is it common to have weird irrelevant assessments? One of my tasks is literally "draw your feelings" for 1% of the total grade, and there are a couple of other ones such as participation as a research projects and giving course feedback.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:00 |
|
Zenithe posted:Hey people who've done uni recently, is it common to have weird irrelevant assessments?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:25 |
|
Zenithe posted:Hey people who've done uni recently, is it common to have weird irrelevant assessments? The answer could only ever be "it depends". For example (I do psychology, so these are some examples/experiences), you may be asked to draw your feelings in a course which deals with interpersonal skills because part of the skillset is to be able and confortable with "looking inwards". I mean it may seem stupid or weird to you but actually not everyone is so self-reflective and this shows in interactions between people. Research participation can be pretty important because a) it introduces undergrads to being a participant and what is usually involved in an actual experiment and b) provides the University with a pool of subjects to do research/pilot studies on. There's a whole thing about using undergrads as subjects (they tend not to be reflective of the general population). I also think there's a bit of a hazing/rite of passage mentality, being that everyone before was subjected to being a lab rat so by golly you'll be a lab rat aswell.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:27 |
|
Recoome posted:The answer could only ever be "it depends". For example (I do psychology, so these are some examples/experiences), you may be asked to draw your feelings in a course which deals with interpersonal skills because part of the skillset is to be able and confortable with "looking inwards". I mean it may seem stupid or weird to you but actually not everyone is so self-reflective and this shows in interactions between people. It's for stats. quote:
I guess I'm surprised it counts for marks, as there is no learning or reflection criteria, just rock up for 6 hours and get that ticked off. It would make sense to have some kind of non-graded pass to me, but to actually count seems a tad off.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:30 |
|
Participation marks were a thing when I did stats, mostly because the lectures were boring as gently caress and people wouldn't rock up to them otherwise.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:40 |
|
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/26/bid-by-belgian-entrepreneur-to-take-over-holden-plant-collapses In news that doesn't really surprise anyone, the idea of some Belgians taking over the Holden car plant in South Australia has collapsed. RIP all those jobs, especially in the component industry and I guess RIP LNP in South Australia
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:55 |
|
JP Services Become a JP Congratulatory Message State Flag. These are some of the critical services that my state member is sending me pamphlets about.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 23:59 |
|
Zenithe posted:Hey people who've done uni recently, is it common to have weird irrelevant assessments? At my institution, course feedback is voluntary and anonymous. Seems like it could be problematic having course feedback tied to one's grade. I haven't done stats at my uni, but I'm pretty sure they have a "draw your feelings" 1% grade task too. Also my school specifically has a big participation element to the marking, because tutorials rely on group discussion and participation in the thought exercises to demonstrate that individuals are actually taking on the knowledge. Past first-year courses (which get a lot of people not staying in the area and just taking it as an elective) a bunch of the smaller participation stuff tends to fall away (outside of attending tutorials and completing homework). The Narrator fucked around with this message at 00:18 on Feb 27, 2016 |
# ? Feb 27, 2016 00:09 |
|
Zenithe posted:It's for stats. Eh I mean it's more common in the intro courses (or social psychology, where the group discussions/analysis were graded) but you shouldn't see the easier poo poo after 2nd year or so.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 00:14 |
|
So how does the inevitable Trumpenreich affect Australia's relations with the US? I can see Trump being the kind of person who would say 'Nah, gently caress 'em' if an ally were to find themselves in need of military assistance for one.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 00:19 |
|
I'm just finishing up David Hicks book Guantanamo and it's hard not to see parallels: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-26/oliver-bridgeman-stranded-syria-federal-gov-cancel-passport/7204250 quote:Queensland teen Oliver Bridgeman stranded in Syria after Federal Government cancels his passport By Josh Bavas Updated about 8 hours ago -/- Even after trying to wrap my head around the likely consequences of President Trump I can't imagine a single way it makes anything better. For an example of my confusion I was trying to convince myself that the recent defence white paper was actually a clever dogwhistle message to Washington announcing clearly who's side we'd picked. Unfortunately even that doesn't explain the deep levels of stupid involved. Even quite young kids know that you can tell Dylan he's your BFF forever without actually pushing Bethany into the toilet. So in specific answer to your question
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 00:53 |
|
Trump is not going to win the US election. No Republican candidate is going to win the US election.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 00:54 |
|
Cartoon posted:I'm just finishing up David Hicks book Guantanamo and it's hard not to see parallels: If the kid is harmed or killed or something and it's because the government cancelled his passport then it's really hosed. Like it seems so bizarre if he's done something illegal allow him to get home but like lmao at the prospect of this dude trying to get to Turkey from Syria right now
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 01:04 |
|
freebooter posted:Trump is not going to win the US election. No Republican candidate is going to win the US election. I like your wishful thinking. If it helps, Trump might end up having to testify in court during the general election too. If it's Hillary v Trump, both might have criminal charges laid against them during the presidential race.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 01:12 |
|
ahaha Auspol reads one Matt Taibbi story and is now "trump is unstoppable waaah"
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 01:29 |
|
Birdstrike posted:ahaha Auspol reads one Matt Taibbi story and is now "trump is unstoppable waaah" Nah the polls really don't favour him. He'll still probably win against Clinton though. She's unlikely to have many Sanders supporters turnout to vote for her.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 01:31 |
|
I remember the conventional wisdom after the 2012 election was that the Republicans were basically demographically hosed unless they started appealing to Latino voters, which none of them did, so it was looking like a Democratic lock, especially given how useless and unliked the entire squabbling mess of Repubalican candidates were. But then Trump has that sort of populist appeal and is drawing in heaps of blue collar workers who might traditionally have voted Democrat or not voted at all. So maybe he does have a chance. On the other hand maybe there are a lot of informed people who are terrified enough of a Trump presidency that they'll turn out to vote not so much in favour of Sanders/Clinton, but rather against Trump. It really is interesting - I noticed this in the UK election - how not having compulsory voting makes it much harder to predict how elections will go. In Australia swing voters are really the only ones who matter, whereas in other countries there's also the whole race of trying to get non-voters to get off their asses.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 02:16 |
|
Can anyone knowledgeable in the matter comment on whether George Pell ever did anything wrong?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 02:24 |
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Can anyone knowledgeable in the matter comment on whether George Pell ever did anything wrong? As someone who knows Pell quite well, he probably hasn't done anything illegal but the Church has a lot of exemptions. If there was such a thing as a pub test in court he would definitely be an accessory to child rape.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 02:36 |
|
Rubio is screwing this up, he just had a debate where he made all sorts of points, and Trump just blows it over with a water bottle joke about Rubio sweating. Now Trump has two Governors endorse him today, one of them Christie. Conventional wisdom is failing, he keeps not losing. But he's only looking good versus other GOP candidates so far.freebooter posted:It really is interesting - I noticed this in the UK election - how not having compulsory voting makes it much harder to predict how elections will go. In Australia swing voters are really the only ones who matter, whereas in other countries there's also the whole race of trying to get non-voters to get off their asses. It really is galvanizing both sides in the US, which is probably going to favour Clinton but who knows. So far the evangelicals haven't really decided for Trump (rather against Cruz) but if they feel threatened by Clinton enough, they'll turn the general into a crusade if it comes down to Trump and Clinton. And as you say, everyone else is energized to vote against him.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 02:43 |
Word cloud for January: Better late than never 2016: J 2015: JFMAMJJASOND 2014: JFMAMJJASOND 2013: AMJJASOND Highlights from last month's thread: ewe2 posted:Predictably the CPG is now going full cry on Briggs side. He "did the right fringe have written him off as a traitor. This controversy just hurts Turnbull, the new line is all about attacking him. You can imagine the kind of idiot), and Steve Kates about the electoral consequences with an entirely different set of idiots who are especially mad at Xenophon for being too popular in SA and threatening 3-4 Lib seats as a result. Birb Katter posted:Are busses that happen better or worse than trains that don't? Sounds like the bar that Briggs tripped on though. No one is going to be freaking amazing. Obviously they can't do poo poo about the copper if that is for sure. freebooter posted:There is just no way the majority of the party is going to vote Abbott back in as leader in this term of government. Even if Turnbull got drunk on Anzac Day and took a piss on a war memorial it would be happy to see them all year. Ditto easter eggs
|
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 04:27 |
|
Rich things hosed
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 04:29 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 10:22 |
|
Cartoon posted:Just one quick touch of the poop... Is this a real headline? Cant even get your nazi propaganda right, thats a very soviet looking tank.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2016 04:35 |