|
fsif posted:Deflategate round 2 is going to get more coverage than the Peyton sexual assault lol Tom Brady molested America's Sport though.
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 22:40 |
|
|
A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing. all I care about is tom brady's life going poorly
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing. 4 Ring Shrimp will take an L though Some storms have rainbows at the end
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing. It's really funny that Tom Brady put his dick way up the NFLPA's rear end during the lockout, but needs them real badly now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:It's really funny that Tom Brady put his dick way up the NFLPA's rear end during the lockout, but needs them real badly now. Tom Brady was one of the ten main plaintiffs for the NFLPA during the lockout...
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
fsif posted:Deflategate round 2 is going to get more coverage than the Peyton sexual assault lol There can only be one saggy ball story
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
Wait so what are the actual consequences of this? Could the suspension...come back...?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Blarfk posted:Wait so what are the actual consequences of this? Could the suspension...come back...? If Brady loses, depending on how they rule it could go back down to Berman or they can decide it themselves. I'm not sure what decides which.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Blarfk posted:Wait so what are the actual consequences of this? Could the suspension...come back...? It's on the table, yes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:48
|
|
|
quote:Kessler exclaimed: “I sense you're being influenced by your view of the facts!” Did Aaron Sorkin script out this exchange?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:50
|
|
|
WHOOPS posted:Did Aaron Sorkin script out this exchange? Not verbose enough
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
I am a bit confused here. Legally speaking the entire point of this appeal was based around whether Berman overstepped his bounds to overturn Goodells ruling as arbiter. The NFL argued that he did, the NFLPA argued he didn't. So shouldn't the questions today been focused around whether Berman's justifications for his decision were wrong rather than focused on the evidence presented in the original case?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing. TAWM BRADY THE LAST STANDING DEFENDER BETWEEN UNIONS AND BIG BUSINESS 
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Tom Brady was one of the ten main plaintiffs for the NFLPA during the lockout... Ah, but he also started the player revolt that lead his union caving on things like Goodell getting the powers of judge and jury bc he "just wanted to go back to work" lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I am a bit confused here. Legally speaking the entire point of this appeal was based around whether Berman overstepped his bounds to overturn Goodells ruling as arbiter. The NFL argued that he did, the NFLPA argued he didn't. So shouldn't the questions today been focused around whether Berman's justifications for his decision were wrong rather than focused on the evidence presented in the original case? Correct
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:TAWM BRADY THE LAST STANDING DEFENDER BETWEEN UNIONS AND BIG BUSINESS This is disingenuous and not what I'm implying at all. Unions and labor rights don't get torn down by large profile ground breaker cases. (with some exceptions) They get whittled away little by little over time until on paper the Unions still exist and appear to have power but in actuality are legally gutted. This would contribute to that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:A reverse in favor of the NFL will likely set a major legal precedent against Unions and labor in general if you care about that sort of thing. Hmmm maybe tom brady shouldn't have cheated then none of this would have happened makes u think
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Ehud posted:you shouldn't cheat at football! The Tom Brady filter when people are quoting news sources will never stop being funny
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Can't wait for Brady to loose, appeal to SCOTUS, and Ballghazi becoming a key part of the confirmation hearing
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
DOOP posted:Can't wait for Brady to loose, appeal to SCOTUS, and Ballghazi becoming a key part of the confirmation hearing Culminating in Obama nominating Goodell to the SC
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
fsif posted:Most the reason I care is because Pats fans are trying to rewrite history and pretend that the ball deflation—which totally isn't a big deal anyway—never actually happened and the ideal gas law destroyed Brady's phone and came up with some nicknames. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:Correct From what I recall about the Berman decision he didn't even rule on the NFL's supposed lack of impartiality, which would then allow the appeals court to take a look at the evidence in favor of or against the cheating allegations. Also because the NFL, as per the CBA, is not required to be impartial even if they lie and say they are. The three things he ruled on IIRC were that The NFL's lack of notice about possible punishment Brady and his legal team not being able to question Pash during the investigation Brady and his legal team not being able to review the Wells notes All three things are objectively true but of course the judges can argue that they aren't significant enough violations of the CBA, or the spirit of the CBA, to undermine the arbitrators original ruling. But they don't seem to be focusing on that at all. Which is confusing to me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
TubeStank posted:Hmmm maybe tom brady shouldn't have cheated then none of this would have happened makes u think "Tom Brady's deflated balls directly contributed to the fall of labor unions in the early 21st century." - history book my son will read some day
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
IANAL but let me tell you exactly how these clowns on the Federal Appeals Court should be ruling in favor of American Hero Thomas Edward Brady. uh uh uh, did you know if Brady loses, Goodell wins? as a wise man once said if you're not with us you're with the enemy
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
I am not worried because President Trump will vacate any possible suspension.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:This is disingenuous and not what I'm implying at all. Unions and labor rights don't get torn down by large profile ground breaker cases. (with some exceptions) They get whittled away little by little over time until on paper the Unions still exist and appear to have power but in actuality are legally gutted. This would contribute to that. Speaking of disingenuity. Jesus Christ. This will have literally zero bearing on any non-multimillionaire based union cases in the future.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
NC-17 posted:I am not worried because President Trump will vacate any possible suspension. oh my god this is actually what's going to happen Hahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
NFL is going to win. NFLPA negotiated a contract that let the NFL do whatever it wanted to protect the integrity of the game. For this the players they represent get a share of revenues. If suspending a cheating rear end jerkwad is not protecting the game and said revenues I don't know what is. Also gently caress the Patriots forever and ever. I miss when they were an easy win on the schedule.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
I still have the wells report thread bookmarked to remind myself why I must work tirelessly to bash ehud and his pee brain
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
4 RING SHRIMP posted:I still have the wells report thread bookmarked to remind myself why I must work tirelessly to bash ehud and his pee brain Bookmarked? I'm getting ink this weekend. Get on my level bitch.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
4 RING SHRIMP posted:I still have the wells report thread bookmarked to remind myself why I must work tirelessly to bash ehud and his pee brain wait is it pee or pea
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Speaking of disingenuity. Jesus Christ. This will have literally zero bearing on any non-multimillionaire based union cases in the future. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't this case, at its very core, revolve entirely around the question of whether a CBA can grant an arbitrator indiscriminate authority to rule on a labor dispute no matter the perceived fairness of it? That an arbitrator doesn't need to act in "good faith" but can rule in any way they want? How would that not affect CBA's at other levels of work?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Can we make a special thread for this? I nominate Ehud for OP.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Elephanthead posted:Also gently caress the Patriots forever and ever. I miss when they were an easy win on the schedule. Only 4 more years to go. We can make it, friend
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
4 RING SHRIMP posted:I still have the wells report thread bookmarked to remind myself why I must work tirelessly to bash ehud and his pee brain I somehow miss that thread Ehud posted:all I care about is tom brady's life going poorly lmao I want this written on my grave
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
swickles posted:Can we make a special thread for this? I nominate Ehud for OP. I dunno, is it possible to create a thread in the Gas Chamber?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Ehud posted:wait is it pee or pea You have a big old urination water logged head
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
NC-17 posted:I dunno, is it possible to create a thread in the Gas Chamber? Admins need to bring back the Retarded Forum for Assholes. Though I think that might technically be the current election forum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 22:40 |
|
|
I just can't wait til this overturned and some does the name change to 4 GAME SUSPENSION SHRIMP.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 23:26
|
|