|
p sure one of the kids of a precinct chair has their cell phone and is answering all the calls from news agencies with ALL DONE because he finished his homework or something. It was a false 100 at 55% too
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
Oh my god... Bernie Sanders isn't a Socialist. I just... I give up on y'all. It's like none of you took the time to read up on Socialism. Even if Bernie was a Socialist, and lets pretend he was, he wouldn't want you to post dumb sexist poo poo about Hillary. Even real-life Bernie wouldn't want you dummies to post stupid poo poo like that whether it's "ironic" or not because he's probably an actual nice person whereas some of you need to grow the gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
Bernie-san 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Trump now ahead 0.1% in Missouri and will take 90% of delegates
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Slate Action posted:Trump now ahead 0.1% in Missouri and will take 90% of delegates If he was behind 0.1% would Cruz get 90%? Or would it not matter because of how many counties or whatever he won?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
So did the Bernie campaign send out fundraising email out yet tonight?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
Tommah posted:trump and clinton win http://enr.sos.mo.gov/EnrNet/ they called it for trump?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
Immortan posted:they called it for trump? that is the official state of missouri website reporting the "unofficial" election results
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
Slate Action posted:Trump wins Missouri by 0.2% and will pick up a cool 90% of the delegates. Good, good. Jeff Roe, Ted Cruz's campaign manager and known as the most evil man in Missouri politics, has just lost his home state the worst way possible. This is good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:If he was behind 0.1% would Cruz get 90%? Or would it not matter because of how many counties or whatever he won? Districts, but yeah.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:If he was behind 0.1% would Cruz get 90%? Or would it not matter because of how many counties or whatever he won? Trump would still win a majority of the delegates if he was behind 0.1% (I think), but Cruz would get the 12 delegates awarded to the overall winner.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Bernie-san
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:If he was behind 0.1% would Cruz get 90%? Or would it not matter because of how many counties or whatever he won? Trump would either win 35-17 or 30-22 depending on which (if any) districts flipped E: if 2 districts flipped Cruz would win 27-25
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Are you guys sure Cruz only wins MO-7? MO-4 looks pretty Cruz-y to me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Montasque posted:Jeff Roe, Ted Cruz's campaign manager and known as the most evil man in Missouri politics, has just lost his home state the worst way possible. Cruz would be dumb not to ask for a recount, could be time to gently caress with the count
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Slate Action posted:Trump wins Missouri by 0.2% and will pick up a cool 90% of the delegates. Good, good. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
What are the odds that the RNC forces these states to go 100% proportional like the Dems next cycle because it's blowing up in their faces so hard
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
lol bernie lost every state. wrap it up bernailures
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:What are the odds that the RNC forces these states to go 100% proportional like the Dems next cycle because it's blowing up in their faces so hard They'll put in a super delegate system.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
oooooomg
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:What are the odds that the RNC forces these states to go 100% proportional like the Dems next cycle because it's blowing up in their faces so hard Considering they changed the rules for this election in a reactionary move because Romney's nomination was so gritty and drawn out, very likely.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Are you guys sure Cruz only wins MO-7? MO-4 looks pretty Cruz-y to me. MO-4 will be close but I think Trump wins it by a few hundred
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
lamentable dustman posted:Cruz would be dumb not to ask for a recount, could be time to gently caress with the count Glad to see you encouraging fraud
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:
I've been to southeastern Ohio and its inexplicable number of Portsmiths. It's a shithole.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Necroneocon posted:Oh my god... Bernie Sanders isn't a Socialist. I just... I give up on y'all. It's like none of you took the time to read up on Socialism. This is an extremely feeble troll attempt
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
How many delegates did Trump get today, about?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:They'll put in a super delegate system. Knowing the GOP they'd be even too worried about them just siding with the delegate winner and would instead introduce a single ultra delegate who can unbind all delegates for the first ballot if they feel it is necessary, before shepherding them into a FIFA - style bribe room
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:What are the odds that the RNC forces these states to go 100% proportional like the Dems next cycle because it's blowing up in their faces so hard I'm assuming if they do it'll blow up in their fat loving faces just like their 2012 decision did because so far evidence suggests there is a just god
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Honestly the easiest thing for the GOP to do would just be to encourage states to switch to closed primaries. It's a lot easier to justify than superdelegates.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:What are the odds that the RNC forces these states to go 100% proportional like the Dems next cycle because it's blowing up in their faces so hard but the whole reason they changed it in the first place was to help out the establishment pick, b/c they assumed they would be in the lead by this point and the WTA states would tip them over the edge. so if they changed it back, i could easily see them being hosed over next primary season, again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Does anyone have the final totals for MO and IL divided by district?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:
So I'm guessing Trump wins West Virginia?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
closed primaries + superdelegates + proportional delegate allocation = happy reince liver
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:I'm assuming if they do it'll blow up in their fat loving faces just like their 2012 decision did because so far evidence suggests there is a just god This is why I want them to change it so bad. Next time will be a slightly less charismatic demagogue that sweeps the initial states and becomes insurmountable as people refuse to drop out
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Necroneocon posted:Oh my god... Bernie Sanders isn't a Socialist. I just... I give up on y'all. It's like none of you took the time to read up on Socialism. Let's just be happy America is entertaining the word 'socialism' for once. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Trump v. Kasich Voters by County Counties included within the "Ohio-Appalachia Region"  Ohio Unemployment Rate by County  BONUS: Ohio Poverty Rate by County QuoProQuid has issued a correction as of 06:09 on Mar 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Ego-bot posted:So I'm guessing Trump wins West Virginia? there is no surer thing on this earth
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:08
|
|
|
Ego-bot posted:So I'm guessing Trump wins West Virginia? What do you think?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
Ego-bot posted:So I'm guessing Trump wins West Virginia? As likely as Cruz winning Utah, so yup.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:09
|
|