|
I'd like to grab the talking heads album for the only reason being that I'm a completionist and I don't have that one yet. But I imagine shipping to Canada and the exchange rate would make it not worthwhile so don't worry about it.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 02:10 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 20:58 |
|
I'll check how much it is to ship to Canada, PM me your postal code.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 02:20 |
|
It's stupid expensive to ship to Canada. You must be able to find that somewhere local. It was a very popular album.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 02:34 |
|
Yeah of course, that's why I said forget about it
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 02:54 |
|
Any of you have experience with the Marantz Model 26? I'm on the verge of checking one out from craigslist but am concerned about it being loud enough. Even by 70s standards, 14 watts/channel seems kind of weak.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 04:18 |
|
Is that Gramovox vertical turntable (http://www.gramovox.com/pages/floating-record) any good at all, or is it just a gimmick?
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:01 |
|
inklesspen posted:Is that Gramovox vertical turntable (http://www.gramovox.com/pages/floating-record) any good at all, or is it just a gimmick? Why would you want a record player with built in speakers?
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:03 |
|
$400 for that? lol get a debut carbon instead
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:08 |
|
BigFactory posted:Why would you want a record player with built in speakers? you don't have to use the speakers; it has regular outputs as well. I like the visual look of it, so if it's decent as a turntable, i might get it.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:10 |
|
inklesspen posted:Is that Gramovox vertical turntable (http://www.gramovox.com/pages/floating-record) any good at all, or is it just a gimmick? At best, it's a thoroughly mediocre turntable, but it's far more likely to be a glorified lathe.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:10 |
|
inklesspen posted:you don't have to use the speakers; it has regular outputs as well. I like the visual look of it, so if it's decent as a turntable, i might get it. It's gonna be a mess. It just uses a spring to maintain tracking force.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:17 |
|
Yeah, I was afraid it would suck. Thanks for the sanity check.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:31 |
|
inklesspen posted:Yeah, I was afraid it would suck. Thanks for the sanity check. If you want a vertical tracker look up an old Sharp or Technics.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 21:38 |
|
BigFactory posted:It's gonna be a mess. It just uses a spring to maintain tracking force. KozmoNaut posted:At best, it's a thoroughly mediocre turntable, but it's far more likely to be a glorified lathe. I disagree. If the spring force applied to the tonearm is matched to the cartridge's ideal tracking weight, and they're not using the cheapest plastic parts or industrial-grade styli, à la $150 Crosleys, then there isn't really any reason to expect this to be poo poo at playback or dangerous for LPs beyond prejudice. The cartridge is a bog-standard AT95e, and the largely conventional tonearm is stabilized by a replaceable spring and gravity, which handles the anti-skate. In terms of fidelity/sound quality, moving parts/complexity/fragility, and physical wear on the record and stylus, there's no reason why this shouldn't be superior to vintage vertical trackers or portable/suitcase turntables. I initially wanted to dismiss this project offhand as a glorified Crosley too but I honestly can't see anything horribly wrong with it. The built-in speakers aren't to my taste, but I can sort of understand the appeal for people looking for a compact and striking office or bedroom stereo.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2016 16:54 |
|
I think the thing I hated more about the floating record player is that you have to screw the record in.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2016 17:04 |
|
Animale posted:I think the thing I hated more about the floating record player is that you have to screw the record in. It's also left handed. Which I guess is a feature if you're left handed.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2016 18:13 |
|
Just a heads up, I just listed a no reserve, $.99 starting price, auction on ebay for a really nice Pioneer SX-1080 if any goons are interested.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 01:26 |
|
Where da new-in-box thrift store SX-1980s for $50 at? :P
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 16:56 |
|
pzy posted:Where da new-in-box thrift store SX-1980s for $50 at? :P I guess at a thrift store?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 17:37 |
|
It's so obvious! Brb to check.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 20:15 |
|
I put my beautiful Bang & Olufsen up for sale I love it so much, but I love money for food and rent even more.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2016 14:56 |
|
evobatman posted:I put my beautiful Bang & Olufsen up for sale Where?
|
# ? Mar 17, 2016 15:09 |
|
ShotgunWillie posted:Where? http://m.finn.no/bap/forsale/ad.html?finnkode=72741806 It's in Norway, so I don't really expect anyone in this thread to buy it, just to share my anguish over having to let it go.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 10:30 |
|
i have these ns10s. i connected them to my marantz 2270 and no sound comes out of the tweeters. at least i think there's no sound coming out of them. if there is, it's very, very faint. i recently had one of the speakers repaired because i thought the tweeter was broken, but now i'm thinking something's wrong with the receiver? but that doesn't make any sense because it powers my bookshelves fine. do i need to put a massive power amp behind these ns10s or something? i felt like the marantz would be plenty...
|
# ? Mar 19, 2016 18:25 |
|
Aren't the NS-10s legendary in how finicky they are?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2016 18:49 |
|
yea, they take a lot of handholding from what i know but yea, i'm at a loss for what to do next. maybe take them to a local shop and test them on another receiver? this is so weird. the one speaker was working fine when i first got them, now that tweeter doesn't work. and the speaker i took in for repair for this exact issue doesn't have a working tweeter. i've tried the marantz and old denon receiver i have too. maybe there is signal coming out and i'm just an idiot? they sound super mid-rangey and i was expecting mid-rangey with really, really high trebles. definitely no really, really high trebles. the one speaker did have really, really high trebles. now it doesn't abelwingnut fucked around with this message at 19:12 on Mar 19, 2016 |
# ? Mar 19, 2016 19:07 |
|
My parents report they have a Panasonic turntable of mid 70s vintage that supposedly still works. Unfortunately it's in storage so I can't get a model # or anything. Is there any chance at all it would be worthwhile as baby's first turntable rather than buying a new one?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 00:47 |
|
Yes, quite possibly, if it just needs some cleaning and lubricant and maybe a new cheap cart or needle
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 02:19 |
|
the yeti posted:My parents report they have a Panasonic turntable of mid 70s vintage that supposedly still works. Unfortunately it's in storage so I can't get a model # or anything. Most likely, in fact. Our general rule of thumb here is "go vintage if you can/want to". You generally get better build quality and components for the price and you really have to spend, like, $400 or more before you start to see modern tables that can match or exceed the quality of a solid vintage one. You're comparing products from today's turntable market when vinyl is a niche hobby to products from when vinyl was the global standard for recorded music and all of our favorite electronics manufacturers specialized in making millions of turntables per year. Depending on what table it is/how it was stored, it might need a new belt, needle/cartridge, or some fresh lube. Any of those are cheap as chips by comparison to a whole new TT and shouldn't disqualify a solid freebie if money is a concern. E: fb, but you get the point
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 15:32 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Most likely, in fact. On the other hand, Panasonic branded stuff in the 70's (and beyond) was pretty crappy. The good stuff was Technics branded.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 20:01 |
|
BigFactory posted:On the other hand, Panasonic branded stuff in the 70's (and beyond) was pretty crappy. The good stuff was Technics branded. I went and asked because I was certain they had Technics equipment when I was a kid. Turns out I was thinking of their tape deck/CD changer
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 20:09 |
|
the yeti posted:I went and asked because I was certain they had Technics equipment when I was a kid. Turns out I was thinking of their tape deck/CD changer Panasonic's kinda garbo, but in your case, it's also free.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 21:21 |
|
evobatman posted:http://m.finn.no/bap/forsale/ad.html?finnkode=72741806 I actually live in your city, but sadly not on the lookout for more boxes. (Please buy my half defunct Primare DVD player) Uansett, lykke til med salget!
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 00:07 |
|
BigFactory posted:Panasonic's kinda garbo, but in your case, it's also free. This is my thought, always great for babby's first table, and better than some Crosley poo poo that's going to gently caress up your records.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 03:45 |
|
iSimian posted:I actually live in your city, but sadly not on the lookout for more boxes. (Please buy my half defunct Primare DVD player) I added a B&O MX 4000 CRT TV to this to play old video games, and I'm waiting for the link cables to integrate it all. It's kinda neat to have around 50 000 NOK in luxury entertainment electronics and not having spent 1000 yet on it all.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 10:20 |
|
I found a pair of Bose 301 series ii from the early 80s at a local store that seem to be in excellent condition. Is there a general consensus on the quality of these speakers? I read some reviews online that were positive, but I was wondering if anyone here has had personal experience with them? Going price is a bit much (~$200), but I wanted to see if it would even be worth my time before I try to haggle the price down. Stupid Dick fucked around with this message at 01:03 on Mar 24, 2016 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 00:54 |
|
Stupid Dick posted:I found a pair of Bose 301 series ii from the early 80s at a local store that seem to be in excellent condition. Is there a general consensus on the quality of these speakers? I read some reviews online that were positive, but I was wondering if anyone here has had personal experience with them? 200 is pretty high for series II, series III are the ones that bring in the most money usually. I normally sell series II for around 125 when I get them. They have these stupid plastic pieces that tend of fall off and they just feel cheaper compared to the rest of the ones I've had. Also you can find much better speakers in that price range anyways. TooLShack fucked around with this message at 01:31 on Mar 24, 2016 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 01:22 |
|
TooLShack posted:Also you can find much better speakers in that price range anyways. I got a pair of HPM-900 in 8.5-9/10 condition with the original graphite woofer cones and a fresh refoam from a Much better speakers indeed.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 03:33 |
|
Not sure if this is the right place to ask but it is related. I picked up a 1/8" female to 1/4" male adapter from a hardware store, but it ended up introducing a LOT of noise. The fact the plug was crooked should've been a warning. Is there a reliable online source for non-poo poo cables and adapters that will ship to Canada? Anything I find on amazon has bad reviews too. I'm not needing anything ~audiophile~ grade, just non-poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2016 19:54 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 20:58 |
|
Monoprice
|
# ? Mar 25, 2016 21:26 |