|
SedanChair posted:As much as fishmech acts like a corn lobbyist without the charm or tact, he's got a point. Have you ever looked at recipes from the '50s? Jesus Christ. But what has changed is portions and intake. Look at what is considered a single serving cookie or muffin, or how you get a literal quart of soda with your (now enormous) burger and fries. Caloric intake is the one variable that seems to apply in almost every case. Portions, intake, and the vast majority of jobs no longer requiring heavy manual labor doesn't help either.
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 11:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 00:44 |
|
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:Less than 24 hours before Jrode is un-probated! Maybe we can replace him with fishmech
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 11:48
|
|
|
Mornacale posted:Maybe we can replace him with fishmech You mean probate fishmech instead of jrod? Because I am 1000% down with this proposition.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 13:42
|
|
|
I warned you all. You fools!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 14:02
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:You mean probate fishmech instead of jrod? Because I am 1000% down with this proposition. Same
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 16:18
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:As much as fishmech acts like a corn lobbyist without the charm or tact, he's got a point. fishmech(and you) are wrong. This is not a difficult question. We have very strong data on both average calorie consumption and calories expended. The latter has gone down a little. The former has gone up immensely. It's more calories eaten far more than it's less calories burned. We also have data on how calories are consumed on a per meal basis. The vast increase has come in the form of 'snacks'. Here: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2640583/cutler_obese.pdf?sequence=2 For women, the amount of non-snack calories consumed actually decreased since the 70s, it was just swamped by the increase in snack calories. And needless to say, the idea that the way food is produced and marketed has not changed since the 50s is ludicrously wrong as should be obvious to anyone who has been in any supermarket in America.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
That was fishmech's entire point. Congratulations on saying someone is wrong and then literally repeating their point. The only potential point you have is about production/marketing and if you'd read Vance Packard's Hidden Persuaders you'd know that the entire marketing method was born back then.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:That was fishmech's entire point. The problem is that fishmech rejects all narratives that hope to elucidate more about the point. This whole time he's basically just said that if someone can afford to overeat (which costs less than 20 bucks per week if you eat just rice), they simply estimate how much food they need, and usually overshoot and, most importantly, never update their estimate according to their observations. Why some people overshoot and others do not, to fishmech, is ineffable. Guess what, fishmech, "people eat more now" is as much of a semantic stop sign for you as "processing" is for raw milkers. Stinky_Pete fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Mar 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete posted:The problem is [...] fishmech 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Guess who's free and almost certainly
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Guess who's free and almost certainly Some sort of huge racist?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Guess who's free and almost certainly 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Guess who's free and almost certainly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYnzEeIbWjs
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Guess who's free and almost certainly
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
I'll save us all some time.  Source
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
PSA: it is immoral for the government to deny my right to eat the still-living flesh of crying babies, they signed the contract so they know what they were getting into
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:PSA: it is immoral for the government to deny my right to eat the still-living flesh of crying babies, they signed the contract so they know what they were getting into
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I thought the libertarian line was that you aren't allowed to kill or eat or torture a baby because that's aggression, but you can't be held accountable for letting the child die through neglect. Yeah, you can eat the baby after it is dead, but eating live babies is a no no. Unfortunately it won't have much meat on its bones if you starve it to death. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I thought the libertarian line was that you aren't allowed to kill or eat or torture a baby because that's aggression, but you can't be held accountable for letting the child die through neglect. Nonono, you see, the babies signed a contract with Mr. QuarkJets to be eaten alive so it's fiiiine
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
Caros posted:Yeah, you can eat the baby after it is dead, but eating live babies is a no no. Sounds like nanny state pandering to me, two consenting individuals should be able to do whatever they want so long as it doesn't violate the non-aggression principle. Maybe the baby asked me to remove, cook, and eat one of its arms. You don't know. Frankly, in that case it would be a violation of the NAP to not eat baby flesh. I'm sick of you loving STATISTS trying to throw me in a cage just for helping children
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Jrode is unprobated. Any bets on when he makes a new post/thread making GBS threads up SA? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
Not soon enough. I want my laughs damnit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:Not soon enough. I want my laughs damnit. I'm kind of hoping tonight. My girlfriend works late and I'm bored.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
jrod will appear whenever the prophecies say he will appear. It is known Or maybe in a couple more months, he needs time to craft a new opening salvo of pseudointellectual horse piss that includes at least one naively racist comment and at least one allusion to the fascist surveillance
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Caros posted:I'm kind of hoping tonight. My girlfriend works late and I'm bored. When will you tell her that your heart belongs to another...?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
jrod is never late. He is never early. He arrives precisely when he means to. And by that when the melon store runs out and he gets bored.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Caros posted:I'm kind of hoping tonight. My girlfriend works late and I'm bored. Caros glances over to a picture on his night stand... a picture of jrod
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
Caros posted:I'm kind of hoping tonight. My girlfriend works late and I'm bored. "May you live in interesting times"
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Caros glances over to a picture on his night stand... a picture of jrod He is just so goddamn handsome. I can't resist it. Its like looking at a more handsome prince Harry.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Caros glances over to a picture on his night stand... a picture of jrod Please don't post any passages from my fanfic, that is my intellectual property ty
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Caros glances over to a picture on his night stand... a picture of jrod ...printed out from hotornot.com
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Twerkteam Pizza posted:Please don't post any passages from my fanfic, that is my intellectual property ty Ideas should be free. If you can't
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
YF19pilot posted:Ideas should be free. If you can't *ignores creative input as a factor of intellectual production*
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 02:54
|
|
|
Twerkteam Pizza posted:*ignores creative input as a factor of intellectual production* No, but see, I have the ability to print more and distribute better than you, ergo ipso facto ixnay on the ombbay, I have more right to your work than you because of the first principles of *wet fart*
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
Could you all please try to be a little more thirsty for jrod to come back? Thanks
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Caros glances over to a picture on his night stand... a picture of jrod 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
I am beginning to worry the next step of this joke is slash fanfiction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 06:35
|
|
|
I saw that there were 150 new posts in this thread and I figured it could mean only one thing, but nope. My heart swelled with joy at the thought of the prodigal son returning...only to see it crushed upon the realization that this new traffic was generated by Fischmench.  ...though this comic did help a tad with the disappointment.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 11:32
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:...though this comic did help a tad with the disappointment. "Hark! A Vagrant!" is a great comic that I always forget exists. The artist is a big history/Canadian nerd, and although I'm American and know little of Canada's politics, I find her Deifenbaker(spelling?) comics quite amusing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 11:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 00:44 |
|
|
YF19pilot posted:"Hark! A Vagrant!" is a great comic that I always forget exists. The artist is a big history/Canadian nerd, and although I'm American and know little of Canada's politics, I find her Deifenbaker(spelling?) comics quite amusing. The founding fathers in the future ones are pretty good too.  (the first panel may be libertarian applicable)
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 12:46
|
|
