|
Just bought a 2795qhd from green-sum, fingers crossed it looks good. Worst case I'll just use it as my secondary monitor next to my 144hz 1080p. Although that will probably look weird.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2016 23:47 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:44 |
|
Trisk posted:Just bought a 2795qhd from green-sum, fingers crossed it looks good. Worst case I'll just use it as my secondary monitor next to my 144hz 1080p. Although that will probably look weird. I bought one a week ago with no dead pixels and runs great at 96 and 110hz. It's sitting next to my old 1080p 60 hz monitor that I generally use only for Internet browsing while playing games. The only downside was removing the glass stem stand was a pain.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2016 23:52 |
|
Zorilla posted:16:9 stops being an issue at 1440p. It's not about aspect ratio and really more about the fact 1080p is so cramped and you need at least 1200 pixels vertically to get real work done. I disagree. At 2160p or more, yes, sure. But until 1600p, not at all.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 05:55 |
|
Really tempted to step up to a 60+ refresh rate hz monitor. I was thinking about buying that korean monitor that overclocks to 96hz for $300. I already have a Dell U2715H at 1440p, is there a big upgrade going from 60hz to 96hz? The U2715H is pretty clear as it is but the refresh rate isn't as smooth as my friends 1080p 144hz TN monitor
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 11:42 |
|
I went from a Dell 27" 60Hz to that current Korean flavour of the month and it was a revelation for me. I sure as hell noticed the jump from 60Hz to 96Hz - and so does every title that can sustain that framerate - and I enjoy the improved smoothness of the desktop for long coding sessions. I didn't really notice as much of a 'wow' from 96Hz to 110Hz, and in my brief foray to 120Hz (which in all honesty it doesn't do well) I didn't notice much at all. Other than 'what the hell is all this crap on my screen oh god im not good with comput' That said this is a highly subjective thing - massively so - and I have old knackered eyes. I have the distinct feeling a 144Hz turbo ubergaming monitor would be thoroughly wasted on me, so take my impression with a large pinch of salt. What I do know is: - I love 96Hz for everything. - The picture is great, the panel is great (I don't know if this is luck or not, but general impressions are positive). - The stand is absolute loving garbage and if you ever have need to adjust your stand for heavens' sake get rid of it and get an arm. - I'm finding brightness controls without having to navigate through multiple menus to be super handy to adjust to ambient light, so couldn't give a toss that this is the only function it has. - If this thing ever breaks I'm screwed for getting it fixed, so I'll get whatever the new one is.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 12:06 |
|
Asus set up an exchange program for pg279q's with backlight bleed. http://techreport.com/news/29874/asus-offers-an-exchange-program-for-some-pg279q-displays Also announced official PG348Q release date. http://techreport.com/news/29872/asus-releases-its-rog-swift-pg348q-in-north-america
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 14:30 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Asus set up an exchange program for pg279q's with backlight bleed. It says it will be released in may, but one of the Powered by Asus vendors let's you purchase the monitor outright for $1300. NCIX will let you buy it for $1999 US or CAD.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 19:22 |
|
Dunno if this is the right spot to ask but I figure it's worth a shot. I'm looking for something in the 27"-32" range, preferably under $400 dollars. I'm not a pc player so trying to do research on this has been problematic to say the least. I primarily play shooters and rpgs on ps4 and wiiu so was looking for a monitor to replace this poo poo crosley tv I bought. Any recommendations or brands I should check out?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 23:43 |
|
Fibby Boy posted:Dunno if this is the right spot to ask but I figure it's worth a shot. I'm looking for something in the 27"-32" range, preferably under $400 dollars. I'm not a pc player so trying to do research on this has been problematic to say the least. I primarily play shooters and rpgs on ps4 and wiiu so was looking for a monitor to replace this poo poo crosley tv I bought. Any recommendations or brands I should check out? Are you just looking for something to hook consoles up to or do you also plan to plug a computer into it? If you're just looking for something for console use then a 1080p TV would probably be your best bet, you can get a 32" VIZIO for $230. If you want something to also hook a computer up to then this Dell is a good choice.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2016 00:08 |
|
Krailor posted:Are you just looking for something to hook consoles up to or do you also plan to plug a computer into it? Oh yeah forgot to mention that stuff. Apologies. I don't a pc now but I figure down the line, like in a couple years of so, I could build a decent pc and hook that up to it. That dell does look nice but I can't figure out how many hdmi ports it has on it. Looking for something with at least two if you'd know of any.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2016 00:23 |
|
Fibby Boy posted:Oh yeah forgot to mention that stuff. Apologies. One HDMI and one VGA. Fwiw I'd probably get the Vizio for the next few years.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2016 04:08 |
|
Anyone used the QX2414, and any comments? e: Can you run 3D on it? Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 22:32 on Mar 19, 2016 |
# ? Mar 19, 2016 22:21 |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to find the following for less than $600: *IPS *1440p *Refresh rate over 60hz *Optionally, but would like it: Gsync Seems like my only options are $750 TN panels or $1,000+ IPS panels, I was hoping there may be some alternatives that Newegg doesn't have or that I'm missing.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 01:13 |
|
Swartz posted:I was wondering if it's possible to find the following for less than $600: Crossover 2795QHD. + IPS + 1440p + Overclockable Refresh rate up to 96Hz + ~$300 - No gsync - lovely stand + VESA compatible mounts Your other options to keep it under $600 would be getting a refurbished XB270HU or ASUS equivalent. And a regular XB270HU goes for ~$775, so not sure where you'd getting $1k from.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 01:52 |
|
One of those Korean monitors? No thanks. Guess I'll be sticking to 1080p 60hz longer than I thought as I can't bring myself to go back to a TN display. Maybe the prices will drop once those 10-bit color monitors supposedly go mainstream this year.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 02:53 |
|
Swartz posted:I was wondering if it's possible to find the following for less than $600: Refurb XB270HU or watch for a killer sale on the same. Or, you could watch the Dell Outlet for a Dell S2716DG. It's TN but it's a very nice TN. Or, get a 24" 1080p panel. You can get a GN246HL or QX2414 for like $140-170, but you're giving up both 1440p and IPS there. The QX2414 can go even faster than 144hz, reportedly, like 170+ (but I don't own one).
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 04:53 |
|
Swartz posted:One of those Korean monitors? No thanks. 10b will be (as it has been) rather expensive. Don't expect it to have much of an impact on the 60+Hz market, because they'll either be independent (60Hz + 10b or 144Hz + 8b but not both), or they'll be silly expensive for awhile. Your real hope is that someone other than AO figures out how to make the damned panels so there can be some actual competition. Until then though...
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 05:34 |
|
Anybody have any experience running the Dell U3415W above the standard 60hz? I'm just curious because it seems like it got to 80hz pretty easily and with all the talk of 96hz+ for gaming I looked into it myself.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 09:13 |
|
ILikeVoltron posted:Anybody have any experience running the Dell U3415W above the standard 60hz? I'm just curious because it seems like it got to 80hz pretty easily and with all the talk of 96hz+ for gaming I looked into it myself. Some monitors with multiple inputs will accept higher refresh rates, but just drop any frames above 60. Use the tests at testufo.com to see if it's doing this.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 17:09 |
|
My computer is fairly close to my television and I'm constantly having to swap HDMI cables on the GPU. I'd like to get a splitter of some sort so I can just press a button to switch between displays, but I can only find pigtail splitters that would output the video to both displays at the same time. I just need to display audio/video to one device at a time, since the TV isn't being used as an extended desktop. I'm also trying to minimize any latency (bought the Sony KDL55W950B specifically for its low latency for an HDTV) and I'm afraid adding something like that might be counter-intuitive. Any suggestions?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 20:46 |
|
Bloodplay it again posted:My computer is fairly close to my television and I'm constantly having to swap HDMI cables on the GPU. I'd like to get a splitter of some sort so I can just press a button to switch between displays, but I can only find pigtail splitters that would output the video to both displays at the same time. I just need to display audio/video to one device at a time, since the TV isn't being used as an extended desktop. I'm also trying to minimize any latency (bought the Sony KDL55W950B specifically for its low latency for an HDTV) and I'm afraid adding something like that might be counter-intuitive. Any suggestions? You're looking for an HDMI switch. A lot of them only go from multiple inputs to a single output so you want a bidirectional one like this: http://www.amazon.com/Sewell-Direct-Ibis-Bi-Directional-Passthrough/dp/B00629NHW6/ I honestly have no idea about any extra latency but I doubt there'd be much if any.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 21:13 |
|
Rexxed posted:You're looking for an HDMI switch. A lot of them only go from multiple inputs to a single output so you want a bidirectional one like this: Perfect. Thank you. I had trouble finding one like that--most of them were made for displays with one input in mind. I came across one on Monoprice sometime last year but lost track of it and couldn't remember bidirectional.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 21:23 |
|
EoRaptor posted:Some monitors with multiple inputs will accept higher refresh rates, but just drop any frames above 60. I read about that, but I don't have a camera that I can test with. Seems like it would be pretty hard to just watch this and figure it out.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 21:29 |
|
Bloodplay it again posted:Perfect. Thank you. I had trouble finding one like that--most of them were made for displays with one input in mind. I came across one on Monoprice sometime last year but lost track of it and couldn't remember bidirectional. You can also go a step further and look into a HDMI Matrix, which is effectively the next step from that. Decent ones can get a little pricey but I can't tell if they add any lag to the chain. I had a Gefen Toolbox that I got for free from a client that I used for a long time. Looks like they are running for around $150 on Ebay now.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 21:37 |
|
ILikeVoltron posted:I read about that, but I don't have a camera that I can test with. Seems like it would be pretty hard to just watch this and figure it out. I've found the automatic detection from testufo to be accurate without using a camera. I was able to visually see my multi-input monitor skipping frames when I thought I had it at 120hz but it was really at 60.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 22:00 |
|
taqueso posted:I've found the automatic detection from testufo to be accurate without using a camera. I was able to visually see my multi-input monitor skipping frames when I thought I had it at 120hz but it was really at 60. Seems to confirm 80hz / 80 fps when set to sync at 80hz. Games also seem to launch at either 60 or 80 and can be either manually set to either.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2016 22:24 |
|
Bloodplay it again posted:My computer is fairly close to my television and I'm constantly having to swap HDMI cables on the GPU. I'd like to get a splitter of some sort so I can just press a button to switch between displays, but I can only find pigtail splitters that would output the video to both displays at the same time. I just need to display audio/video to one device at a time, since the TV isn't being used as an extended desktop. I'm also trying to minimize any latency (bought the Sony KDL55W950B specifically for its low latency for an HDTV) and I'm afraid adding something like that might be counter-intuitive. Any suggestions? What resolution is your monitor? If it's 1080p (and so is your TV), why not just use two ports and display mirroring? Edit: oops, on mobile and the Awful app didn't refresh the thread when I reopened it hours later, even though I forced it to. Beaten with a better answer than mine. Zorilla fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Mar 21, 2016 |
# ? Mar 21, 2016 03:24 |
|
ILikeVoltron posted:Seems to confirm 80hz / 80 fps when set to sync at 80hz. Games also seem to launch at either 60 or 80 and can be either manually set to either. You aren't getting >60hz on the U3415W. You don't need a special camera to test it, just go to this ufotest and fullscreen it, it will be apparant the monitors scalar drops frames over 60hz as you will easily see cells get skipped. http://www.testufo.com/#test=frameskipping&horiz=50&vert=20 rage-saq fucked around with this message at 06:01 on Mar 21, 2016 |
# ? Mar 21, 2016 05:58 |
|
Dunno if this is the place to ask but since this is a monitor thread, I'll give it a shot. A 1600x900 LCD monitor I've had for a little over 3 years--and is currently a secondary monitor--has been doing a weird thing where: every time I shake the monitors awake from idle sleep, it won't turn on right away. It'll stay blinking and make a weird, faint *click* sound like a switch going on and off, for about 30 seconds. During that time, pressing the power button for the monitor doesn't do anything. What I've read is that either the monitor is dying or I have a GPU issue. My GPU is a pretty recently purchased GTX970 that hasn't been giving me issues, and while this is happening, my system is still recognizing that monitor is plugged in and (seemingly) functional. When it finally kicks in, I can turn it off and on and it'll click on right away. So before I impulsively buy a new monitor to replace this thing, can anyone tell me what's up?
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 06:30 |
|
Morter posted:Dunno if this is the place to ask but since this is a monitor thread, I'll give it a shot. A properly implemented monitor will send EDID information to the computer, even when it's not even plugged into power. Does your computer have integrated graphics you can try out? If you can reproduce the issue on integrated graphics, that would rule out your GTX 970. If you can rule it out, I suspect the power supply board on the monitor could have failing capacitors or MOSFETs based on the way it's failing to turn on and not responding to inputs, but that usually doesn't cause bad behavior 100% of the time since temperature and current draw are factors. If you are able to reliably reproduce the issue in a way that manifests exactly the same way each time by running through the same sequence of events, it could be something wrong with the signal board instead. What is your monitor's model number? If it has known issues leading to failure, you can sometimes find "repair kits" online on sites like eBay that contain capacitors (and sometimes other components) to replace the ones that commonly fail on those boards. Zorilla fucked around with this message at 07:24 on Mar 21, 2016 |
# ? Mar 21, 2016 07:20 |
|
Ok so I have this laptop and this Monoprice WQHD 2560x1440 I wasted way too much time trying to get it to output 2560 via HDMI only to find out the monitor only will via DP or DVI according to this review. What cable/adapter/converter do I need to get this thing to output 2560 if the laptop only has HDMI out?
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 07:45 |
|
Nostalgia4Dicks posted:Ok so I have this laptop and this Monoprice WQHD 2560x1440 For that particular laptop, you might be able to pull it off with a USB 3.0 port replicator compatible with that model. Your only other option is getting a laptop with DisplayPort. It looks like they normally go for $150, but here's a used one for $40: http://www.ebay.com/itm/272177863418 Zorilla fucked around with this message at 08:08 on Mar 21, 2016 |
# ? Mar 21, 2016 08:04 |
|
rage-saq posted:You aren't getting >60hz on the U3415W. Can I overclock my U2415 from 60 Hz up to like say 72 Hz? Why would I want to and/or is there any reason I shouldn't?
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 08:35 |
|
Zorilla posted:For that particular laptop, you might be able to pull it off with a USB 3.0 port replicator compatible with that model. Your only other option is getting a laptop with DisplayPort. Yikes. Thanks for the response. Didn't realize it was such a hassle. This is for a family member as I'm playing tech support. Seems like such a waste to use that monitor and not utilize the 2560 resolution, ugh. I'll look into the port replicator
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 08:52 |
Boris Galerkin posted:Can I overclock my U2415 from 60 Hz up to like say 72 Hz? Why would I want to and/or is there any reason I shouldn't? You can't. Monitors that can overclock can do so because they don't have a scalar. But without a scalar you can't have multiple inputs, most monitors do have multiple inputs including the U2415.
|
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 09:38 |
|
I use my computer and monitor for gaming, browsing, and watching stuff, but my monitor is a hand-me-down low quality TN with atrocious viewing angle. Plus it seems the backlight is bleeding through the edges of the screen, washing out dark colors even when looking straight on. I don't have much money to spend, so is there an IPS or VA monitor around 22-24", LED, and 1080p for under $250-300? I'm fine with refurbished or knock offs if they are worth it.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 12:48 |
|
Locke Dunnegan posted:I use my computer and monitor for gaming, browsing, and watching stuff, but my monitor is a hand-me-down low quality TN with atrocious viewing angle. Plus it seems the backlight is bleeding through the edges of the screen, washing out dark colors even when looking straight on. I don't have much money to spend, so is there an IPS or VA monitor around 22-24", LED, and 1080p for under $250-300? I'm fine with refurbished or knock offs if they are worth it. There's tons of choice at that price and size. I've got one of the S series Dell monitors I like a lot (but it's only the 21.5" one): http://www.amazon.com/s/url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=ips+24+inch+monitor&sprefix=ips+24%2Caps%2C132 The more expensive models like the Dell Ultrasharps are still under your price range: http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-U2414H-24-Inch-Monitor/dp/B00GTV05XG/ edit: when I linked it, that ultrasharp was $229, prices obviously fluctuate. Rexxed fucked around with this message at 19:49 on Mar 21, 2016 |
# ? Mar 21, 2016 17:50 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:Can I overclock my U2415 from 60 Hz up to like say 72 Hz? Why would I want to and/or is there any reason I shouldn't? The only monitors that can overclock at the moment are those that are either specifically noted as doing so/marketed as >60Hz (eg, the X34), or the Korean 1440p panels due to the lack of a scaler and some other interesting part choices that make it possible. Anything you get from Dell, HP, etc., will be incapable of overclocking.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 18:23 |
|
Rexxed posted:There's tons of choice at that price and size. I've got one of the S series Dell monitors I like a lot (but it's only the 21.5" one): Thanks for the response! How does this ASUS model look? I am a shameless cheapskate so spending half my planned budget on what looks like a pretty good monitor sounds like a deal to me, and the reviews look pretty solid.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 22:11 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:44 |
|
Does anyone have experience with both the Dell 2312hm and 2515h for gaming? I'm thinking of adding the latter as an all-purpose 1440p screen (don't want anything larger like a 27") and just want some idea of how colors and response time compare especially for FPS games.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2016 23:41 |