|
Notably, it does say "when a land goes to your yard from ANYWHERE", I could see it being fringe mcmagic-playable with the right support.
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:11 |
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Yeah, but nobody takes your pronouncements of whether things will ever be good 30 seconds after you see them seriously for an actual reason. Because you don't like anything fun. You just like generically good cards. It would be fun with Loam in Standard. Thats something I would be interested in doing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:why doesn't this just say "Permanent Card" instead of listing them out? There must be a new permanent type coming and this would be too broken if it could find those, so the FFL nerfed this card.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
If I had this in play while loaming/molten vortexing 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
Could be a pretty fun commander, it goes off pretty hard with dredge and should give you a lot of cards regardless. I disagree with the green vessel being bad by the way. It's 3 mana for a 2 mana effect but you can split up the cost and it can reasonably get to deliriim, or close to it, on its own.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
Hey and we got Groundskeeper! Wombo-combooooo
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
vortex + frog sounds like a lot of fun too since you can have vortex already in play and play a mountain and activate the turn you play frog.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
My first brew of the new standard is going to be a Molten Vortex/Groundskeeper/Gitrog Frog deck just to spite mcmagic
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:why doesn't this just say "Permanent Card" instead of listing them out? It's a contradiction in terms. If it's not on the battlefield, it's not a permanent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
Doesn't it mill your whole deck with Dakmor Salvage and a discard outlet? And draw cards too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
I wrote a short thing about how cool vampires are over here and there are some preview cards and a preview page from the artbook for Shadows.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Doesn't it mill your whole deck with Dakmor Salvage and a discard outlet? Honestly If you play it and dredge a GGT that turn I think you just mill your deck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Just realized Froggy has the same mana cost and P/T as Spiritmonger and now I miss Spiritmonger 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
This guy will probably be my Pox, Death Cloud commander. Serious
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
I feel like there's actually a bad Legacy deck with that card where you Dredge a bunch, play Reanimate, crack a fetch then draw as many cards as you need to win off of a Lab Maniac.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Is Gitrog Monster in modern a conversation worth having? It's 5 mana but it could do stuff with fetches and dredge. I mean, you have this guy out, instead of drawing for the turn dredge 3 for Life From the Loam, you get a draw again for each land that goes in the bin here, and each of those can be used to dredge again. If there are good BG self-mill tools in the set, which would probably be common and also delirium enablers in a set like this, this guy might go somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Mr. Toad goes in Jund. Play with Magmatic Insight Vaaaaluuuueeee I'm labeling this as The Mythic I'm Going to Open Way Too Many of.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Mind Rot is pretty bad in draft... It can be good depending on the draft format. A powerful sideboard option at the very least. Oh and the toad fuckin owns. I love the design, art, and stats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Remember that the frog has the Sidisi style wording, where it only triggers once when you put a bunch of lands into your yard at once.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:15
|
|
|
Kunzelman posted:I wrote a short thing about how cool vampires are over here and there are some preview cards and a preview page from the artbook for Shadows. I wanna open that Vampire rare every draft
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Entropic posted:Remember that the frog has the Sidisi style wording, where it only triggers once when you put a bunch of lands into your yard at once. thank mr dreamcrusher
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:Just realized Froggy has the same mana cost and P/T as Spiritmonger and now I miss Spiritmonger This was my first thought when I saw it. My second was "Oh it's from anywhere! That seems abusable."
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
suicidesteve posted:This was my first thought when I saw it. My second was "Oh it's from anywhere! That seems abusable." Seems like the perfect type of creature for EDH.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
suicidesteve posted:This was my first thought when I saw it. My second was "Oh it's from anywhere! That seems abusable." Yeah, anytime I see "from anywhere" in a to-the-graveyard clause, I remind myself that that's very good and so much different than the regular version.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Have we seen this yet? The only deck I could really see wanting this is Modern Dredgevine, which is barely even tier 2.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
Kraus posted:It's a contradiction in terms. If it's not on the battlefield, it's not a permanent. what i mean is, why is it not templated similarly to Creeping Renaissance http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=245198
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:I wanna open that Vampire rare every draft It's an excellent Value Vampyre.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
Gitrog  doesn't Squander its Resources heh
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:what i mean is, why is it not templated similarly to Creeping Renaissance opens them up to creating a new permanent type down the road that isn't searchable with this, obviously
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Yeah but those decks have better stuff to be doing. Have you ever had fun playing magic?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
jassi007 posted:Have you ever had fun playing magic? I only have fun when I win.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
MiddleEastBeast posted:opens them up to creating a new permanent type down the road that isn't searchable with this, obviously I guess that's true. I wonder what they could create, current permanent types seem to encompass so much Related question, what Permanent Types exist now that didn't exist in Alpha? Is it just Planeswalker?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
Plenty of stuff references "permanent cards" in zones other than the battlefield. Ugin's ultimate for example.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
Kraus posted:It's a contradiction in terms. If it's not on the battlefield, it's not a permanent. The same is true for the supertypes, which is why we have the "creature card" wording in the first place. "Permanent card" is perfectly normal wording used on 56 existing cards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
It may be that they want to spell it out on a common to make it clearer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:It may be that they want to spell it out on a common to make it clearer. It's this mcmagic posted:I only have fun when I win. Bad attitude, mister sit on my Facebook fucked around with this message at 16:43 on Mar 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:I only have fun when I win. Magic must be miserable for you a good bit. Nobody wins 'em all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
btw according to the flavor article the gitrog is literally hypnotoad which...doesn't come through in the card at all :I
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Elyv posted:btw according to the flavor article the gitrog is literally hypnotoad We can't give not-blue Mind Control effects, that would be unfair to blue.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:11 |
|
|
jassi007 posted:Magic must be miserable for you a good bit. Nobody wins 'em all. It is. Can't help it though. Personality defect.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:46
|
|