|
are amoleds any good nowadays or are they still garbage
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 08:03 |
|
|
Dodoman posted:That can't be real thats what you get 3d rendering through purely nadir photography. and not enough datapoints I guess
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
Linguica posted:are amoleds any good nowadays or are they still garbage  much like plasma, burn in will never go away
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Millstone posted:Sorry I will secure my shitposting in the future lol why are nerds so in love with amoled? I had a galaxy nexus and the display was utter garbage
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:lol why are nerds so in love with amoled? I had a galaxy nexus and the display was utter garbage better specs
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:lol why are nerds so in love with amoled? I had a galaxy nexus and the display was utter garbage newer = better. iphone doesn't have it = that makes it ever betterer
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:lol why are nerds so in love with amoled? I had a galaxy nexus and the display was utter garbage it's theoretically better in some respects but it has a very short life and has burnin
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
computer parts posted:it's theoretically better in some respects but it has a very short life and has burnin Nice AV
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
its a bad movie
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
tfw Xcode's Accessibility Inspector tells you UI Element names that are completely wrong for AppleScript AXSplitGroup, role name: split group, applescript name: splitter group AXRowCell, role name: cell, applescript name: UI Element because gently caress you It wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't so sparsely documented, but holy gently caress when you have to write AppleScript to spit out the correct element names for every child object in the AppleScript DOM as they apply for _that specific app_ 
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
TFW I don't give a poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
TFW Nobody Cares
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
TFW Reddit Is Leaking
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:lol why are nerds so in love with amoled? I had a galaxy nexus and the display was utter garbage
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:tbf, the galaxy nexus screen was notoriously bad. amoled's come a long way since then, and in terms of performance, it's better than lcd in every respect and allows for things lcd doesn't Such as?
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:Such as? you can turn on parts of it separate from the entire screen which is definitely something that isn't a complete loving stupid gimmick and is actually a useful feature for neurotypicals also black pixels are off entirely
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
and yet all advantages are useless because of burn in
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
Amoled screens look beautiful
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:Amoled screens look beautiful
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
tbf apple will only release it if it's ready for the big time
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
kalstrams posted:yea i might be wrong here, but i think that colour reproduction for latest generation amoleds is not really matched by other screens You're wrong here, oversaturated reproduction is not accurate reproduction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:You're wrong here, oversaturated reproduction is not accurate reproduction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
yeah outside of oversaturation oled/amoled screens are much more pleasing to look at.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:yeah outside of oversaturation oled/amoled screens are much more pleasing to look at. true, they are brighter, but the tech is still having issues
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
i think we can all agree pleasing aesthetics don't necessarily translate to good products
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
99.9999999999999% of people don't really know what a color correct screen would look like
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
paging pagancow
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
also pentile.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:Or care that too, but mostly i was thinking "they'll like hearing the screen is color accurate" without actually seeing if the claim is true
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:99.9999999999999% of people don't really know what a color correct screen would look like amoled is a cool and nearly mature enough technology. a non garbage company that gave a poo poo could probably make v nice (non pentile (lol), calibrated) amoled displays it's not like lcd tech is immune to "higher numbers == better than" idiots making a mess
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 05:14
|
|
|
did you know????? RGBG=2 pixels
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Amoled displays are perfectly fine as long as you don't go outside and use it in sunlight (has never occurred for a typical anorid user ) so it's unknown what effects it would have on nt iphone users
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Millstone posted:Amoled displays are perfectly fine as long as you don't go outside and use it in sunlight (has never occurred for a typical anorid user ) so it's unknown what effects it would have on nt iphone users nah they're brighter now and supposed to be fine in the sun and you're supposed to buy a new one or trade it in at the apple store before burn-in is much of an issue
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:you can turn on parts of it separate from the entire screen which is definitely something that isn't a complete loving stupid gimmick and is actually a useful feature for neurotypicals don't white pixels use a lot more energy though i remember that being a controversy because all of google's apps were white without any option to change it
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Soldier of Fortran posted:they'd think they look like apple displays, which are generally ok for what they are is sony's oled tech their own spin on it? the original vita had an oled screen and burn in wasn't that much of a problem.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:iPhone screens are kind of a pain in the rear end to see in bright sunlight especially if you have sunglasses on I've found toggling night shift to be super useful for that situation, but my eyes are all kinds of hosed anyway and having even minimal warm color shifting tends to help a lot for me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 07:13
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:is sony's oled tech their own spin on it? the original vita had an oled screen and burn in wasn't that much of a problem. the vita unless it's set for full power mode clamps the output, it's a sad screen but not many used it there is some cases though
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 08:52
|
|
|
and they changed it to lcd anyway because it was "just as good as oled"
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:is sony's oled tech their own spin on it? the original vita had an oled screen and burn in wasn't that much of a problem. it does get weird blotches u can see when the screen is displaying black pixels tho. still looks nicer than the lcd model
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 15:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 08:03 |
|
|
computer parts posted:don't white pixels use a lot more energy though white uses more than black, yes, for fairly obvious reasons, and i'm fairly certain subpixels even use different amounts of power at a given luminosity. they also wear at different rates*, hence some really weird custom roms that make the entire screen red to preserve the blue and green subpixels, as well as use less power. i don't know if the actual in-use difference would really show up at the end of a day, though. *current tech is rated at something like 25k-40k hours to half the luminosity. virtually no phone will ever get that much use in its lifetime, though a display model left on 24/7 will show noticeable effects pretty quickly as a result. i'd be concerned about the long-term effects on a tv, though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 28, 2016 16:27
|
|