Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



hackbunny posted:

I wonder sometimes if traps are how "political homosexuality" is manifesting in the alt-right. Commentators have wondered for a long time why they won't go gay if women are so terrible, like women went lesbian in protest in the past, and I say, but they are going gay. Just an idea though because I haven't set foot in 4chan or any of its offshoots in years, so I don't know what they have mutated into
Political lesbianism is a brand of homophobia and bigotry that requires a different frame of mind than the reactionary has. It requires one to honestly believe they're being progressive while still taking part in erasure.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



I always figured any effects like that were due to latent bisexuality being expressed.

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av

Cingulate posted:

Do you have any evidence that people can actually "go gay"? Because from all what we see, there is remarkably little plasticity in what sex one is attracted to.

Don't be so literal

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Nessus posted:

I always figured any effects like that were due to latent bisexuality being expressed.
I remember some pornography researcher who claimed to have observed that men are generally obsessed with penises, and putting the penis on what otherwise registers as a woman is just the same sort of hyper stimulation as any other porn thing. And as most here are probably aware of, in ancient times, the salient alignment was not about what sex you want to do, but if you're the active or the passive part, and up on the totem pole were the guys who put it into other people, regardless of what kind of other people.

hackbunny posted:

Don't be so literal
I went from you saying "people go gay" to saying, people don't usually "go gay".

Twerkteam Pizza
Sep 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

Cingulate posted:

Do you have any evidence that people can actually "go gay"? Because from all what we see, there is remarkably little plasticity in what sex one is attracted to.

I swear to the god I don't believe in that a couple of months ago I saw this NY times article that talked about some recent study suggesting that " all women are 'at least' bisexual"

Maybe it was some other site, but I swear to god I saw that.

Not that this undermines your point though, one study doesn't make a supported theory

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av

hackbunny posted:

Don't be so literal

Cingulate posted:

I went from you saying "people go gay" to saying, people don't usually "go gay".

How could I possibly respond to this

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Twerkteam Pizza posted:

I swear to the god I don't believe in that a couple of months ago I saw this NY times article that talked about some recent study suggesting that " all women are 'at least' bisexual"

Maybe it was some other site, but I swear to god I saw that.

Not that this undermines your point though, one study doesn't make a supported theory
I actually have no intuitions on women. I don't think gay women have as extensive of a history of attempts of reeducation, cures, or straight out trying to murder them as gay men, so the hardest data - that people show homosexual behavior much beyond what rationality would lead one to do were this drive significantly plastic - is not there.

I'm not actually opposed to the idea that one can show some development regarding being more or less attracted to (if one is mainly a man interested in rather stereotypical women) stereotypically feminine men. I just think saying there is substantial potential for people to "go gay" is not there.

Iirc the consensus is also that there is little overlap between the typical man who has sex with men (to the extent that there is such a thing) and men who are into women and also into men who dress and act feminine. Like, these are two clusters with little overlap. Again, I don't have good sources here either though.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow
Forced Gay By A Moldbug

Twerkteam Pizza
Sep 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Forced Gay By A Moldbug

Man that's the best Star Wars Paperback imo

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av
I posit that the phrase "going native" is a nonsense because a foreigner can't be native by the very definition of the respective terms, furthermore *massive wet fart*

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

Nessus posted:

I always figured any effects like that were due to latent bisexuality being expressed.

That's always been my assumption. If you go by Kinsey* absolute heterosexuals are fairly rare.

*Dated I know, but there's a dearth of good studies AFAIK.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
There was a Psych Sci article recently arguing that homosexuality and heterosexuality are actually not so much a gradient, as clusters: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/26/12/1843.abstract

I didn't really read it closely.

atomicgeek
Jul 5, 2007

noony noony noony nooooooo

Cingulate posted:

I actually have no intuitions on women. I don't think gay women have as extensive of a history of attempts of reeducation, cures, or straight out trying to murder them as gay men, so the hardest data - that people show homosexual behavior much beyond what rationality would lead one to do were this drive significantly plastic - is not there.

"Corrective rape." No, don't google it. :smith:

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

atomicgeek posted:

"Corrective rape." No, don't google it. :smith:
I know why I said "not as extensive" (as in, compared to the history of male homosexuality) rather than "no". But I wouldn't mind having some numbers behind this intuition.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow
Cingulate Forced My Thread Gay

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Cingulate Forced My Thread Gay

To be fair, half of that was hackbunny.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

divabot posted:

This is related to a current discussion on rationalist Tumblr: ozymandias271 suspects a lot of closeted trans people end up there, and figures advertising to them would be a good idea. They did QALY calculations and everything. The trans people in the thread (which includes Ozy) mostly considered this a not inherently terrible idea, on the basis that it would actually have helped them when they were on 4chan.

Bringing this back up for a moment, I was talking to ~MY GIRLFRIEND~ about it this morning (who happens to be trans) and she still talks to people who frequent 4chan a lot. Apparently the /lgbt/ board is actually not terrible and they already had this idea and even have a name for the closeted / in denial transpeople who lurk the traps threads ("egg mode", she has no idea why).

Wanamingo
Feb 22, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

Bringing this back up for a moment, I was talking to ~MY GIRLFRIEND~ about it this morning (who happens to be trans) and she still talks to people who frequent 4chan a lot. Apparently the /lgbt/ board is actually not terrible and they already had this idea and even have a name for the closeted / in denial transpeople who lurk the traps threads ("egg mode", she has no idea why).

Well let's check that out for ourselves, shall we? I wonder what I'll find if I go there right now and look at the very first thread.



No, I think I'm gonna go ahead and call your girlfriend wrong

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Wanamingo posted:

Well let's check that out for ourselves, shall we? I wonder what I'll find if I go there right now and look at the very first thread.



No, I think I'm gonna go ahead and call your girlfriend wrong
Most likely, PP's girlfriend has a more informed and important, or at least not inferior, perspective to yours.

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av

Small Frozen Thing posted:

To be fair, half of that was hackbunny.

Someone (Parallel Paraplegic?) theorized that the obsession with "traps" stems from the idea of creating women untainted by innate "dirty" femininity, and I was trying to agree with him. I don't think the alt right is entirely composed of 100% heterosexual men as commonly assumed, I think they have a certain degree of variance, that tends to manifest in unique unhealthy identities like "trap" (the tumblr left doesn't have a monopoly on unique unhealthy identities) because everything has to be framed in a certain ideology

Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



There are a lot of gay guys among the alt right.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

Terrible Opinions posted:

There are a lot of gay guys among the alt right.

Remind me, who was that guy who advocated that massively homophobic gay-separatist ideology based on the (heavily fictionalised) example of the Spartans?

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Darth Walrus posted:

Remind me, who was that guy who advocated that massively homophobic gay-separatist ideology based on the (heavily fictionalised) example of the Spartans?
Matt Forney?

DarklyDreaming
Apr 4, 2009

Fun scary
You're thinking of Jack Donovan

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax

hackbunny posted:

Someone (Parallel Paraplegic?) theorized that the obsession with "traps" stems from the idea of creating women untainted by innate "dirty" femininity, and I was trying to agree with him. I don't think the alt right is entirely composed of 100% heterosexual men as commonly assumed, I think they have a certain degree of variance, that tends to manifest in unique unhealthy identities like "trap" (the tumblr left doesn't have a monopoly on unique unhealthy identities) because everything has to be framed in a certain ideology

And I'm saying that's a ridiculous hypothesis born of lack of familiarity with the communities involved. "Trap" is a 4chan thing, it has nothing to do with the alt-right and everything to do with channers. There is overlap between those groups, but that's the only connecting point. I know in person a pretty hardcore leftist and ex-4chan refugee who refers to themselves as a "trap", because they are genderqueer and extremely effeminate while still identifying as male.

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax
The reason "traps" are so popular on 4chan in general is because they are attractive to the mostly-heterosexual men who post there, and are male, thus creating an allure of the "forbidden" or "exotic." In a similar way, very strong and muscular women are also popular on some parts of the site and offshoots. It's pretty much as complex as that.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Small Frozen Thing posted:

The reason "traps" are so popular on 4chan in general is because they are attractive to the mostly-heterosexual men who post there, and are male, thus creating an allure of the "forbidden" or "exotic." In a similar way, very strong and muscular women are also popular on some parts of the site and offshoots. It's pretty much as complex as that.
I keep being astonished by how confident a lot of people in here are, especially on topics presumably rather foreign to them.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Wanamingo posted:

Well let's check that out for ourselves, shall we? I wonder what I'll find if I go there right now and look at the very first thread.



No, I think I'm gonna go ahead and call your girlfriend wrong

I think I might have interpreted her wrong initially, asking her about /lgbt/ just now she said "oh yeah it's kinda horrible" :v:

I guess I sort of assumed a lot of transpeople wouldn't hang out there if it was so trans hostile but I guess the *chan's "culture" (if you can call it that) has some weird magnetism on a lot of people. I have friends myself who go to 8chan (and even /pol/) and fully acknowledge that it's 90% gamergators or pedos or DE weirdos or literal Nazis but still go because... actually I'm really not sure. The only person who's ever really answered said "they're very creative." :shrug:

Cingulate posted:

Most likely, PP's girlfriend has a more informed and important, or at least not inferior, perspective to yours.

Well like I said she's friends with several people who go there often and are also trans, so her perspective comes from people who have already applied the mental filtering that most 4chan frequenters innately, automatically apply.

Darth Walrus posted:

Remind me, who was that guy who advocated that massively homophobic gay-separatist ideology based on the (heavily fictionalised) example of the Spartans?

Actually there's several people who match that description afaik, I mentioned it in this thread once in the past - there's a bunch of gay right-wing "activists" who are in a weird place where they've accepted that they're gay but not that gender norms are invalid so they reject gay marriage and only want to have gruff manly man sex with gruff manly men.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Small Frozen Thing posted:

The reason "traps" are so popular on 4chan in general is because they are attractive to the mostly-heterosexual men who post there, and are male, thus creating an allure of the "forbidden" or "exotic." In a similar way, very strong and muscular women are also popular on some parts of the site and offshoots. It's pretty much as complex as that.

Cingulate posted:

I keep being astonished by how confident a lot of people in here are, especially on topics presumably rather foreign to them.

It's pretty well known that there's a lot of people who consider themselves to be 100% completely heterosexual on 4chan who find traps attractive but insist it's 100% completely straight because they have a "girly dick" or something. Like it's common enough to give rise to several memes.

EDIT: wait Cingulate is agreeing with someone here I am not used to that and thought I needed to make a counterpoint

Shame Boy has a new favorite as of 18:07 on Mar 29, 2016

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

It's pretty well known that there's a lot of people who consider themselves to be 100% completely heterosexual on 4chan who find traps attractive but insist it's 100% completely straight because they have a "girly dick" or something. Like it's common enough to give rise to several memes.

EDIT: wait Cingulate is agreeing with someone here I am not used to that and thought I needed to make a counterpoint

His overwhelming desire to be a devil's advocate turns out to be right when people actually are making ridiculous over-reaching theories.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

It's pretty well known that there's a lot of people who consider themselves to be 100% completely heterosexual on 4chan who find traps attractive but insist it's 100% completely straight because they have a "girly dick" or something. Like it's common enough to give rise to several memes.

EDIT: wait Cingulate is agreeing with someone here I am not used to that and thought I needed to make a counterpoint
I keep learning I'm a terrible writer here.

I wasn't trying to agree (again). I'm sorry to disappoint. I'm saying: if you claim to have understood special, or any, sexual behavior, and if it seems not complex to you, maybe you should slow down. We probably haven't understood it, and it's probably weirder than we can imagine.

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax
I was saying that it wasn't some bizarre right-wing take on "political lesbianism" and almost certainly the other thing, source: i spent years on 4chan and have spent my entire childhood and most of my adulthood trying to research gender and sexuality, jesus christ why did i ever think for a second you weren't an annoying piece of poo poo

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Small Frozen Thing posted:

I was saying that it wasn't some bizarre right-wing take on "political lesbianism" and almost certainly the other thing, source: i spent years on 4chan and have spent my entire childhood and most of my adulthood trying to research gender and sexuality, jesus christ why did i ever think for a second you weren't an annoying piece of poo poo
... You're a sexologist?

That's cool.

Or are you just saying you watch a lot of porn?

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av

Small Frozen Thing posted:

I was saying that it wasn't some bizarre right-wing take on "political lesbianism" and almost certainly the other thing

What other outlets for intimacy are left for them though?

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax

Cingulate posted:

... You're a sexologist?

That's cool.

Or are you just saying you watch a lot of porn?

I'm a highschool dropout with autism so severe I couldn't speak until I was 8

That still makes me significantly more qualified to speak on matters of human behavior and sexuality than you

I Killed GBS
Jun 2, 2011

by Lowtax

hackbunny posted:

What other outlets for intimacy are left for them though?

Hentai. No joke.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Cingulate posted:

... You're a sexologist?

That's cool.

Or are you just saying you watch a lot of porn?

yes

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Cingulate posted:

I keep learning I'm a terrible writer here.

I wasn't trying to agree (again). I'm sorry to disappoint. I'm saying: if you claim to have understood special, or any, sexual behavior, and if it seems not complex to you, maybe you should slow down. We probably haven't understood it, and it's probably weirder than we can imagine.

Nobody's claiming to understand sexual behavior at a core innate level, it's just that there are people who loudly announce that "I am straight but drat that's a hot ladyboner" which is more straightforward than the idea that it's popularity is driven by woman-haters trying to find untainted women to gently caress or whatever. Not saying they can't both be right (or wrong), but the first is at the very least the answer accepted by the actual group we're talking about. Saying "yes but is it really?! science just doesn't know!" isn't really helpful in this situation even though yes, I agree that is the case.

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Cingulate posted:

I keep being astonished by how confident a lot of people in here are, especially on topics presumably rather foreign to them.

What life experiences could possibly have convinced you that feigned surprise does anything but alienate and disgust people who read it? Every time you shitpost like this, you reach a new height in completely useless self-aggrandizement. "Oh poor me, last holder of the twin ancient secrets of empathy and appropriate confidence!". It communicates nothing but your unshakeable belief in your superiority to everyone else in the thread.

Thank you for helping me realize why some spaces ban feigning surprise, now pease try to be less than utterly repulsive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Doc Hawkins posted:

What life experiences could possibly have convinced you that feigned surprise does anything but alienate and disgust people who read it? Every time you shitpost like this, you reach a new height in completely useless self-aggrandizement. "Oh poor me, last holder of the twin ancient secrets of empathy and appropriate confidence!". It communicates nothing but your unshakeable belief in your superiority to everyone else in the thread.

Thank you for helping me realize why some spaces ban feigning surprise, now pease try to be less than utterly repulsive.
Surprise isn't the real word. Astonishment?

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

Nobody's claiming to understand sexual behavior at a core innate level, it's just that there are people who loudly announce that "I am straight but drat that's a hot ladyboner" which is more straightforward than the idea that it's popularity is driven by woman-haters trying to find untainted women to gently caress or whatever. Not saying they can't both be right (or wrong), but the first is at the very least the answer accepted by the actual group we're talking about. Saying "yes but is it really?! science just doesn't know!" isn't really helpful in this situation even though yes, I agree that is the case.
Being technically correct, but unhelpful is kind of my thing you see.

:(

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply