|
Selfless posted a strategy breakdown for their Zeus eco round: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jmi_BG0QZY It's pretty interesting, especially if you're a scrub like me
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
get in the clown car #sewagetreatment #nacs
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Smithereens posted:get in the clown car *nods sagely*
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
Think I might have netted 200pts on fantasy pickem today
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
might be a dumb queastion but, is it better to have a higher DPI on my mouse and lower ingame sensitivity, or a higher in-game sensitivity and lower dpi
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
Technically high DPI but the difference is so small that you won't notice
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Trax416 posted:might be a dumb queastion but, is it better to have a higher DPI on my mouse and lower ingame sensitivity, or a higher in-game sensitivity and lower dpi Low/Low
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
My aim improved when I went to 1.5/800 and it got even better when I dropped my resolution from 1680x1050 to 1280x800. So Low/low/low imo I'm still bad but now I'm less bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:21
|
|
|
Trax416 posted:might be a dumb queastion but, is it better to have a higher DPI on my mouse and lower ingame sensitivity, or a higher in-game sensitivity and lower dpi It has a less restrictive answer than people say but for non special snowflakes 400 dpi/ less than 2ish in game works because you in general have your crosshair in the general area you expect someone to be and you usually aren't aggressively wrong about that. So you move your wrist a little bit to fine tune your crosshair placement when your enemy appears. If you whip your arm around a bunch you are already hosed. If you value higher dpi more you might be a very flick between targets player or more likely just be reading the game very poorly. Its not necessarily true, you might be flicking well between targets but if you aren't lower is better because your thinking might be better than your reaction speed. Goofballs fucked around with this message at 01:32 on Mar 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
Oh wow. Train. Again. How interesting.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
Not in my fantasy pickem, don't care
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
The plow has awoken.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
France go home
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
This is an absolute mauling.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
Geez this is shaping to be the worst stomping the entire tournament.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
virtus pro saving strats for major
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
The Virtus.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
ok g2 is bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:56
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7f1M5fSjEA
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
The smoking gun is real, liked and subscribed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
I wonder what the majors would look like with the normal map veto system. For example, there's no way in hell Navi would be playing C9 on train in a regular bo1 map veto scenario.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
Smol posted:I wonder what the majors would look like with the normal map veto system. For example, there's no way in hell Navi would be playing C9 on train in a regular bo1 map veto scenario. c9 could have def won overpass, sucks that rng is such a big factor at majors for no good reason
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Wow, 100% proved
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 08:21
|
|
|
I didn't see the game but why the gently caress did G2 let VP play on Train? As far as I can see of VP's last 10 matches on Train, 4 of them were against G2 and they won all of them - the time before this being 16-2.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 09:18
|
|
|
rng
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
Hold on, why is it that VP got 3 vetoes and G2 got 2?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 09:43
|
|
|
qhat posted:Hold on, why is it that VP got 3 vetoes and G2 got 2? The better team (the legend in this case) got to decide whether they want 3 bans or 2 bans and pick which side to start on. The opposing team got the other option.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 09:52
|
|
|
Efb
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 09:52
|
|
|
hold on, how is it that G2 did not ban loving train against Virtus.Pro? Not that it matters, you don't go 1-14 on CT Train if you have any chance against the opposing team. This would have been a slaughter on loving Dust
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 10:38
|
|
|
Katana Gomai posted:The better team (the legend in this case) got to decide whether they want 3 bans or 2 bans and pick which side to start on. The opposing team got the other option. Am I the only one who sees that as ridiculously unfair?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 12:06
|
|
|
qhat posted:Am I the only one who sees that as ridiculously unfair? I don't think it's unfair with a group stage format.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 12:13
|
|
|
Photex posted:I don't think it's unfair with a group stage format. What does that change? Is there a reason it shouldn't be 2 bans each or even 3 bans each, and just flipping a coin on which side to start? For some reason there is RNG in the most important part of the matchup, but none in the least important.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 12:15
|
|
|
qhat posted:What does that change? Is there a reason it shouldn't be 2 bans each or even 3 bans each, and just flipping a coin on which side to start? For some reason there is RNG in the most important part of the matchup, but none in the least important. again this is only for the group stage format, there should at least be SOME slight advantage for a higher seeded team.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 12:21
|
|
|
8/8 on the pick 'em and 199 points in fantasy. Yesterday wasn't too bad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 13:50
|
|
|
I was 7/8 and 152 points. Not a bad start. Too bad I won't see another match until Friday 
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 14:10
|
|
|
A TURGID FATSO posted:I was 7/8 and 152 points. Not a bad start. Too bad I won't see another match until Friday Apparently nv is a bad team. Had half my team suck balls. Got 102 points which nets me in the top %91. Goodbye golden wet floor sign. At least I have my Doritos from last year
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 14:15
|
|
|
5/8 (seriously, gently caress nv for being bad and VP for suddenly being good) and 153 points
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 14:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
I unironically love these puff pieces on pro CS players. It's pretty fun for a newb like me who doesn't know most of these teams from a hole in the ground. That little vignette before the VP match made me root for VP and I was happy to see them killdozer. Markeloff is kind of adorable
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 15:08
|
|
