|
 including the tagline: Also:  
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 09:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
In this documentary, we will reveal that all of De Palma's movies are the things he keeps seeing whenever he peeks out his window (said window faces a brick wall).
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 09:27
|
|
|
Whoa. Cheel make good! Any other Film Junk fans out there?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 10:54
|
|
|
Palpek posted:
No ring?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 13:20
|
|
|
Sick
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Looks like he fits right in to the Blade Runner poster
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
A CRUNK BIRD posted:As bad as the Avengers movies are (they're really bad) I think the people behind this stuff are smart enough to know that everyone knows Spider-Man's whole deal at this point and there'll be a brief scene of Tony Stark recruiting Peter Parker from his high school all "we've been watching you" or whatever "Hey kid, ever driven a Lambo before?"
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
Palpek posted:I hope it's more like Michael Bay's Power Rangers. From a couple days ago, but they already did that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw5vcUPyL90
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
I Before E posted:"Hey kid, ever driven a Lambo before?" Officially licensed Lamborghini Spider Buggy coming soon exclusive to Toys'R'Us. I still can't believe that there were official Lamborghini and Bugatti toys that transform into space robots sold to children recently, thanks to Transformers 4. teagone posted:From a couple days ago, but they already did that. Some people unironically want next year's Power Rangers movie to be like this. The MSJ fucked around with this message at 07:42 on Apr 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 07:21
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Some people unironically want next year's Power Rangers movie to be like this. I'm gonna shove all of them into a single locker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 07:54
|
|
|
teagone posted:From a couple days ago, but they already did that. I would hate every second of it but I really want to see the full movie of this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
I watched literally ten seconds of that and turned it off. Please stop trying to make things "cool." It is never cool.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:25
|
|
|
The guy who directed that directed Torque, that's all you need to know about that to understand what he was going for.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:30
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:I watched literally ten seconds of that and turned it off. U sound uncool
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:31
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:I watched literally ten seconds of that and turned it off. It's like that on purpose. Watch it as a commentary on what Michael Bay has done with the Transformers and Ninja Turtles IPs on the big screen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
teagone posted:It's like that on purpose. Watch it as a commentary on what Michael Bay has done with the Transformers and Ninja Turtles IPs on the big screen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:No. It's giving people exactly what they want, gritty CONSEQUENCES FOR REAL garbage, and showing it's loving awful. And it worked 100% because there is a Wikipedia article for it discussing how much it was praised. I was paraphrasing/summarizing what I read from the hitfix exclusive I had bookmarked. quote:This is a fan film, and as such, it's amazing, because it is not an act of devotion to a property. Instead, it's a lacerating straight-faced comment on where we are with these movies. It's not just the "dark and gritty" approach, it's the use of a property that was little more than a cynical merchandising trick the first time around. article here if anyone cares to read it: http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/world-exclusive-what-are-katee-sackhoff-and-james-van-der-beek-doing-in-joseph-kahns-powerrangers
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:The guy who directed that directed Torque, that's all you need to know about that to understand what he was going for. Joseph Kahn is a genius and I've lost count of how many times I've watched Detention.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Guy Mann posted:Joseph Kahn is a genius and I've lost count of how many times I've watched Detention. Agreed. Detention is amazing 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
teagone posted:It's like that on purpose. Watch it as a commentary on what Michael Bay has done with the Transformers and Ninja Turtles IPs on the big screen. Those movies are only reflecting what was already in the franchise for years. Transformers had a movie that messed up many children because it killed all their beloved characters in the first 30 minutes. Yes, it's the 1986 one. Just be glad they don't have Optimus getting power by kissing a little girl.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
That reminds me that I need to rewatch Detention again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 07:05
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:The guy who directed that directed Torque, that's all you need to know about that to understand what he was going for. And it's produced by the guy that dresses like the Crow and produced Dredd. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 07:16
|
|
|
Woah, a scary house poster: It's a year of the scary house, soon we'll be able to do a top-10 scariest ghost house of 2016 list:   
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 07:27
|
|
|
effectual posted:And it's produced by the guy that dresses like the Crow and produced Dredd. Sting?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 08:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 09:38
|
|
|
Yup.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 09:48
|
|
|
teagone posted:From a couple days ago, but they already did that. This is awesome. I mean, it's obvious just watching that it's the creators having fun turning something so bright into something so over-the-top. Plus it's Dawson v Starbuck, how can you not love it. MikeJF fucked around with this message at 10:24 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 10:22
|
|
|
Poster Six-Pack: Bunch 'o Stuff Edition    Subtle. Real subtle.  
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 11:45
|
|
|
Why kiimo, why?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:31
|
|
|
I'm Nightcrawlers hosed up wall eyes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:41
|
|
|
I really want to enjoy the new X-Men film but all the promo material looks so loving bad. Although I guess in fairness, the promo material for Days of Future Past looked like poo poo too, and people liked that one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 13:28
|
|
|
Woebin posted:I really want to enjoy the new X-Men film but all the promo material looks so loving bad. The promos for First Class was complete poo poo and yet it was a good movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
Well, Fox doesn't have comics to market, so ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8yzKzwmCdU e: Are they allowed to make toys and mobile games with the license? Maybe there's just nothing related that they can promote. Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 14:30 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
I literally thought this was an old magazine ad for like, the first one from the early 2000s. This looks like the kind of corny advertisement they had back then, not something that came out in 2016.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:e: Are they allowed to make toys and mobile games with the license? Maybe there's just nothing related that they can promote. Marvel has to sign off on that stuff in some way, and they don't anymore. There were toys for some of the earlier pre-MCU movies. They also allowed Wolverine figures for several of the movies from Hot Toys, a high end Japanese figure company. And recently allowed a Deadpool figure for that movie. That's about it though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:Well, Fox doesn't have comics to market, so ... Really? Using the opening song from Guardians? I mean I know they don't exactly own the song, but when it comes to comic book movies, it's basically theirs now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:42
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:Why kiimo, why? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
Distorted Kiwi posted:
To be fair, that is incredibly subtle for a porn movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 15:46
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:Well, Fox doesn't have comics to market, so ... 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
Woebin posted:But Cyclops' beams don't heat anything up, they're just force! I was going to joke about Wikipedia probably proving you wrong but they literally have a 2 page explanation of how the beams work and yeah it's pretty loving dumb and cab be summed up with "it just works"
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:12
|
|