|
stinkles1112 posted:My dudes did you not read my post That's what prompted my asking. So dope.
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
rabidsquid posted:What's budget to you, so we have some kind of base line to start with Eleven thousand dollars
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
stinkles1112 posted:Yeah you would say that, because you're a gigantic Johnny Raincloud all the drat time 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
Injuryprone posted:That's what prompted my asking. So dope. Here's one that baaaarely exceeds the budget: W/R Rally, Really 4 Expedition Envoy 2 Stoneforge Acolyte 4 Weapons Trainer 3 Zada's Commando 4 Kor Castigator 4 Firemantle Mage 3 Lantern Scout 2 Reckless Bushwhacker 2 Nahiri, the Harbinger 3 Lightning Axe 3 Fiery Temper 1 Avacyn's Judgment 4 Captain's Claws 4 Battlefield Forge 4 Ally Encampment 7 Plains 6 Mountain Another just barely under $50 UR-Fastest 2 Zurgo Bellstriker 3 Insolent Neonate 2 Abbot of Keral Keep 4 Elusive Spellfist 4 Stormchaser Mage 4 Slip Through Space 2 Expedite 4 Titan's Strength 2 Rush of Adrenaline 3 Tormenting Voice 2 Lightning Axe 4 Fiery Temper 2 Just the Wind 1 Fevered Visions 4 Shivan Reef 4 Highland Lake 10 Mountain 3 Island I like madness ok sit on my Facebook fucked around with this message at 23:41 on Apr 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
wotc has the sisue that individual employees are given a lot of free reign and there is basically no accountability. if you've been there long enough you're never getting fired
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Injuryprone posted:$20-40 What play style is your favorite? Do you like smashing face in combat? Crazy combos? Controlling the game until you play your favorite finisher creature/card? All of the above and more are deck choices for you if you play pauper. If you play online you have way more chances to play but you should just convince more ppl to play paper pauper instead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
born on a buy you posted:wotc has the sisue that individual employees are given a lot of free reign and there is basically no accountability. if you've been there long enough you're never getting fired wotc is like a textbook case of pioneer advantage, except it also applies to their old time employees too it seems like
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
PleasantDirge posted:What play style is your favorite? Do you like smashing face in combat? Crazy combos? Controlling the game until you play your favorite finisher creature/card? All of the above and more are deck choices for you if you play pauper. If you play online you have way more chances to play but you should just convince more ppl to play paper pauper instead. Yeah but if you are a person who wants to have fun at fnm pauper isn't a thing for 99% of people because stores barely run paper pauper events and they almost certainly aren't on Friday. But yeah just throw together a cheap aggro deck that attacks with some kind of unique angle if possible and maybe get lucky. If you're having fun you've already won!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
Injuryprone posted:$20-40 Mono-U Brains.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
It is hilarious to me that MaRo still thinks that complexity is the greatest threat to magic's long term success when it's obviously WotC's incompetence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
ShadeofBlue posted:It is hilarious to me that MaRo still thinks that complexity is the greatest threat to magic's long term success when it's obviously WotC's incompetence. It's like they want their business to fail. Much like Games Workshop. I'm glad Hearthstone's such a huge success, it finally lit a fire under Wizard's rear end in regards to digital format. Especially with Hearthstone's announcement of 50million active users today.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
Thisuck posted:It's like they want their business to fail. Much like Games Workshop. I'm glad Hearthstone's such a huge success, it finally lit a fire under Wizard's rear end in regards to digital format. Especially with Hearthstone's announcement of 50million active users today. C'thun anf Yoggs excellent adventure is a really good and fun set with a bunch of interesting poo poo going on. Hearthstone is a cool and fun game. Meanwhile I refuse to use the mtgo client for anything other than standard playtesting during beta. Count Bleck fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Apr 27, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
All you nerds should check out Spellweaver too, it just released on steam and it is pretty sweet, I like it a lot better than Hearthstone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
Just watched Enter the Battlefield... Wow was it bad and Patick Chapin is the biggest goober I've ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
I wonder what Magic would look like if they could start over, as a lot of what we bitch about regarding stuff in and around the game (and stuff Wizards complains about) seem baked into the very fabric of Magic, or are at least so ingrained that no one at Wizards wants to change it. Surely someone on the mothership has written this article before, right?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
mcmagic is right, the blue brain deck isn't good. you'll gon2-2 in your normal 4 round fnm if you're lucky
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
It costs $2 to play 1 game of magic on mtgo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:I wonder what Magic would look like if they could start over, as a lot of what we bitch about regarding stuff in and around the game (and stuff Wizards complains about) seem baked into the very fabric of Magic, or are at least so ingrained that no one at Wizards wants to change it. You'd probably get to something similar to Hex, which is kind of a garbage game too in a lot of ways in that the main problem is gonna be bad design and bad players forever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
uPen posted:It costs $2 to play 1 game of magic on mtgo. You have to have prize support though! Did you think these digital didn't cost us anything?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Telex posted:You'd probably get to something similar to Hex, which is kind of a garbage game too in a lot of ways in that the main problem is gonna be bad design and bad players forever. Which is a shame, because they had some solid ideas to start with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:I wonder what Magic would look like if they could start over, as a lot of what we bitch about regarding stuff in and around the game (and stuff Wizards complains about) seem baked into the very fabric of Magic, or are at least so ingrained that no one at Wizards wants to change it. http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/starting-over-2015-01-26 good luck have fun
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Just watched Enter the Battlefield... Wow was it bad and Patick Chapin is the biggest goober I've ever seen. As I watched it I was searching, in my mind, for what word it was that was right on the tip of my tongue every time Chapin was talking to the camera. It was goober Edit: seriously you guys go try Spellweaver, it's sweet. The design principles are similar to magic but they fixed the mana system in a really interesting way and reduced the variance pretty substantially
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
dragon enthusiast posted:http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/starting-over-2015-01-26 There is so much in there that is going to piss some people off. I particularly like this one. "Power-levelwise, you misjudged the power level for spells and creatures. You made the first much too high and the latter much too low. We spent over fifteen years just trying to get those two to the same level."
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Sickening posted:There is so much in there that is going to piss some people off. ....And then spent another 5 going waaaaay past that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
uPen posted:It costs $2 to play 1 game of magic on mtgo. It costs nothing to play a game of Magic on MTGO actually If all you want to do is play the game, you can play casual games for free as much as you want.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
Anyone have weird/stupid pauper brews? I have soul sisters and izzet blitz built but i want something dumber for the CK pauper tournament.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
I'm new to Magic. I don't have much of a base of cards and I'm feeling a bit limited playing with what I've picked up from sealed product. I play primarily kitchen table, have my first casual night at the store next week, and plan on graduating to FNM in a couple of months. Vendors on MagicCardMarket.eu are selling a single set of commons/uncommons for around £1.20/£3 for SoI, and £0.70/£1 for everything else in Standard. A full set of four of every common and uncommon in Standard would set me back around £60 delivered with storage boxes. For price context, that's 18 boosters. Just the commons delivered with storage boxes would run £26 delivered, which is 7-8 boosters. Is this incredible value in my position or am I about to fall into a trap and pay a huge premium for buying everything at once? The plan would be to netdeck from Pauper/Peasant formats in Standard or even use decks that did well in Limited tournaments and use that as a starting point to gitbetter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
dragon enthusiast posted:http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/starting-over-2015-01-26 Somehow I knew that, if such an article existed, it would be written by MaRo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
Judd Stackington posted:I'm new to Magic. I don't have much of a base of cards and I'm feeling a bit limited playing with what I've picked up from sealed product. I play primarily kitchen table, have my first casual night at the store next week, and plan on graduating to FNM in a couple of months. Unless you highly value [the ability to swap decks immediately] vs [ordering singles after deciding on a decklist], it's better to order singles as needed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
rabidsquid posted:What's budget to you, so we have some kind of base line to start with I only have $11,000 to work with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
clamiam45 posted:I only have $11,000 to work with. Have I got a foiled out vintage deck for you
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:Have I got a foiled out vintage deck for you Too soon.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:Have I got a foiled out vintage deck for you For 11k no you don't. http://www.mtggoldfish.com/archetype/vintage-uwr-mentor-25516#paper 17k for the poo poo tier uwr mentor deck w/o a single foil or beta thing
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
Christ, the prices for Power and duals have shot through the roof.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
Fortunately for all of us ETERNAL MASTERS is right around the corner! Finally, the opportunity to break into eternal formats that I've been waiting for!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
stinkles1112 posted:Fortunately for all of us ETERNAL MASTERS is right around the corner! Finally, the opportunity to break into eternal formats that I've been waiting for! 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
On further consideration, $4,000ish doesn't seem too insane for a Lotus. It's $2,000 for a Mox or an Ancestral that seems super high.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
SEX HAVER 40000 posted:Anyone have weird/stupid pauper brews? I have soul sisters and izzet blitz built but i want something dumber for the CK pauper tournament. The dumbest deck in pauper history is dead dog, and it's not good, and people have wanted it to be good for like six years.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
rabidsquid posted:The dumbest deck in pauper history is dead dog, and it's not good, and people have wanted it to be good for like six years. List? I need a bad deck to play in this same event.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
SEX HAVER 40000 posted:Anyone have weird/stupid pauper brews? I have soul sisters and izzet blitz built but i want something dumber for the CK pauper tournament. It's not really a "brew" in that it is a known-quantity at this point but this is probably the coolest deck in pauper Cactrot posted:List? I need a bad deck to play in this same event. it's an insanely bad deck that tries to get value out of tortured existence, wild mongrel, and putrid imp. it's not actually that interesting, the joke is you discard creatures for value then get them back
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 02:11
|
|
