|
This woman at the front is pure cringe, jesus christ.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:43 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 20:55 |
|
Take my money! That's a huge increase.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:43 |
|
4.4x / 3.6x = 1.22x as fast as a Titan X. Maybe 4.4x / 3.7x = 1.18x.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:43 |
|
Did I see that right, the 1080 is close to 200W? 700$+ bomb incoming.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:44 |
|
Tim Sweeney looks incredibly uncomfortable up there
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:44 |
|
sauer kraut posted:Did I see that right, the 1080 is close to 200W? Available in limited numbers in September.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:44 |
|
Thank God I didn't bite on the 980 ti deals. TAKE ALL OF MY MONEY 1080
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:45 |
|
I predict $500 for the 1080.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:45 |
|
This makes the decision of whether to buy the 1080 or wait for the big Pascal/Vegas especially tough, I'll probably still try to wait but we will see.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:45 |
|
Tim Sweeny on stage chatting Unreal Engine. Price and availability wheeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnn damnit.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:46 |
|
I'll keep my 970 for now since I don't need much more (yet). But if the price is right this will be very tempting.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:46 |
|
Nfcknblvbl posted:I predict $500 for the 1080. I'd be ok paying $500 for a card with that big of a leap over the Titan X.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:46 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Holy gently caress 1x 1080 is faster than a Titan X or 980 SLI, by a significant margin apparently. Where does the Ti fall in to that graph? It seems it was left out, so the 1080 isn't faster than 980Ti SLI. Still, that's a huge improvement, and at a lot less power, as Ti's are about 250W.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:47 |
|
I'm not sure how to read that graph - it looks impressive but also like they're trying to twist the data a bit? It seems to be a graph of "relative" performance with no data point at 1x - so relative to what? The figures look like it's towards but a chunk below twice the performance of a 980, but the graph makes the difference look far more dramatic..
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:47 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Where does the Ti fall in to that graph? It seems it was left out, so the 1080 isn't faster than 980Ti SLI. Still, that's a huge improvement, and at a lot less power, as Ti's are about 250W. The 980 Ti is basically equivalent to a Titan X (since aftermarket cards are available for the 980 Ti and were restricted/disapproved by NVIDIA for the Titan X). The Titan X outperforms a little if you put a hybrid cooler on it but ultimately a ref board can't keep up with the G1 Ultra Extreme Hardcore Thunderstrike Classified Gaming Editions of the world.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:49 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Where does the Ti fall in to that graph? It seems it was left out, so the 1080 isn't faster than 980Ti SLI. Still, that's a huge improvement, and at a lot less power, as Ti's are about 250W. The Titan X is slightly faster than the 980ti so there is no need.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:49 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Where does the Ti fall in to that graph? It seems it was left out, so the 1080 isn't faster than 980Ti SLI. Still, that's a huge improvement, and at a lot less power, as Ti's are about 250W.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:49 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Where does the Ti fall in to that graph? In the same spot as the Titan-X.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:50 |
|
980ti's for $299 incoming RIP This is the 780ti all over again
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:51 |
|
Froist posted:It seems to be a graph of "relative" performance with no data point at 1x - so relative to what? The figures look like it's towards but a chunk below twice the performance of a 980, but the graph makes the difference look far more dramatic.. You compare the relative performance numbers. 3.7x vs 4.4x still tells you something, whether it's measured in frames-per-second or multiples of a 960 (). The 1080 is ~1.2x as fast as a 980 Ti.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:51 |
|
havenwaters posted:I'll keep my 970 for now since I don't need much more (yet). But if the price is right this will be very tempting. I'm in the same boat with a 970, but it's almost always worth it to buy a graphic card the minute it comes out (given that you plan on buying it at all). The price of GPUs drop so slowly that you're gaining much more utility by buying the card instantly, and taking the small $ hit, but getting to enjoy the product for its full life span.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:51 |
|
DrDork posted:Available in limited numbers in September.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:52 |
|
Froist posted:I'm not sure how to read that graph - it looks impressive but also like they're trying to twist the data a bit? The graph is accurate, but undeniably a bit shady.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:52 |
|
Froist posted:I'm not sure how to read that graph - it looks impressive but also like they're trying to twist the data a bit? Looks like its roughly twice the speed of 980sli with maybe 20% more power
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:52 |
|
2.1ghz omg
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:52 |
|
Taima posted:I'm in the same boat with a 970, but it's almost always worth it to buy a graphic card the minute it comes out (given that you plan on buying it at all). Yeah. hmmm gpu clock 2.1ghz. fun.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:53 |
Holy poo poo, 2.1GHz on air cooling with the 1080.
|
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:53 |
|
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:53 |
|
11ghz memory, 2.1ghz core, 67c
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:54 |
|
~hurriedly F5's newegg~
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:54 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Holy poo poo, 2.1GHz on air cooling with the 1080. Wonder if that's "stock"? The char has the 1080 as ~25% faster than a 980Ti, but I assume that's stock-vs-stock. Bump the 980Ti up the 20-30% of a normal overclock and it's back up to par, so if the 1080 doesn't overclock well it won't be much of an actual upgrade in raw horsepower, but hopefully will be a substantial improvement in DX12 and future games, plus VR blah blah blah.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:55 |
|
pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffuck 2100 mhz
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:55 |
|
What about the GTX1070? I want a GTX1070!
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:55 |
|
DrDork posted:Wonder if that's "stock"? The char has the 1080 as ~25% faster than a 980Ti, but I assume that's stock-vs-stock. Bump the 980Ti up the 20-30% of a normal overclock and it's back up to par, so if the 1080 doesn't overclock well it won't be much of an actual upgrade in raw horsepower, but hopefully will be a substantial improvement in DX12 and future games, plus VR blah blah blah. at 67c i hope we got some room to bump voltage and clocks.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:55 |
|
Those 3dmark scores were at what, 1.8ghz lol
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:56 |
|
so when it the 1080ti? haha. gently caress this card sounds insane.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:57 |
|
$299 GTX1070 $299 GTX1070 $299 GTX1070
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:57 |
|
Don Lapre posted:at 67c i hope we got some room to bump voltage and clocks.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:57 |
|
spasticColon posted:$299 GTX1070 $299 GTX1070 $299 GTX1070 I'd be sad for someone I know who bought a 970 last week if it's at that price.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:58 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 20:55 |
|
Coming from a 560ti - this is gonna be great.
|
# ? May 7, 2016 02:59 |