|
Peanut President posted:The problem is that most people who watch NASCAR don't give a gently caress about the Wood Brothers, Smokey, or anything before 2008. Hell I bet most NASCAR fans don't even know who Dale Earnhardt Junior's dad is. He's the dude who finally got NASCAR to let their steering wheels turn to the left right
|
# ? May 9, 2016 21:13 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 12:14 |
|
Peanut President posted:The problem is that most people who watch NASCAR don't give a gently caress about the Wood Brothers, Smokey, or anything before 2008. Hell I bet most NASCAR fans don't even know who Dale Earnhardt Junior's dad is. Pfft, Junior Johnson. Think about it. That's why he's Dale Earnhardt, Junior, sumbitch.
|
# ? May 9, 2016 22:08 |
|
There's not a 20 year old southerner that doesn't know who Dale Jr's dad is They grew up watching their great grandad cheer for him
|
# ? May 10, 2016 00:56 |
|
Of course people know who Dale Jr's dad is, he's driving the number 88 that his father made famous.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 01:03 |
|
It boggles my mind what a oval office Teresa Earnhardt is. Dale would be so disappointed. http://www.sportingnews.com/nascar/...op141brytlirn6g
|
# ? May 10, 2016 03:05 |
|
mearn posted:Of course people know who Dale Jr's dad is, he's driving the number 88 that his father made famous.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 03:29 |
|
Elitist Bitch posted:It boggles my mind what a oval office Teresa Earnhardt is. Dale would be so disappointed. That's the chance you take when you marry a trophy wife.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 03:39 |
|
Elitist Bitch posted:It boggles my mind what a oval office Teresa Earnhardt is. Dale would be so disappointed. Except for the part where she was always a useless piece of poo poo who got way more in a last name than anyone that was actually part of that family.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 03:50 |
|
Does she still own that Garage-mahal?
|
# ? May 10, 2016 04:16 |
|
Never mind, the CMT special is pretty good. Give it a watch.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 04:52 |
|
Elitist Bitch posted:It boggles my mind what a oval office Teresa Earnhardt is. Dale would be so disappointed. The hilarious thing is she had this reputation before he died, his relationship with her always strained the family, and he still left her in sole control of his legacy. He would be 100% on board with this as her having control is how he set it up. I'd be shocked to hear he didn't tell her to burn it down if he wasn't there to oversee it totally.
|
# ? May 10, 2016 05:37 |
|
What if I told you a story where everyone involved is poo poo? http://speed51.com/words-protests-exchanged-amid-mahoning-modified-action/
|
# ? May 11, 2016 00:00 |
|
Casey Mears is running a Smokey Yunick throwback for Darlington. https://twitter.com/schwartz_chris/status/730180550779097089 Best one so far in my opinion
|
# ? May 11, 2016 01:16 |
|
it'd prolly be easier to just punch Brian France in the dick
|
# ? May 11, 2016 01:17 |
|
Boomer The Cannon posted:What if I told you a story where everyone involved is poo poo? There used to be a rumored rule (20 years ago) at a track around here where anyone (supposedly fans included) could claim the winner's engine after the feature. I never heard of it actually happening. I would just assume that's when the firearms would come out.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 03:05 |
|
theacox posted:There used to be a rumored rule (20 years ago) at a track around here where anyone (supposedly fans included) could claim the winner's engine after the feature. I never heard of it actually happening. I would just assume that's when the firearms would come out. claimer rules have been a thing for decades at short tracks, and I've even heard the fan thing, too generally, the first year it's instituted, no one uses it because everyone has an illegal engine (hence why the class is now claimer) second year, someone gets mad enough to break the ice, 9 times out of 10 not worth it, guy techs clean (this is because he's now running cheater shocks) third year, no one uses it, everyone techs clean (engines) half the field has moved up or down to a class where they can cheat year 5, rule dropped, class half dead and 8% less fans in the seats than year 1 e- note, this doesn't apply to the lowest style of car like street stock or enduro, those guys don't give a gently caress and happily claim each others cars and engines as a feature of the class, and it usually works quite well Seizure Meat fucked around with this message at 05:48 on May 11, 2016 |
# ? May 11, 2016 05:46 |
|
also, I've found it better for all involved if a track offers a bounty on the guy winning, instead, preferably one that rolls over week to week and increases
|
# ? May 11, 2016 05:49 |
|
c-c-combo! .... and the fallout from the death of Syracuse starts to settle across the land
|
# ? May 11, 2016 06:27 |
|
http://www.nascar.com/en_us/news-media/articles/2016/5/11/kyle-busch-crew-chief-penalized-kansas-2016.html Kyle Busch and Joe Gibbs racing are a disgrace to the sport. Mr Gibbs if you love Jesus so much why does your team keep cheating? I call for resignation and end of team asap.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 18:20 |
|
How about they hand down a harsher penalty. Suspending a crew chief doesn't mean much these days.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 18:23 |
|
yeah, they should carry out decimation of the entire team like the Romans did
|
# ? May 11, 2016 19:02 |
|
Apparently one lug nut had no threads so it looked like there were five nuts on the wheel but one was just glued there.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 20:39 |
|
Is the 5 lugnut thing just a carry over tradition thing? Why not go to a single, and cut all this garbage cheating out?
|
# ? May 11, 2016 20:43 |
|
mearn posted:Apparently one lug nut had no threads so it looked like there were five nuts on the wheel but one was just glued there. lol this is some good cheating
|
# ? May 11, 2016 21:01 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2016 21:36 |
|
fukken dope
|
# ? May 11, 2016 22:10 |
|
L_Harrison posted:How about they hand down a harsher penalty. Suspending a crew chief doesn't mean much these days. How about treating it like they got disqualified from the race, give up any prize money and 0 points from race.. in the world of one win gets you in.. you can try stupid poo poo and hope you don't get caught.. especially early in the season. This was a blatant cheat not a "bend the rules a bit"
|
# ? May 11, 2016 22:22 |
|
tater_salad posted:How about treating it like they got disqualified from the race, give up any prize money and 0 points from race.. in the world of one win gets you in.. you can try stupid poo poo and hope you don't get caught.. especially early in the season. DQing a race winner for missing a lug nut, which they could do legally like 2 races ago, would be extra dumb even for nascar
|
# ? May 11, 2016 22:27 |
|
kidcoelacanth posted:fukken dope
|
# ? May 11, 2016 22:33 |
|
Maybe it's kuz I hate the super buschio bros, but it's not a "missing lug nut" it's a glued on lug nut so that when they put the tire on it looks like all 5 are on and they don't get black flagged. It's not an oops we tried to get by with 4 For now it's here give us a nickel and now you have to call your crew chief on the phone.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 22:49 |
|
VikingSkull posted:claimer rules have been a thing for decades at short tracks, and I've even heard the fan thing, too We had claim rules at Seekonk when we ran in the weekly late model series there. It was only used in our division 1 time that I remember and it didn't work. I forget the details but remember the guy who was accused was like, say goodbye to your money rear end in a top hat. You had to pony up like $500, I think, claim that somebody was cheating and if you were wrong, the track kept your money. Basically we tore this car down for nothing, you lose your security deposit mother fucker.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 23:11 |
|
tater_salad posted:Maybe it's kuz I hate the super buschio bros, but it's not a "missing lug nut" it's a glued on lug nut so that when they put the tire on it looks like all 5 are on and they don't get black flagged. It's not an oops we tried to get by with 4 Right but you forget that literally nobody gives a poo poo about the lugs and its a silly situation in the first place Also, Kevin Harvick had a fake fuckin gas tank in the car and he got 25 points, at a time when last place was worth 34 points. In the current system, thats .7 of a point. The only people I can ever remember really getting creamed are Carl Long (lol) and MWR. NASCAR doesn't take away wins, ever, and even if they did, it wouldn't be for a goddamn lug nut.
|
# ? May 11, 2016 23:13 |
|
bigbillystyle posted:We had claim rules at Seekonk when we ran in the weekly late model series there. It was only used in our division 1 time that I remember and it didn't work. I forget the details but remember the guy who was accused was like, say goodbye to your money rear end in a top hat. You had to pony up like $500, I think, claim that somebody was cheating and if you were wrong, the track kept your money. Basically we tore this car down for nothing, you lose your security deposit mother fucker. Claim rules own.
|
# ? May 12, 2016 00:08 |
|
I think that lugnut thing is hilarious and exactly the type of cheating NASCAR needs to have come back. e- the actions detrimental thing tells you they had them on a technicality, prolly something along the lines of "you said there had to be 5 glued and 5 tight, that bitch is tightly glued what you talkin bout" "ACTIONS DETRIMENTAL THEN WISEASS"
|
# ? May 12, 2016 01:11 |
|
I do like the lugnuts thing - technically it follows the letter of the rule, but not the intent.
|
# ? May 12, 2016 01:38 |
|
At the dirt track I went to growing up in the 80's-90's, I think the engine claiming rule in late models was: any other driver could buy the winner's engine for the predetermined fair cost of an engine. It was in place so you wouldn't have people spending $50k on a motor and winning every week. Not sure how it worked if it was actually determined they were cheating when they broke it down. But I'm guessing that's different than the rule Billy was referencing.
|
# ? May 12, 2016 04:35 |
|
SPiTZ posted:At the dirt track I went to growing up in the 80's-90's, I think the engine claiming rule in late models was: any other driver could buy the winner's engine for the predetermined fair cost of an engine. It was in place so you wouldn't have people spending $50k on a motor and winning every week. Not sure how it worked if it was actually determined they were cheating when they broke it down. But I'm guessing that's different than the rule Billy was referencing. There are a lot of variants of how they do it, but the real difference is in the class and/or why it's being instituted. Low class, small bucks? It works like a champ. Late model as in wedge style, 4 link rear late? lol they are showing up in $150,000 haulers they are just gonna cheat in seventeen other ways
|
# ? May 12, 2016 05:16 |
|
also, for the double post, we've had two legends of the modifieds die within a few weeks Bill Wimble went a few weeks ago and 5 time Langhorne winner and NASCAR Sportsman champ Dutch Hoag went today
|
# ? May 12, 2016 05:22 |
|
Boomer The Cannon posted:I do like the lugnuts thing - technically it follows the letter of the rule, but not the intent. I'm down with this as long as they also promise to stop doing bullshit moves like caution clocks, fining drivers for commenting on safety, and all the other nascar bullshit.
|
# ? May 12, 2016 13:49 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 12:14 |
|
I am down with no pitting during cautions. You should win the race on the track not by lugnut cheating. I guess we need cars that can pass other cars then so this will never work.
|
# ? May 12, 2016 15:15 |