|
Another weird potential 3DS port: Runbow, a Wii U-exclusive versus party platformer with a colour-switching gimmick, has a listing for a retail 3DS release on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Nighthawk-Int...awk+Interactive
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
Has Fantasy Life ever gone on sale on eShop?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:0.99999... = 1 no it doesn't
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
Housh posted:Has Fantasy Life ever gone on sale on eShop? Yeah, it did during a Nintendo Summer Sale about a year ago.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Weedle posted:It's loving bonkers that people act like Nintendo is killing their dog because they're charging $10 for a 30-hour RPG that's widely considered an all-time classic of the genre. Just because you can get games for $3 in the Steam summer sale doesn't mean they're not worth more than that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Lunchmeat Larry posted:Nintendo is proud of you for defending them. Your 5 Nintendo Points gift card is in the post
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Man, Nintendo defense isn't worth what it used to be.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Use of the word "entitled" should be probatable imo
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
I swear, these loving millenials wanting cheap games...
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
I will never get goons obsession with defending a companies outdated policy. You are not making any money why do you care?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
goferchan posted:Is it? I played them all as a kid when they were coming out but forgot the tier lists. Good to know I'm gonna go sip some coffee on the porch and fire that sucker up on the Wii U gamepad right now i still like dual strike but AW2 is def the one i like most really i'd love a new one but the chances of that seem slimmer and slimmer the more years go on...
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
I made a joke about how non-negative opinions about Nintendo weren't allowed a while back, but it's really starting to look like I was right. Is it really so hard to accept that some people aren't upset about every single thing Nintendo does? And if you're tired of hearing the word "entitled" I suggest you stop acting entitled. I'll stop immediately, I promise.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
codenameFANGIO posted:Use of the word "entitled" should be probatable imo its a good way to know a poster is retarded
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I will never get goons obsession with defending a companies outdated policy. You are not making any money why do you care? Eh, Nintendo are within their rights in dictating their prices. They want to equate prices with quality, and most of the time this has been the case. Most of the time. It would be better if prices were lower though, but discounts will have to do in the meantime. Or wait until it reappears as a Nintendo Selects release.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
Davincie posted:its a good way to know a poster is retarded Are slurs necessary?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
No one is saying they don't have the right but the consumer has the right to complain. It's just dumb, like the word entitled, which somehow became an insult. Even though it shouldn't be.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
LoveBoatCaptain posted:I made a joke about how non-negative opinions about Nintendo weren't allowed a while back, but it's really starting to look like I was right. Is it really so hard to accept that some people aren't upset about every single thing Nintendo does? Bitch, I know you aren't telling me I hate Nintendo right now. jivjov posted:Are slurs necessary? I just got a bingo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Lol I missed that post, dude is to invested in Nintendo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
nintendo is okay but they're a company and companies want money so they'll have business practices that are bad for the customer and in conclusion full communism now
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:in conclusion full communism now 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:No one is saying they don't have the right but the consumer has the right to complain. It's just dumb, like the word entitled, which somehow became an insult. Even though it shouldn't be. The literal definition of entitled isn't an insult, but the word has pretty much become a shorthand for having a false sense of entitlement, which is what many people are tired of seeing. You're right, there's nothing wrong with complaining if you feel entitled to something and you aren't getting it, but if you (in the general sense, not you specifically) lash out at the people who disagree with you and act like they're just mindlessly defending Nintendo it's going to look like your sense of entitlement is out of proportion. Also, I think slurs are great, they make it so much easier to figure out who to ignore.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Isn't the whole price discussion kind of moot anyway? They wouldn't charge that much if they weren't able to make adequate money charging that amount. Just like any other company. The best sort of complaining a consumer can do is not purchase things they think they are being charged too much for. Right?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
jivjov posted:Are slurs necessary? yeah
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:33
|
|
|
LoveBoatCaptain posted:I made a joke about how non-negative opinions about Nintendo weren't allowed a while back, but it's really starting to look like I was right. Is it really so hard to accept that some people aren't upset about every single thing Nintendo does?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
Also, man. A game's price and quality are two totally different things. It's like any other product- you charge what you can get away with charging. It kinda comes down to whether there's a lesson to "teach" Nintendo, and if they care. There is a reduced value propostion to investing in a Nintendo Console, to a certain extent, because the first party titles never go on sale. However, the console itself is often half the price of its competitors, so you consider that maybe that purchase is being subsidized by Nintendo's always full-price games. Would I pay $60 for Star Fox Zero? Nah. I have no regrets about paying $60 for Splatoon, though. Similarly, I'd probably pay more than $40 for Monster Hunter if Capcom suddenly decided to start charging it like the Atlus tax. That franchise is like a crack rock the size of a human head, all for me. Do I prefer to pay like $20 or less for a game because it went on Steam Sale? Of course. The end result is that I pay more per game for fewer Nintendo games. Given their release schedule, I think that's honestly what they want.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
A lot of my goodwill towards Nintendo went out the door when Club Nintendo got replaced with the shittiest program ever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
My main issue with Nintendo is more with games like Star Fox 64 3D. The original came out in the 90s and the port was released in 2011, yet the game is still $40 on the eshop with cart prices being even more hilarious. It rarely goes on sale and when it does it basically just goes down to a more sensible baseline price. As someone who has never played a Star Fox game and has no investment in the series, this puts me off of ever bothering to purchase it. I feel there are a number of titles like this, which is more than a little disappointing. That said, while I personally feel anything over $5 is too much for some of the VC games that are 20-30 years old and running on pure nostalgia, the price point is still low enough that I pay for them without regret. That's my story. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:nintendo is okay but they're a company and companies want money so they'll have business practices that are bad for the customer and in conclusion full communism now Communism ftw
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
The Worst Bear posted:My main issue with Nintendo is more with games like Star Fox 64 3D. The original came out in the 90s and the port was released in 2011, yet the game is still $40 on the eshop with cart prices being even more hilarious. It rarely goes on sale and when it does it basically just goes down to a more sensible baseline price. As someone who has never played a Star Fox game and has no investment in the series, this puts me off of ever bothering to purchase it. I feel there are a number of titles like this, which is more than a little disappointing. That said, while I personally feel anything over $5 is too much for some of the VC games that are 20-30 years old and running on pure nostalgia, the price point is still low enough that I pay for them without regret. That's my story. Except that's kind of a lovely example because it's a great game that was beautifully remastered in 3D making good use of it so that people like you that never played the original could enjoy a version that was more up to date? Not to mention that it's worth the price and people will pay it. You can't really compare any of their 3D rereleases to anything on the VC, all of the ones I've seen have been pretty solid.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:i still like dual strike but AW2 is def the one i like most Advance Wars By Web still exists.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
star fox 3d looks a hell of a lot prettier than the original
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
The Colonel posted:star fox 3d looks a hell of a lot prettier than the original It's definitely a remake and not just a port.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
Slur posted:Advance Wars By Web still exists. AW is more than multiplayer though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
I tried the online multiplayer in Dark Conflict/Days of Ruin a few times but people would just disconnect once things start going wrong because they don't want to spend the next 10-15 minutes slowly losing
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
The Worst Bear posted:My main issue with Nintendo is more with games like Star Fox 64 3D. The original came out in the 90s and the port was released in 2011, yet the game is still $40 on the eshop with cart prices being even more hilarious. It rarely goes on sale and when it does it basically just goes down to a more sensible baseline price. As someone who has never played a Star Fox game and has no investment in the series, this puts me off of ever bothering to purchase it. I feel there are a number of titles like this, which is more than a little disappointing. That said, while I personally feel anything over $5 is too much for some of the VC games that are 20-30 years old and running on pure nostalgia, the price point is still low enough that I pay for them without regret. That's my story.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
I would be OK with the price of the virtual console titles IF they were linked to your nintendo account and not tied to your console
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Slur posted:Advance Wars By Web still exists. i want them to make the new game with support conversations so i can make lash and sonja kiss
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
LoveBoatCaptain posted:The literal definition of entitled isn't an insult, but the word has pretty much become a shorthand for having a false sense of entitlement, which is what many people are tired of seeing. They are just mindlessly defending nintendo tho. They have no stake or really any counterargument to speak of. It's just cheerleading.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:i want them to make the new game with support conversations so i can make lash and sonja kiss same.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
Nintendo software is typically more expensive because that's what their brand is worth. You start selling a bunch of old Mario games for a buck, and then Mario becomes cheap. They've made games that are considered works of art, and aren't supposed to lose their value over time. They're not supposed to be priced in the same category as mobile games, or old Playstation games. They're like Disney movies coming out of the Disney Vault, and Nintendo prices them in a way that makes them (seem) high end.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2016 20:25
|
|
