|
Sickening posted:Thanks for totally missing the point of that. lol, awesome. SHAME
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 12:28 |
|
|
jaegerx posted:Yup, I love my bank using that awesome cheap rear end VPS to host my financial information. EVERYONE SHOULD USE THE CLOUD FOR EVERYTHING. Dude's literally assembling parts for a database server like it's some baller gaming rig. I don't think it's a bank.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
Fiendish Dr. Wu posted:
Haha the gently caress is your issue?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 21:23
|
|
yeah everybody using a cloud provider is just dumb amirite lolol
|
CLAM DOWN posted:Haha the gently caress is your issue? obviously reading words is hard
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
Fiendish Dr. Wu posted:obviously reading words is hard Well then, get better at it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
Che Delilas posted:It's not a debate or anything but this probably hasn't been seen by some of the people in this thread and it's good for a chuckle. This is good too: https://gist.github.com/HisModusness/5624767 Edit: Here's the solution for any of you people trying to get a sweet dev job: quote:print("1\n2\nFizz\n4\nBuzz\nFizz\n7\n8\nFizz\nBuzz\n11\nFizz\n13\n14\nFizzBuzz\n16\n17\nFizz\n19\nBuzz\nFizz\n22\n23\nFizz\nBuzz\n26\nFizz\n28\n29\nFizzBuzz\n31\n32\nFizz\n34\nBuzz\nFizz\n37\n38\nFizz\nBuzz\n41\nFizz\n43\n44\nFizzBuzz\n46\n47\nFizz\n49\nBuzz\nFizz\n52\n53\nFizz\nBuzz\n56\nFizz\n58\n59\nFizzBuzz\n61\n62\nFizz\n64\nBuzz\nFizz\n67\n68\nFizz\nBuzz\n71\nFizz\n73\n74\nFizzBuzz\n76\n77\nFizz\n79\nBuzz\nFizz\n82\n83\nFizz\nBuzz\n86\nFizz\n88\n89\nFizzBuzz\n91\n92\nFizz\n94\nBuzz\nFizz\n97\n98\nFizz\n") Dr. Arbitrary fucked around with this message at 21:40 on Jun 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:
*snort*
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Anyone have any experience with cloud-based monitoring and alerting? We're just beginning to develop an Azure infrastructure and I'm curious how painful setting up something like the full Solarwinds software suite there would be; I'm guessing the I/O cost alone would outweigh the advantage of the location.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Wrath of the Bitch King posted:Anyone have any experience with cloud-based monitoring and alerting? We're just beginning to develop an Azure infrastructure and I'm curious how painful setting up something like the full Solarwinds software suite there would be; I'm guessing the I/O cost alone would outweigh the advantage of the location. Check out Datadog, we use that with AWS and it's pretty slick and not expensive.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Dell's Selling SonicWALL and Quest for $3 Billion. I was on the fence about abandoning SonicWALL wholesale (40 units). Dell just pushed me off. Thanks, Dell! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Well at least they didn't waste any money at all by investing in the products since the original acquisition.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
We need another gently caress Dell thread.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
Lord Dudeguy posted:Dell's Selling SonicWALL and Quest for $3 Billion. Been thinking about moving away myself, so I guess now's a good time to figure out an alternative for their web filtering and other CGSS stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Erwin posted:Dude's literally assembling parts for a database server like it's some baller gaming rig. I don't think it's a bank. It does have a hardware security dongle though, something requires some physical security action.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Well at least they didn't waste any money at all by investing in the products since the original acquisition. I was just thinking this. Who the gently caress still uses sonicwall? what is this 2004?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:I was just thinking this. Who the gently caress still uses sonicwall? what is this 2004? Checkpoint forever
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
Turns out that when you're taking on loving $50 billion in debt to acquire a company (EMC), you gotta find cash wherever you can. Spinning off SonicWall for a cool $3bill seems like an easy win for them. Albeit a drop in the bucket.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:I was just thinking this. Who the gently caress still uses sonicwall? what is this 2004? The company I work for does. Hell, I just set up a TZ300 for a client the other day 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Colonial Air Force posted:Been thinking about moving away myself, so I guess now's a good time to figure out an alternative for their web filtering and other CGSS stuff. For our branch locations that need integrated Wifi, I'm thinking Sophos' UTM solution. For our core locations, we're scoping out Checkpoint, Palo Alto, Cisco and Fortinet.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
Docjowles posted:Turns out that when you're taking on loving $50 billion in debt to acquire a company (EMC), you gotta find cash wherever you can. Spinning off SonicWall for a cool $3bill seems like an easy win for them. Albeit a drop in the bucket. The sale seem strange and I don't understand how it improves Dell's position in the market.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:I was just thinking this. Who the gently caress still uses sonicwall? what is this 2004? Me. Well, not me, but my company.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:I was just thinking this. Who the gently caress still uses sonicwall? what is this 2004?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
LochNessMonster posted:I think he means 25 people who'll be using the ERP software thats going to be installed on the server, not 25 people logging into the server itself. Huh, I'm not sure what's the difference here? I mean people connect remotely to the server through their ERP program at their PC, which uses some Oracle database, is what I understand... And there's some sort of asynchronous/autonomous terminal customization where sales points and such can continue working when the internet goes out(this is meant to be a temporary measure, they obviously shouldn't do this for weeks). We don't need this CAL deals for this, right? They never mentioned that. Do you mean people physically going to the server and logging in? That's definitely not how it works or was even mentioned, seems impossible even, locations are too remote from each other. Anyway it turns out there's a couple HP certified server vendors in town so I'm calling around and the owner almost instantly agreed to up the budget to 5k USD, so good times.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Don Tacorleone posted:Huh, I'm not sure what's the difference here? I mean people connect remotely to the server through their ERP program at their PC, which uses some Oracle database, is what I understand... And there's some sort of asynchronous/autonomous terminal customization where sales points and such can continue working when the internet goes out(this is meant to be a temporary measure, they obviously shouldn't do this for weeks). We don't need this CAL deals for this, right? They never mentioned that. edit: read this: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/volume-licensing/2014/03/10/licensing-how-to-when-do-i-need-a-client-access-license-cal/
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
adorai posted:If you connect to a windows server you need a CAL. If it's a webserver, you can use web edition and skip the client CALs. This is exactly what I meant. You're not going to use it as a terminal server so no need for the CALs someone suggested.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 08:31
|
|
|
adorai posted:financial institutions... banks That makes sense. If it ain't broke and all that... Don't most banks still use AS400?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 12:44
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:That makes sense. If it ain't broke and all that... Maybe for smaller stuff. $JOB -1 was a big international bank, and they had more than one of the big IBM Z System Mainframes for the backend financial stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 12:56
|
|
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:That makes sense. If it ain't broke and all that...
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 13:04
|
|
|
I can't for the life of me remember how to change which is the primary DC / replication source. Ugh.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
AAB posted:I can't for the life of me remember how to change which is the primary DC / replication source. Ugh. Isn't it transfering the roles via ntdsutil?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
Sefal posted:Isn't it transfering the roles via ntdsutil?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:Sure but you really ought to use PowerShell instead. Is there a single benefit to doing this through powershell except to say you did it through powershell?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Is there a single benefit to doing this through powershell except to say you did it through powershell? Move-ADDirectoryServerOperationMasterRole -Identity domaincontroller -OperationMasterRole 0,1,2,3,4 Here's the ntdsutil procedure: RDP to domaincontroller Start -> Run -> ntdsutil At the 'fsmo maintenance:' prompt, enter connections At the 'server connections:' prompt, enter connect to server domaincontroller After a connection has been established, enter q At the 'fsmo maintenance:' prompt, enter transfer ROLE, where ROLE is one of Schema master, Domain naming master, RID master, PDC emulator, or Infrastructure master Repeat for each role as necessary Mash q to back out. anthonypants fucked around with this message at 15:54 on Jun 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 15:50
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:Here's the PowerShell command for all five FSMO roles: So no? NTDSutil stuff can be done with a batch file. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
Sickening posted:So no?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:Uh, you can put PowerShell inside of a batch script, too? And I'm sorry if you don't believe that command's way less cumbersome. Yeah I'm with a-pants on this one, except for always forgetting the actual PS commandlet (thank god for tab completion, I just type move-ad and hit tab a couple times), it makes so much more sense to transfer the roles with Powershell. gently caress the ntdsutil bullshit. Also yeah you can save it in a batch file, but maybe it's nice not to have the baggage of a bunch of batch files that you absolutely need for administrative work? It's like that debate a couple months ago about what you install on Linux to enhance your shell experience, and a lot of people were saying "I used to install all these tools and utilities, but it takes too much time to do so and it meant that when I moved to a new system I was lost because it was a default shell so now I just make do with the default stuff". There was another similar debate about Windows but I can't remember the details (maybe what to customize/install for a default server image? I'm on the side of "very little"). So in that vein being able to jump on any DC and move roles without having to remember the steps involved in ntdsutil is very goddamn handy. Now querying on the other hand, I just can't be hosed to unlearn "netdom query fsmo", though I'm sure I'll have to at some point. I've tried using PowerShell for it and as I recall it was actually more typing to do so, even with tab completion. But I'm sure Microsoft will deprecate it eventually.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Potato Alley posted:Yeah I'm with a-pants on this one, except for always forgetting the actual PS commandlet (thank god for tab completion, I just type move-ad and hit tab a couple times), it makes so much more sense to transfer the roles with Powershell. gently caress the ntdsutil bullshit. Also yeah you can save it in a batch file, but maybe it's nice not to have the baggage of a bunch of batch files that you absolutely need for administrative work? It's like that debate a couple months ago about what you install on Linux to enhance your shell experience, and a lot of people were saying "I used to install all these tools and utilities, but it takes too much time to do so and it meant that when I moved to a new system I was lost because it was a default shell so now I just make do with the default stuff". There was another similar debate about Windows but I can't remember the details (maybe what to customize/install for a default server image? I'm on the side of "very little"). So in that vein being able to jump on any DC and move roles without having to remember the steps involved in ntdsutil is very goddamn handy. The point is that I am not memorizing the powershell command to do the work either and no matter which way I do it its going to end up as a text file. I don't personally give a poo poo if a file is .bat or .ps1 myself unless there is a functional reason to use one over the other.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
Sickening posted:The point is that I am not memorizing the powershell command to do the work either and no matter which way I do it its going to end up as a text file. I don't personally give a poo poo if a file is .bat or .ps1 myself unless there is a functional reason to use one over the other. code:
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 16:54
|
|
|
Sickening posted:So no? Do you work with me? There's this old guy down the hall who refuses to use PowerShell because "what's the point, I can just make a batch file"
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 12:28 |
|
|
CLAM DOWN posted:Do you work with me? There's this old guy down the hall who refuses to use PowerShell because "what's the point, I can just make a batch file" I don't refuse to use powershell. I actually use powershell forever almost everything. I asked if there was a benefit to using powershell over ntsutil and the first reply was a copy and paste of the manual commands vs the powershell script.  And the complete thruth is that I have no emotional investment in what scripting language is used for a solution as long as I understand it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 17:10
|
|