|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
incredible
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
So, like, are we going to get a "Trump's payroll checks bounced" flood of leaks before the election, or only immediately after a la Romney? Even with a couple million in your piggy bank you shouldn't have trouble with that, but this IS Trump we're talking about. Either way, we'll hear about it it. For a staff of 28 people there are a shitton of leaks on every single story.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
Jonked posted:So, like, are we going to get a "Trump's payroll checks bounced" flood of leaks before the election, or only immediately after a la Romney? Even with a couple million in your piggy bank you shouldn't have trouble with that, but this IS Trump we're talking about. no. trump has a staff of like 20 people he spent more money in May on hats than he did on ads and building up a voting bloc combined
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
exploding mummy posted:no.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
The checks won't bounce. They also won't show up in the first place, because Trump is well known for straight up just not paying people if he doesn't feel like it, and when he loses disastrously I'm not confident he'll be feeling like honoring any deals.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Jonked posted:Quoting this to spitefully requote it on October 29th. I mean right now, the campaign of Ben Carson has more cash on hand then the Trump campaign we're not going to get any stories on there being late staff payments....because there's no staff and there's no money
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Lemming posted:The checks won't bounce. They also won't show up in the first place, because Trump is well known for straight up just not paying people if he doesn't feel like it, and when he loses disastrously I'm not confident he'll be feeling like honoring any deals. well its not called the honor of the deal
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:
I feel like writing something in favor of the new "America First" campaign in the style of Dr. Seuss would be a bit of a slap in the face considering 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
gently caress it add me to the permatoxx band wagon. Those trumpers are weak and pathetic just like their small handed leader.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 06:17
|
|
|
With all that's coming out about trumps campaign I'd have to be a coward not to perms-toxx. Count me in
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
I have no artistic skills of note but I will happily wear whatever garish gang tag you guys come up with.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
Reminder that Trump had $1.3m in the bank 20 days ago. He's probably sitting on a cool half million or so at this point. Looks like he's been "borrowing" less and less from himself over time, too, which might signal an unwillingness to sacrifice too much of his fortunate (or, hilariously, the end of his liquidity.)
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 07:47
|
|
|
I'll permatoxx, but I'm keeping my Wildcards tag, it was earned in the fires of the Bad Thread (TM) and it compliments my av.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Reminder that Trump had $1.3m in the bank 20 days ago. He's probably sitting on a cool half million or so at this point. Looks like he's been "borrowing" less and less from himself over time, too, which might signal an unwillingness to sacrifice too much of his fortunate (or, hilariously, the end of his liquidity.) It's looking more and more like this election is going to give us the most amazing academic experiment. What percentage of voters will come out and vote Republican no matter what? No get out the vote ground game, no actual advertising, the party itself distancing themselves from the candidate. Additionally they are being shamed against voting for that nominee by their surrounding community(admittedly to varying degrees) and the general national culture. Nothing but a person on the ballot with (R) following their name who occasionally goes on TV and says such insane poo poo that the American Media calls them out. Just a whole cycle of data on people who you can not stop from voting Republican by any means short of force.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
gently caress it, perma- me too. We've already had the black swan terrorist event, and Trump has somehow botched it hard enough that Hillary still leads him by high-single or double digits. Gimme that gang tag too, whenever the thread figures out a good one.Cuz I mean come on: Slate Action posted:Trump's gonna get fuckin destroyed, lmao Slate Action posted:Trump's gonna get fuckin wrecked, part II: Slate Action posted:Trump is gonna get fuckin wrecked, part III: Slate Action posted:Trump is gonna get fuckin wrecked, part IV:
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
I'll perma- for Hitlery Kkkillnton, if only because I think she may actually give Donald a heart attack and that would just make me so happy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
I'm being peer pressured to perma- for  It worked. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Consider this a perma-ban  only if one of the Trump losers can find enough energy to perma-ban themselves for Trump.All it will take is one Trump looser to perma-ban themselves for my perma-ban to apply.Sadly, I doubt any Trump poster will take me up on this offer because they're all low energy losers. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) A Winner is Jew has issued a correction as of 22:12 on Jun 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
I, too, shall put my account on the line for Hillary. Upgrading to perma! (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
When I saw how miserable Donald's cash on hand number was, I was loving shocked, and that pushed me over the edge. I will perma- At this point, Hillary just needs to avoid going to prison, and she'll be president.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Consider this a perma-ban Doesn't posting in this thread automatically toxx you?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
Alucard Nacirema posted:Doesn't posting in this thread automatically toxx you? It does, but they put conditions on their perma-toxx
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 03:44
|
|
|
Alucard Nacirema posted:Doesn't posting in this thread automatically toxx you? For a regular ban, yes. Some Hillary toxxers have been all full of beans lately for some odd reason, and have decided to go all-in on permaban toxxes, which I'll allow because it's funny and it'll be a nice consolation prize if worse comes to worst and the sweaty orange clown wins.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 03:44
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:For a regular ban, yes. Some Hillary toxxers have been all full of beans lately for some odd reason, and have decided to go all-in on permaban toxxes, which I'll allow because it's funny and it'll be a nice consolation prize if worse comes to worst and the sweaty orange clown wins. Are conditional permas like A Winner is Jew's also permissible, then?
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 03:50
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Are conditional permas like A Winner is Jew's also permissible, then? You know what, I should say something official on this. RULES UPDATEIn the Primary Toxx thread I banned conditional toxxes as it would lead to all sorts of weaselly bullshit, but since we've split the general into two separate threads, I think betting on additional punishments beyond the standard ban is acceptable. To be clear: no matter what anyone says, a basic ban is always in the cards if Hillary doesn't win, but if you want to up the ante, I won't stop you (unless it's dumb and/or not funny). Matter of fact, let's just add that to the OP.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
exploding mummy posted:I mean right now, the campaign of Ben Carson has more cash on hand then the Trump campaign Yeah yeah I know this isn't really what we were talking about and also Buzzfeed/just fired aide, but lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Time to put a 2002 account on the line for the deeply deserved downfall of the Donald. Perma .
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
This would not have changed my decision to perma-, but I'm just curious. What if Hillary has a massive heart attack tomorrow and dies? Are we still on the hook? I figure its probably good to be clear about the crazy scenarios now, before they happen.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:This would not have changed my decision to perma- We would almost certainly be permabanned.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:14
|
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:This would not have changed my decision to perma- The only way that Hillary can end up not being the President Elect come November and we still don't get banned is if whoever wins changes their name to Hillary Clinton and we successfully rules lawyer the issue.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:26
|
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:This would not have changed my decision to perma- Mrit posted:We would
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:While technically the primary season is still on at the point that I post this, it's pretty clear that Bernie is not going to take the Democratic nomination. However, if some bizarre socialist miracle should occur and he emerges from their convention as the party nominee, I'll declare a mulligan and remake this thread. A technicality can save you. However it's up to Captain_Maclaine to make the final call imo
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
I'll appeal any decision I find unjust to scosaf.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:45
|
|
|
If that sick situation ever happens, D&D would have a field day about it for about 1 week, maybe 2 weeks tops. Nothing is sweeter in this subforum than schadenfreude.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 05:46
|
|
|
Gyges posted:The only way that Hillary can end up not being the President Elect come November and we still don't get banned is if whoever wins changes their name to Hillary Clinton and we successfully rules lawyer the issue. OP says that if Bernie manages to ursurp Hillary's nomination, we're off the hook.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:This would not have changed my decision to perma- All right, I'll weigh in on this hypothetical since you're not the only one speculating on it: Under those circumstances, presuming the party then gave the nomination to the Bernman, I'd do as I said in the OP and just close the thread. If, I dunno, they were to draft Biden or something, all bets are off, chaos reigns, etc. Once the convention has passed, you live or die as does her campaign.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:19
|
|
|
prepare your  I've got an uncle that works at the FBI and he says that the Clinton foundation documents are definitely the ones that are going to sink her
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
Al! posted:prepare your It will be well worth the $10 if true
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 12:36
|
|