|
wocobob posted:Okay, another ignorant American backstory question: And in addition to the comments upthread a few posts. They did this, sold out everything they were supposed to believe in to get a referendum on replacing 'First past the post' with an altenative vote scheme whose details you can look up but aren't really relevant here. Naturally everyone either voted against it, or used it as a protest vote against the now widely despised party. It lost by a margin of better than two to one. Thus sealing their image as not merely lying weasels, but incompetent lying weasels.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 19:16 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:Bumham's stint in the Sun cab is remarkable because he used to play up his scouse cred by refusing to give them interviews and stuff iirc. Fundamentally, Burnham represents the worst of New Labour: vapid image politics. He'll take any political position for the sole purpose to make himself look good. He was culture secretary for fifteen months before he got heckled at the Hillsborough 20th anniversary service, and only then he asked for the inquiry. He was completely for Labour's privatisation of the NHS while he was in Health, then turned on a sixpence to oppose the same plans he helped get off the ground as a Cabinet minister. That said, he's smart enough to know which way's the wind blowing, hence why he's one of the few people in the PLP not to stir the pot over Corbyn. Jose posted:lol is this what tintower has been bringing up for months when posting about burnham? I'm not sure almost being sued for smearing one of the country's most respected civil liberties campaigners to the point of nearly being sued is "lol", to be honest.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:24 |
|
wocobob posted:Okay, another ignorant American backstory question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkPyhcW5b7k
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:25 |
|
In retrospect, the AV referendum brought back the whole horrible idea of putting down populist policies by putting them to a highly divisive vote between two imperfect options.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:29 |
|
josh04 posted:a highly divisive vote between two imperfect options. to be fair, see also Pretty Much Every UK General Election
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:31 |
|
Has there ever been a referendum on a significant issue anywhere that was a good idea? The best I can say about the few Canadian referenda I remember is that at least most of them didn't gently caress things up too bad -- but some of them did. I don't think a referendum has ever managed to make something better.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:32 |
|
PT6A posted:Has there ever been a referendum on a significant issue anywhere that was a good idea? The best I can say about the few Canadian referenda I remember is that at least most of them didn't gently caress things up too bad -- but some of them did. I don't think a referendum has ever managed to make something better. The Good Friday Agreement.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:33 |
|
Angepain posted:to be fair, see also Pretty Much Every UK General Election Nah that's an à la carte of bastards
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:33 |
|
Angepain posted:to be fair, see also Pretty Much Every UK General Election Well, for most of my life they weren't that divisive. Elections were just Labour winning against a series of increasingly grotesque Tories.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:33 |
|
PT6A posted:Has there ever been a referendum on a significant issue anywhere that was a good idea? The best I can say about the few Canadian referenda I remember is that at least most of them didn't gently caress things up too bad -- but some of them did. I don't think a referendum has ever managed to make something better. Legalising gay marriage in Ireland.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:34 |
|
Although I guess that depends on your perspective of whether gay people should have rights...
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:35 |
|
Tesseraction posted:Legalising gay marriage in Ireland. Oh, I did forget about that one! Still, it seems like every referendum at best does something that an elected government could do, and at worst either binds or advises that elected government into doing something extremely stupid.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:38 |
|
wocobob posted:Okay, another ignorant American backstory question: 1) coalition with the Tories in 2010, which led to 2) tuition fees hike being one of the horses traded off, despite a pledge not to increase tuition fees being a major Lib Dem electoral plank, 3) in part because Clegg personally disliked the party line, and saw coalition government as a convenient basis upon which to veto line-items in the party manifesto if this seems a little odd, you have to consider the degree to which insurgent Liberal Democrats of the 2000s attacked Labour as too hypocritically centralist, too unwilling to compromise, and too transparently cynical' it has to be accepted that the UK is not New Zealand and - even discounting the electoral system - a small, nimble third party cannot bank on supporters empathizing with tradeoffs. People live in their own bubbles. In large polities, mobilization matters much more.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:39 |
|
PT6A posted:Has there ever been a referendum on a significant issue anywhere that was a good idea? The best I can say about the few Canadian referenda I remember is that at least most of them didn't gently caress things up too bad -- but some of them did. I don't think a referendum has ever managed to make something better. Not many. Good outcomes of referenda are fairly rare. Representative democracies work because most people have lives and aren't interested or capable of devoting the time and effort necessary to make good decisions on complicated political issues. Hence the representative, who is "hired" to devote his time to doing those things and making good decisions on the public's behalf. Fundamentally it's specialization of labor. There's a reason I don't mine my own iron ore, refine it, and cast it into a hammer. I leave it to other people who are better at it than me and I go buy one at the hardware store.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:40 |
|
ronya posted:1) coalition with the Tories in 2010, which led to The lovely Lib Dem campaign last year was orchestrated by Clegg's inner circle, and a lot of party members were understandably upset. And then the LD's director of communications then went on to head the Remain campaign.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:43 |
|
Tesseraction posted:Legalising gay marriage in Ireland. only well after it already had overwhelming parliamentary support by all four parties, with even the Church carefully gauging public sentiment and only Irish Muslims daring to stick their heads over the parapet for a right to discriminate the lesson here is to either not require referendums to approve overwhelming amendments, or not require amendments just to overturn case law
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:43 |
|
Lethal Drizzle posted:How do you "almost sue" someone? She threatened to sue him so he wrote an apology saying it was part of the political cut and thrust, politicians should be allowed to use emotive and colourful language to make a point, but that he was sorry for causing offence. After receiving the apology she didn't sue him.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:43 |
|
ronya posted:only well after it already had overwhelming parliamentary support by all four parties, with even the Church carefully gauging public sentiment and only Irish Muslims daring to stick their heads over the parapet for a right to discriminate well yes but I was providing an example of a good referendum
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:50 |
|
Tesseraction posted:well yes but I was providing an example of a good referendum It's a referendum with a good result, that's different from a good referendum, assuming the result could have been achieved without the referendum (my knowledge of Irish constitutional law is non-existent). The Quebexit referendum ended up being a good referendum too, insofar as voters picked the sane choice, but giving them that choice in the first place was probably a massive mistake.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:53 |
|
TinTower posted:The Good Friday Agreement. Yeah this is the best answer, great legislation supported by the majority that helped secure peace after years of horrors, not really anything bad about it.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:55 |
|
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 16:58 |
|
PT6A posted:Has there ever been a referendum on a significant issue anywhere that was a good idea? The best I can say about the few Canadian referenda I remember is that at least most of them didn't gently caress things up too bad -- but some of them did. I don't think a referendum has ever managed to make something better. Scottish devolution referendum was good.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:04 |
|
StoneOfShame posted:Yeah this is the best answer, great legislation supported by the majority that helped secure peace after years of horrors, not really anything bad about it. Apart from the whole 'allowing murderers to go unpunished' thing. I do think it was an awesome agreement on balance, but there were certainly downsides.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:05 |
|
forkboy84 posted:Scottish devolution referendum was good. Well, the second one, anyway
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:06 |
|
A re-post probably, but the lack of any form of awareness is terrifying https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/748883945325027329
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:10 |
|
I'm laughing like an idiot and there's no way I can explain to anyone else in the room.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:11 |
|
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...4b0b320cf128772quote:Michael Gove’s clear hint that he could scrap the Barnett formula, the Treasury system which fixes Scotland’s budget, and change the fiscal framework under the Scotland Act has brought a furious response from the Scottish National party. Angepain posted:Well, the second one, anyway Well the First one was more at fault with that Labour MP putting a loving 40% threshold needed.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:12 |
|
Who cares about Scotland, what do people think of pinsents decision not to restart the Cambridge Berkeley race in the visitors?
Loving Africa Chaps fucked around with this message at 17:18 on Jul 1, 2016 |
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:15 |
|
Good news for Wales if Barnett goes, but it won't help the IndyRef2 Remain campaign!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:15 |
|
Meant to post this earlier: https://twitter.com/LordAshcroft/status/748792135592194048
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:16 |
|
"Look, we cannot solve this situation by loving the poor, we need an actual answer." "We just don't have enough poors to gently caress, we'll make more poors." *the Eye of Sauron slowly turns towards Scotland*
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:17 |
|
Ah yes, not the Irish then. It's the Scots who will become the enemy of peace.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:20 |
|
Extreme0 posted:http://www.theguardian.com/politics...4b0b320cf128772 I'm angry that that sort of threshold wasn't used for the EU referendum to be honest.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:22 |
|
Loving Africa Chaps posted:Who cares about Scotland, what do people think of pinsents decision not to restart the Cambridge Berkeley race in the visitors? Cambridge steered straight for the booms under no pressure, idiots.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:23 |
|
Why are all of your political cartoons grotesques?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:28 |
|
Deptfordx posted:Ah yes, not the Irish then. It's the Scots who will become the enemy of peace. What have those moochers ever done for us? OUR TAXPAYER MONEY is going straight to those leec sorry I couldn't even finish that I mean I know loving Scotland is a proud national British pastime, but I don't think this sudden "piss the Scots off so we can more easily scapegoat them" is going to work as well as they think it will, especially with Scotland chomping at the bit to leave that dumpster fire. It's remarkable how consistently these morons make decisions without a single second of forethought.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:29 |
|
VanSandman posted:Why are all of your political cartoons grotesques? Art should reflect life? vv Also what this guy said. Bojo's hair has never looked that good in real life.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:29 |
|
VanSandman posted:Why are all of your political cartoons grotesques? Because those in the cartoons are about five times as grotesque as the pictures.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:29 |
|
VanSandman posted:Why are all of your political cartoons grotesques? forkboy84 posted:I'm angry that that sort of threshold wasn't used for the EU referendum to be honest.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:30 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 19:16 |
|
Sorry for being dumb, but I don't really understand why Gove running meant Boris couldn't. Was it simply that they couldn't have two Brexit candidates?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:34 |