Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Mulva
Sep 13, 2011
It's about time for my once per decade ban for being a consistently terrible poster.

Pissflaps posted:

I don't 'hate' Jeremy Corbyn: I think he's the wrong person to lead the Labour Party.

No you don't.

e: On this day in 1847 Liberia declares it's independence! And who doesn't like a little liberty?

Mulva fucked around with this message at 21:12 on Jul 26, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Pissflaps posted:

I don't 'hate' Jeremy Corbyn: I think he's the wrong person to lead the Labour Party.

Yeah. Basically the leader of the labor party and the voters of the labor party don't really fit the labor party itself.

It's a conundrum really.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

ukle posted:

I think that's very likely, especially given I believe the Labour rules allow for another contest to begin almost immediately if they get the 20% nominations so they can drop Smith, then when ready try again with someone different - especially if the polls still are loving dire. Expect them to run a very different tac next time though, maybe even trying to get Corbyn to anoint a successor if the polls are still in the 20's.

Do you honestly think that if it ended in such a farcical way they'd be able to challenge again and have any chance at all? Even if the ghost of Clement Atlee returned to this plane of existence to lead the rebellion?

Kegluneq
Feb 18, 2011

Mr President, the physical reality of Prime Minister Corbyn is beyond your range of apprehension. If you'll just put on these PINKOVISION glasses...

Pissflaps posted:

I don't 'hate' Jeremy Corbyn: I think he's the wrong person to lead the Labour Party.

Thank God you don't have the courage or integrity to make this opinion meaningful.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Noxville posted:

Do you honestly think that if it ended in such a farcical way they'd be able to challenge again and have any chance at all? Even if the ghost of Clement Atlee returned to this plane of existence to lead the rebellion?

Unless the rules of triggering a Labour Leadership election change then what's to stop them?

However, any leadership contest that hasn't been instigated by Corbyn resigning is doomed to failure. And he won't resign. That's why Labour is hosed.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

The Grauniad has had its arm twisted for the week and produced a pro-Corbyn article https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/26/labour-battle-blairites-corbynistas-conservatives-progressives

quote:

The 2008 crash and subsequent period of austerity turned the need to break out of the neoliberal trap into an urgent imperative. With Thatcher’s policy framework and new “common sense” still substantively intact, New Labour’s few progressive achievements proved easy for David Cameron and George Osborne to unravel. Meanwhile, the steady resurgence of racism and xenophobia that began during Labour’s rightward shift on immigration was mixing with the country’s deep economic problems, forming a toxic brew that would lead to Brexit and the outbreak of hate crime that came with it.

Jeremy Corbyn’s support unites around some clear basic principles: the need to break decisively with neoliberalism in favour of a new egalitarian economic model, and to defend immigrants, ethnic minorities and people on social security from the rising tide of bigotry and the effect of government spending cuts. Conspiracy theories about mass Trotskyist entryism, while (unintentionally) entertaining, are of little help in explaining the huge and enduring support for Corbyn among Labour’s ballooning membership. The real reasons are simple enough. Corbyn represents a head-on challenge to a status quo that a broad swath of left-progressive opinion now considers intolerable. Analytical genius is not required to identify his limitations as a leader. The problem is the lack of any credible candidate to carry forward that challenge in his place.

That alternative is unlikely to be Owen Smith, a former lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry, who once claimed that Nye Bevan would have supported Blair’s marketisation of the NHS, and likened Labour’s involvement in the invasion of Iraq to socialist volunteers in the 1930s going to fight in the Spanish civil war. More recently, Smith supported Osborne’s devastating benefit cap due to its popularity with voters, and abstained in parliament on a welfare reform bill that was expected to negatively impact on 330,000 of the country’s poorest children. Is this the man to drive through root-and-branch reform of British capitalism in the teeth of strong opposition from elite vested interests, and to challenge majority views on issues like welfare and immigration? Somehow, it seems unlikely.

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

Noxville posted:

Do you honestly think that if it ended in such a farcical way they'd be able to challenge again and have any chance at all? Even if the ghost of Clement Atlee returned to this plane of existence to lead the rebellion?

Not sure why you have faith in the PLP being clever enough to not do something really stupid and self destructive.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Pissflaps posted:

Unless the rules of triggering a Labour Leadership election change then what's to stop them?

However, any leadership contest that hasn't been instigated by Corbyn resigning is doomed to failure. And he won't resign. That's why Labour is hosed.

I don't know why you bothered answering the question in your first sentence with your second one.

ukle
Nov 28, 2005

marktheando posted:

Not sure why you have faith in the PLP being clever enough to not do something really stupid and self destructive.

Exactly, this is the PLP we are talking about, doing stupid things is their current default.

Its also why I expect them to only do one again once they have secured Corbyn's departure to a chosen successor. All this is assuming the Labour poll numbers don't magically recover to be ~35%, as if they do then Corbyn will be safe.

ukle fucked around with this message at 13:39 on Jul 26, 2016

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

Noxville posted:

Do you honestly think that if it ended in such a farcical way they'd be able to challenge again and have any chance at all? Even if the ghost of Clement Atlee returned to this plane of existence to lead the rebellion?

Why not? Their goal isn't to win on merit, it's to basically hold the party hostage and sabotage it until someone cracks - either Corbyn gives up or the voters do. Endless resignation games and temporary leadership challenges, so that "Corbyn's Labour" as pissflaps has started calling it becomes eternally mired in bad publicity and ineffectiveness

They're making the party unelectable in the name of electability, until they get their way

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

Mr. Flunchy posted:

Hope those £25 registered supporter fees get refunded.

I hope they're not, because it's funnier that way

LemonyTang
Nov 29, 2009

Ask me about holding 4gate!
Received this very powerful email from future saviour of the Labour Party Owen Smith

quote:

I grew up in South Wales during the miners' strike. That's when I came alive politically.

I saw the power of politics to change lives, for better and worse. We are seeing it again with a Tory government inflicting such damage through austerity. That's why we need a radical, united Labour Party and why I am standing for Leader.


RADICAL POLITICS VIDEO


Jeremy Corbyn has reconnected our party with its radical principles. But it's now time for a new generation with the energy and ideas to turn those principles in to action.

Under my leadership, we will be a powerful voice for social justice.

Together we can defeat this government.

Owen

My favourite part is how he thinks 'radicals' are the sort of people who just go around looking for the word 'radical', rather than being the sort of people who actually seek out policy specifics and form their own judgement on whether or not they're 'radical' (and good).

Owen, here's a tip: backing up Trident and 'socially conservative' platforms are not radical.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Cerv posted:

I hope they're not, because it's funnier that way

Maybe they could give them a free vote in the next one as compensation?


baka kaba posted:

Why not? Their goal isn't to win on merit, it's to basically hold the party hostage and sabotage it until someone cracks - either Corbyn gives up or the voters do. Endless resignation games and temporary leadership challenges, so that "Corbyn's Labour" as pissflaps has started calling it becomes eternally mired in bad publicity and ineffectiveness

Labour voters are giving up. This is happening.

MikeCrotch
Nov 5, 2011

I AM UNJUSTIFIABLY PROUD OF MY SPAGHETTI BOLOGNESE RECIPE

YES, IT IS AN INCREDIBLY SIMPLE DISH

NO, IT IS NOT NORMAL TO USE A PEPPERAMI INSTEAD OF MINCED MEAT

YES, THERE IS TOO MUCH SALT IN MY RECIPE

NO, I WON'T STOP SHARING IT

more like BOLLOCKnese

Cerv posted:

I hope they're not, because it's funnier that way

If Owen Smith pulls out of the race I hope Corbyn's response is a video of him making it rain with £10 notes while 3.75 MILLION POUNDS flashes on the screen

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

Exciting mailshot for affilated members today

quote:

Dear xxxxxxx,

You were eligible to vote in the 2015 leadership election as an affiliated supporter of the Labour Party. As a result, we've contacted your affiliated organisation to confirm your continued membership. We will then re-check you against the electoral register.

We will be in touch over the coming weeks, including letting you know if you need to take any actions, but in the meantime we wanted to share more information about our upcoming leadership elections.

Your right to vote

We will confirm your right to vote once we have checked with our affiliated organisations the status of their members. We will be in touch to let you know when this happens.

Assuming that you are a paid up member of your organisation or society, you will be able to vote and you will receive your ballot via email by the end of August.

Investigating abuse during the campaign

The Labour Party will not tolerate abusive or threatening behaviour by supporters or members. If you engage in abusive behaviour you will not get a vote in this leadership election.

Details of any abusive behaviour can be reported by emailing validation@labour.org.uk

Your data

Your details will be passed to both leadership campaigns and you will receive contact from both candidates, outlining their views via phone, email, post and text where the Labour Party has this information. The Labour Party has set strict limits to the number of emails that candidates can send you. You will be able to opt out at any time from one or both of the candidates. You may also have signed up to hear more from the candidates via their websites.

We will also contact you directly, as the Labour Party, to let you know about debates between the candidates and other events or information related to these elections.

Thank you again for your contribution to the Labour Party, your enthusiasm and interest in our future.

The Labour Party



To manage your email preferences or unsubscribe from Labour party emails please click here. We won't pass on your email address to anyone else: see our privacy policy. Reproduced from an email sent by the Labour Party, promoted by Iain McNicol on behalf of the Labour Party both at Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT.



I wouldn't say I have enthusiasm for this, but there you go

kapparomeo
Apr 19, 2011

Some say his extreme-right links are clearly known, even in the fascist capitalist imperialist Murdochist press...

Tesseraction posted:

Why would she do that?

Actually, Comrade, I apologise and you're right. I'd have thought that a woman who's as white as the driven snow and in the top 5% of salary earners in the UK might pause before condemning others for "white privilege" and a dedicated republican might wonder if her principles were compromised by working to support an organisation that not just has the Queen as a passive ceremonial Patron but which actively promotes the monarchy, but you have a fair point in that much like how the UKMT obstinately ignores Dear Leader's lamentable national polling socialists are not known for their self-reflection.

kapparomeo fucked around with this message at 13:46 on Jul 26, 2016

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

marktheando posted:

Not sure why you have faith in the PLP being clever enough to not do something really stupid and self destructive.

Some small part of me still thinks that they can't be that loving stupid. How would they even bow out of this one? Have somebody go "For the past month we've been saying that Corbyn will destroy the party and that he likes kicking cute kittens in the face, but now we're not going to even try to get rid of him and have therefore hosed the party over for no reason". Like, there's absolutely no way to spin that as anything else than utter incompetence and irresponsibility on every concievable level.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

LemonyTang posted:

Received this very powerful email from future saviour of the Labour Party Owen Smith


My favourite part is how he thinks 'radicals' are the sort of people who just go around looking for the word 'radical', rather than being the sort of people who actually seek out policy specifics and form their own judgement on whether or not they're 'radical' (and good).

Owen, here's a tip: backing up Trident and 'socially conservative' platforms are not radical.
Trident is pretty tubular though.

I like "Jeremy Corbyn has reconnected our party with its radical principles. But it's now time for a new generation with the energy and ideas to turn those principles in to action."

Yes, Mr. Corbyn has reconnected Labour with its mondo principles during the 8 months we let him lead, half of which were spent stabbing him in the back, but it's now time to put them into action by sweeping them under the rug.

Mulva
Sep 13, 2011
It's about time for my once per decade ban for being a consistently terrible poster.

Pissflaps posted:

Labour voters are giving up. This is happening.

What's it like to spend so much time talking about something you so clearly don't give a poo poo about?

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Boogaleeboo posted:

What's it like to spend so much time talking about something you so clearly don't give a poo poo about?

What have I said to make you believe I don't give a poo poo?

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

kapparomeo posted:

Actually, Comrade, I apologise and you're right. I'd have thought that a woman who's as white as the driven snow and in the top 5% of salary earners in the UK might pause before condemning others for "white privilege" and a dedicated republican might wonder if her principles were compromised by working to support an organisation that not just has the Queen as a passive ceremonial Patron but which actively promotes the monarchy, but you have a fair point in that much like how the UKMT obstinately ignores Dear Leader's lamentable national polling socialists are not known for their self-reflection.

just gently caress off you tedious poo poo

Pissflaps posted:

What have I said to make you believe I don't give a poo poo?

same but more despairing

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

kapparomeo posted:

Actually, Comrade, I apologise and you're right. I'd have thought that a woman who's as white as the driven snow and in the top 5% of salary earners in the UK might pause before condemning others for "white privilege" and a dedicated republican might wonder if her principles were compromised by working to support an organisation that not just has the Queen as a passive ceremonial Patron but which actively promotes the monarchy, but you have a fair point in that much like how the UKMT obstinately ignores Dear Leader's lamentable national polling socialists are not known for their self-reflection.

So in other words you've got nothing.

Also not much point calling me comrade, I'd leave you in a burning building to save baby hitler.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
it's pretty surreal being pandered to by someone I have 0 confidence will deliver. my best case has always been what smith is promising: Corbyn politics with a young firebrand delivering them. I find it hard to believe a loving big pharma lobbyist is going to be that person, and loving impossible to believe that my hypothetical candidate would so incompetently stab Corbyn in the back

Paxman
Feb 7, 2010

Guavanaut posted:

Trident is pretty tubular though.

I like "Jeremy Corbyn has reconnected our party with its radical principles. But it's now time for a new generation with the energy and ideas to turn those principles in to action."

Yes, Mr. Corbyn has reconnected Labour with its mondo principles during the 8 months we let him lead, half of which were spent stabbing him in the back, but it's now time to put them into action by sweeping them under the rug.

I don't see how saying the existing leader is basically right about things but we should boot him out anyway because we need a "new generation" is going to inspire people.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

CoolCab posted:

it's pretty surreal being pandered to by someone I have 0 confidence will deliver. my best case has always been what smith is promising: Corbyn politics with a young firebrand delivering them. I find it hard to believe a loving big pharma lobbyist is going to be that person, and loving impossible to believe that my hypothetical candidate would so incompetently stab Corbyn in the back

I dunno about you but I'm all in for this man trying to stab corbyn in the back with his limp dick only to trip over a tub of pfizer branded pills and end up with his head stuck up his arse

MikeCrotch
Nov 5, 2011

I AM UNJUSTIFIABLY PROUD OF MY SPAGHETTI BOLOGNESE RECIPE

YES, IT IS AN INCREDIBLY SIMPLE DISH

NO, IT IS NOT NORMAL TO USE A PEPPERAMI INSTEAD OF MINCED MEAT

YES, THERE IS TOO MUCH SALT IN MY RECIPE

NO, I WON'T STOP SHARING IT

more like BOLLOCKnese

Paxman posted:

I don't see how saying the existing leader is basically right about things but we should boot him out anyway because we need a "new generation" is going to inspire people.

Well you could always go for the tactic of "be unable to answer basic questions about your previous employment and sound really boring on Newsnight". That's sure to fire up the voters!

ukle
Nov 28, 2005
This morning's ICM poll is interesting as its partially blown a 'myth' that keeps being brought up here.

https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_july_vote_poll-3.pdf

Specifically that its the North and The Midlands where Labour will lose votes to UKIP. Its hard to judge based on this limited data, but the threat from UKIP to Labour seems to be more in the Midlands and Wales; UKIP are polling within a few percentage points to Labour in Wales now - whether that would turn in to seats is another matter. But the UKIP threat in the north seems to be very overblown.

Nitrousoxide
May 30, 2011

do not buy a oneplus phone



40% chance of a post Brexit recession and a huge increase in the pension gap.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-26/brexit-s-biggest-fans-face-new-115-billion-pension-hole

GEORGE W BUSHI
Jul 1, 2012

ukle posted:

This morning's ICM poll is interesting as its partially blown a 'myth' that keeps being brought up here.

https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_july_vote_poll-3.pdf

Specifically that its the North and The Midlands where Labour will lose votes to UKIP. Its hard to judge based on this limited data, but the threat from UKIP to Labour seems to be more in the Midlands and Wales; UKIP are polling within a few percentage points to Labour in Wales now - whether that would turn in to seats is another matter. But the UKIP threat in the north seems to be very overblown.

UKIP being a threat to Labour in Wales isn't new, but the data for Wales is way too limited. There's no way I'm buying the Tories at 30% and Labour at 22% in Wales, especially off a poll of 80 people.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

ukle posted:

This morning's ICM poll is interesting as its partially blown a 'myth' that keeps being brought up here.

https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_july_vote_poll-3.pdf

Specifically that its the North and The Midlands where Labour will lose votes to UKIP. Its hard to judge based on this limited data, but the threat from UKIP to Labour seems to be more in the Midlands and Wales; UKIP are polling within a few percentage points to Labour in Wales now - whether that would turn in to seats is another matter. But the UKIP threat in the north seems to be very overblown.

I think it's that Wales feels most neglected by post-97 Labour. Thatcher did actually pile money into (south) Wales through the various enterprise schemes, but Labour - at least as far as I know - really didn't do anything much at all for them, and certainly they didn't benefit at all from the turn of the century boom and were even more comprehensively hosed over by the Great Recession than most, while having a devolved Labour Party that were completely disconnected in the same way Scottish Labour were. However Plaid haven't been anywhere near as muscular as the SNP were in exploiting that, which has led to them drifting UKIP-wards more or less by default.

The fact that Wales is most likely to be hurt by Brexit hasn't really factored into things at all because people just aren't interested in facts any more, they just want the politician who's going to give them the easiest scapegoat.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


LemonyTang posted:

Received this very powerful email from future saviour of the Labour Party Owen Smith


My favourite part is how he thinks 'radicals' are the sort of people who just go around looking for the word 'radical', rather than being the sort of people who actually seek out policy specifics and form their own judgement on whether or not they're 'radical' (and good).

Owen, here's a tip: backing up Trident and 'socially conservative' platforms are not radical.

I'm imagining that he's hoping that a lot of the new members aren't actual radical. And I mean...he's right to a point, as a group we're not as radical as the braying idiots like Rafael Behr like to pretend but it would appear that a majority of us still seem more radical than Jeremy Corbyn the Labour Leader (as opposed from Jeremy Corbyn the backbencher who isn't trying to hold a squabbling PLP together). But this all comes down to whether you acknowledge that Corbyn's time as leader hasn't really been all that radical except on his Trident vote. Which is one of those rare things where ronya & I actually agree (I think).

But yes, this is the wing of the party that likes to talk about things like "radical centrism" & "radical moderates". Nick Clegg called himself a radical centrist. I mean really.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
Also the threat was never really "UKIP will take a bunch of Northern seats" it was that UKIP seemed to gain what Labour lost, leaving the seats to get scooped up by the Conservatives. I think "Labour is losing voters to UKIP while the Tories remain loyal" is oversimplified, but "Labour loses when nationalists eat their lunch" already played out just across the border.

GEORGE W BUSHI
Jul 1, 2012

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I think it's that Wales feels most neglected by post-97 Labour. Thatcher did actually pile money into (south) Wales through the various enterprise schemes, but Labour - at least as far as I know - really didn't do anything much at all for them, and certainly they didn't benefit at all from the turn of the century boom and were even more comprehensively hosed over by the Great Recession than most, while having a devolved Labour Party that were completely disconnected in the same way Scottish Labour were. However Plaid haven't been anywhere near as muscular as the SNP were in exploiting that, which has led to them drifting UKIP-wards more or less by default.

The fact that Wales is most likely to be hurt by Brexit hasn't really factored into things at all because people just aren't interested in facts any more, they just want the politician who's going to give them the easiest scapegoat.

There has been quite a bit invested in Wales, mostly by the EU though. There's also this idea that all the money gets spent in Cardiff Bay. I think part of the reason that Plaid Cymru don't do as well is their heavy pushing of the Welsh language. The majority of us don't really speak any Welsh and it does create a bit of a disconnect.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

ukle posted:

This morning's ICM poll is interesting as its partially blown a 'myth' that keeps being brought up here.

https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016_july_vote_poll-3.pdf

Oh, it's an online poll. When did ICM start doing online polls?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

forkboy84 posted:

Nick Clegg called himself a radical centrist. I mean really.
Well refusing to oppose anything is taking centrism to its radical extreme.

ukle posted:

but the threat from UKIP to Labour seems to be more in the Midlands
The Midlands are poo poo. :(

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014


An article claiming a 40% chance of a post-exit recession is 60% out.

peanut-
Feb 17, 2004
Fun Shoe

None of those people will suffer because everything else will be slashed to keep funding those pensions.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Guavanaut posted:

Well refusing to oppose anything is taking centrism to its radical extreme.
Bodacious centralism

Most triumphant politics

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

peanut- posted:

None of those people will suffer because everything else will be slashed to keep funding those pensions.

No, gently caress them. Let's referendum their loving pensions away and see how they react.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Helen Highwater
Feb 19, 2014

And furthermore
Grimey Drawer

Guavanaut posted:

The Midlands are poo poo. :(

Can confirm. Used to live in:
Nottingham. poo poo.
Peterborough. poo poo
Boston. Very poo poo
Cambridge. Pretty but poo poo.

  • Locked thread