|
 hahaha, what a way to start a new page.
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
You son of a bitch
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:47
|
|
|
Huh. It seems as if audiences and critics are less interested in what pretty frozen images you can screenshot for internet forums, and more interested in characterization, interaction and dialogue, ie the things humans react to in a story. There must be something wrong with them
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Sounds like those people should go to a play instead of ignoring the inherent cinematography that comes with cinema.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Are they interested in screenshots that aren't for Internet forums?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Huh. It seems as if audiences and critics are less interested in what pretty frozen images you can screenshot for internet forums, and more interested in characterization, interaction and dialogue, ie the things humans react to in a story. There must be something wrong with them
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Cinema is
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Detective No. 27 posted:Sounds like those people should go to a play instead of ignoring the inherent cinematography that comes with cinema. That's a bit harsh. I'm sure plays utilize elements of 3D design and have better lighting than The Avengers. Edit: Yes. 
ThePlague-Daemon fucked around with this message at 04:19 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Detective No. 27 posted:Sounds like those people should go to a play instead of ignoring the inherent cinematography that comes with cinema. Your opinion on the comparative irrelevance of human interaction is noted for the brief moment before it is drowned out by the tidal roar of critics and audiences
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Your opinion on the comparative irrelevance of human interaction is noted and drowned out by the tidal roar of critics and audiences Tezzer rereg: expert on human interaction.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Your opinion on the comparative irrelevance of human interaction is noted for the brief moment before it is drowned out by the tidal roar of critics and audiences 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
Three characters meet in the woods. Thor is angry that his very dangerous brother has escaped and mere mortals who don't know what they are dealing with refuse to hand him to the gods' justice. Tony Stark is irreverent, literally, which further angers Thor, who we know to be a pompous, violent hothead. Stark is arrogant and possessive and dismissive, he sees Thor as an annoyance and an interloper keeping him from his goal. Thor sees Stark as a deluded fool. Thor attacks and Stark rises to the challenge, to prove the tech he built is above so-called magic. From afar, Loki watches with glee. They fight and Thor inadvertently gives Stark a brief advantage, which sets the tone - Thor is clearly more powerful, but Stark's cleverness keeps them evenly matched. Steve Rogers arrives to play peacemaker, but misjudged how much Thor - an unknown to him at this point- is amped for a fight. Thor blindly attacks Rogers in a rage, causing a wave of destruction. The characters stand up, the climax passed. Rogers asks "Are we done here," and indeed, we are. But the cinematography is lame, and that's the important thing, say guys who defend the Star Wars prequels. On the other hand, two characters hate each other, but one realizes that they both have a mommy named Martha. But with good slow-mo cinematography pictures you could screenshot for your wallpaper. I can't imagine why one is considered a boring mess Fuckman fucked around with this message at 04:41 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:35
|
|
|
On the third hand, dude obsessed with Steampunk and easily trolled writes paragraphs of how everyone's caring too hard.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
Equeen posted:Tezzer rereg: expert on human interaction.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
A Glistening Hodor in GBS made an excellent point as to why Pretty Pictures can, in some cases, be counterproductive to the story you're telling. I can't find the original post so let me summarize. A family is stranded on their roof due to a flood. Superman appears, backlit by the sun. They reach out to him. It all looks epic. It would be a great comic splash page, or a great two pages, of the desperate woman reaching out to the sky, and then pan over to Superman hovering in the sky in a halo of light. The problem is when you try to apply that image to a moving picture. We get an image of a Superman who looks like a weird, distant, alien rear end in a top hat, who is floating there watching these people scramble for safety, perhaps moments away from their home collapsing from the floodwaters and plunging them into the current, while they reach out to him for help and he stays there, unmoving. It creates a great image!! It creates a character who feels like an emotionless sadist drinking in their supplication.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:53
|
|
|
An idiot director wasting his time and ours:  I couldn't find a good quality capture and I don't know where my DVD is. Fuckman posted:A Glistening Hodor in GBS made an excellent point as to why Pretty Pictures can, in some cases, be counterproductive to the story you're telling. Or it can humanize an alien having alien problems:  You're arguing against the very concept of 2D composition because you think it was used wrong in your example. ThePlague-Daemon fucked around with this message at 05:02 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
TetsuoTW posted:Who's Tezzer? He was a poster in the Star Wars CD thread who whined about people liking the prequels. His username might have been Tezzor. Equeen fucked around with this message at 04:58 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
Three characters meet in the woods. They "fight". Steve Rogers arrives to play peacemaker, but misjudged how much Thor - an unknown to him at this point- is amped for a "fight". Thor blindly "attacks" Rogers in a rage, causing a wave of "destruction". The characters stand up, the climax passed. Rogers asks "Are we done here," and indeed, we are.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
seravid posted:Three characters meet in the woods. They "fight". Steve Rogers arrives to play peacemaker, but misjudged how much Thor - an unknown to him at this point- is amped for a "fight". Thor blindly "attacks" Rogers in a rage, causing a wave of "destruction". The characters stand up, the climax passed. Rogers asks "Are we done here," and indeed, we are. I'm Black Widow reading Fuckman's posts.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:The problem is when you try to apply that image to a moving picture. We get an image of a Superman who looks like a weird, distant, alien rear end in a top hat, who is floating there watching these people scramble for safety, perhaps moments away from their home collapsing from the floodwaters and plunging them into the current, while they reach out to him for help and he stays there, unmoving. It creates a great image!! It creates a character who feels like an emotionless sadist drinking in their supplication. That scene is part of a montage where people give their views about Superman, both positive and negative, and it shows how those people on the roof view Superman in a way that can be interpreted as either.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
Equeen posted:He was a poster in the Star Wars CD thread who whined about people liking the prequels. His username might have been Tezzor.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:That scene is part of a montage where people give their views about Superman, both positive and negative, and it shows how those people on the roof view Superman in a way that can be interpreted as either. Ambiguity over Superman's actions as a distant weirdo was sure the right way to go when establishing your franchise lmao
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:15
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Ambiguity over Superman's actions as a distant weirdo was sure the right way to go when establishing your franchise lmao 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Ambiguity over Superman's actions as a distant weirdo was sure the right way to go when establishing your franchise lmao Well, yes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:19
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Ambiguity over Superman's actions as a distant weirdo was sure the right way to go when establishing your franchise lmao Hey you found a correct thought good for you
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
Hm. Img-Rottentomatoes + BvS-BoxOffice.png
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:25
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Three characters meet in the woods. Thor is angry that his very dangerous brother has escaped and mere mortals who don't know what they are dealing with refuse to hand him to the gods' justice. Tony Stark is irreverent, literally, which further angers Thor, who we know to be a pompous, violent hothead. Stark is arrogant and possessive and dismissive, he sees Thor as an annoyance and an interloper keeping him from his goal. Thor sees Stark as a deluded fool. Thor attacks and Stark rises to the challenge, to prove the tech he built is above so-called magic. From afar, Loki watches with glee. They fight and Thor inadvertently gives Stark a brief advantage, which sets the tone - Thor is clearly more powerful, but Stark's cleverness keeps them evenly matched. Steve Rogers arrives to play peacemaker, but misjudged how much Thor - an unknown to him at this point- is amped for a fight. Thor blindly attacks Rogers in a rage, causing a wave of destruction. The characters stand up, the climax passed. Rogers asks "Are we done here," and indeed, we are. But the cinematography is lame, and that's the important thing, say guys who defend the Star Wars prequels. This is why Cinematography is important. Look at the feelings it evokes, the meltdowns it provokes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Three characters meet in the woods. Thor is angry that his very dangerous brother has escaped and mere mortals who don't know what they are dealing with refuse to hand him to the gods' justice. Tony Stark is irreverent, literally, which further angers Thor, who we know to be a pompous, violent hothead. Stark is arrogant and possessive and dismissive, he sees Thor as an annoyance and an interloper keeping him from his goal. Thor sees Stark as a deluded fool. Thor attacks and Stark rises to the challenge, to prove the tech he built is above so-called magic. From afar, Loki watches with glee. They fight and Thor inadvertently gives Stark a brief advantage, which sets the tone - Thor is clearly more powerful, but Stark's cleverness keeps them evenly matched. Steve Rogers arrives to play peacemaker, but misjudged how much Thor - an unknown to him at this point- is amped for a fight. Thor blindly attacks Rogers in a rage, causing a wave of destruction. The characters stand up, the climax passed. Rogers asks "Are we done here," and indeed, we are.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
ThePlague-Daemon posted:
this looks like forgettable generic poo poo and it's laughable that one would even invoke it. Imo Fuckman fucked around with this message at 06:38 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
I want you all to visit the obscure website Youtube.com and search for Zack Snyder until you've seen enough of the man speaking and describing his creative decisions and the reasons behind them to disabuse yourself of the notion that he is a misunderstood genius and start becoming impressed at the apparent fact that he dresses himself without a team of nurses.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Kenneth was wasted on this film and all the bullshit that was tied to it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:Hm. Img-Rottentomatoes + BvS-BoxOffice.png 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:42
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:I want you all to visit the obscure website Youtube.com and search for Zack Snyder until you've seen enough of the man speaking and describing his creative decisions and the reasons behind them to disabuse yourself of the notion that he is a misunderstood genius and start becoming impressed at the apparent fact that he dresses himself without a team of nurses.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
Fuckman posted:I want you all to visit the obscure website Youtube.com and search for Zack Snyder until you've seen enough of the man speaking and describing his creative decisions and the reasons behind them to disabuse yourself of the notion that he is a misunderstood genius and start becoming impressed at the apparent fact that he dresses himself without a team of nurses. Burkion posted:Kenneth was wasted on this film and all the bullshit that was tied to it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:
Haven't gotten to see it yet. I hope so
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
computer parts posted:On the third hand, dude obsessed with Steampunk and easily trolled writes paragraphs of how everyone's caring too hard. hahaa I forgot about the steam punk wedding. Tezzor is the gift that keeps on giving. He's like the Donald Trump of elaborately hating DC movies and Star Wars prequels
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:54
|
|
|
Zelder posted:someday i hope to be released from this comic book hellscape i've slaved my soul to, but i can't, because if i don't keep watching them, i'll never get to see NFL SuperPro lovingly brought to the big screen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8P4VAtzZ_U
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
I think of Tezzor as an impotent Galactus.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Yeah, putting on clothes can be difficult when you're so swol This seems like a weird tactic, employed solely by fanboys when it is convenient. Nerds are prejudiced against films when they have women directors or casts and aren't directed at white heterosexual cismales. But wait! They're also prejudiced against films when it looks like the white hetero cismale director goes to Gold's gym twice a month
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
As it happens, David Ayers best film (End of Watch) has absolute poo poo cinematography but is good by virtue of its excellent characterization. Is that irony?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 06:01
|
|
