|
CommieGIR posted:Trump is kicking out people holding pocket Constitutions.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:00 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 21:54 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Per CNN, Trump is kicking out people holding pocket Constitutions. I don't know why each new layer of pettiness surprises me, but it always does and it's delightful. So loving petty.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:00 |
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Conveniently for him no matter how poorly he does he still won. In January he'll show up to the inauguration and try and slip his hand under Hillary's as she's placing it on the book of Satan.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:01 |
|
Solkanar512 posted:That's why it's expressed as a percentage. Yeah, 538 is just a really volatile model with some weird poo poo going on. PEC has been really stable for instance, but even it has drifted up to 70% and 85% for their two models after being 65 & 80% forever. http://election.princeton.edu/
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:01 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Per CNN, Trump is kicking out people holding pocket Constitutions. the constitution is now banned as dictated by our glorious leader!
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:02 |
|
BTW, funny story, one of my colleagues today was doing a lesson about the American two-party system, and he was gonna point out how the two sides never go beyond a 60/40% split because of how the electorate is structured and he had to change his lesson at the last second when he showed fivethirtyeight on the smart board.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:02 |
|
TVarmy posted:I thought the Orlando shooting would turn it around for him, actually, until he went and showed he cared more about fomenting praise than mourning the victims. Appreciate the congrats!
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:03 |
|
I hope someone slams Trump with a good bible verse on TV. Then he'll start kicking out people with bibles.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:03 |
|
any way, here's the big story about why Obama and Clinton were right to allow Republicans space and not tie them to Trump en masse, even if that's what's true: https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/761306395232862208
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:04 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:BTW, funny story, one of my colleagues today was doing a lesson about the American two-party system, and he was gonna point out how the two sides never go beyond a 60/40% split because of how the electorate is structured and he had to change his lesson at the last second when he showed fivethirtyeight on the smart board. Was Mondale/Reagan not even more than 60/40?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:04 |
|
*this morning* Manafort: Ok Donald, today is the start of the new campaign. Stay focused, stay on message. Don't get sidetracked by distractions and think before you speak *this evening* Trump: Hey Paul, I threw out some people who were literally holding the constitution in the air
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:04 |
|
SquadronROE posted:Was Mondale/Reagan not even more than 60/40? 58-40
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:04 |
|
As soon as McCain's primary is over, I feel like he's going to go scorched earth on Trump The irony of the "moral" voice of the GOP being the man that introduced Sarah Palin to the national stage is palpable, but he seems to be one of the few with the guts to actually stand up for something in the party vvvv LBJ got 61% against Goldwater vvvv
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:05 |
|
SquadronROE posted:Was Mondale/Reagan not even more than 60/40? The biggest electoral landslide in history is like 58.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:05 |
|
zoux posted:The biggest electoral landslide in history is like 58. 61.1% for LBJ vs. Goldwater's 38.4%. Unless you go back to 1820. e: Nixon-McGovern was 60.7% vs. 37.5%.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:06 |
|
Zeeman posted:As soon as McCain's primary is over, I feel like he's going to go scorched earth on Trump 61-35 and 60-37 in '64 and '72 respectively (in modern times) FDR also won 60-37 in '38, and Hardding won 60-34 in '20.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:07 |
|
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:07 |
|
Crain posted:So claiming footage of outrageous things exist, when they clearly don't, is just like Trump's thing? He keeps doing it because form of rhetoric is aimed straight at people who desperately need to feel a sense of superiority and/or who are deeply afraid of feeling inferior. Every piece of nonsense he spews (and even the occasional fact) comes in the form of "This thing that happened, it was X-number or Y-number. It was a big deal, a very big deal so you remember. You're smart, of course you remember". By using this type of phrasing where he goes "I'm not entirely sure of the details, but you remember," he's implicitly saying that his audience is expected to remember the details and to not remember would mean failing to live up to Trump's expectations (and everyone knows what Trump thinks of losers). As a result, you get people who go along with what he says so they can appear smart by telling everyone (including themselves) "I remember that!" rather than admitting that they don't actually know/remember and looking up information on their own because they are under the impression that being smart is a matter of knowing concrete, objective facts rather than a process of continually learning new things and challenging old ones. This also is what likely leads to the assumption that the media must be biased/wrong if it says something they disagree with because if they think it's already bad to simply not know something, they will think it's significantly worse to be outright wrong on something.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:07 |
|
St. Dogbert posted:In honour of the WWE Superstar winning his GOP primary this week, I would like to say that Donald Trump is basically 1994-2001 WCW re-written as a presidential candidate. That's incredibly apt
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:07 |
|
There's not even a loving green blip for Trump winning.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:08 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:*this morning* I like to think he yells "HEY PAUL" like his son did in that one biopic.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/761307667549810688
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:10 |
|
Trump probably can't lose in one of those 49-1 state Electoral College sweeps because there are too many states with lower populations that are really loving red, but a historic popular vote blowout is definitely within reach if he keeps up this death spiral.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:10 |
|
My guess is Hillary's numbers will retreat abit. I think 8-9 seems possible, and that would be a massive defeat that would almost certainly imperil Republican control of congress.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:11 |
|
Lol at this being drat near as bad as Mondale.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:11 |
|
Like even if Republicans had a more sane candidate, the Senate was in trouble for them; with Trump instead of having four or five seats to defend -- they're looking at having to defend maybe as many as 8 or 9 seats.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:12 |
|
Note that this is similar to 538's nowcast and almost always shows an overwhelming win at any given time.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:13 |
|
Lumberjack Bonanza posted:That's incredibly apt August 6, 2016 - Paul Manafort fired as Trump campaign manager, to be replaced by Vince Russo.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:14 |
|
Lemming posted:Note that this is similar to 538's nowcast and almost always shows an overwhelming win at any given time. The main difference is that it doesn't flop around nearly as much as 538's Now-Cast. It's been at 80% forever and just went up to 85%. Their "random drift" is analogous to 538's Polls Only number, but it's also less flip-floppy over time and just went from 60% to 65% to 70% now.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:15 |
|
St. Dogbert posted:August 6, 2016 - Paul Manafort fired as Trump campaign manager, to be replaced by Vince Russo. lol if you think Vince Russo isn't already writing this campaign SWERVE, it turns out his wife is an illegal immigrant!
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:15 |
|
Lemming posted:Note that this is similar to 538's nowcast and almost always shows an overwhelming win at any given time. the now cast is just a capture of the very moment. it's, in his own admission, not a good forecasting tool this far out
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:16 |
|
For the record, if you were to go to 538 and look at the Nowcast predictions for every state and give Trump only those states where 538 guarantees his victory (i.e. where their margin of error does not include even the slightest chance of a Democratic victory), this is the map you get: If you do the reverse and give Clinton only the states where 538 guarantees her victory, this is the map you get:
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:16 |
|
sean10mm posted:The main difference is that it doesn't flop around nearly as much as 538's Now-Cast. It's been at 80% forever and just went up to 85%. I was referring to that image, specifically This one represents the 85% Bayesian model Edit: lmao it just rocketed up in the time I copy/pasted it from the site, glorious
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:16 |
|
Obama going off on this Iran "conspiracy" https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/761309856003399684 Also the GOP sure has a lot of balls accusing a president of secret illegal cash deals with Iran.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:17 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:My guess is Hillary's numbers will retreat abit. I think 8-9 seems possible, and that would be a massive defeat that would almost certainly imperil Republican control of congress. It's hard to compare to past awful campaigns because mindless party line voting is much stronger now than it was in 1984, 1972 or 1964... but Trump is also vastly more incompetent on all fronts than anybody we've seen by a huge margin. Clinton "only" winning on the scale of Obama 2008 wouldn't stun me, but a this point neither would a 60-35 shithousing.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:18 |
|
zoux posted:Obama going off on this Iran "conspiracy" did you miss ollie north talking about it last night?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:18 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:did you miss ollie north talking about it last night? No i did not.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:19 |
|
vyelkin posted:For the record, if you were to go to 538 and look at the Nowcast predictions for every state and give Trump only those states where 538 guarantees his victory (i.e. where their margin of error does not include even the slightest chance of a Democratic victory), this is the map you get: Lol at SC, MS, TX
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:19 |
|
Trump's campaign being a WCW storyline makes way too much sense. Like I'm having nWo red/white doublecross clusterfuck flashbacks when I look at the current state of the GOP.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:19 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 21:54 |
|
Other bullshit Obama is not putting up with today https://twitter.com/ericawerner/status/761310719640043521
|
# ? Aug 4, 2016 22:20 |