|
MattD1zzl3 posted:This 2nd amendment gaffe is a great chance to point out something thats been bugging me all election.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:10 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 19:02 |
|
MattD1zzl3 posted:What i
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:10 |
|
MattD1zzl3 posted:
As it was pointed out before, that interpretation is straight up nonsense. Chronologically it says that the "seconde amendment people" have to act if she gets to pick her judges, i.e. after the election.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
|
hey guys when trump blows this weird whistle my ears hurt and i can't hear for a little bit, but nobody else seems to react - what is the media covering up?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
|
Crows Turn Off posted:How many times does he have to toe the line before you realize which side of the line he's actually on? Trump's not actually racist/sexist/insane, he just loves the tightrope
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
|
Aren't there some legal issues with a presidential candidate telling people to shoot his rival?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
|
Crows Turn Off posted:It's real. That's not what it sounds like to me. The whole "could" thing is her trying to spin the statement as "your 2nd amendment rights could be at stake so go out and vote" (which of course is grade A horse poo poo), but I don't think she's addressing a hypothetical assassination.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
|
MariusLecter posted:What you hear is your brain doing a wishy washy "I'm still a good person, I'm not hateful and racist" but you are and you just can't cope otherwise. Have i ever been anything but an open racist in this thread? You must be new. Mostly its the initial "Mexicans = Rapists" quote from last summer, "People who wouldnt be admitted legally might try coming illegally because they want money" makes absolute sense just as he said it, and i dont get why another interpretation took off like a Saturn V rocket. (it certainly did) (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) MattD1zzl3 fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Aug 9, 2016 |
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:11 |
MattD1zzl3 posted:Have i ever been anything but an open racist in this thread? You must be new. Wait are you seriously racist? Why?
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:12 |
|
MattD1zzl3 posted:
This interpretation does not make any sense, because Trump is describing a scenario in which Hillary has already won and is already picking judges. It would be too late for anyone to vote against her in that case.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:12 |
|
drilldo squirt posted:Aren't there some legal issues with a presidential candidate telling people to shoot his rival? He's got just enough plausible deniability in that quote that I don't think any legal charges could possibly stick, but I'm hoping at least this scares off another handful of his potential voters if nothing else.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:12 |
|
Anti-Trump attack happened in the town next to my hometown. I wonder if this will gain traction with Trumpers showing how crooked Hillary is sending goons out to make sure TRUE AMERICANS don't vote Trump or some horseshit
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:13 |
|
If he was trying to speak to a large voting base, then why did he pick the one known for guns? And not:
No, he wasn't trying to connect Hillary with gun grabbing. He was thinking "Hey, you can't do anything about her judge picks if she gets elected. But you guys with a lot of guns and love for guns, you might be able to." Jesus christ, it would only be more obvious if he winked and said "IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN". He is a man literally known for bullying and being aggressive - of course he's going to hint at violence. Hinting at it is his way of toning it down, since he was also the guy that flat-out said he wanted to hit some of the people at the DNC.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:13 |
drilldo squirt posted:Aren't there some legal issues with a presidential candidate telling people to shoot his rival? The next couple things he does tomorrow will top this.
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:14 |
|
D&D I love you but you're really bad at not feeding trolls.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:14 |
|
Supercar Gautier posted:This interpretation does not make any sense, because Trump is describing a scenario in which Hillary has already won and is already picking judges. It would be too late for anyone to vote against her in that case. Sometimes things don't always come out like you mean
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:15 |
|
zoux posted:
The world's most massive state-sponsored attack on America since Pearl Harbor, targeted against ten thousand county clerks' IT systems.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:15 |
|
SquadronROE posted:If he was trying to speak to a large voting base, then why did he pick the one known for guns? And not: "Just look at the clip! He clearly shows that he just wants to run his thumb under her chin as a kind of 'buck up, kiddo!' motion. I have no idea how you could possibly misinterpret that."
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:16 |
|
Arrgytehpirate posted:Wait are you seriously racist? Why? I think racism is an aspect of our personality we should all identify in ourselves, admit, and make sure we dont hurt anyone who doesnt deserve to be hurt. But this does not jive with the DnD definition so w/e certainly dont listen to me. and, ya know....... white nationalism
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:16 |
My dream is for Trump to sub 100 electoral votes.
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:17 |
|
MattD1zzl3 posted:This 2nd amendment gaffe is a great chance to point out something thats been bugging me all election. What trump says, how i take it, and how its taken. What i heard: "Someone willing to risk their life and fortune to subvert the legal immigration process is likely to be someone who would be weeded out by it, we should enforce our borders better". What you heard: All mexicans are rapists, white power! Direct Trump quote:"If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do folks. Although the Second Amendment people—maybe there is. I don't know." What i heard: Hillary is going to gently caress the second amendment sideways, if you care about this vote against her. What you heard: Someone please shoot hillary. (Frankly "What i heard" could just as easily be "What he should have said", but really, what do you expect from a candidate from queens) [/quote] I'll give you the first one as a maybe possibly reasonable argument to someone who is completely deaf to dog whistles. The second one is clearly a threat however.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:17 |
|
PoorMoralCompass posted:The next couple things he does tomorrow will top this. I don't know how you can top calling for people to shoot your opponent if she wins but I'm very excited to find out.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:17 |
|
Lol in case you needed another reason to hate him, Joe Lieberman is considering endorsing Trump.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:18 |
|
Supercar Gautier posted:You'd think they would have done a group huddle first, to get their story straight, but nope, every Trump surrogate is leaping heroically into the fray with a wildly different "obvious" interpretation. This is because each Surrogate is trying to vie for Trump's attention so wont cooperate.. If they win, they will be rewarded. If they lose, they can get a book deal on how they were in the middle of 'How Trump destroyed the Republican Party'. And I bet you there is a poo poo ton of more money to be got from the latter.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:18 |
|
PoorMoralCompass posted:The next couple things he does tomorrow will top this. Will he throw a baby? He might throw a baby.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:18 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Lol in case you needed another reason to hate him, Joe Lieberman is considering endorsing Trump. Ahahaha, what a piece of poo poo
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:18 |
|
Sensible Thursday posted:D&D I love you but you're really bad at not feeding trolls. It's really hard to tell when they act far more civilized than the goddamn nominee of the republican party. This election I don't believe trolls exists. Everyone is way dumber, more racist and sincere than I could ever imagine. EDIT: Trabisnikof posted:Lol in case you needed another reason to hate him, Joe Lieberman is considering endorsing Trump. See?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:18 |
|
Arrgytehpirate posted:My dream is for Trump to sub 100 electoral votes. And if the Russians hack to give Trump 0 electoral votes in an attempt to provoke civil war in America?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:19 |
|
Before the end of the night the right wing talking point is going to be that Hillary said the same thing about Obama in 2008(her ill advised Robert Kennedy comparison) even though it's not remotely the same thing.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:19 |
|
MattD1zzl3 posted:I think racism is an aspect of our personality we should all identify in ourselves, admit, and make sure we dont hurt anyone who doesnt deserve to be hurt. But this does not jive with the DnD definition so w/e certainly dont listen to me. i think most people agree with that but instead of "make sure we dont hurt anyone who doesnt deserve to be hurt" you got probated multiple times for arguing that treyvon martin deserved it so in this case it's not the liberal d&d hivemind that is wrong, but you failing to live up to your own stated expectations
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/763136332784951306 I really can't believe this 2nd amendment poo poo is where we are in this election today. I figured it would take Trump getting owned in a debate before he openly called for her murder.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:19 |
GreyjoyBastard posted:Will he throw a baby? He might throw a baby. Call her an actual witch. Burn her at the stake! A CROOKED STAKE! But seriously, his calls to violence beginning with his early speeches, have just doubled down again and again. Someone's going to take him up on his suggestions if he keeps it up. Our country is literally about to be stolen, remember. Complaint Compilation fucked around with this message at 23:24 on Aug 9, 2016 |
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:21 |
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/763136332784951306 Probably my favorite twitter account right there
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:23 |
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Will he throw a baby? He might throw a baby. "Get me some babies, I will kiss them in front of everyone, it will be HUUGE in the press" *5 babies brought on stage, 1 is non-white* "Aww, look at the little babies here, let me kiss them" Kisses all but the non-white one. "Don't want to catch Zika now, do we."
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:24 |
|
Yeah he murdered that baby, but clearly it was just a commentary on how many babies that Democrats have murdered with their pro-abortion policies.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:24 |
|
How the blue staring gently caress is he going to top this, wearing actual nazi uniform, growing the moustache?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:24 |
|
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/763136332784951306 god dammit I was just about to post that. Nihilist Arby's is amazing. Also nothing surprises me at trump. He's already kicked babies out of his rallies, made "She's on the rag" jokes, and gone after gold-star families. And now "Gosh it'd be a shame if somethin' were to happen to her".
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:25 |
|
He also doubles down on every idiot thing he says so I wonder what he's going to say this time
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:24 |
Josef bugman posted:How the blue staring gently caress is he going to top this, wearing actual nazi uniform, growing the moustache? Still hoping for the c bomb during a debate
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:25 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 19:02 |
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Will he throw a baby? He might throw a baby. Some mother will hand him a baby and he'll go all Liu Bei on it.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2016 23:25 |