|
Heavy Metal posted:I heard she.... rattles the cages... Well let's go to the graph and check that: Okay, Jonah Hex is definitely worse than Suicide Squad but I think GI Joe: Rise of Cobra might be just behind Suicide Squad, although it's really close.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 06:57 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 09:25 |
|
If we're lising GI Joe, would Men in Black technically count as a 'Marvel' movie, too, if only through their acquisition of Malibu.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 07:36 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Well let's go to the graph and check that: I was referring to my opinions, since I was reviewing it. JediTalentAgent posted:If we're lising GI Joe, would Men in Black technically count as a 'Marvel' movie, too, if only through their acquisition of Malibu. I was just comparing movies, though all comic book movies. Oh right the graph thingy, well Hasbro owned GI Joe so it was a licensed comic, like say a Doctor Who comic from IDW. But it was a popular comic at Marvel. Speaking of IDW, they had the GI Joe license when that movie came out. Heavy Metal fucked around with this message at 08:43 on Aug 15, 2016 |
# ? Aug 15, 2016 08:37 |
|
Heavy Metal posted:I was referring to my opinions, since I was reviewing it. I wasn't posting the graph seriously, I thought it was hilarious that anyone took the time to plot out all those RT scores. I'd hate to think that anyone would actually try and bring up that graph as some way of ending an argument.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 10:28 |
|
Tobey Maguire and Kristen Dunst are definitely my pick for worst couple. Their complete lack of chemistry combined with the big focus their relationship has in the movies make them a pain to watch.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 10:43 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:I wasn't posting the graph seriously, I thought it was hilarious that anyone took the time to plot out all those RT scores. I'd hate to think that anyone would actually try and bring up that graph as some way of ending an argument. Wouldn't be that hard to do if you could pull the data directly from an API or whatever.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 13:09 |
|
Crion posted:Amy Adams and Henry Cavill are perfectly fine. Christian Bale and Katie Holmes, on the other hand, Well, Rachel kept brushing him off for the entire movie and didn't like him, so that makes sense.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 14:41 |
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Wouldn't be that hard to do if you could pull the data directly from an API or whatever. Don't kid yourself, some schmuck did that by hand, data point by data point, browser tab per movie. Darko posted:Well, Rachel kept brushing him off for the entire movie and didn't like him, so that makes sense. Bruce was such a goober in that movie.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 14:46 |
|
MacheteZombie posted:
"I...I am....I am more."
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:22 |
|
She was awfully judgmental in that movie.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:27 |
|
Jimbot posted:She was awfully judgmental in that movie. She was 100% right.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:40 |
|
Crion posted:Amy Adams and Henry Cavill are perfectly fine. Christian Bale and Katie Holmes, on the other hand, It's all in the framing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSe6tvfedb0
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:43 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:I wasn't posting the graph seriously, I thought it was hilarious that anyone took the time to plot out all those RT scores. I'd hate to think that anyone would actually try and bring up that graph as some way of ending an argument. Ah right on. Maybe that data could be used in a CAD program to make a Marvel/DC movie shaped cookie or something cool like that. Dexo posted:It's all in the framing That commercial is magical.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:49 |
|
Why is it every time I hope one of y'all is posting the "I can't believe this is a commercial for a Batman movie" video, it's always ABC Family's commercial and not this one, literally produced by Warner Brothers to play on The WB and UPN: https://youtu.be/y9NNIQ-F5lw The different subtext of that "Batmobile through the waterfall" bit is some crazy poo poo on its own, that is some magical editing right there
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 15:57 |
|
I still blame everything about Rachel Dawes squarely on the Nolan Bros. You can tell because Maggie Gyllenhall is a better actress than Katie Holmes and still does worse in the role.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 16:16 |
|
The Rachel stuff carrying into Rises was the only part of it I found weird. The Dark Knight has Bruce totally despondent after she dies and he's unwilling to be Batman if it means other people get killed. Alfred is basically all "stiff upper lip, Master Bruce" and convinces him that Gotham has to make do with him and he has to soldier on. But then he's squarely back in extended mourning and isolation in Rises. Probably a more realistic depiction of grief so maybe I'm being too hard on it, it just seemed to run counter to how that development was resolved in The Dark Knight.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 17:31 |
|
The Cameo posted:Why is it every time I hope one of y'all is posting the "I can't believe this is a commercial for a Batman movie" video, it's always ABC Family's commercial and not this one, literally produced by Warner Brothers to play on The WB and UPN: I love that movie, but hot drat this TV spot, it is too much. I wonder if Nolan had final cut on that spot.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 17:49 |
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:The Rachel stuff carrying into Rises was the only part of it I found weird. The Dark Knight has Bruce totally despondent after she dies and he's unwilling to be Batman if it means other people get killed. Alfred is basically all "stiff upper lip, Master Bruce" and convinces him that Gotham has to make do with him and he has to soldier on. But then he's squarely back in extended mourning and isolation in Rises. Probably a more realistic depiction of grief so maybe I'm being too hard on it, it just seemed to run counter to how that development was resolved in The Dark Knight. The impression I got was he was run down from being Batman for so many years without any success.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:13 |
|
Heavy Metal posted:I love that movie, but hot drat this TV spot, it is too much. I wonder if Nolan had final cut on that spot. Directors have almost nothing to do with the marketing, if my understanding is correct.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:14 |
|
Yeah I thought it was culmination of everything. Rachel dying, Harvey getting turned, Bat's efforts only creating more problems, and so on.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:14 |
|
WampaLord posted:Directors have almost nothing to do with the marketing, if my understanding is correct. I was channeling my Leslie Nielsen in Airplane deadpan, but it is pretty great to imagine Chris Nolan sitting in front of a monitor working on the editing of that Nickelback romance commercial thingy.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:26 |
|
Tezcatlipoca posted:The impression I got was he was run down from being Batman for so many years without any success. It may have been that. He wasn't Batman for very long, as far as I could tell. A few months in Begins, an indeterminate amount of time between Begins and The Dark Knight, maybe a couple months in The Dark Knight and then the hiatus. The Dark Knight does seem to imply he's been active long enough to have frequent interactions with Gordon since "he often doesn't" show up when the signal is lit, and the signal is introduced at the end of Begins. All three movies together give me the impression that his career as Batman was like two years tops.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:28 |
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:It may have been that. He wasn't Batman for very long, as far as I could tell. A few months in Begins, an indeterminate amount of time between Begins and The Dark Knight, maybe a couple months in The Dark Knight and then the hiatus. The Dark Knight does seem to imply he's been active long enough to have frequent interactions with Gordon since "he often doesn't" show up when the signal is lit, and the signal is introduced at the end of Begins. All three movies together give me the impression that his career as Batman was like two years tops. The scene with Bruce at the doctor's office made it seem like he had built up years and years of injuries so I think by DKR he had been at it for a while.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:33 |
|
DKR states that it takes place 8 years later. Not sure if it is ever clear how long it is between Begins and TDK.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:53 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:DKR states that it takes place 8 years later. Not sure if it is ever clear how long it is between Begins and TDK. Yeah, but wasn't DKR pretty clear that Bruce just Howard Hughes-ed it up in Wayne Manor for those 8 years, or did I forget a scene?
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:57 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:DKR states that it takes place 8 years later. Not sure if it is ever clear how long it is between Begins and TDK. Seems to be very little time between Begins and TDK, given that they say at the very end of Begins that Joker has just shown up.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 18:59 |
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:Yeah, but wasn't DKR pretty clear that Bruce just Howard Hughes-ed it up in Wayne Manor for those 8 years, or did I forget a scene? Sort of. They say that he gradually winded down his time as Batman over the years and let the police take over. He hasn't been doing any Batman-ing for a couple of years when DKR STARTS.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 19:01 |
|
WampaLord posted:Directors have almost nothing to do with the marketing, if my understanding is correct. They very rarely have anything to do with it unless they have enough pull to get something written into their contract. I've heard stories that the director on John Carter had a lot of pull in the ad campaign for that movie but he also shot scenes in such an order that not a lot of good stuff was sufficiently complete for the ads anyway, but on the other hand that might just be rumours spread by Disney peeps who wanted to throw him under a bus.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 19:15 |
|
EDIT: Wrong thread.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 19:16 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:They very rarely have anything to do with it unless they have enough pull to get something written into their contract. I've heard stories that the director on John Carter had a lot of pull in the ad campaign for that movie but he also shot scenes in such an order that not a lot of good stuff was sufficiently complete for the ads anyway, but on the other hand that might just be rumours spread by Disney peeps who wanted to throw him under a bus. There's also the famous mistake Sony Pictures made of letting David Fincher have control of the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo ads, which immediately led to David having the photoshoot with Craig and Mara where she's topless and having that be the teaser poster for the movie. They had to talk him down to sending the poster out with a sticker over the areola as to avoid people absolutely losing their poo poo. Then he spent a chunk of change (on SPE's dime) on the music rights to "Immigrant Song", which at least got them an award-winning teaser trailer.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 20:24 |
|
The Cameo posted:There's also the famous mistake Sony Pictures made of letting David Fincher have control of the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo ads, which immediately led to David having the photoshoot with Craig and Mara where she's topless and having that be the teaser poster for the movie. I didn't like the book (or the movie, for that matter), but I remember this ad making me think it was going to be great.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 20:26 |
|
Sony might be the worst of the big name movie studios. The best they can manage when they don't gently caress over their talent is mediocre
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 20:32 |
|
and Spider man 2
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 20:48 |
|
The Cameo posted:Then he spent a chunk of change (on SPE's dime) on the music rights to "Immigrant Song", which at least got them an award-winning teaser trailer. Fuckin' worth it, tbh
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 21:30 |
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I didn't like the book (or the movie, for that matter), but I remember this ad making me think it was going to be great. Honestly, I'm pretty okay with the Fincher movie. The source material being lovely weighs it down, but they did the best they could regardless.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 21:39 |
|
Look, if that's what he needed to do to make Gone Girl, I wish he'd just gone ahead and done the whole trilogy.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 21:40 |
|
MacheteZombie posted:and Spider man 2 I specifically said when they don't gently caress over their talent. Spider-Man 1 and 2 were about the best things they've made in a while because Sam Raimi was allowed to be Sam Raimi. Then Sony stepped in on Spider-Man 3 and down it went
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 21:42 |
|
Fair enough, somehow missed that in your post.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 21:44 |
|
Good news, folks! Doctor Strange has been rated PG-13 for...Latino Review posted:...kaleidoscopic galactic intensity and other-dimensional psychotropic violence. gently caress yeah. feedmyleg fucked around with this message at 23:18 on Aug 15, 2016 |
# ? Aug 15, 2016 23:16 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 09:25 |
|
feedmyleg posted:Good news, folks! Doctor Strange has been rated PG-13 for... God drat it, and I was thinking about taking my son to see it. Kaleidoscopic galactic intensity way too mature for his age I think.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2016 23:19 |