|
The type system in r is real garbage. It's like they managed to get the worst of both worlds while combining it with weird array structures which give you different types depending on how you index.
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 05:12 |
|
|
so loving future posted:good call definitely learn the thing that's sorta like the thing that everyone uses it is easier to learn hg and then learn how to translate hg concepts into git's weird ui than it is to start by learning git and a lot of git tutorials spend an entire first chapter jerking off over git's content addressable store even though this is not something you need to know at all also some high profile projects and companies actually use hg believe it or not
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:it is easier to learn hg and then learn how to translate hg concepts into git's weird ui than it is to start by learning git isn't that basically true for any programmy thing though? agonizing over which one to learn first is time not spent learning your first one and figuring out how to use that info elsewhere? last time at uni i went through smalltalk, c++withoutthe++, college we did cobol and jcl, and now i'm going through babbys first programming language with java and it feels a bit weird cause i keep thinking "shouldn't we be doing something a bit more procedural before leaping straight into oo?" Shaggar posted:documentation in intro cs classes are to show what your intent was and how you think it works as compared to the actual results. sad but true if only they documented the questions half as well as they expect me to document the answer
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
i have a compsci masters and i did not touch a VCS once single time as part of my course
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:we use SVN at work  we've actually been talking about switching to git soon so hopefully that actually happens
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:i downloaded that 68k emulator/debugger easy68k to play with. it includes all kinds of simulated peripherals, serial connection, file i/o, even TCP and UDP networking. i decided i wanted to try clearing the 7-segment LEDs this is very old but the 68K instruction set really is the best by far, I wish for a completely reasonable 64-bit extension
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 00:00
|
|
this instruction set is magic holy poo poo autoincrementing memory addresses
|
Luigi Thirty posted:64 bits is enough for anyone when your money is denominated in mills I know someone who had to stop using TurboTax because of Rule 36 overflow issues at that point you really should be paying an accounting firm to manage your money
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:i expanded my directory enumerator to look for a file named "program.bin" (the number displayer with ORG $1000 changed to ORG $800000), load it into 0x800000 and execute it. i've invented dos. you actually invented TOS since it's 68K and using FAT now you need an Atari ST
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
quiggy posted:first semester of freshman year, we took an "intro to programming for engineers" course, which was half matlab and half c. you have never seen something as awful as watching someone who has never tried to program before learn off of matlab and c, and needless to say the only people who got reasonable grades in that class were people who already knew how to program hey, i took that class when i was in college too! except for me it was half fortran 77 half c. i imagine people who'd never touched a computer before didn't do all that well, but as someone who'd been touching computers for a decade by that point, i don't really care and hey we did do stuff like computing the lift generated by an airfoil with basic numerical methods, which is kind of cool, so it wasn't a total waste of time either
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Prolog is fun 
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:it is easier to learn hg and then learn how to translate hg concepts into git's weird ui than it is to start by learning git hg was better, but git won accept it
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
i think git won completely on the back of github too. just goes to show that accessibility will always beat quality
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
worse is still better, turns out
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
git has better out of the box support for rewriting local history so it's better
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:hg was better, but git won kinda, like it depends how you had better - a big large project switched to it first based on their experiences using other tools, while most other large projects still used svn - git's content addressable store model, well, storing snapshots, not deltas, is a reasonable thing to do, the internals of mercurial are funny - github meant a lot of people jumped ship because sourceforge was a complete pain in the rear end - hg had a nicer interface but things like rebasing took a while to appear - git worked very well for "I want to fork this and send patches" and github PRs can be tricked into being a mechanism for this - git is slowly gaining useful defaults but you'll have to often hack around it to produce your own workflow - git is still hilariously bad at large files, and a lot of people still copy paste their way through it but uh, people still use and maintain mercurial, same as git so neither one has won, I mean, people still use svn too git's success is probably as much due to stackoverflow as github, the former providing the cookbook for git people who use svn will likely find the jump to hg much, much easier too i dunno, i remember sourceforge, google code, i remember svn as being the "end-of", it really depends which bubble you're in tef fucked around with this message at 03:02 on Aug 27, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
you can still use hg just know it won't be a popular choice but tbh it's a pointless detail compared to how you track issues and merge branches
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
eschaton posted:you actually invented TOS since it's 68K and using FAT  ok got one. now what i think to invent TOS i need to implement an ugly-rear end green desktop
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 03:17
|
|
|
amiga rules, atari drools!
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 03:29
|
|
|
so I've got my Pentium 90 running Windows 3.1 and my Windows 10 computer connected with a null modem cable what fun can I have with this and my 3D engine
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 03:51
|
|
|
I wonder what is more powerful The p90 Or the new pc's embedded controller
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Btw you can get ISA Ethernet cards that do 10mbps I have one from uhh Netgear I think and it works fine in Windows 3.11 For Workgroups
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:so I've got my Pentium 90 running Windows 3.1 and my Windows 10 computer connected with a null modem cable ask it what 4195835/3145727 is
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Hard Drivin' supported up to 5 (I think) game boards connected via serial link to the master board which showed the scene from different angles, multi monitor 3D in 1988 also since I got a promotion I'm spending $Texas on the Atari ST system I've wanted for 20 years 1040STf, VGA adapter, Marpet memory expansion to 4MB, hard drive emulator gonna write hella 68000 asm on it
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:02
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:Btw you can get ISA Ethernet cards that do 10mbps that would probably be a more ideal solution but goddamn Watcom requires a serial connection for debugging DPMI applications anyway I'm not sure if Windows 3.11 can connect to modern MS workgroups but I could just set up an FTP server pointing to my dosbox folder anyway Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 04:06 on Aug 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:ask it what 4195835/3145727 is 1
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:that would probably be a more ideal solution but goddamn Watcom requires a serial connection for debugging DPMI applications anyway a long time ago I had a 3.11 comp connected to xp over an isa Ethernet card and NetBIOS.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
i need to publish a thing i coded for my student project, help me choose open source licence (idk much about this). i get that it likely won't ever be read through by anyone (i mean the project, no one reads licences), even partially, but why bother doing if im not doing it right. my "project" uses some core python 2 stuff and 5 external libraries for python. 3 are licensed under bsd-new, 4th has modified psf licence for it's bsd-compatible code, and last is creative commons zero. im looking at the licenses and its a loving mess with licences all over the place. while im p sure that i do not want anything like gnu gpl v3, im not sure how do i pick between apache 2, mit, and bsd-new.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
quiggy posted:
i made sure to ask every employer in my current round of interviews what their source control was svn wasn't a straight deal breaker but i now consider it a red flag
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:i need to publish a thing i coded for my student project, help me choose open source licence (idk much about this). i get that it likely won't ever be read through by anyone (i mean the project, no one reads licences), even partially, but why bother doing if im not doing it right. use gnu gpl v3
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
use mit
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
you just copy paste in the mit license and your all set
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:i need to publish a thing i coded for my student project, help me choose open source licence (idk much about this). i get that it likely won't ever be read through by anyone (i mean the project, no one reads licences), even partially, but why bother doing if im not doing it right. If no one is going to use it anyways you might as well go GPL3.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
In the case that anyone wants to use it, do you prefer: 1) They must open source whatever they use it for, meaning they may choose not to use it, or 2) you don't give a gently caress, people can do whatever If 2), paste in the MIT license and be done with it. If 1) use GPLv3, or AGPL if you want to be thorough (AGPL gets rid of the "loophole" in gpl where you don't have to open source your modification of the thing if you use it in a web thing) Arcsech fucked around with this message at 01:42 on Aug 29, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:i made sure to ask every employer in my current round of interviews what their source control was it only works with us because we're a small company. svn's branch support is so loving bad that i can't even begin to imagine it working in a setting of 10 or more programmers
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
thanks everyone for licencing advice, mit it is. i dont give a poo poo what all 0 people are going to do with it, as long as it's least amount of hassle for them
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
quiggy posted:it only works with us because we're a small company. svn's branch support is so loving bad that i can't even begin to imagine it working in a setting of 10 or more programmers what problems are you having w/ branches? works fine for me
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:what problems are you having w/ branches? works fine for me purely command line syntax / difficulty merging. like i said i dont have a huge amount of experience with it but it leaves a lot to be desired
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
why would you use command line tools? are you from 1970?
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 05:12 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:why would you use command line tools? are you from 1970? yes
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2016 02:30
|
|