|
Real hurthling! posted:someone was trying to tell me that gamescom demo redeemed sc. was it actually impressive/real? i didn't see it. it set a new high benchmark for videogame immersion and fidelity edit: tax alf_pogs fucked around with this message at 03:29 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 12:38 |
|
did they pretend to play live?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:26 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:someone was trying to tell me that gamescom demo redeemed sc. was it actually impressive/real? i didn't see it. People are going to be doing a "back, and to the left" analysis of the demo when it all goes to pot (and a few have already - though I don't have the links, but I'm hoping someone will provide them). I can only imagine the scrambling that's going on from now until CitCon, to reassure backers like they're the board of shareholders in a public company. Or they'll stay the course and hope the faithful will keep buying in. There's a third option, but that's well-tread theorycrafting in this thread.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:27 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:did they pretend to play live? They played "live" but it was all on rails and predefined. Here is a video to simulate the presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLtmEjqzg7M vs reality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8P2CZg3sJQ
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:36 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:did they pretend to play live? It was played live and very pretty. It was also very apparent that if they did anything that deviated from script it would have broken. And it still was a demo with four players on a lan. So of course redeemed. Drunk Theory fucked around with this message at 03:40 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:38 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:someone was trying to tell me that gamescom demo redeemed sc. was it actually impressive/real? i didn't see it.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:40 |
|
I am legit excited for CIG's Star Citizen. Can't wait for the retail release of Star Citizen. It's going to be amazing. Star Citizen.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:44 |
|
What was that? Star Citizen depends on Squadron 42 being a runaway success? But what if it isn't? OH..................
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:45 |
|
Kind of disappointed in you Derek. You should have used that Humility quote as the new title.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:47 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:What was that? Star Citizen depends on Squadron 42 being a runaway success? But what if it isn't? OH.................. Uh, but how could it not be? My "friend" is a huge COD fan and he said that he was sick of the modern day setting and was really interested in Squadron 42. That's like 5 million sales right there and- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF3UTkCoxY oh.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:48 |
|
I've figured it out. They knew they couldn't compete with COD/Mass Effect/Titanfall 2, so instead, they'll delay SQ42 until after those titles (plus all DLC) are released and old hat. Then SQ42 will swoop in like a majestic albatross into the now open market. Brilliant really.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:51 |
|
I love the idea that a company ran out and spent tens of millions of dollars on actors and motion capture, even coming back and doing reshoots, for a game where basic gameplay mechanics are not only unimplemented but still have yet to be defined.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 03:59 |
|
Ben Lesnick, Developer
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:01 |
|
Chocobo posted:I love the idea that a company ran out and spent tens of millions of dollars on actors and motion capture, even coming back and doing reshoots, for a game where basic gameplay mechanics are not only unimplemented but still have yet to be defined. We just have to be patient Commando
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:10 |
|
trucutru posted:It's supposed to be a plaza. Probably a shopping one because that's all there is to do in SC. Anyways, according to reddit that's not concept but *pre-concept* art, so yeah. So it was made before they even had the idea to make it? Holy poo poo, these people are completely retarded.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:13 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:did they pretend to play live? Well, they sure didnt let anyone else but their own guys "play" 3.0 at the event. Hmm... I wonder why.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:25 |
|
Real hurthling! posted:someone was trying to tell me that gamescom demo redeemed sc. was it actually impressive/real? i didn't see it. If you look at it as a very tightly scripted "don't dare step over the red line" type of presentation, it was OK; fairly nice visuals (that you'd kind of expect in Cry) but pathetic demonstration of game development (ie, fun). If you look at it as a state of current gameplay capability by the end of this year....... you're an idiot. Needless to say the shitizens thought it was great.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Drunk Theory posted:I've figured it out. They knew they couldn't compete with COD/Mass Effect/Titanfall 2, so instead, they'll delay SQ42 until after those titles (plus all DLC) are released and old hat. Then SQ42 will swoop in like a majestic albatross into the now open market. I actually wouldn't be surprised if that doesn't fit in to a degree. Problem is, there's a long lineup of contenders coming in the next couple years. CIG will be relegated to whatever leftovers spring for it on Steam Sales.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:49 |
|
ripptide posted:I actually wouldn't be surprised if that doesn't fit in to a degree. Problem is, there's a long lineup of contenders coming in the next couple years. CIG will be relegated to whatever leftovers spring for it on Steam Sales.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 04:58 |
|
The GamesCom presentation was a vertical slice that showed the concept of Star Citizen only 20 months after it was scheduled to be released. It did a good job of conveying the intent behind SC. Unfortunately the backers are interpreting it as a representation of progress and not merely the promise.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 05:03 |
|
thanks. i was hoping there'd be like a smoking gun of unplugged keyboards or something proving its fake but that's cool too.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 05:06 |
|
Bookmark the next three months!
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 05:09 |
|
I have a signed picture of Derek smart on my desk. It's framed and everything. I wish I actually got a good 8x10 glossy with his real signature on it but it works. It reminds me I once believed this was gonna be a real game and I was a sucker. Thanks to Derek I got my refund though.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:14 |
|
titaniumone posted:Bookmark the next three months! thanks anabelle
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:19 |
|
I saw this over at and thought it was too good not to share. https://gfycat.com/MarriedEasygoingAmericanbadger Sparks are not effected by the voodoo of the "local physics grid", because why not.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:31 |
|
D_Smart posted:My book will be out first. I meant a documentary like Electric Boogalo, not the one they lied about making.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:33 |
|
Viscous Soda posted:I saw this over at and thought it was too good not to share. lol
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:48 |
|
It was a demo that was supposed to be a fetch quest. Theres no way that that could be in the game. So many mechanics/things in the game just plain dont make sense in the context of what star citizen is supposed to be. If it was a SQ42 level itd be fine. But its supposed to Alpha 3.0. Its so goddamn tedious they better hope it isn't. It took em almost an hour to do it.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:49 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The GamesCom presentation was a vertical slice that showed the concept of Star Citizen only 20 months after it was scheduled to be released. It did a good job of conveying the intent behind SC. Unfortunately the backers are interpreting it as a representation of progress and not merely the promise. Looking at it over again now, the question remains the same. What IS Star Citizen? An FPS EVE Clone? ED wannabe? If you're already buying endgame ships then whats the point of the credit grind? My take, Star Citizen is the best virtual shopping experience, ever. 10/10.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 06:59 |
|
no_recall posted:Looking at it over again now, the question remains the same. What IS Star Citizen? An FPS EVE Clone? ED wannabe? there are like a hundred thousand better shopping videogames
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 07:08 |
|
I.N.R.I posted:This game looks like its starting to come together. Itll be nice if it turns out to be really good Even though I had completely forgotten you I did call my parents yesterday. You have successfully infected me. Viscous Soda posted:I saw this over at and thought it was too good not to share. I wonder what would happen if he jumped up and lost contact with the ship floor. MeLKoR fucked around with this message at 07:26 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ? Sep 5, 2016 07:16 |
|
alf_pogs posted:there are like a hundred thousand better shopping videogames please list some, this is my fetish. I wish GTA 5 had more outfit save slots edit: GTA 5 is insanely fun if you run missions with a friend entirely in the 1st person btw. It's like this living breathing FPU. (First Person Universe). Raskolnikov fucked around with this message at 07:51 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ? Sep 5, 2016 07:35 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:please list some, this is my fetish. edit: couldn't fall through the floor though. Trapezium Dave fucked around with this message at 07:49 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ? Sep 5, 2016 07:47 |
|
remember only rockstar maybe can match Star Citizen here is a picture of their FPU. All the cars, helicopters, and airplanes have a functional cockpit with accurate meters for speed altimeter etc.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 07:57 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:remember only rockstar maybe can match Star Citizen http://imgur.com/gallery/f8cXF http://imgur.com/gallery/fItFt Star Citizen will be more detailed, ofcourse
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:08 |
|
Cigstomper58 posted:If it was a SQ42 level itd be fine. But its supposed to Alpha 3.0. Its so goddamn tedious they better hope it isn't. It took em almost an hour to do it. "THERE'S GOING TO BE 100 HOURS OF GAMEPLAY IN STANTON!"
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:09 |
|
http://wmfelite.imgur.com/ Someone sure is archiving the Elite thread and making a list of haters.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:10 |
|
Chris Ihao posted:So how does a man (Chrogbert) look like when his dream crumbles and crashes at PAX? Where is the video of this?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:17 |
|
AlmightyPants posted:Where is the video of this? Actually this bit of history was based on that demo (the origin of the airhorns) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7ywfd1qe8 from the GBS threads a few years ago (and $80,000,000 ago) one thing i notice is that they got rid of the lego block ship system at some point. Meaning it was so impossible they actually had to admit that.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 12:38 |
|
Pop quiz: 1) Who still thinks I am wrong and that sq42 will still be out this year in some form. Obviousley that German article was mistranslated and Chris Misquoted. Despite there being not one shred of evidence that sq42 even exists as a game (And we now have 3 months left in 2016). If a prelude level surfaces around 2018/19 will some of the hardcore then start to question Chris? 2) based on the sq42 shennanigens and CIG's track record for maybe , possibly being a bit out with their deadlines who thinks that a fully working progen planet with trading and FPS, 3.0 will be out in December ? 3) based on the blink and you miss it, animatic of a badly animated space dude checking his gun at gamescom , who thinks that Starmarine will be out this year as well? I can tell you what you will see. A sweet looking trailer for sq42 at Shitcon. All dev work is now on hold and everyone is taping and gluing furiousley to get a sq42 showcase out. We just need to finalise the attaching of some smoke to some mirrors and we are nearly there.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2016 08:48 |