|
alpha_destroy posted:No, they are dumplings. 
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 21:00 |
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:Generally any terrorists who actually bought their guns legally from a licensed dealer (a stupidly small number) had clean enough records to pass their nation's background checks anyway. Or they just use something where a background check isn't an issue, like a pressure cooker or a commercial airliner.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Your Computer posted:A smørbrød (literally "butter bread" aka. buttered bread) is a brødskive too, but the term is often used for a bit more ~fancy~ ones that have luxuries such as lettuce or two pieces of bread (aka. a sandwich). I think it's a funny ö. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-RdBu8TJgc The swedish chef became danish in Germany. -e- Other way around. Lurking Haro has a new favorite as of 22:10 on Sep 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:Or they just use something where a background check isn't an issue, like a pressure cooker or a commercial airliner. But how would a terrorist get onboard a plane? It's not like they can just buy a ticket like anyone else. That's what all that extra security is for, right? The schadenfreude is on all of us 
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
TAKE THIS GUN CONTROL poo poo SOMEWHERE ELSE NERDS THIS IS THE SHADENFREUDE THREAD; THE ONLY SHOTS IN HERE ARE NUT SHOTS   
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
I'm imaging this is one of those Korean news things about Jerry Jones ruining the Cowboys.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Your Computer posted:Sandwiches aren't really much of a thing in my country, it's all "brødskive" which is a slice of bread with butter and "pålegg" on top that can be cold cuts, cheese, spreads, etc. A hot dog is definitely not a brødskive. This has nothing to do with sandwiches but I love how strange Norwegian looks and sounds
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Zamboni_Rodeo posted:Y'all want some real gun schadenfreude? Thanks to the NRA's meddling, all of those gun applications aren't allowed to be recorded as computerized records: That was a really good read. Thanks for posting it!
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:That was a really good read. Thanks for posting it! Canada had a national database of guns. They dropped it because it was ridiculously expensive to maintain and didn't help them solve crimes. That whole article was: "The real world doesn't work like CSI but wouldn't it be neat if it did?", ignoring the fact that it *can't*. http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/fu...k-and-never-did
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
But what if it *did*?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
oldpainless posted:But what if it *did*? https://youtu.be/u8qgehH3kEQ
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
Sulla-Marius 88 posted:What does a military engagement in an active war zone have to do with domestic gun control though? I'm not saying the burn wasn't icy but this smacks of "As a single mother of 3, I know what it takes to balance a budget" Apparently he was a intel officer in the National Guard, which makes me wonder how much of this "volunteering to ride in a unarmored SUV" was being done to get a medal, or because he wanted to shoot at Afghans.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:Canada had a national database of guns. They dropped it because it was ridiculously expensive to maintain and didn't help them solve crimes. That whole article was: "The real world doesn't work like CSI but wouldn't it be neat if it did?", ignoring the fact that it *can't*. By the sounds of it, they had a national registry of long guns that was barely enforced in the first place, so of course it was useless. That really doesn't say anything about national databases other than that one was a fiasco that was really poorly planned out. It only briefly mentions handgun laws passed previously but doesn't really discuss them at all. Garrand has a new favorite as of 00:28 on Sep 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
The Canadian gun registry was sold to the public partially on the CSI angle, but what got most people onboard was a specific scenario: "Officer gets a DA call. On route they can call the CFR, and find out if the resident owns any firearms, and which ones. This allows the officer to prepare for the possible presence of a firearm(s) in the home. If there's no licensee in the home, there's a pretty high chance there's not going to be any surprise guns coming out. If there is, and he's a gun collecting goon with several shotguns, rifles and handguns, then maybe the officer might approach the situation differently". It all sounded great in theory. I got my license, I registered all my guns, kept all the paperwork in a safe place, etc in case of an inspection (which the police can absolutely do to firearms owners but almost never do). Five years later they cancel the program because it turns out that the police run 24/7 and a call center that runs 9a-8p for LE doesn't exactly jive, so cops stopped calling altogether, defeating the sane-sounding part of the whole thing. And that's how you blow a billion dollars on a safety program!
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
You're saying the only reason it didn't work is because it relied on humans in a call center instead of an API the cops could hit from a smartphone?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
cars are registered
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:You're saying the only reason it didn't work is because it relied on humans in a call center instead of an API BIG BROTHER could hit from a smartphone?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Failarmy catch up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OpSIJiYpRM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEQIk1fCTdc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRvt5d2OPfU
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
L. Ron Hubbard in hell?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
Elohssa Gib posted:Failarmy catch up The guy at 4:40 with the kid crying he can't have coffee. Dude that's mostly milk and sugar you pansy of course the kid loves "coffee" I had no phone on me the other day but this 3 or 4 y/o kid was running around his dad's SUV screaming "NO VIDEO" as he was being chased by his dad. It's like dad was trying to get something going for a little youtube and the kid was sick of it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
He's probably 100% immune at this height, right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQzuQ8Hve-Y
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Caedus posted:Five years later they cancel the program because it turns out that conversatives are spiteful as gently caress ftfy
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Is this the race where the aussie came from behind and won the gold?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 04:16
|
|
|
Zteuer posted:Is this the race where the aussie came from behind and won the gold? Nah, that was an Olympic speed-skating event. http://i.imgur.com/d4gwUpX.gifv E: It was Australias' first ever Winter Olympics Gold, too, I think
Malachite_Dragon has a new favorite as of 04:55 on Sep 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Nah, that was an Olympic speed-skating event. Funny thing, the Australian had actually provided free skates to the American in that race as a sponsorship prior to the Olympics as he never expected to even make it past the heats let alone actually winning the gold.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
2:25 is the sound you make when you just realized you probably have three seconds left to live
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
Testekill posted:Funny thing, the Australian had actually provided free skates to the American in that race as a sponsorship prior to the Olympics as he never expected to even make it past the heats let alone actually winning the gold. Quote from website: quote:In an unlikely series of events, short-track speed skater Steven Bradbury became the first Australian to win a gold medal at a Winter Olympics. In Salt Lake City in 2002 he competed in the thousand-metre short-track event. After winning his first heat it seemed that his chances of progressing any further were slim – his quarter-final draw included two of the world’s best skaters, and only first and second placegetters would progress to the semi-final. Bradbury finished third, but one of the other placegetters was disqualified for obstruction, thus giving the Australian a spot in the semi-final.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 07:17
|
|
|
johnnyratbastard posted:Quote from website: or as narrated by an  : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fFnSRKUBFU
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
CAPTAIN CAPSLOCK posted:or as narrated by an I do love me an Ozzy Man review. And it's a fact that we all talk like that in real life at the pub.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 09:10
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Nah, that was an Olympic speed-skating event. HE'S A HERO THIS MAN
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 13:28
|
|
|
This is pretty old but thematically fitting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iWI72c42gc
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
Humphreys posted:And it's a fact that we all talk like that in real life at the pub. About the Ozzy Man dais?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
^ nice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
Look upon my works ye drunkards and get smashed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/OVdkGYF.gifv
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
The silver medalist(Anton Ono?) was pretty impressive there too, he has the presence of mind to kick his toe out over the finish line or he may have lost out to the next guy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 21:00 |
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:2:25 is the sound you make when you just realized you probably have three seconds left to live
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:34
|
|
