|
it was pretty wild how clinton went through a whole speech about "what is donald hiding in his tax returns" and donald didn't bring up her wall street speeches because he was too busy doing rails off his podium lol
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 13:55 |
|
|
The debate broke the Internet. As in so much streaming that my lovely ISP broke 45 minutes in.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:11
|
|
|
Trump explained the Ms. Piggy comment, so it's all good now. https://twitter.com/alexburnsNYT/status/780726367860195328 RandomPauI has issued a correction as of 13:17 on Sep 27, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
I was pretty drunk for that but I'm pretty sure it was a savage shithousing
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:I was pretty drunk for that but I'm pretty sure it was a savage shithousing I just feel comforted that if I can stay as drunk as I was last night for the next 4-8 years I might make it through it all
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:17
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:it was pretty wild how clinton went through a whole speech about "what is donald hiding in his tax returns" and donald didn't bring up her wall street speeches because he was too busy doing rails off his podium lol There so many salvos that Trump launched and then completely went off rails 10 seconds into talking. It was bonkers how many missed opportunities. And now his ammunition is all used up because if he brings it up again in the next debate Hillary can call him out on how he's already said that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:20
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:Trump explained the Ms. Piggy comment, so it's all good now. ffs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:30
|
|
|
Flambeau posted:I know Trump got slaughtered last night because my google News feed this morning has barely a peep about it I read that the candidates traded jabs last night
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:Trump explained the Ms. Piggy comment, so it's all good now. already an article too: Trump doubles down: Former Miss Universe 'gained a massive amount of weight' http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/297973-trump-doubles-down-on-former-miss-universe-she-gained-a
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:38
|
|
|
Drunkboxer posted:I read that the candidates traded jabs last night They traded Jeb!s last night. Trump had a rare one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:40
|
|
|
I'm really surprised there isn't videos everywhere of Trumps "Nothing. I say nothing" response to the question of racial reconciliation. That's so much worse than the 47% comment and he basically shouted it into the mic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/gdebenedetti/status/780720087464546304
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
TheQuietWilds posted:I'm really surprised there isn't videos everywhere of Trumps "Nothing. I say nothing" response to the question of racial reconciliation. That's so much worse than the 47% comment and he basically shouted it into the mic. too much other crazy
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:56
|
|
|
neither candidate can be called a winner, although you amateur drunks are definitely the losers
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
DJ BK posted:neither candidate can be called a winner, although you amateur drunks are definitely the losers A hot take.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
Atoramos posted:How the hell did Trump manage to go through a cyber question and talk about his son, but not Hillary's e-mails? Seriously though, that didn't even occur to me as it happened. He probably felt he had to match Hillary's shoutout to her granddaughter in some way and because being (appearing to be) better than anyone else trumps (pun intended) bringing up such unimportant things like bringing up the emails.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
DJ BK posted:neither candidate can be called a winner, although you amateur drunks are definitely the losers Clinton overwhelmingly won that debate, and she's infinitely more qualified for the job.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:http://bingo.baloogan.com/game.php?Name=pathetic+little+tramp Let's see B1, Maybe I1, I2, N2, G2, probably O3, but I didn't listen explicitly, N4, Probably O4, but my whole bottom row is a wash. Terrible Bingoing from me
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
drat looks like Trump's hispanic outreach is working!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:TRUMP: I would love to respond. First of all, I got to watch in preparing for this some of your debates against Barack Obama. You treated him with terrible disrespect. And I watched the way you talk now about how lovely everything is and how wonderful you are. It doesn't work that way. You were after him, you were trying to -- you even sent out or your campaign sent out pictures of him in a certain garb, very famous pictures. I don't think you can deny that. Holt: Sir, I just asked you whether you'd like to upgrade to large for ten cents more.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:27
|
|
|
Hillarys open was stiff but beyond that she did really well Next debate they're both bringing "the big guns" 
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
The next debate being a town hall should benefit Trump. He'll profit from an audience that is allowed to be more lively and he can play off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:33
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:The next debate being a town hall should benefit Trump. He'll profit from an audience that is allowed to be more lively and he can play off. I always hated the town halls. They always got the absolute worst people to ask the dumbest questions. I'm looking more forward to the 3rd debate instead.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:35
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:Seriously though, that didn't even occur to me as it happened. He probably felt he had to match Hillary's shoutout to her granddaughter in some way and because being (appearing to be) better than anyone else trumps (pun intended) bringing up such unimportant things like bringing up the emails. To me, last night was Trump's night to discuss the 'Deplorables' comment. I was looking forward to it, because I wanted Clinton to turn it around and ask something like "Are the 51% of your supporters that want a constitutional ban on homosexual marriage not deplorable?".
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
fart blood posted:I always hated the town halls. They always got the absolute worst people to ask the dumbest questions. I'm looking more forward to the 3rd debate instead.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:Do you even look at millenial polls? She's losing a lot to Gary Johnson (lol) and Jill Stein. Taking Bernie supporters for granted was a giant mistake. Thanks for calling in. This next tweet is from "baloogan" from the "Something Awful" forums, who writes, "peckerwood"
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
Isn't Cooper the mod of the next presidential debate?
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
Rosie odonnell nobody feels bad for her in fact she deserves it
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:44
|
|
|
tbh I can't actually think of anyone who likes Rosie O'Donnell then again I can't actually think of any reason Rosie O'Donnell is relevant to anything whatsoever in TYOOL 2016 either so it isn't like it matters
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:47
|
|
|
anyway Trump's still wrong because there's so many better ways to insult Rosie O'Donnell than calling her fat
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Let's see I just needed the never Trump movement and and Bill's infidelities.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
Harold Stassen posted:Rosie odonnell nobody feels bad for her in fact she deserves it Trump got a mysterious text around 2am "looks like the worm has turned bitch -r"
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:anyway Trump's still wrong because there's so many better ways to insult Rosie O'Donnell than calling her fat if the old d&d banner ads are true, she should be mocked for using a happyelf-based hygeine product
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
VAGENDA OF MANOCIDE posted:They traded Jeb!s last night. Trump had a rare one. i have an extra holo-foil "jeb is visibly disgusted at being touched by poors", willing to trade for a "jeb marches like a saturday morning cartoon" in mint conidition
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 14:56
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:The next debate being a town hall should benefit Trump. He'll profit from an audience that is allowed to be more lively and he can play off. You forget that the audience will not be all friendly to Trump. He thrives on the crowd eating up his poo poo, if there's enough people that don't he'll get flustered.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:01
|
|
Cat Army
|
Atoramos posted:I wanted Clinton to turn it around and ask something like "Are the 51% of your supporters that want a constitutional ban on homosexual marriage not deplorable?". And this is why she's a pro politician and we aren't.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
Ouhei posted:You forget that the audience will not be all friendly to Trump. He thrives on the crowd eating up his poo poo, if there's enough people that don't he'll get flustered. Its not gonna go good for either i bet. Heres what their questions will be like: Clinton: benghazi emails benghazi? Clinton foundation transcripts. Trump: why are you such and awful stupid piece of poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
Ouhei posted:You forget that the audience will not be all friendly to Trump. He thrives on the crowd eating up his poo poo, if there's enough people that don't he'll get flustered. Yeah it's another university campus so the bet is the mix will look like the audience last night. Al! posted:Its not gonna go good for either i bet. Heres what their questions will be like: Questions will be vetted and then asked via moderator card I think? But if somebody actually stands up to ask about Benghazi the audience will probably strangle him and/or key his car.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:12
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:They produce memorable moments, though. "That one" and "Proceed, Governor" both happened at town hall debates. Third debate of '08 that wasn't a town hall had a good one: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 13:55 |
|
|
I was a little surprised that immigration wasn't so much as mentioned til Trump couldn't help shouting 800 PEOPLE WE WERE DEPORTING GOT MADE CITIZENS BY A CLERICAL ERROR AND MAYBE IT WAS ACTUALLY 1800 during a completely unrelated question.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2016 15:32
|
|
