|
It's going to be hard for Trump to establish standing in podunk Florida like Hulk did.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 05:17 |
|
|
I'm pretty sure that a bunch of polling outlets threw out their results because they want to do some new ones that reflect the latest bombshell. There hasn't been any polling since the middle of last week and some were supposed to be out this weekend.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
Xae posted:http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/what-sort-of-man-is-donald-trump
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:And Gawker might win the court case to publish Hulk's dick, doesn't undo the bankruptcy. It looks like the maximum financial penalty in this case is $5,000.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
mrbradlymrmartin posted:a neurologicql disorder that produces medical bills They do that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
hey guys
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
computer parts posted:It looks like the maximum financial penalty in this case is $5,000. He can argue in the civil suit that the release caused damages to his brand that by his estimates could be in the hundreds of billions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
Isn't this the case that even Jezebel said was dubious and probably fabricated by some Never Trump PAC?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:He can argue in the civil suit that the release caused damages to his brand that by his estimates could be in the hundreds of billions. doesn't matter, lawsuit won't be in a state that forces parties to post bonds for damages even if the case is still in appeal.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:He can argue in the civil suit that the release caused damages to his brand that by his estimates could be in the hundreds of billions. I hope he argues that the release caused damages to him by preventing him from becoming president, and therefore we get to see what value Donald Trump's lawyers place on being president of the United States.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:The law is clear, printing or publishing a tax return that was given to you in an unauthorized manner is a felony. And Supreme Court precedent is clear - when it comes to matters of public interest freedom of the press as guaranteed in he first amendment trumps statues which make that disclosure illegal. There is no way that the NYT gets in trouble for this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Who knows, but this is part of the legal code criminalizing what the NYTs did: There's another thing here: Marla Maples. You have to realize that these are /her/ tax returns as well. If she comes out and says, "Yes, I authorized their release," Trump loses all clout in order to A. press charges, and B. sue. E: unless he wants to sue to end alimony, which he may do, but I don't know if a court would let that fly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Phoenixan posted:Scott Adams has a lot in common with Tim Buckley in that he made a comic that got popular and was widely considered funny for a while but now he's been reduced to a guy copy-pasting the same characters over and over on a cintiq. Scott Adams disables Aero Glass. Throw him out the airlock. I bet he's one of those shitlords who has spent the last decade running Windows without UAC, too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
hiddenriverninja posted:As a complete law pleb, can someone walk me through the most likely events/cases mentioned if Trump were to sue the NYT? They would enter the discovery process, and then Trump would drop the suit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:They would enter the discovery process, and then Trump would drop the suit. Same thing happened with Fox News and the sexual harassment suits. They settled those things pretty much immediately, because they knew they didn't want to deal with discovery and all the poo poo that would dredge up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
Xae posted:http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/what-sort-of-man-is-donald-trump He seems to go out of his way to play into every corporate villain stereotype, doesn't he?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:The mormons Ive known have been excellent at compartmentalizing the crazy party of their religion. Decennt people outside of Sundays. This is true of literally any religious person whose last name isn't Phelps (in which case you embrace the crazy instead of compartmentalizing it). All religions everywhere are loving cuckoo bananas in various fun ways In Deuteronomy, The Bible says that if two dudes are fighting and one dude's wife tries to end the fight by grabbing the opponent's dick, then you have to cut off her dick-grabbing hand. At one point in Matthew Jesus is hungry and walks up to a fig tree hoping to find delicious figs but finds out that the tree doesn't have any figs on it, so he gets mad and basically says "gently caress you, fig tree" and the tree instantly loving withers and dies Deuteronomy also says that Heaven has a big sign on it that reads "no eunuchs allowed" Everyone likes to think of Mormons as being the crazy weirdo christians, but really that's just because everyone forgets how weird and hosed up the old and new testaments are. Every religion has its weird stories QuarkJets fucked around with this message at 21:55 on Oct 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:At one point in Matthew Jesus is hungry and walks up to a fig tree hoping to find delicious figs but finds out that the tree doesn't have any figs on it, so he gets mad and basically says "gently caress you, fig tree" and the tree instantly loving withers and dies Wait, what? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
iospace posted:Wait, what? Parable about faith or something
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
iospace posted:Wait, what? Matthew 21:19
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:The mormons Ive known have been excellent at compartmentalizing the crazy party of their religion. Decennt people outside of Sundays. I saw that there was some sort of Mormon council leak video recently. Was there anything juicy inside?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
iospace posted:Wait, what? quote:Matthew 21:18-22King James Version (KJV)
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
Geostomp posted:He seems to go out of his way to play into every corporate villain stereotype, doesn't he? More octo suprise, he did a real life Capt. Planet villain poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
Crow Jane posted:Getting burned by a Mormon has got to be pretty rough. drat. If I ever meet Tim Kaine in real life I'm going to get him to play Dogsong on the harmonica. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:If I ever meet Tim Kaine in real life I'm going to get him to play Dogsong on the harmonica. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Nate Silver attempts to create a map which sits in the overlap between "mental" and "halfway plausible", gets halfway there http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-the-craziest-end-to-the-2016-campaign-runs-through-new-mexico/
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
Hitler B. Natural posted:Nate Silver attempts to create a map which sits in the overlap between "mental" and "halfway plausible", gets halfway there Congress would clearly listen to the will of the people, and anoint Paul Ryan as the 45th President of the US
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
Nate Silver has completely lost the plot.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
Hitler B. Natural posted:Nate Silver attempts to create a map which sits in the overlap between "mental" and "halfway plausible", gets halfway there A month ago I might have believe this map as possible. Now? Hillary wins Florida, no question.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
God Hates Figs!
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Nate Silver has completely lost the plot. He doesn't say this is at all likely to happen. In fact he explicitly states it isn't. Just that it's not impossible.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:21
|
|
|
I believe the last time it sorta kinda happened we had a civil war.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
Endorph posted:hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election? Gary Johnson basically is a Republican and governs exactly like that. Jill Stein rules over the remaining 3 people after a mysterious virus killed off all humanity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
Endorph posted:hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election? If get a majority of electoral votes, you win. I mean, you probably need to pick a caucaus to side with for some matters, but overall, not much. The democrats and the republicans were third parties at various points in the very distant past
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:23
|
|
|
So it was a couple pages ago but USPOL Oct: A Song of Whites and Ire
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:23
|
|
|
Endorph posted:hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:24
|
|
|
Endorph posted:hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election? They become president. Is this a trick question?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 05:17 |
|
|
Endorph posted:hypothetically, what even happens if a third party candidate actually wins the election? It's hard to predict how well a third-party president would be able to work with Congress.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 22:25
|
|