|
A Fancy 400 lbs posted:That's what makes this so amazing. That's absolutely what they need to do, but they can't. They have to resign themselves to watching him desperately flail around on stage and make everything worse and their best hope is getting started on planning the damage control early. The only reasonable move the GOP has left to them on the chessboard is to concede the election, just forget about winning the white house, and blow the dust off that old "lets not give (Bill/Hillary) Clinton a blank check" strategy that they used when Bob Dole was clearly done and they needed to limit the damage in congress from Bill Clinton's obvious re-election.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 01:26 |
Tom Guycot posted:Even in the weird situation where the GOP requested an extension (never mind the laws in place regarding the date), why on earth should the democrats agree? "Preserving the Republic" my rear end, a bunch of racist, mysoginist idiots made their bed and they should have to sleep in it. They shouldn't get to claim a do over because they don't like how its going.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:39 |
|
Antti posted:As to what Hillary is doing right now, she's preparing furiously, of course. Is that what the kids are calling it these days? ... I guess assuming public figures masturbating to good news was always creepy, but now I'm realizing I'm imagining Hillary Clinton masturbating, and hate myself for being a creep ...
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:40 |
|
Ego-bot posted:Plus Trump still has Secret Service protection, any GOP goons physically trying to stop Trump would be arrested or worse. Somehow I'd forgotten about the SS guys assigned to Trump, and I blame the nap I just woke up from. My god, he's actually going to be allowed on camera on Sunday if he wishes. I do suspect what little GOP leadership there still is will be looking for some way to disassociate him from the party and perhaps have him disqualified from the debate on Sunday on the grounds of him "not being a Republican", even though NBC will say "lol, no". In some form or another, it's pure damage control from here on out, and I suspect this weekend will see the GOP throwing Trump under the train. Geostomp posted:Exactly. Trump shows that even now, you can be a total incompetent fool with no redeeming qualities, but still get dangerously close to the presidency so long as you tap into the white rage of the electorate and decades of smear campaigns against your opponent. That is what should be terrifying. This is also the wider point. The simple fact that Trump crushed all his primary challengers - Cruz is the only one who even came within real striking distance - needs to give us all pause. One of the parties in America's two-party system is essentially hostage to demagogues at this point, and perhaps can only operate on demagoguery right now. As much as I know a lot of people in this thread will be relieved that Clinton is going to sail into the White House with a comfortable win and possibly working majorities in both houses of Congress, America having only one real functional political party is a dangerous position for the country to be in. If this isn't the darkest timeline, 2016 to 2020 need to be about either somehow "fixing" the GOP or facilitating some kind of functional replacement that isn't run by white-power demagoguery. e: Tom Guycot posted:Even in the weird situation where the GOP requested an extension (never mind the laws in place regarding the date), why on earth should the democrats agree? "Preserving the Republic" my rear end, a bunch of racist, mysoginist idiots made their bed and they should have to sleep in it. They shouldn't get to claim a do over because they don't like how its going. The bolded was actually my point, if it didn't come across - even if the GOP wanted to ask for such, the sheer power of coming from the Democratic leadership would be intense enough to power the nation for days. They have no reason to be accommodating at this point. This is purely a bed the GOP made for itself. (Though see above for my thoughts w/r/t more than one functioning party & more than one actual, electable candidate for President being important to the health of our government) SpaceDrake fucked around with this message at 09:47 on Oct 8, 2016 |
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:42 |
|
Also, I just noticed I failed to purge one of the Trots I knew in college from Facebook. She's still furiously defending Trump and claiming Hillary is the one who's really anti-woman. It will never stop being bizarre seeing supposed socialists defend Trump, doubly so when it's a woman.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:45 |
|
A Fancy 400 lbs posted:Also, I just noticed I failed to purge one of the Trots I knew in college from Facebook. She's still furiously defending Trump and claiming Hillary is the one who's really anti-woman. It will never stop being bizarre seeing supposed socialists defend Trump, doubly so when it's a woman. what kind of fuckedup bizarro Trots did you associate with
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:47 |
|
Given the metric tons of poo poo and emotional misery the GOP has cruelly inflicted upon Hillary over the last long couple decades, I can not imagine that there is a human being on the entire loving planet who is experiencing a more complete feeling of bliss and satisfaction right now. She is going to be crowned in 4 weeks for certain, Her cruel fat loud orange tormenter is staring into the abyss of professional, personal, and financial ruin, and the GOP is going to get just loving WRECKED. She might end up having only a short 2 years of real power assuming the Dems manage to seize the house before the GOP comes back in 2018, but hey, Obama did a lot with 2 short years.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:48 |
|
foobardog posted:This too, honestly. In an area where my expectations for what Americans would accept from their candidates was subterranean, we've moved through the Earth and come out on the other side in Wonderland.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:49 |
|
WeAreTheRomans posted:what kind of fuckedup bizarro Trots did you associate with It was just the campus socialist organization at the college I went to, I swear they weren't this insane back in like '08. It's like this election collectively broke them.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:50 |
|
Eschers Basement posted:Jesus Christ, people, it's The Igrab-Cuntra Affair, keep it straight
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:51 |
|
A Fancy 400 lbs posted:It was just the campus socialist organization at the college I went to, I swear they weren't this insane back in like '08. It's like this election collectively broke them. maybe socialism works differently in America cause you guys never quite figured out how to do that stuff
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:52 |
SpaceDrake posted:As much as I know a lot of people in this thread will be relieved that Clinton is going to sail into the White House with a comfortable win and possibly working majorities in both houses of Congress, America having only one real functional political party is a dangerous position for the country to be in. Why? Is it more 'the GOP is deranged but still has power' or is there some concern that the Democrats will become mega wikkid, instead of fissioning after a period of liberal darkness.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 09:55 |
|
WeAreTheRomans posted:what kind of fuckedup bizarro Trots did you associate with Dunno, sounds like the regular kind to me.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:00 |
|
Wait so has more things happened since he said the thing about grabbing women? This poo poo is moving too fast for me
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:00 |
|
I honestly believe that the House is fully in play now. Clinton is at 87% on the 538 now-cast and still rising rapidly, and most of that is just a result the 1st debate and its aftermath. The current poll numbers don't even take into account the past several days yet, let alone the clusterfuck that just happened in the past 12 hours. The election is one month away, there are still two more debates for Trump to humiliate himself in, and Clinton campaign is going to dump all of the opposition research they've kept in reserve over the past year before election day hits. If I remember correctly, the Dems need a 7 or 8 point popular vote victory in order to overcome gerrymandering and capture the House. VirtualStranger fucked around with this message at 10:05 on Oct 8, 2016 |
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:00 |
|
Banana Man posted:Wait so has more things happened since he said the thing about grabbing women? This poo poo is moving too fast for me
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:02 |
|
I don't think- or at least I hope- that a democratic house wouldn't fall for the same ridiculous notions of bipartisanship like they did in 08, not after the last six years. They should treat the republicans as saboteurs, only trusting on a few at a time to snitch or switch side, but any pretense of a broad coalition should be completely exempt. The proclamations of making hillary a one-term president will ring out just like they did for Obama, and anyone who expects anything besides obstinate obstructionism is a fool. On a side note, I am really surprised we got the first black president and first woman president before either of them made VP. Kind of leapfrogging a bit, not that I'm complaining, it's just interesting.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:05 |
|
Bushiz posted:What do you suppose Hillary has been doing for the last twelve hours. Clinton does not strike me as the type celebrate before the finish line, so probably just endless hours of rigorous debate prep. Maybe she gave a snort when someone handed her an iPhone with the story on it, but then I imagine she got back to drilling her posture and speech cadence.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:05 |
|
SpaceDrake posted:Somehow I'd forgotten about the SS guys assigned to Trump, and I blame the nap I just woke up from. My god, he's actually going to be allowed on camera on Sunday if he wishes. The thing is that the GOP and their media empire have spent decades doing everything in their power to build this base of deluded zealots as easy dupes. When an actual black man won the White House, they turned their race baiting up more than they had in decades: decrying him as every boogeyman they could think of and promising to make white he could get nothing accomplished solely to try to make the base forget about the disastrous Bush years. They basically made the idea of allowing the government to function a betrayal to their base. Surprising no one but themselves, this lead to alienating everyone besides ignorant white people and twisting that group into extremists who demand nothing but ideological purity and consider burning the nation down in the process to actually be a positive outcome. It was only a matter of time before the base rebelled and hijacked the party under an opportunistic leader. The sane GOP can't turn back into sane territory now without basically admitting that they had been lying and manipulating their base for decades and losing the only people left who vote for them. Their only hope is to change the rules as much as possible to keep their remaining base as disproportionately powerful as possible so they can continue to manipulate the nation from their stranglehold on local governments.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:05 |
|
Banana Man posted:Wait so has more things happened since he said the thing about grabbing women? This poo poo is moving too fast for me Coverage of the pussy-grabbing has been extensive, with much Republican condemnation (but only three unendorsements that I can recall, though Paul Ryan uninvited him from Wisconsin), plus reactions that range from hilarious to horrifying, and Trump released a video "apology" where he never actually apologized for or even acknowledged that he claimed to sexually assault women, then started hitting Bill Clinton and saying he "actually" hurt women, before ending on a challenge to Hillary, saying he'll see her at the debate on Sunday. Edit: Some other stories have emerged too, like him trying to fire the woman he sexually harassed in the tape.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:06 |
|
VirtualStranger posted:I honestly believe that the House is fully in play now. Downballot GOP is gonna jettison Trump like the saucer section of the Enterprise, and the rest of the month is going to be getting the message out about split-ticket voting
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:07 |
|
The Clinton camp kept their powder dry and held this tape through SO many negative media cycles. They managed to time it to nullify the Wikileaks drop, remove any moral high ground Donald might pretend to stand on in the next debate, and completely embarrass the Speaker of the House hours after he signed a bill protecting victims of sexual assault SIMULTANEOUSLY. That's maybe the best play I've ever seen in politics. Holy poo poo.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:09 |
|
Nessus posted:I keep seeing this as an aphorism. I do believe in the long run...... in the very, very long run where the politics of the day doesn't resemble what we are seeing now, a fiscally conservative party that questions whether our current or proposed level of spending is excessive, is healthy. We currently are in a period of time where austerity is loving stupid and counterproductive, and we are nowhere near the point where we need to question whether we are needlessly wasting resources, but it could get there. In theory, having a fiscally conservative party which challenges the left can be healthy, but we are currently at a point where the right (the GOP) needs to be burned the gently caress to the ground and have no power at all for a couple cycles, then maybe we can deal with whatever rises from the ashes.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:09 |
|
negativeneil posted:The Clinton camp kept their powder dry and held this tape through SO many negative media cycles. They managed to time it to nullify the Wikileaks drop, remove any moral high ground Donald might pretend to stand on in the next debate, and completely embarrass the Speaker of the House hours after he signed a bill protecting victims of sexual assault SIMULTANEOUSLY. That's maybe the best play I've ever seen in politics. Holy poo poo. It's not clear that this came from the Clinton campaign and it didn't directly come from them (in the sense of release and timing). They are spurring a lot of coverage from their opposition research but there are a ton of other people in on the feeding frenzy all by themselves.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:12 |
|
Thank you, thank you... I think I'm feeling something analogous to injecting heroin reading this.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:12 |
|
Bip Roberts posted:It's not clear that this came from the Clinton campaign and it didn't directly come from them (in the sense of release and timing). They are spurring a lot of coverage from their opposition research but there are a ton of other people in on the feeding frenzy all by themselves. Apparently Access Hollywood just had it in their archives after doing an interview or two with him in 2005 or so. So they found it and dug through it, were preparing a story on it, and the video got leaked before it could air.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:13 |
|
negativeneil posted:The Clinton camp kept their powder dry and held this tape through SO many negative media cycles. They managed to time it to nullify the Wikileaks drop, remove any moral high ground Donald might pretend to stand on in the next debate, and completely embarrass the Speaker of the House hours after he signed a bill protecting victims of sexual assault SIMULTANEOUSLY. That's maybe the best play I've ever seen in politics. Holy poo poo. The Clinton camp actually had nothing to do with this as far as we know. NBC went over a bunch of old footage from Access Hollywood and someone leaked it to the Washington Post before NBC could report on it themselves.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:13 |
|
Crazy Ted posted:She's been cackling like Mallory Archer and sipping on mixed drinks with her heels up on the desk in her main office. This actually makes me sad because she still came with everything she had. The Alicia Machado attack is one of the most genius things I've seen done, and because white people didn't know who she was I don't think it really gets the accolades it deserves. Machado was known enough in media to have tabloid stories written about her before Hillary ever uttered her name. Then latinos, who are already disinclined to like Trump, see he attacks her. Women see he attacks her. He's a loving idiot so he thinks it's some random woman. He never realized he's attacking someone that had some amount of name recognition. The way they had Cosmo ready to go. The way they had a Spanish-lanuage ad set up and ready to go. Like, no way Trump can possibly win Florida now. At this point Texas might go blue. I don't want there to be an asterisk by this election because of Trump. Hillary has run a masterful campaign. She deserves the win, and when she wins it will not just be because Trump was such a train wreck. She should get a mandate from it. In 30 years I don't want people saying, "Yeah, Bush was so terrible we managed to end up with the first black president. Then Trump was so terrible we ended up with the first woman president." Obama is a once in a lifetime political candidate, but '12 Hillary Clinton is almost as good ('08 Clinton was far less good).
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:14 |
|
Apparently multiple outlets including Access Hollywood (?!), Fahrenthold at WaPo and MSNBC were working on the tape story simultaneously. Now it doesn't preclude the idea that some Clinton ally had their hands on the tape and pressed a button somewhere, but even so it means they couldn't have been able to perfectly orchestrate the timing. While Clinton's done a very good campaign Trump is making it look so, so easy. Play of the Election for me still goes to dropping Machado at the end of the debate. It was a little hamfisted but it was a smartbomb and Trump walked into the trap like Sideshow Bob into rakes.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:14 |
|
ErIog posted:She should get a mandate from it. No doubt; she'll have her pick of suitors.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:15 |
WeAreTheRomans posted:Downballot GOP is gonna jettison Trump like the saucer section of the Enterprise, and the rest of the month is going to be getting the message out about split-ticket voting
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:16 |
|
Nessus posted:Yeah, like the saucer section, alright Trump, Troi. Close enough.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:17 |
|
Placed my first ever political bet last night; 5 grand on Hillary at 2/5. The only way she loses now is if something previously unknown/devastating is leaked, and if Wikileaks/Russia/the RNC had anything like that you can be drat sure they'd have already deployed it. This thing is over.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:17 |
|
Nessus posted:Yeah, like the saucer section, alright precisely what i was thinking of
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:17 |
VirtualStranger posted:I honestly believe that the House is fully in play now. I will be the voice of pessimism! Whether Trump's goose is cooked, there's still a few debates and a month for something super insane to happen. And this isn't his first collapse or scandal, so there's always the chance he shrugs it off. This isn't even the worse thing, objectively, it just seems to really be getting the media's attention because of how bluntly bad it is. ...but you're right. He's probably done. Even pessimistic me can't redeem him. Senate wise - what if Dems don't bother to vote, but Republicans are still motivated to support their guys "to check hillary" or some other stupid logic. Fanatical Trumpists might still come out, though I imagine some might be mad at their own reps for disavowing him. If Dem voters don't see the point, it's probably not enough to sink Hillary, but could turn the Presidential year turnout into something closer to midterms, and gently caress over a few close races for the Senate Dems. House wise, much as I really hope it's in play, it's really not. Plenty of other posters have talked about how the Dems really did not prepare quality candidates in all potential swing states, having effectively given up on the House well before this. It's need to get REALLY bad for the Republicans, like super-depressed turnout and intra-party civil war, for things to flip to the Dems. That would involve reps turning on one another or pissing off Trump supporters, depressing Republican turnout in strong Republican (R+10 or more) districts to the point where a relatively unknown Democrat has one month to get enough votes to be elected. Not impossible, but a long shot even if Trump completely collapses. Even if Trump collapses, there's also the issue of ~~Hillary's mandate~~. Plenty of people are voting against Trump, and if Trump truly collapses, Hillary's going to IMMEDIATELY face the criticism from Republicans that she's not actually being elected by the will of the people, simply the lesser evil with Trump (actually this'll probably happen before election day). Properly delegitimized and facing a hostile house, we get another 4 years of no legislation or progress, yay! And maybe, if by SOME MIRACLE, the Democrats take the house. There's always the Senate filibuster. And Dems ain't getting 60 senate seats unless a bunch of Republican senators keel over before election day.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:19 |
|
Antti posted:Apparently multiple outlets including Access Hollywood (?!), Fahrenthold at WaPo and MSNBC were working on the tape story simultaneously. Now it doesn't preclude the idea that some Clinton ally had their hands on the tape and pressed a button somewhere, but even so it means they couldn't have been able to perfectly orchestrate the timing. Here's the article from WaPo on how this story broke: https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...3b66_story.html quote:Reporter David Fahrenthold got a phone call around 11 a.m. Friday from a source with a tip about Donald Trump. The source asked: Would Fahrenthold be interested in seeing some previously unaired video of Trump?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:20 |
|
I still think her best play so far was saying the just the right tepid nice thing about the recently passed Reagan at just the right time so as to ensure that Nancy was being blasted for being a hateful bigot murderer rear end in a top hat shitguckerjjcjfncjjfnfbjjd As she was being lowered into the ground
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:20 |
JosefStalinator posted:And maybe, if by SOME MIRACLE, the Democrats take the house. There's always the Senate filibuster. And Dems ain't getting 60 senate seats unless a bunch of Republican senators keel over before election day.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:21 |
|
If we get the Senate, the filibuster is gone day 1
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:22 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 01:26 |
|
Just looked at Foxnews. Yeah, he dead.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 10:22 |