|
Xarn posted:Why do then the new MS UWP apps suck so drat badly? they're all really good
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 09:26 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:they're all really good was kinda with you up to this point
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
that unum guy had a debate with kahan recently, havent watched the vid but the slides are of interest http://arith23.gforge.inria.fr/slides/Gustafson.pdf http://arith23.gforge.inria.fr/slides/Kahan.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZAeZBVAzVw
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
is there a way to access help files for C++ like the way you can easily get them in R or whatever, Xcode only includes obj c help files
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
if you're doing c++ it's too late. you're on your own. there is no help coming.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:is there a way to access help files for C++ like the way you can easily get them in R or whatever, Xcode only includes obj c help files press alt f4
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
you type the fully qualified type name into Google and then cuss loudly whenever clicking the first result takes you to cplusplus.com instead of cppreference.com
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
fritz posted:that unum guy had a debate with kahan recently, havent watched the vid but the slides are of interest summary: he's a total crank who doesn't understand the major literature of the fields he's supposedly obviating and is making wild, unfounded claims about the efficiency of his proposals
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
i made it through about 10 of those "slides" before i felt the awful shudder of academic politics and closed the tab people like that are the worst
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:summary: he's a total crank who doesn't understand the major literature of the fields he's supposedly obviating and is making wild, unfounded claims about the efficiency of his proposals im watching it now and tbh kahan's not coming across that great but gustafson is mostly just compaining
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
oh god, i didn't even look at gustafson's slides, they're just pure crank it takes him less than 10 slides to bring up his book's #1 amazon sales rank in the doubtlessly rich category of Number Systems
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
fritz posted:gustafson is mostly just compaining "only 8% of the world knows calculus and this means that only 8% of the world can use floating point"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:summary: he's a total crank who doesn't understand the major literature of the fields he's supposedly obviating and is making wild, unfounded claims about the efficiency of his proposals counter: GUYS ITS A LINKED LIST, C'MON fritz posted:"only 8% of the world knows calculus and this means that only 8% of the world can use floating point"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:objection: traipsing about ignoring byte and/or cache line boundaries is expensive did you tell him that you already zoomed in all the way?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
leper khan posted:did you tell him that you already zoomed in all the way?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
i knew a guy like that too. if you give him the benefit of the doubt, it means he's into infinitesimals and will end up down the rabbit hole of non-standard analysis. let him go
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:i knew a guy like that too. if you give him the benefit of the doubt, it means he's into infinitesimals and will end up down the rabbit hole of non-standard analysis. let him go dude but hyperreals though
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 08:34
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:you type the fully qualified type name into Google and then cuss loudly whenever clicking the first result takes you to cplusplus.com instead of cppreference.com
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 08:48
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:you type the fully qualified type name into Google and then cuss loudly whenever clicking the first result takes you to cplusplus.com instead of cppreference.com This except you have custom search set up for cppreference.com because you are not a dumb dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 12:18
|
|
|
Xarn posted:This except you have custom search set up for cppreference.com because you are not a dumb dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 12:42
|
|
|
!cpp
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:14
|
|
|
I just used Java REPL to write a stream operation that loaded the values of an enum we have, sorted them, and printed them out in a format somebody else needed. Felt good man.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
building C++ code in Xcode is hell on earth. whatever is building my code does strange things like replace var values with gibberish from memory sometimes, and then does so consistently until I have to copy over my code into a new project to fix it but at least I get some human readable feedback on it unlike writing it in a text editor and building using clang in terminal
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
even eclipse is better than Xcode for c++
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
gently caress I'd rather use qt creator on non qt code
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:building C++ code in Xcode is hell on earth. whatever is building my code does strange things like replace var values with gibberish from memory sometimes, and then does so consistently until I have to copy over my code into a new project to fix it just use clion
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:gently caress I'd rather use qt creator on non qt code i just use vim with syntastic and youcompleteme. it's pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 13:31
|
|
|
just use visual studio
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
Bloody posted:just use visual studio This. If you cannot run VS, YOSPOS!
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
Xarn posted:This. I have VS in a VM. it's alright, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
leper khan posted:I have VS in a VM. it's alright, I guess. this is what I do when Xcode has failed me completely going to see what clion is like
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
clion is cool but is miles behind IntelliJ unfortunately
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
https://github.com/p-org/P a literal p-lang
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
leper khan posted:i just use vim with syntastic and youcompleteme. it's pretty good. i tried to check this out but youcompleteme is not nice to install
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:https://github.com/p-org/P they're programs are made of P 😂😂😂😂
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 11:48
|
|
|
Mr SuperAwesome posted:i tried to check this out but youcompleteme is not nice to install it's also, from my experience, incredibly slow and vim being vim halts everything while it tries to figure out what to autocomplete. maybe it's fine on smaller codebases.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 11:52
|
|
|
netcat posted:it's also, from my experience, incredibly slow and vim being vim halts everything while it tries to figure out what to autocomplete. maybe it's fine on smaller codebases. yeah, most of the projects I work on are in the 10s/low 100s, not 1000s KLOC. on larger projects I end up turning off automatically looking for completions. I've also been working in C# a lot lately, which I use monodevelop for completion through omnisharp and doesn't suffer quite so much from that issue. if stuck on java, I use eclim which is also surprisingly nice.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 12:25
|
|
|
youcompleteme trip report: we have like 50k LOC (python) in this project and its really slow and not very useful b/c i already know what most of the poo poo does anyway
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 13:21
|
|
|
Mr SuperAwesome posted:youcompleteme trip report: we have like 50k LOC (python) in this project and its really slow and not very useful b/c i already know what most of the poo poo does anyway ironically youcompleteme is written in python iirc
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 09:26 |
|
|
this kind of gigantic surface-area is a bit of a java'ism anyway (a million tiny and arbitrarily delineated abstraction units tossed in a pile without thought), ideally you'll have codebases which do not require an encyclopedic knowledge of the breadth of the system
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 13:48
|
|
