|
Crazy Ted posted:The only real game changer at this point would be a leaked FBI memo saying that they wanted to charge Clinton with felonies but they decided not to for political reasons. Didn't the FBI actually investigate that case and find no actual evidence besides her word (mostly because it happened 21 years prior?)
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:57 |
|
|
Rfk was as charismatic as Jack and basically the Obama of the day, and going up against an even older and more paranoid Richard Nixon than his brother did. Think Clinton-Dole, but even more.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:Hell, have Cuban promise them a job on Shark Tank. Shark Tank is owned by the dude that is threatening the lawsuits for the leaks, Cuban's already called himself out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
The Rokstar posted:Haha, "why couldn't all these bad things have come out before I did a monumentally stupid thing?" Nah, it's more like "why couldn't all these bad things have come out so I could win?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
Andrast posted:Vince would be a better president than Trump Night10194 posted:Didn't the FBI actually investigate that case and find no actual evidence besides her word (mostly because it happened 21 years prior?)
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
Surprised nobody has drawn a line from "Where are the emails" to "Where are the apprentice tapes" yet.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
canepazzo posted:Shark Tank is owned by the dude that is threatening the lawsuits for the leaks, Cuban's already called himself out. There's gotta be someone in Hollywood willing to offer up a position for someone who is willing to leak footage for the greater good of America.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Donnie should get in a bidding war. (He can't)
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Trump should put up a $5 million bounty for Hillary saying racist poo poo on tape and see what shows up
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Andrast posted:Vince would be a better president than Trump at least vince has run a successful business
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:Trump should put up a $5 million bounty for Hillary saying racist poo poo on tape and see what shows up A video of Obama and Hillary together, Hillary calls Obama something racist, Obama smiles to the camera and thanks Trump for the 5 mill for charity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:Trump should put up a $5 million bounty for Hillary saying racist poo poo on tape and see what shows up If it existed (barring "super predators"), it already would've surfaced.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 RNC about to literally assassinate Trump, looks like
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
The only answer I'm a bit worried about is if people draw a line from her "public vs private opinions" line to "well, she has changed her position on things publicly, but how can we know if she will actually follow through?" CNN just showed a clip of Tim Kaine trying to defend against that line, and he failed miserably. But that's more to keep enthusiasm up for downtickets vs. actually costing her the election.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
Trump fought Vince at Wrestlemania. He wants to humiliate him which is why he secretly released this and is now holding a debate opposite a PPV.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
edrith posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 Sounds more like they are going to assassinate Hillary
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
I'm betting on involuntary commitment.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
Eugene V. Dabs posted:If it existed (barring "super predators"), it already would've surfaced. No president in the history of presidents has been vetted more than Hillary Clinton.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:If he brings up her defending a child rapist, it's really easy to combat by talking about how important public defenders and the right to an attorney are, and how she fulfilled the requirements of her job despite it not being something she wanted to do, as opposed to Trump who just bails on everything by going bankrupt or getting divorced. Just wanted to quote this as the right way to handle that. Also, what's the odds on Brodderick getting paid under the table to give these new interviews?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:A part of me wonders what happens if Hillary completely flubs the debate tonight. How the hell does anyone handle that? That's essentially impossible. She may not do great dealing with Trump insanity, but it's a town hall and she is going to kill at answering questions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:A video of Obama and Hillary together, Hillary calls Obama something racist, Obama smiles to the camera and thanks Trump for the 5 mill for charity. Nah, she does it by reciting one of Trump's offensive statements about race, then thanking him for the 5 mill for charity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
blue squares posted:That's essentially impossible. She may not do great dealing with Trump insanity, but it's a town hall and she is going to kill at answering questions. She did well at dealing with Trump insanity last time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:Sounds more like they are going to assassinate Hillary Yes. It really does. It's kinda scary. Edit: Rexicon1 posted:No president in the history of presidents has been vetted more than Hillary Clinton. I'm actually kinda wondering about this. How will 2020 look? Unless she does devastating stuff during her presidency (she wont) what are they going to attack her with? Will they just repeat the exact same warmed up stories and hope that she suddenly forgot how to defend against them? cant cook creole bream fucked around with this message at 22:08 on Oct 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
edrith posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 Realistically (and if this guy isn't talking out of his rear end), it'd be something like Day One Impeachment Charges. And I say "realistically" lightly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:The only answer I'm a bit worried about is if people draw a line from her "public vs private opinions" line to "well, she has changed her position on things publicly, but how can we know if she will actually follow through?" CNN just showed a clip of Tim Kaine trying to defend against that line, and he failed miserably. I hate this because I read the quote and the whole thing is taken way out of context (at least in my eyes, as someone who has been in business meetings). You say poo poo in private that would not be good things to say publicly because you have to think of all the possibilities when discussing the future or whatever policy you're talking about. And if she is talking about being two/faced, her record would have outed her decades ago.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
edrith posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 Ever heard of
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
edrith posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 I heard a rumor that Glen Beck & the Mormonati would attempt a Mittens spoiler run, forcing the presidential decision to go to Congress.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
Oh my goodness if anyone is watching MSNBC right now Carl Paladino is accusing the FBI director of destroying evidence against Hillary and claiming that Benghazi was to hide a secret arms deal with ISIS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
Rabble posted:I hate this because I read the quote and the whole thing is taken way out of context (at least in my eyes, as someone who has been in business meetings). You say poo poo in private that would not be good things to say publicly because you have to think of all the possibilities when discussing the future or whatever policy you're talking about. If other jobs had to be elected they'd probably say different things in private and public too. The public is filled with a bunch of idiots who don't know anything. This election is the most perfect example of that. We have a guy who (supposedly) says the same things in private and in public, and he's the world's biggest rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
Captain Fargle posted:Unless you're The New York Post (I think that's the correct paper. Might be New York Times?) then they take your story, publish it, get mad credit for publishing it and then call for your indictment. Just like they did for Snowden. I was actually on board with that, because the logic made sense. The story on NSA surveillance was big and they were happy to publish that, but Snowden also stole a shitload of unrelated classified documents and absconded with them to China and Russia. No one ever seems to remember that part. You can praise a guy for doing one thing that you think is good and condemn him for doing another that you think is bad, there's nothing wrong with that
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:A video of Obama and Hillary together, Hillary calls Obama something racist, Obama smiles to the camera and thanks Trump for the 5 mill for charity. It should just be Obama asking her if she is worried about Trump winning the general, and she just deadpans a, "nigga please." and they fist bump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
Rabble posted:I hate this because I read the quote and the whole thing is taken way out of context (at least in my eyes, as someone who has been in business meetings). You say poo poo in private that would not be good things to say publicly because you have to think of all the possibilities when discussing the future or whatever policy you're talking about. I totally agree! Having a private opinion (personal) and a public one (the one you actually push for your constituents/the American people) is just called being a politician. But it is so easy to twist and feeds into the unending storyline about her being "untrustworthy".
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
Kulkasha posted:I heard a rumor that Glen Beck & the Mormonati would attempt a Mittens spoiler run, forcing the presidential decision to go to Congress. This literally cannot happen.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
Nucleic Acids posted:Realistically (and if this guy isn't talking out of his rear end), it'd be something like Day One Impeachment Charges. And I say "realistically" lightly. The NY investigation into the Clinton Foundation is still lingering
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
I think Kellyanne lost it: https://twitter.com/KellyannePolls/status/785201628303486976
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
I had no idea Media Matters made that kind of scratch.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
last time I checked the news Giuliani had basically accused Bill Clinton of rape and Trump ditched his media train for the day, has anything juicy happened since then?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
Sent in my ballot. +1 in Wisconsin
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
edrith posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/785220993459576832 Hopefully whatever their plan is works as well as their plan to prevent Trump from becoming the nominee
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:57 |
|
|
ImpAtom posted:A part of me wonders what happens if Hillary completely flubs the debate tonight. How the hell does anyone handle that? Hillary's campaign team, noting the positive reaction to her shimmy in the first debate, advise her to begin each question tonight by doing an increasingly elaborate jig. cant cook creole bream posted:I'm actually kinda wondering about this. How will 2020 look? Unless she does devastating stuff during her presidency (she wont) what are they going to attack her with? Will they just repeat the exact same warmed up stories and hope that she suddenly forgot how to defend against them? They're going to blow up every minor issue she has while in office into a faux-controversy that requires an FBI investigation and an impeachment attempt.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:18
|
|
