|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKvWOqrYHqg (Cleveland) Some kind of lich is describing the horrors of Hillary's america.
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:24 |
|
|
canepazzo posted:Is it that uncommon for a statement to be unattributed? I wonder if no one wanted their name on a statement they know is false. All of Clinton's are attributed so I also wonder if that's the case. Especially when coupled with Trump's already observed concerns that his campaign statements will come up in trials.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/789902702889140224 Good job NC
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Instant Sunrise posted:I think you mean, "give himself the unfireable lifelong job of california state porn inspector." hey, it's worked before
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Inferior Third Season posted:Paul Ryan is painfully aware of how deplorable they actually are. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:Are you saying that just because of this post, or because of my posting style in general? yeah you seem like you're borderline retarded
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
gently caress you state republicans
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Boy it's getting hard out there to see the complete generic benghazi trash innuendos hauled back out. Out of curiosity, what is the connection of Mr. Ghazi's struggles to "weapons" now? Is it supposed to have been cover for a covert arms deal, no doubt for Clinton blood money?
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
poo poo like this is unconscionable, and exactly why they think they still have a chance there. Are there any new NC polls out?
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Complaint Compilation posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKvWOqrYHqg Who is this guy?   
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Boy it's getting hard out there to see the complete generic benghazi trash innuendos hauled back out. Out of curiosity, what is the connection of Mr. Ghazi's struggles to "weapons" now? Is it supposed to have been cover for a covert arms deal, no doubt for Clinton blood money? A cover for selling arms to ISIS apparently. I'm pretty sure it's never come up before the infowars crowd latched on, it's all bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote Turns out the Roberts court was somewhat biased.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote 5-4 ideological Supreme Court line. I'm not exaggerating when I say the Alito / Thomas / Scalia court was utterly incapable of enforcing law.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:People really like the idea of small government, individual responsibility, and bootstraps. But when you ask them to adopt specific policies to support those ideas, they hate it. IMO this is because people don't really understand what government actually does - they're repeatedly told by political figures they trust that government is bloated and out of control, so they imagine all these wasteful programs that can simply be cut at no real cost. It's like when John McCain stands up and talks about grants to study turtles mating, or when Fox News loses it over some stupid expenditure like a conference or some stupid internal video, people like to believe that there's this massive amount of completely flippant, wasted spending that amounts to crony capitalism or naked mismanagement. Then conservatives bait and switch by using that "small government" mandate to attack broadly popular programs, essentials like education, or services targeted towards the poor and minorities (which those voters may not directly feel). I don't think most Republican voters even realize the degree to which basic services like the justice system or public education are dying due to state-level austerity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Putting your feet on the table is the new manspreading.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote Voting isnt a right per se.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Not really a poll, but...  https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/789964237632307200 https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/789964779041554432 quote:Watch AZ, Utah, Georgia in next two weeks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote From the court that brought us Kelo vs New London, Citizens United, and Hobby Lobby
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:5-4 ideological Supreme Court line. So its not active malice, its incompetence? Somehow that doesnt make me feel any better. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:04
|
|
|
Nucleic Acids posted:A cover for selling arms to ISIS apparently. Furnaceface posted:So its not active malice, its incompetence?
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:So its not active malice, its incompetence? Scalia was involved. It was active malice.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Khanoisseur/status/784442906383745026
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:So its not active malice, its incompetence? It's absolutely active malice. That's why they gutted the VRA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:How is that not illegal? It directly affects a persons ability to vote because states aren't required to offer in-person early voting nor have more than one site per administrative unit when they do
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
Instant Sunrise posted:From the court that brought us Kelo vs New London, Citizens United, and Hobby Lobby Pedantic, but Kelo was actually 5-4 with the liberal wing in the majority. The facts of the case sound pretty bad, but it's pretty much in line with eminent domain precedent
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
The more I learn about your politics the more sad I become. I really hope goons here represent a big enough chunk of the younger voting generations because at least then I have hope that things will eventually change. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:09
|
|
|
I am hoping desperately for a reemergence of Secret Muslim Paul Ryan you know he's secretly muslim again because of the beard see edit: also in all seriousness it's kind of a riker situation, he needs that beard if he wants to stop being seen as a boy genius at age 46.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:09
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:So its not active malice, its incompetence? It is both. Active malice in the red states, mixture of malice and Tjomas being literally told how to vote in scotus, and frustration in lower federal courts when Supreme Court lets gerrymandering and poll closures slide as precedent. Potato Salad fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Oct 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:5-4 ideological Supreme Court line. scotus striking down vra preclearance under section 5 isn't directly responsible for the cuts in nc. well kinda in fact it was the post-scalia court punting on the 4th circuit striking down the last voter suppression law that did it the law as written required the same number of hours and sites; when it was struck it freed counties to do whatever they wanted
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:I am hoping desperately for a reemergence of Secret Muslim Paul Ryan All I know is that in certain pictures he looks uncomfortably like my boyfriend, and I have trouble unseeing it 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
The hits just keep on coming. And I love it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
Boot and Rally posted:Gotta love that Channel suit. I wonder if she got it at the Ogdenville outlet. Wow, I understood the -gently caress- out of this sentence
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/vpkivimaki/status/789839417351495680Armani posted:Wow, I understood the -gently caress- out of this sentence I'll admit I didn't notice it until it got brought up. Now I can't unsee it. Young Freud fucked around with this message at 00:16 on Oct 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
You know I think I've finally reached the point. Trump's things are a blur to me. I can't keep track of them. I can't imagine how lower-information voters feel. Does it feel like it's just one thing they're harping over and over again?
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:You know I think I've finally reached the point. I doubt they are paying much attention.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
I dont think the "He's working for the Rusians!" attack works on Trump and his cronies. Most of his base love Putin and the idea of being ruled over by someone like him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
Precambrian posted:Trump's overweight, admits he eats like crap, doesn't seem to sleep, Lord knows he probably abuses some kind of pills, and then you throw on the election stress, rage, and nonstop campaigning. Melania's probably calculated his life expectancy, looked at the date, and concluded she could just wait him out. He is going to leave her with six million in hidden debt and nothing else.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
Crow Jane posted:All I know is that in certain pictures he looks uncomfortably like my boyfriend, and I have trouble unseeing it   
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:24 |
|
|
ImpAtom posted:You know I think I've finally reached the point. ImpAtom posted:The rate of Trump scandals is speeding up. We've reached it, the Cheeto Sky.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:19
|
|