|
PT6A posted:Wait, what? I thought everyone liked the new Star Wars. its a woman as the hero, and a black man and a latino man with visible sexual tension people got super salty
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 16:21 |
|
CascadeBeta posted:So what exactly happens if the house attempts to impeach on day one of Hilldawg's presidency? We're more likely than not going to have a Democrat Senate, but if the Senate was still GOP, and this situation occurred, what would happen? Nothing, takes 67 Senate votes for removal.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:If I could just get something that doesn't dehumanize people with learning disabilities that would be cool
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:If I could just get something that doesn't dehumanize people with learning disabilities that would be cool I would be cool with this too. FactsAreUseless posted:Not my job to give you a new avatar because you don't like the angry av someone bought you. The whole reason SA has that function is so idiots can spend money changing other people's avatars. The correct response is to laugh that someone got so pissy they spent $10 to change your tiny internet picture. Don't get me wrong my av is a constant reminder that I made some idiot Trump supporter waste $10 with absolutely no effort exerted on my part, and I appreciate that aspect.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
TheOneAndOnlyT posted:Nothing, because the Senate has to vote to convict Hillary to actually kick her out, and that requires 67 senators and not 51. Aha, I figured there was a good reason I hadn't heard anything of the sort till now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
computer parts posted:It's a shame that director may be a rapist. I'm kind of shamefully relieved that the director being a shithead gives me a simple excuse for not seeing the movie, because it looks like a bunch of Hard to Watch agony porn and I'm tired of looking at black history solely through that lens on film.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:SAYS WHO? SAYS WHO? Reminder, that guy might be the guy that used pony as a defense. this. election.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:So what exactly happens if the house attempts to impeach on day one of Hilldawg's presidency? We're more likely than not going to have a Democrat Senate, but if the Senate was still GOP, and this situation occurred, what would happen? A very, very dangerous precedent, at the very least. Second, it takes 2/3rds majority of Senators, so it would be impossible (one party is very unlikely to get that many Senators, so it takes something clearly indefensible to convict, ala Nixon, who got out before they did). 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
computer parts posted:It's a shame that director may be a rapist. It's a decent remake but yeah people have dog piled onto the director for being a rapist... which never stopped anyone from seeing a Roman Polanski movie but I'll give you one guess as to what the director of BoaN skin tone is and why it suddenly matters.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/793170005865009152
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Sky Shadowing posted:A very, very dangerous precedent, at the very least. Only black democrats can avoid impeachment from here on out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I'm kind of shamefully relieved that the director being a shithead gives me a simple excuse for not seeing the movie, because it looks like a bunch of Hard to Watch agony porn and I'm tired of looking at black history solely through that lens on film. I really want to see Moonlight
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
idk bro people are pretty against seeing woody Allen movies these days unless you think that's persecuting jews
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:its a woman as the hero, and a black man and a latino man with visible sexual tension Before it came out, yeah, but most people seemed to love it. The difference between the new Ghostbusters and the new Star Wars is that the new Star Wars was really good, so only hardcore racists/misogynists complained about it being too "PC"after it came out, whereas the new Ghostbusters was mediocre, so the casual misogynists, who are much more numerous, are able to dogpile it as the worst movie and point to it as an example of "PC gone mad!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:idk bro people are pretty against seeing woody Allen movies these days unless you think that's persecuting jews On the other hand they won't shut up about how Roman Polanski only raped that one underage girl and she deserved it anyway.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:its a woman as the hero, and a black man and a latino man with visible sexual tension No, a tiny fraction of internet weirdos got salty, Star Wars made 2 billion dollars, people didn't care. A less-than-tiny fraction of people got salty about Ghostbusters.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:idk bro people are pretty against seeing woody Allen movies these days unless you think that's persecuting jews I think AWiJ means certain people. You know the ones. *looks suggestively at mayonnaise jar*
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:It's a decent remake but yeah people have dog piled onto the director for being a rapist... which never stopped anyone from seeing a Roman Polanski movie but I'll give you one guess as to what the director of BoaN skin tone is and why it suddenly matters. People definitely do actually refuse to see movies made by Polanski or Allen because of what they did.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
 I got this in the mail today. I think it's supposed to aim for millennials but who knows?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
The Senate races are more important than the Presidential race at this point in time (since Clinton will win). Clinton winning avoids a Trumpocalypse, sure, but 4 more years of absolute stagnation, with a Senate who can stall forever on SCOTUS nominations, and a continuation of the least-effective Congress ever is not a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Mos Def had a really good verse once about the Woody Allen/Michael Jackson dichotomy
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
What I heard of Birth of a Nation is it's a decent action type revenge movie but not an incredible race extravaganza like people were playing it up to be. I'll have to stick to The Jerk for that. Truly an inspirational movie about race relations in America.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
bobjr posted:
That's adorable
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Crossposting: https://twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/793172938719653888
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
FWIW, 538 pegs it at 65% chance of Dem control for the Senate atm.quote:So what exactly happens if the house attempts to impeach on day one of Hilldawg's presidency? We're more likely than not going to have a Democrat Senate, but if the Senate was still GOP, and this situation occurred, what would happen? If Hillary wins, the Senate will likely be fairly close. It is very unlikely that the Republicans would maintain a party-line Senate vote on impeachment, so it would probably stall out and fail. The news media would be in 100% freakout mode. Even if the Senate sustained an impeachment, there would be little to no political will or motivation to repeat the process for Tim Kaine, so we'd probably end up with a Kaine presidency.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:On the other hand they won't shut up about how Roman Polanski only raped that one underage girl and she deserved it anyway. What? I've never encountered someone who defends Polanski.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:What? I've never encountered someone who defends Polanski. Found the loser who didn't go to film school
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:On the other hand they won't shut up about how Roman Polanski only raped that one underage girl and she deserved it anyway. Who's the "they" in this case? I constantly hear about how "the left" constantly comes to Polanski's defense but I really don't see that beyond a few Hollywood idiots.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Is the checking in at standing Rock thing as much of a totally pointless slacktivism thing as it looks like?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:idk bro people are pretty against seeing woody Allen movies these days unless you think that's persecuting jews Sorry not sorry, but I'm an anti-Semite-marrying-your-adopted-daugherist. Like, come at me SJWs, I drink your tears for breakfast.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
The thing about impeaching Hillary is it will hilariously backfire, like it did with her husband. The other thing is Tim Kaine isn't much different than Hillary policy wise, so while they may slay the demon, they have nothing on the apprentice. I'm that 2% of Hill supporters who think she's a demon 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
What an incompetent fool this guy is. Great appointment Obama.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Are. You. loving Kidding. Me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:People definitely do actually refuse to see movies made by Polanski or Allen because of what they did. A few yeah. But to say that the same number of people wouldn't see a Polanski/Allen flick due to the director being a rapist vs how many people won't see BoaN because the director probably is one isn't even remotely close.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Lol what movie was that. I need a word then. At the same time, I'm a white bisexual man and I need a word for me too that recognizes the difference in the way the law handled our skin color pre and post civil rights movement, relevant per the current discussion on the SCOTUS and the fact that we are a week away from having the first liberal one since the civil rights movement.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:What? I've never encountered someone who defends Polanski. It's mostly Hollywood people Like, Gore Vidal and Whoopi Goldberg have both said some pretty odious poo poo about it off the top of my head.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Ghostbusters murdered my childhood and then it came back as a ghost and they busted it
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
 "CNBC posted:FBI's Comey opposed naming Russians, citing election timing: Source
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Someone post the giant growing please.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 16:21 |
|
|
Impeachment is gonna be as common under the third Clinton administration as votes to repeal Obamacare are under Obama.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 20:34
|
|