|
http://www.psp-tv.com/r/NiteCrew This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
|
500562 | 49.92% |
 |
|
139 | 0.01% |
 |
|
153 | 0.02% |
 |
|
500888 | 49.95% |
 |
|
940 | 0.09% |
| Total: | 1002682 votes | ||
|
Can democrats also get some newspapers and tv channels and webpages that are popular
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 18:42 |
|
|
euphronius posted:Will there ever be laughter agai. N
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:Idiot Fascism is neoliberalism in decay
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Meanwhile, in silver lining land: https://twitter.com/Taniel/status/796394833539637248
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
i felt i made some nice posts, in particular the "the stone head of Kek has made fools of us all" one
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
So does the whole Trump TV thing get scrapped or are we going to get America's RT in a year or two?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Does anyone have a good breakdown on how not having third party candidates would have helped trump or Hillary? the consensus is that third parties actually helped hilary, there were some states she won where gary johnson won more votes than the difference between her and trump if all those people really would've voted trump in a world w/o third parties is anyone guess but it's still a loving dire look for clinton
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:this is all benefits of hindsight, but i'm sort of feeling like the 2010 and 2014 waves have placed dems in a situation where we didn't really have a good option with a presidential win this year. Oh yeah we're screwed but I feel like most of the screwing got moved from 2020 to 2016. The main thing that scares me is that Trump just listens to what his advisers say and parrots it. If they were inline with the milquetoast centrist image he projected in NYC I wouldn't be nearly as scared.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:So does the whole Trump TV thing get scrapped or are we going to get America's RT in a year or two? Believe it or not, I think even Trump feels being the President and running a new channel is a bit much.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
I got to keep Rick Nolan as my congressman. Of course his opponent is a rich douchebag with no job so he might be back in two years.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Can democrats also get some newspapers and tv channels and webpages that are popular nah let's keep up the NPR style of ineffectual bullshit where journos would rather hammer themselves in the balls instead of drawing a loving conclusion or making a moral stand
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:centrism bad The DNC have got the message, and will now be a firmly right wing party.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rcallimachi/status/796434831064367110
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Do we have to fight when we can all agree that the republicans are the ones who started this whole thing
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Mike the TV posted:2008: a campaign about change wins the presidency uhhh
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
Rukmini is a pro follow for ISIS-related stuff, just for all yall's information
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:also i just want to say that i like basically all of you and think there are a lot of good points itt. You should know that I followed that Trump thread all the way through and when I had to skip large swaths of posts, the only thing I made sure to catch up on was yours. As someone with a (underutilized) quant background, I learned a poo poo ton about all things polls this time around. Thanks for sharing your time 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:slay queen, yaaas, *dumb gif*, drumph, abulea, etc etc etc I'll miss the Trump thread but that was a different time. I am glad it got closed before the  started.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
Shark Sandwich posted:Oh yeah we're screwed but I feel like most of the screwing got moved from 2020 to 2016. i literally have no idea what president trump is going to be like as a president and i don't think anyone else does either. probably bad though!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
GobiasIndustries posted:Even Jeffrey Lord has no words for how hosed up things could get because of his candidate those are some top shelf comments under that video. I remember when I thought yt comments were sort of a "place" that only a tiny minority of lovely people went to disseminate their poo poo. No, turns out we live in a 3000 mile wide youtube comments section.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Shark Sandwich posted:They'll turn on him when #MAGA doesn't happen in 100 days But it will happen. Obama invited illegals across the border, and now there's hundreds of miles of wall along that border. The inner cities were war zones under Obama. Murders were at an all time high. Now look at the statistics under Trump. There was 11 million illegals in the country, and now there are only 3 million (and dropping) under Trump. Taking credit for things other people have done, or just claiming responsibility for a general state of order is something Trump will 100% do. If something is bad, he will blame someone else. He's put out enough false information that he can now cite factual information and claim credit for the difference.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
Obama's '12 campaign was more than just "i've done good things". The overarcing narrative was that Change was not finished, and that it was not time to cede to the republicans once more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
I'm both comforted and scared by the fact that Trump will be an unequivocally really lovely president.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Fireside Nut posted:You should know that I followed that Trump thread all the way through and when I had to skip large swaths of posts, the only thing I made sure to catch up on was yours. very welcome friend!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
MysteriousStranger posted:The point of labeling them racists isn't entirely that they are racist. The point of labeling them racist is to make the un people, that way we don't have to feel bad about screwing over their communities to make coastal cities richer, because they are bad people and thus it's OK to hurt them, because they deserve it. It's OK that banks destroyed their communities. Because they are racist, and Goldman Sachs funds liberals in big liberal cities and is full of well educated social liberals, and Goldman Sachs is a partner of the Human Rights Campaign and really came through for gay marriage. Plus, criticizing bankers is racist, because what you actually doing is criticizing jews because you are a racist. oh hey a good post
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:i literally have no idea what president trump is going to be like as a president and i don't think anyone else does either. corruption, nepotism, kleptomania and rape of the environment they just haven't figured out in which order to do them
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Casimir Radon posted:Not for awhile. This is one hell of a kick in the balls. I've been laughing since last night
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Silver lining - Donna Brazille is likely to lose her job at the DNC and likely won't have a chance to get hired in a media organization again given the taint of her name. And DWS's career growth is almost certainly over.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Hot take: Multiple people and institutions are to blame in varying amounts for reasons that will become clear over time .
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:i literally have no idea what president trump is going to be like as a president and i don't think anyone else does either. Eh, I think we have a pretty good idea after seeing Trump evolve from announcement to victory. He will basically be be President Mitch McConnell + Wall. Chances are he doesn't get the wall in the first term, and maybe gets a fence in the second term.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
MysteriousStranger posted:The point of labeling them racists isn't entirely that they are racist. The point of labeling them racist is to make the un people, that way we don't have to feel bad about screwing over their communities to make coastal cities richer, because they are bad people and thus it's OK to hurt them, because they deserve it. It's OK that banks destroyed their communities. Because they are racist, and Goldman Sachs funds liberals in big liberal cities and is full of well educated social liberals, and Goldman Sachs is a partner of the Human Rights Campaign and really came through for gay marriage. Plus, criticizing bankers is racist, because what you actually doing is criticizing jews because you are a racist. let me know when Trump didn't use building a giant wall, wanting mass deportations, and the banning of all muslims as the cornerstone of his campaign. Let me know when the KKK didn't just see this as a vindication of their movement and beliefs. Let me know when people who voted for Trump didn't know all these things.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Does anyone have a good breakdown on how not having third party candidates would have helped trump or Hillary?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Godinster posted:Silver lining - Donna Brazille is likely to lose her job at the DNC and likely won't have a chance to get hired in a media organization again given the taint of her name. And DWS's career growth is almost certainly over. Counterpoint: Katrina Pierson
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:During the primaries, every poll showed Bernie doing much better against Trump than Clinton. The polls that have proven to be poo poo just last night. Regardless who the candidate would have been, the Democrats need to work on fixing one issue first and foremost: Voter suppression. The people in WI that couldn't vote for Clinton wouldn't have been able to vote for Sanders either. Same with the removed EV voting stations in black districts in NC. Which maybe had a bit of a negative impact considering the severely lower turnout in both states. "Clinton was the worst candidate to ever run" - maybe, but she still managed to get the popular vote and lose in many swing state with a really, really small margin. Talking like the Democrats just got voted out with 1/3 of the votes they got last time around seems a bit weak-kneed. The Democrats just barely lost, their message overall can't have been that wrong like it is made out to be here, even if the messenger had too much baggage in the end.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Is Wonder Woman still coming out?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
MrWilderheap posted:Do we have to fight when we can all agree that the republicans are the ones who started this whole thing Look, we can't stand up to the Republicans until we thoroughly murder each other for slight differences of opinion first!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
My one hope is we take a serious snap back in 4 years, unemployment will almost certainly start rising under Trump, he is not going to be able to bring back factory jobs to the rustbelt, he isn't going to be able to build the wall. What we will get is tax cuts on the rich, rising income inequality, 10s of millions of people losing health insurance, the Trump administration is going to be bad for the working class, they are just another group of people conned by Trump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
It begins. Republicans are going to go for broke. https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/796441333007319040
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
lorn Wayne posted:Counterpoint: Katrina Pierson MVP
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 18:42 |
|
|
TyrantWD posted:Eh, I think we have a pretty good idea after seeing Trump evolve from announcement to victory. He will basically be be President Mitch McConnell + Wall. Chances are he doesn't get the wall in the first term, and maybe gets a fence in the second term. If Trump is just bog-standard institutional republican and his administration is just a complicated dance between Pence, McConnell, and Ryan then that's really lovely, but probably not existentially threatening. I think there's realistically the chance that he does his own thing which is mildly terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:58
|
|