|
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 03:16 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 16:19 |
|
Sunswipe posted:I cannot get my head around how putting five or so candidates in the order of which you'd most like to win is difficult. http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2016/guide/senate/
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 03:29 |
|
Most people used to just ignore all of this and just put a 1 on the party they actually want. That's why we have a climate change truther in the senate.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 03:55 |
|
You can guarantee that other than the 2% of posts calling everyone morons, that everyone responding to this is a Grade A gullible racist dickhead. https://www.facebook.com/ThePatriotReview/posts/879739805549929
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 05:10 |
|
Intoluene posted:Most people used to just ignore all of this and just put a 1 on the party they actually want. That's why we have a climate change truther in the senate. Hey he's an idiot on social media, so.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 05:17 |
|
This isn't part of a chain of comments, and there are no replies to it. It's not even really relevant to the video.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 06:46 |
|
SwitchbladeKult posted:This election has got people on edge. Part 2. Same people new thread. I'd ask these people even if their mysterious accusations are true that Hillary supporters, Hillary, Bill and Obama have all said and done worse things than Trump and his supporters, do two wrongs make a right? Only what's the point? There is literally nothing Trump and his ilk could do that would make his detractors go "that's too far." And if they did, it would be media lies.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 07:23 |
|
The social idiot this time, is Trump. And now I have something for the next time someone on my facebook said "Conservatives never riot, we wouldn't have, and we're not racist!"
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 08:17 |
|
It doesn't make it any less funny, but the time stamps for the Trump tweets make it look recent when in reality it was from years ago.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 08:26 |
|
OP (pink) posted about her teenage daughter going to a Trump protest, comments joined in progress. I'm the George Soros conspiracy theory 3 days after Donald Trump was elected president of the United States.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 08:50 |
|
You can probably guess but red and blue are black/mixed race, green is white.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 11:51 |
|
White people are the worst. "WE ARE VICTIMS TOO, DON'T FORGET ABOUT US US US."
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:07 |
|
Reverse racism is real.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:20 |
|
I unfriended this woman. When I was a CNA she was the Head Nurse. She is part of a ghost hunting group in St. Joseph, MO.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:28 |
|
I'm not surprised but still somehow sad that Imgur is already shifting to the anti-hillary and anti-liberal posts you see on facebook. Oh and here's some more anti-BLM "I'M NOT RACIST BUT THESE UPPITY..." Facebook friend also posted that bullshit "Democrats opposed the amendment that ended slavery" so who's the racist party now?! When someone called him out on it the response he has was "Check out this youtube video of some dude with a webcam and microphone talk about how that's not true" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EXNp3HddMI Are the black bars above and below the image macro just "I'm too lazy to hold my finger on an image to save it or share it so I'll just take a screencap of my entire phone screen instead"? Edit: Where do these people find these no-name websites with these viewpoints? Also, good-loving-luck. Ularg has a new favorite as of 13:39 on Nov 12, 2016 |
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:33 |
|
Freedom of speech! except for all those people who would express an opinion that's different to mine i think we should throw those people in jail
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:49 |
|
Slime posted:Freedom of speech! except for all those people who would express an opinion that's different to mine i think we should throw those people in jail For the highest federal charge that exists.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 14:48 |
|
Why Canada and not Iceland?!Ularg posted:I'm not surprised but still somehow sad that Imgur is already shifting to the anti-hillary and anti-liberal posts you see on facebook.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 14:49 |
|
ikanreed posted:For the highest federal charge that exists. "Super Duper Federal Charge Times Infinity!" - President Trump
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 14:50 |
|
The thought process behind this meme is borderline incomprehensible
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 14:52 |
|
Let's not just start posting naked racism here, eh? Ularg posted:Where do these people find these no-name websites with these viewpoints? Facebook. When they got rid of human moderation of news sources, there was an instant, huge spike of literal hoax site recommendations. They tell me the situation has improved but the damage is done
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 14:56 |
|
Web browser developers and mobile OS makers have a lot to answer for here, since they didn't do anything to stem the spread of misleading content. To say nothing of ISPs and cable providers.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:00 |
|
What do ISPs and Cable providers have to do with it? Honest question.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:01 |
|
Ularg posted:What do ISPs and Cable providers have to do with it? Honest question. The hoax material or misleading statements traveled over their infrastructure, just as over Chrome's and Facebook's.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:03 |
|
Subjunctive posted:The hoax material or misleading statements traveled over their infrastructure, just as over Chrome's and Facebook's. Do you really want ISPs to start policing internet content?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:15 |
|
Pretty sure that "right to vote for all" 15th amendment was missing a couple people.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:17 |
|
Vladimir Poutine posted:The thought process behind this meme is borderline incomprehensible Subjunctive posted:Web browser developers and mobile OS makers have a lot to answer for here, since they didn't do anything to stem the spread of misleading content. To say nothing of ISPs and cable providers.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:20 |
|
Thinky Whale posted:Pretty sure that "right to vote for all" 15th amendment was missing a couple people. gently caress, I live on the other side of the planet from the US and even I know that the Democrats and Republicans effectively changed sides after all that poo poo* was pushed through. Might as well say, "Remember when the Repubicans cared about people and fought for their rights?" *except Obamacare
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:20 |
|
Andrast posted:Do you really want ISPs to start policing internet content? No, I don't. I don't want Facebook adjudicating truth of articles, either. Tiggum posted:What were they supposed to have done? What was Facebook supposed to have done?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:22 |
|
Subjunctive posted:What was Facebook supposed to have done? I didn't suggest they should have done anything. You said that web browser developers, mobile OS makers, ISPs and cable providers "have a lot to answer for here, since they didn't do anything to stem the spread of misleading content" and I'm asking you what it is that you think they should have done. If there's nothing they should have done then they have nothing to answer for. So what is the responsibility that they had and how should they have addressed it?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:29 |
|
....oooook?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:31 |
|
Blue is a friend, I don't know Brown. Replies are me and Blue. How do you gently caress up that bad?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:48 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Web browser developers and mobile OS makers have a lot to answer for here, since they didn't do anything to stem the spread of misleading content. To say nothing of ISPs and cable providers. Facebook is not infrastructure. They chose to be a news source (I'm talking about the automatically generated "see also" links in case you want to be clever, not the news shared by users), they chose an editorial policy for their news. It's on them
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:05 |
|
Tiggum posted:I didn't suggest they should have done anything. You said that web browser developers, mobile OS makers, ISPs and cable providers "have a lot to answer for here, since they didn't do anything to stem the spread of misleading content" and I'm asking you what it is that you think they should have done. If there's nothing they should have done then they have nothing to answer for. So what is the responsibility that they had and how should they have addressed it? Sorry, I was being ironic, extending the argument that Facebook is obliged to act. The whole stack delivered the content.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:05 |
|
hackbunny posted:Facebook is not infrastructure. They chose to be a news source (I'm talking about the automatically generated "see also" links in case you want to be clever, not the news shared by users), they chose an editorial line for their news. It's on them Those links aren't recommendations, and they aren't labeled as such. They choose everything that shows up in feed algorithmically.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:07 |
|
The background here is that Subjunctive used to be a Facebook executive, make of that what you will
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:07 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Those links aren't recommendations, and they aren't labeled as such. They choose everything that shows up in feed algorithmically. Yes, they publish content and "algorithmic" is their editorial policy. We don't disagree but we read different things into it Remember the many times Google became unusable for certain topics due to biases in their algorithms? hackbunny has a new favorite as of 16:11 on Nov 12, 2016 |
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:09 |
|
hackbunny posted:The background here Doxx much?
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:12 |
|
hackbunny posted:Remember the many times Google became unusable for certain topics due to biases in their algorithms? Yes, but I don't recall them being accused of being responsible for distorting discussions of those topics. They were viewed as a broken tool for some purposes, not an organization failing to meet their moral duty.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:15 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 16:19 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Doxx much? Yes, stating that someone used to work a job is exactly what doxxing is.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 16:15 |