|
Clarste posted:While I'm sure Scotland has some sort of gun control laws, isn't that whole region supposed to be Rafe's private property? They were keeping out trespassers. Yeah, Rafe owns all of that, so technically Shoreline is in the clear on that one. King's Bay, on the other hand...
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 23:47 |
|
|
CJacobs posted:He's been calling Sully 'Sullivan' occasionally for the whole game so far (he did it earlier in this very episode) and as dumb as it sounds it's actually been legitimately bothering me. It's what Sam calls him. Sam is rubbing off on Nate.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:19
|
|
|
Any locale that bears a sufficient resemblance to Tortuga isn't allowed to have any laws. It's the law.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
Really Pants posted:Any locale that bears a sufficient resemblance to Tortuga isn't allowed to have any laws. It's the law. Well I am just gonna loot the bar at that pirate fantasy restaurant then
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
General Ironicus posted:It's what Sam calls him. Sam is rubbing off on Nate. Sam's pretty insistent in calling him "Victor" at all times and that definitely sounds weird.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
Jeez, this game, this game. I feel like this game is going to suffer from the classic sequel problem, the narrative is going to feel like the story is finished and these people should just be left to live their lives, but the game is so amazing that it feels like a shame if they didn't make more. How much of the crazy poo poo in this game is built into the engine and how much is just lovingly crafted, I have no idea. Galaga Galaxian posted:Way to gently caress up Nathan. It's pretty much exactly how he looks in Tales of Monkey Island. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
No mustache
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:No mustache Uncharted takes place in an alternate universe where Guybrush decided to grow out the peach fuzz and therefore never went on happy go lucky pirate adventures. Instead he went on totally serious pyrate adventures.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Threepwood's Tales outfit is based directly on his second game appearance, anyway. And it is his most piratical outfit, so no wonder everyone keeps reusing it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
CJacobs posted:Uncharted takes place in an alternate universe where Guybrush decided to grow out the peach fuzz and therefore never went on happy go lucky pirate adventures. Instead he went on totally serious pyrate adventures. Or Guybrush dropped a razor a week before posing for that portrait.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:23
|
|
|
Sully hasn't gone by Victor consistently since he was an adult film star in the 70's named Slick Vic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
bobjr posted:Sully hasn't gone by Victor consistently since he was an adult film star in the 70's named Slick Vic. In the 70's or in his 70's?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
KieranWalker posted:Yeah, Rafe owns all of that, so technically Shoreline is in the clear on that one. Just because he owns it doesn't mean his private security can carry whatever guns they want. Or maybe they can, I don't know what Scotland's laws on self-defense are.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:In the 70's or in his 70's? yes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
SatansBestBuddy posted:Like, how many games shown off at E3 actually live up to the hype they create? Very few, and Uncharted 4 doesn't count as one of them. Remember that first teaser that was tooootally in engine footage and the gameplay was going to be 60 FPS?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:13
|
|
|
Galaga Galaxian posted:I can't wait to see what terrible secret Libertalia hides. It's filled with internet libertarians. When they arrive they have to face off against 500 unwashed neckbeards screaming about their purestrain gold.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:34
|
|
|
Ometeotl posted:Very few, and Uncharted 4 doesn't count as one of them. maybe I just don't have good eyes, but this doesn't really look particularly better than the actual game to me, and all of the game is in-engine without CGI cutscenes. also people care about 60 FPS too much. the game plays great at 30, and I don't really remember them making a selling point out of it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:36
|
|
|
Huzzah! posted:yes. With Victor Sullivan, "His 70s" doesn't narrow things down as much as it might normally. A better question regards the hundreds digit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:38
|
|
|
morallyobjected posted:maybe I just don't have good eyes, but this doesn't really look particularly better than the actual game to me, and all of the game is in-engine without CGI cutscenes. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:42
|
|
|
Clarste posted:While I'm sure Scotland has some sort of gun control laws, isn't that whole region supposed to be Rafe's private property? They were keeping out trespassers. "Keeping out tresspassers" rarely involves "shoot them dead on sight."
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 07:49
|
|
|
Ometeotl posted:Very few, and Uncharted 4 doesn't count as one of them. I guess I should have said "played live at E3" instead. I don't really count early CGI teasers since the game's still in development at that point, so why would they have that many art assets and a working game engine running visuals of that level of fidelity when there's still two or three years left to make the game? AAA games simply don't look like that when they're three years out from release, they're still mostly code and featureless gray blocks. The game would look like the top half of this image around the time that teaser trailer was released, and wouldn't look like the bottom half until close to a year left in development. So, yeah, 30 second long teaser trailers? Lies, ever single one of them, and this game is also on the hook for that. Game actually being played live onstage? Often times also lies, so I'm impressed that this game actually looks as good now as it looked then.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
Jetrauben posted:"Keeping out tresspassers" rarely involves "shoot them dead on sight." Clearly you've never been to the south, or Wyoming.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 13:59
|
|
|
Jetrauben posted:"Keeping out tresspassers" rarely involves "shoot them dead on sight." Well they didn't shoot anyone dead did they? Looks like they're in the clear.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
Do PMC's face any sort of legal repercussions for doing this, like are shoreline going to get a big fine?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 16:12
|
|
|
SatansBestBuddy posted:I guess I should have said "played live at E3" instead. That's fair. It's just unfortunate that Naughty Dog did the Ubisoft/EA thing and really went out of their way to lie about the teaser footage.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:Do PMC's face any sort of legal repercussions for doing this, like are shoreline going to get a big fine? Well, looking at blackwater.... No
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:18
|
|
|
Ometeotl posted:That's fair. It's just unfortunate that Naughty Dog did the Ubisoft/EA thing and really went out of their way to lie about the teaser footage. you keep saying this and the only thing they maybe misled people about was whether it was going to be in 60 FPS the whole time (I can't remember them specifically claiming this, but to be fair it's been years), to which they said relatively early out that they thought about it and realised they'd either have to delay the game a bunch to do the optimisations necessary or deal with a highly variable frame rate, so they chose to lock it at 30 FPS. it's not like they waited until the game came out to just let people find out. what part of the game looks so much worse than the original trailer?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Also technically that trailer just says it's running on PS4 hardware, it doesn't say it's in-engine footage. I don't know what other claims were made at the time, but the trailer itself isn't actually lying. Misleading could definitely be argued, though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
Good to see Guybrush passed the hidden 4th pirate test: Being Photogenetic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
Also didn't the first stuff come out before all the rewrites and changes?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
bobjr posted:Also didn't the first stuff come out before all the rewrites and changes? yeah, but that only really affected the narrative, I'd imagine--not gameplay
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
Was Guybrush a pirate? I thought Mancomb Seepgood was the pirate and Guybrush just went around selling fine leather jackets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
Brutakas posted:Was Guybrush a pirate? I thought Mancomb Seepgood was the pirate and Guybrush just went around selling fine leather jackets.  Mancomb Seepgood, meanwhile, met a grisly fate at the hands of Edward Kenway.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
Doc Morbid posted:Guybrush wasn't a pirate, he was a Mighty Pirate. Nonsense. He joined a street fighting ring in Toussaint.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
Clarste posted:While I'm sure Scotland has some sort of gun control laws, isn't that whole region supposed to be Rafe's private property? They were keeping out trespassers. Scottish Gun laws are basically as strict as the rest of the UK. You can own a Shotgun, or long barreled pistol that's not easily concelable. Or a .22 Rifle. If you can get a gun license. This requires. Passing a background check. A Character reference from a 'reputable' source. (Remember I said basically. This is an extra requirement unique to Scotland). Demonstrating a need for a firearm. The latter is ironclad. Wanting a gun, is not a valid reason for owning one. You'd better be a working farmer or someone else who can demonstrate they have a legitimate use for a shotgun. To further illustrate this. The English Olympic shooting team trains abroad, as it's too much of a hassle gettin permission at home. As for Assault Rifles and similar, forget about it. Private property or not. Totaly illegal, especially for unliscensed foreign nationals.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Deptfordx posted:Demonstrating a need for a firearm. …like being a mum.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Zurai posted:Also technically that trailer just says it's running on PS4 hardware, it doesn't say it's in-engine footage. I don't know what other claims were made at the time, but the trailer itself isn't actually lying. Misleading could definitely be argued, though. There were claims made by ND employees about the first trailer running real-time on actual PS4 hardware and a bunch of banging on the 60 FPS drum in general. So yeah, I guess you can argue they were being at least semi-intentionally misleading.  But the real question is, who gives a poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
There was a gameplay demo after the announcement with Liquid Sam gunning for revenge and the Madagascar chase but the LP hasnt gotten to the segment yet. I imagine thats where the 60 fps came from
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
Deptfordx posted:Demonstrating a need for a firearm. Makes sense to me!
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 23:47 |
|
|
Man, I can't wait for Chip to LP Watch_Dogs 2. Links are 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 02:39
|
|
