Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Gaunab
Feb 13, 2012
LUFTHANSA YOU FUCKING DICKWEASEL

FactsAreUseless posted:

Universities are garbage.

I agree.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

DACK FAYDEN posted:

Isn't that the whole "7% less for Hillary in districts that used electronic machines" thing NYMag was writing about? I didn't ever see their data so I'm skeptical but they certainly made a lot of noise.

That metric is essentially garbage because districts that use paper tend to be cities, which is already where Hillary was strongest. Here in Virginia urban areas almost universally saw the problems with electronic machines, went "whoa poo poo let's not," and went back to scantrons. Suburbs and rural counties, on the other hand, went full speed ahead with the cyberfuture.

e: accidentally a word to make things more clear to people whose states aren't insane

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Fojar38 posted:

This bargaining stage (it must have been rigged! There must have been massive voter fraud!), combined with the hyperbolic declarations of the imminent descent of the USA into dictatorship and the eventual extinction of the human race and that the Democrats are traitors for not being ideologically pure enough to literally cordon off capital hill to stop the GOP from governing is virtually identical to the reaction from the right in 2008.

The Right survived. The Left will also survive as will the Republic.

Except Obama wasn't running on a platform of throwing Christian gunowners into FEMA camps, funding Islamist camps in Mexico or undermining American sovereignty to the UN, like the Right accused him of, but Trump did campaign to deport immigrants en masse, build a border wall, turn black communities into police states "for their own good", etc.

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

Quorum posted:

That metric is essentially garbage because districts that use paper tend to be cities, which is already where Hillary was strongest. Here in Virginia urban areas almost universally saw the problems with electronic machines, went "whoa poo poo let's not," and went back to scantrons. Suburbs and counties, on the other hand, went full speed ahead with the cyberfuture.
Yeah, I edited something in while you wrote this - long story short, I'm not convinced.

Then again, if I was Hillary's campaign I would have started prepping to file for a recount literally the instant the election was called. It's so drat close in WI/MI/PA and the payoff for winning the goddamn Presidency is so high that it's got to be favorable from a strict expected value standpoint.

Chaos Personified
Oct 9, 2012
So considering this is the Trump timeline, what are the odds that the Green Parties investigation ends up showing the machine being tampered with to throw the election to the democrats, and this is why they are all trying to be hush hush about it?

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Chaos Personified posted:

So considering this is the Trump timeline, what are the odds that the Green Parties investigation ends up showing the machine being tampered with to throw the election to the democrats, and this is why they are all trying to be hush hush about it?

There will be significant evidence that the election might have been stolen, but Republicans will shut it down and nothing will happen.

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Chaos Personified posted:

So considering this is the Trump timeline, what are the odds that the Green Parties investigation ends up showing the machine being tampered with to throw the election to the democrats, and this is why they are all trying to be hush hush about it?

1%

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Actual 1% or Pollster 1%?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod



that's the odds of trump winning the election so i'm feeling lucky!

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
:thejoke:

Tom Clancy is Dead
Jul 13, 2011

DACK FAYDEN posted:

Isn't that the whole "7% less for Hillary in districts that used electronic machines" thing NYMag was writing about? I didn't ever see their data so I'm skeptical but they certainly made a lot of noise.

Late edit: Clicking through the links in that Guardian article, I'm not actually convinced by the argument that "Hillary lost districts that Obama won far worse when they were electronic ballot districts" as that doesn't control for literally anything, including race and wealth. There certainly could be something there. It's close enough that a recount is definitely a wise idea in all three states, especially given that if one's been called incorrectly for whatever reason it's likely all three are since the whole point of the swing was that it was all three unexpectedly differing from polling. But I don't know if I actually believe the evidence we have is sufficient to indicate that there must be a recount.

Yeah that argument is garbage and gets pulled out every time an election happens. It invariably ends up being that paper vs. electronic only is correlated with some other, actually causal variables. This is the somewhat more convincing argument: https://medium.com/@jhalderm/want-to-know-if-the-election-was-hacked-look-at-the-ballots-c61a6113b0ba#.r40lm8ac9, basically that with the Russians loving around in our electoral process so much we should use the paper verification to be as sure as we can be that they didn't meddle with the vote counts and to get in the habit of auditing.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Paradoxish posted:

Do humanities programs actually teach the kind of soft skills that you're talking about, though? I don't actually disagree with you about the value of those skills or about the value of a humanities education in general, but I'm also not sure that there's much overlap between a traditional humanities program and the kind of interpersonal workplace skills that you're talking about.

yeah, totally! if we take the most classical definition of the humanities - the study of human culture and behavior - you spend a ton of time talking about your subjective opinion on things and basically negotiating with people. group projects in stem tend to be a collective exercise to determine an optimal answer, not one where the is no optimal answer and compromise and negotiation are useful tools

Xae posted:

Are we really going to go off on a huge STEM/Non-STEM circle jerk?

its not really a circle jerk, there's one guy with bad opinions being dogpiled

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich
also btw i have humanities degrees and i work at a software company managing a team of engineers with stem degrees, so, lol

its way easier to teach yourself how to code than it is to teach yourself how to locate useful information and synthesize arguments

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

boner confessor posted:

also btw i have humanities degrees and i work at a software company managing a team of engineers with stem degrees, so, lol

its way easier to teach yourself how to code than it is to teach yourself how to locate useful information and synthesize arguments

yeah the bad poo poo coming from STEM people is mostly because it's the current "make money" fad degree

those people would be lawyers if it was 40 years ago

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?

FAUXTON posted:

Not enough though, and certainly not enough in upper level work. Team boatbuilding projects in the intro to engineering class isn't going to cut it when an engineer gets out and starts poo poo-talking architects and draftsmen and designers over aesthetics because it'd be more practical their way.

It probably varies a bit, but a lot of my upper level work was capstone project stuff that was industry oriented. That said, I think the problem you're talking about has more to do with engineering students than it does the coursework. There's a limit to how much you can cram into four or five years of work, and my experience was that a lot of engineering students were just the kind of people who wanted to be right and felt that their education was some kind of trump card in that respect. I don't know how you solve that, but I don't think it's an issue with the degree programs themselves.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Paradoxish posted:

It probably varies a bit, but a lot of my upper level work was capstone project stuff that was industry oriented. That said, I think the problem you're talking about has more to do with engineering students than it does the coursework. There's a limit to how much you can cram into four or five years of work, and my experience was that a lot of engineering students were just the kind of people who wanted to be right and felt that their education was some kind of trump card in that respect. I don't know how you solve that, but I don't think it's an issue with the degree programs themselves.

oh no, the programs themselves recognize that turning out highly specialized turbonerds is not good either for the students or the program's post-graduation employment numbers. the problem is that stem programs tend to attract, as you said, objective thinkers who have a certain perspective of the world which is very logical, linear, and overly dismissive of things that aren't easily categorized

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.

Fojar38 posted:

Actual 1% or Pollster 1%?

That's 1% on the NowCast, we're looking at .7% on the PollsPlus.

Winkie01
Nov 28, 2004
https://twitter.com/ktumulty/status/801575151292846080

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod



trump and intelligence just don't mix

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Fojar38 posted:

This bargaining stage (it must have been rigged! There must have been massive voter fraud!), combined with the hyperbolic declarations of the imminent descent of the USA into dictatorship and the eventual extinction of the human race and that the Democrats are traitors for not being ideologically pure enough to literally cordon off capital hill to stop the GOP from governing is virtually identical to the reaction from the right in 2008.

The Right survived. The Left will also survive as will the Republic.

Hopefully it does.But if the right tries to rig the place like North Carolina, the left should consider that 1861 or 1793 are on the table for the time when it gets back on power. Because then FEMA camps will be a solution to the right.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib
I know it is somewhat uncharted waters here but generally speaking if there was some kind of tampering with the elections (any elections really), and especially if it is thought to be done by a foreign agency, wouldn't the FBI or CIA or anyone in national security investigate it? I mean it seems like that if such a serious allegation is made and the securities agencies don't seem to care it probably should mean that there is nothing there, right?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

You guys may have already discussed it, but that poo poo that's happening in North Dakota is disgusting. A peacefully protesting woman's arm gets blown off, but the inbred members of Y'allqaeda get off without a scratch. This is everything that's hosed up about this election.

Geostomp
Oct 22, 2008

Unite: MASH!!
~They've got the bad guys on the run!~

Mr Interweb posted:

You guys may have already discussed it, but that poo poo that's happening in North Dakota is disgusting. A peacefully protesting woman's arm gets blown off, but the inbred members of Y'allqaeda get off without a scratch. This is everything that's hosed up about this election.

And our media can't be bothered to care. We need to do something, that orange bastard and his cronies are already destroying the nation months before he takes office.

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.

So he just doesn't want to do the work?

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
At some point, Republicans screw around with elections too much and the entire government becomes illegitimate from a small-d democratic standpoint

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY

Looks like Trump forgot what happens when a president does not take intelligence briefing

Confounding Factor
Jul 4, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

So he just doesn't want to do the work?

Were you expecting otherwise? He got the title, now its time to play golf most of his presidency.

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

At some point, Republicans screw around with elections too much and the entire government becomes illegitimate from a small-d democratic standpoint

somewhere Pat McCrory just broke out in a cold sweat and doesn't know why

HannibalBarca
Sep 11, 2016

History shows, again and again, how nature points out the folly of man.
Jill Stein's totally-not-a-scam recount kickstarter has raised $818,000 in 6 hours :v:

Xibanya
Sep 17, 2012




Clever Betty

Madkal posted:

FBI?

Supposedly the FBI is full of Trump-supporters so good luck.

After parlaying various jobs I've held since graduating with a degree in economics in 2011, this year I managed to become a professional dev and among my immediate teammates are a geology major, a math major, someone with no degree whatsoever, and yes and some CS majors too. And we all do a good job. I sure as poo poo am glad I didn't even consider majoring in CS. I probably would have ended up on my current career track much sooner which would translate into missed earnings of hundreds of thousands of dollars or whatever but I didn't have to get immersed in undergrad CS culture for four years straight. Also my degree taught me how hard to roll my eyes at lovely applications of misunderstood macroeconomic theory, and that, my friends, is priceless.

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

Never tell Trump the odds. When America says "I love you," he says "I know."

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*

Samurai Sanders posted:

A "circle jerk" would suggest that we all agree with each other about this and that is usually not the case, so the circle is broken and someone isn't gonna get jerked.

Broken circle jerk is the best description of DnD I've ever heard.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


HannibalBarca posted:

Jill Stein's totally-not-a-scam recount kickstarter has raised $818,000 in 6 hours :v:

it's already up another 20k

edit: it's up another 30k since i made this post

Condiv fucked around with this message at 01:32 on Nov 24, 2016

Motto
Aug 3, 2013

FactsAreUseless posted:

5. As mentioned in 3: there is no way for students to effectively pick a good school. The majority of students get funneled into one school or another because they get a scholarship there, or it's close to home, or in-state tuition is cheaper. If and when it turns out those schools are terrible, students can do poo poo. First, how would they know? Every college prep guide and list and article measures the success of schools based on things like exclusivity (an artificially-inflated joke measurement) and graduation rates, and maybe post-college job placement. And if you don't realize that post-college job placement has more to do with your economic status and connections than your education, well, good, because that's what these universities want. And once students are in, they're in. You can't get your money back. You can transfer to another school, maybe, but that's difficult and expensive.

Still feeling this one three years in. My college visits and stuff just resulted in a list of schools that all seemed pretty good I guess maybe with one giving me tuition and no real idea if the others would be significantly more or less helpful.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


at the rate they're receiving donations they'll have raised an additional $5.76 million in 24 hours

edit: up another 10k since my last post

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
Kickstarter curves are usually logarithmic so it's going to fall off but likely make the goal.

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.
Urgh what Id do to route all that money into the ACLU or PP

HannibalBarca
Sep 11, 2016

History shows, again and again, how nature points out the folly of man.

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Urgh what Id do to route all that money into the ACLU or PP

I was gonna say something like "if only they had donated it to the Clinton campaign", but then I realized that Robby Mook would have set it on fire airing extra TV ads in Houston or something.

edit: lol speaking of which

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/801585489178460160

size1one
Jun 24, 2008

I don't want a nation just for me, I want a nation for everyone

DACK FAYDEN posted:

Yeah, I edited something in while you wrote this - long story short, I'm not convinced.

Then again, if I was Hillary's campaign I would have started prepping to file for a recount literally the instant the election was called. It's so drat close in WI/MI/PA and the payoff for winning the goddamn Presidency is so high that it's got to be favorable from a strict expected value standpoint.

WI, MI, and PA were all close 27,257 (1%) and 11,612 (0.3%) and 68,236 (1.2%) respectively. She needed all three though and the margins are big enough that without serious shenanigans a recount wasn't going to matter.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stallion Cabana
Feb 14, 2012
1; Get into Grad School

2; Become better at playing Tabletop, both as a player and as a GM/ST/W/E

3; Get rid of this goddamn avatar.

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Urgh what Id do to route all that money into the ACLU or PP

This is something that bothers me and I'm curious about.

ACLU helps fights for people's rights partially through the courts; they sue the government to get better rights for the people who they're either defending or prosecuting for.

While this is reasonable and makes sense in a democracy as a way to effect change, if Trump stacks the Supreme Court AND the Federal Courts (Which he will because Obama wasn't allowed to appoint Federal judges), any judge who ends up hearing a case will just strike it down no matter how high it gets.

While I appreciate the context behind the ACLU how much is there really to be gained by trying to use legal action to change the government when it's going to be filled with people who would hear Rick Synder go 'people don't have a fundamental right to read' and go 'Actually he's right.'?

I'm not a legal scholar so I don't get that part.

  • Locked thread