|
Polyakov posted:The ships will only go up in value, think of it like an investment that you also get to play FTFY e: New CIG concept 
ripptide fucked around with this message at 23:22 on Nov 26, 2016 |
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 12:53 |
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Guys, I'm having a bit of a dilemma. I've just been on the RSI website and they have this great 'Intro pack'. Might pick this up while I can to get a head start in the PU. GTA 5 + CIV 6 alone will probably last you longer than any SC ships. The rest are just gravy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
A Neurotic Corncob posted:it's a compromise of sorts I fear than by the time this thing release, everybody who's really interested in this dumpster fire will walk out of the gate with an Idris. Balance will go flying out the window on day 1.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:He made one for me. Was it fidelitous?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:I fear than by the time this thing release, everybody who's really interested in this dumpster fire will walk out of the gate with an Idris. Balance will go flying out the window on day 1. Did you know that large ships like The 890jump will only have ONE manufactured a month in the entire verse? Buy Now!
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:GTA 5 + CIV 6 alone will probably last you longer than any SC ships. The rest are just gravy. I dunno man, I'm still quite tempted by those sweet, sweet ship jpegs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Guys, I'm having a bit of a dilemma. I've just been on the RSI website and they have this great 'Intro pack'. Might pick this up while I can to get a head start in the PU. That collection has The Division in it and is therefore obviously the worse option.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Tippis posted:That collection has The Division in it and is therefore obviously the worse option. Hey now, The Division is a decent enough game until you get to lvl 30, that is.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Guys, I'm having a bit of a dilemma. I've just been on the RSI website and they have this great 'Intro pack'. Might pick this up while I can to get a head start in the PU. This is like the best argument against the lunacy that is the ship-price tags I've seen.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
I backed Star Citizen and was considering picking up The Division. I'm like a nexus for retarded bad game purchasing decisions.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Hooray! Cannot wait for 2015! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:I fear than by the time this thing release, everybody who's really interested in this dumpster fire will walk out of the gate with an Idris. Balance will go flying out the window on day 1. There won't be a day 1.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Beet Wagon posted:I backed Star Citizen and was considering picking up The Division. I'm like a nexus for retarded bad game purchasing decisions. Lethality, is that you?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2016 23:57
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
The Division is fine. Even more so for 20 bucks. If it had a subscription thingy, it'd be a problem but it doesn't so that's fine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
BigglesSWE posted:This is like the best argument against the lunacy that is the ship-price tags I've seen. I know you're looking at that list and thinking 'wow, there's literally thousands of hours entertainment there' and you'd be right. However, have you considered how many hours of entertainment you could get from owning your very own Constellation Aquila? Not only is it everything you need to get around this star system, but is also fully equipped to take you to the next!* *Next system not yet available. Please refer to our frequently updated timelines for estimated delay status.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Polyakov posted:The ships will only go up in value, think of it like an investment that you also get to play for fun! I forgot which article it was but in the comments a citizen actually made the argument that since the game will take so long to complete if you take inflation into account it's actually cheaper than any AAA game. By that time you may forget you bought the game entirely so risky strategy imo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:04
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WTvS6nSSvQ&t=37s I thought those were lights flickering but it actually might be artifacting?? Can't get over this guy's eyebrows. And of course the amazing magnetic dad shirt and jacket
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3795907&pagenumber=1&perpage=40 The division is good now. They pretty much fixed all the major complaints. It changed so much a new thread was started for it because the old thread is completely irrelevant now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
A Neurotic Corncob posted:it's a compromise of sorts CIG should be very, very concerned that these aren't selling as quickly as before. Everyone else should be concerned they're selling at all. orcinus posted:Was it fidelitous? It's pretty nice, with a distressed image of the FLJK Goonrathi logo on it. I use it to remind me that I've wasted my life.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
thinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughtsthinkhappythoughts
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
cool new Polack jokes posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WTvS6nSSvQ&t=37s Eugh, the whole thing is just loving horrible. It's just really, really bad. Shitizens go on about how CIG take their time but then put out great content, but they don't. Everything they release just looks like B-grade crap. With all their loving million $$$ mo-cap and christ-knows how many artists they should be delivering cut scenes which could drop into a feature film. Yet despite the fact they do crappy 2 minute videos with 1 character, what they put out looks like it was thrown together by enthusiastic amateurs at best. They are so far away from the 'uncanny valley' that they could be in a separate star system. And you just know that next year millions more will be thrown at this 'let's use mo-cap so I can play at being director' horseshit with the same terrible results. Give it up Crobberts, you're a has-been turned conman. Stop robbing sad nerds of their money.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Guys, I'm having a bit of a dilemma. I've just been on the RSI website and they have this great 'Intro pack'. Might pick this up while I can to get a head start in the PU. You have good taste in games, but horrible taste in JPEGs. Tippis posted:That collection has The Division in it and is therefore obviously the worse option.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Give it up Crobberts, you're a has-been turned conman. Stop robbing sad nerds of their money. Why on Earth would he stop? The only thing that's going to stop CR from pushing this thing are charges or bankruptcy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Give it up Crobberts, you're a has-been turned conman. Stop robbing sad nerds of their money. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Wrecked Angle posted:Guys, I'm having a bit of a dilemma. I've just been on the RSI website and they have this great 'Intro pack'. Might pick this up while I can to get a head start in the PU. Please add another game to that list so we can say "well at least the ship package is cheaper" Also "RSI Intro Pack" 
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Please add another game to that list so we can say "well at least the ship package is cheaper" For the prospective backers who simply want to get their feet wet but not fully commit to the vision. That'll be 250 bucks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:Star Citizen is going to be released on christmas!!  
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
hottubrhymemachine posted:Something I've always wondered when they show themselves dragging the supposed sun around in their videos to change the time of day on a planet: they say this is a real sun so does that mean if another camera was out in space would they see this massive sun model being dragged around at like millions of mph? From how responsive it is in the editor I can't see how it's not just a little light that looks like a distant sun but that's not what they claim right? You're exactly right, it's a skybox and not an actual sun in space. For me it sets off a big SCAM ALERT, because this is willful deception in misrepresenting what they're showing. Because they're not saying it's a sun in a universe. They're just showing it and we're left to draw our own conclusions. If you're a backer, you want to believe it's real.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Please add another game to that list so we can say "well at least the ship package is cheaper" Replace Stellaris with Elite: Dangerous, its cheaper.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:Replace Stellaris with Elite: Dangerous, its cheaper. I think you'll find E:D with its yearly DLC is so expensive Star Citizen will be end up being cheaper
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
I'd be legit surprised 2.6 actually releases this year. Jesus christ in June I thought 2.7 was a bit of a stretch but they might get it done. I knew SQ42 had 0 chance. At gamescom in August I thought wow theres no way they get 3.0 in, but 2.6 is a lock. At citcon 2.6 is not even remotely close and they cant show a small vid of sq42. And here we are about in Dec. Assuming their normal patch cycle starts tmw with no blockers (their timeline is a lie that just arbitrarily shortened testing phases as stuff slips), no 2.6 this year. Also arent we supposed to have a brand new wbsite with VOIP and a Discord-killer "definitely expected before xmas"? lol Think of all the features and things that were billed as going in this year. We really have almost none of it. But they just keep renaming patches and redoing schedules so the goldfish memory citizens think its a new thing that "of course will get delayed thats game dev" A dude on reddit said about the 2.6 timeline. "Its only been delayed once thats game development" 0 memory at all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
Seeing the world through the same eyes as these people would be kind of frightening.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Some even have a completely wrong idea of what 2.6 was suppose to have because in their heads they merged it with 2.7 thinking that 3.0 was its own independent thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
TheLightPurges posted:I'd be legit surprised 2.6 actually releases this year. No you see they're just "internal timelines that are purposely aggressive", according to some reddiots. It's almost like they know gently caress all about development
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Remember when they were going to have monthly patches? So 2.6 was the big June patch in theory. In practice it's almost December already and it's nowhere to be seen. It's not that the backers will never know, it's that the backers are incapable of remembering.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:Some even have a completely wrong idea of what 2.6 was suppose to have because in their heads they merged it with 2.7 thinking that 3.0 was its own independent thing. Star Marine will get Star Marined into 3.0, together with a whole bunch of other effort crap. "2.6" will be released with a couple new ships and the Grimhex bar, plus a
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
AlmightyPants posted:Remember when they were going to have monthly patches? So 2.6 was the big June patch in theory. In practice it's almost December already and it's nowhere to be seen. It's not that the backers will never know, it's that the backers are incapable of remembering. No that was just a very ambitious visionary effort on CIG's part, you can't expect them to deliver that stuff. On the other hand, this 2.6 timeline sounds totally reasonable and I'll believe it until the very second when it's delayed again.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
It seems like sometimes they are working on 3.0 and 2.6 at the same time? I don't get that poo poo at all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 12:53 |
|
|
At CIG, development progress slows the more work is completed. They can only ever approach a milestone, never reach it. Conversely, work speeds up the further away from any sort of goal or product they get.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 01:10
|
|