|
Baloogan posted:do you guys have any figureheads less than 100 years old? Fewer
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:12 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:06 |
|
Baloogan posted:do you guys have any figureheads less than 100 years old? world historical individuals rise and fall with the ages and unfortunately we're not into the next age to bring about new leftist figureheads yet
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:12 |
|
Pablo Iglesias is pretty dreamy. Idk if he's doing a very good job though because he and his second in command are already fighting.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:14 |
|
imo you should (seriously, not joking) look into memeing China Miéville hes marxist as all hell and writes well
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:15 |
|
pisspiggrandpa is a good figurehead for the new irony left
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:15 |
|
Baloogan posted:do you guys have any figureheads less than 100 years old? uh every major party candidate this cycle and being discussed for next cycle is mad old this isn't unique to commies
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:16 |
Baloogan posted:do you guys have any figureheads less than 100 years old? Well Marx (and Engels) had the good fortune to describe capitalism pretty well back at the onset of it. I would argue that their texts are still relevant.
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:17 |
jarofpiss posted:pisspiggrandpa is a good figurehead for the new irony left He's a good memer that's for sure.
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:17 |
|
he writes (marxist influenced) fiction, and marxist stuff
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:19 |
|
Baloogan posted:imo you should (seriously, not joking) look into memeing China Miéville Yeah he's cool. I really liked The City and The City. If you'd like to experience the peak of Marxist navel gazing here he is giving a Marxist critique of Lord of the Rings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chCcupi1bRY
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:21 |
|
how does it compare to mccaine's tolkien critique
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:23 |
|
SSJ_naruto_2003 posted:Well Marx (and Engels) had the good fortune to describe capitalism pretty well back at the onset of it. I would argue that their texts are still relevant. Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:46 |
|
Enjoy posted:Fewer This is wrong. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:49 |
|
asdf32 posted:Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:55 |
|
asdf32 posted:Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx. Could you explain your conclusion with detailed analysis please. We're all on the edge of our seat.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 03:59 |
|
asdf32 posted:Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx. its true, no author or theorist has developed marx's ideas and we never cite or paraphrase them here, especially not in a long reading list posted at the beginning of the thread
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:01 |
|
Nobody cares about the 19th century is what he's saying
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:01 |
|
Homework Explainer posted:its true, no author or theorist has developed marx's ideas and we never cite or paraphrase them here, especially not in a long reading list posted at the beginning of the thread capitalists can't read don't blame him
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:02 |
|
Baloogan posted:oh a pun. good. that is progress. I guess. Br00tal
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:04 |
|
David Harvey and Richard Wolff are good contemporaries.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:11 |
|
Minge Binge posted:Nobody cares about the 19th century is what he's saying bonus irony when he then tries to land burns via a Victorian-era understanding of "religion" as a category
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:25 |
|
asdf32 posted:Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx. Do you think nobody reads Plato, Mill, Hobbes, Rousseau, Machiavelli etc. etc.?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:26 |
|
Bryter posted:Do you think nobody reads Plato, Mill, Hobbes, Rousseau, Machiavelli etc. etc.? noted dumbass asdf32 forgot about the eminent contemporary leftist sex symbol zizek, too
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:28 |
|
Bryter posted:Do you think nobody reads Plato, Mill, Hobbes, Rousseau, Machiavelli etc. etc.? Which has a contemporary cult named after them?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:31 |
|
plato wait so which is it, are we anachronistic or contemporary
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:34 |
|
asdf32 posted:Which has a contemporary cult named after them? Platonist stayed around a lot longer than Marxism has existed. They directly affected philosophy for the better part of a millenia This is basic poo poo, man.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:51 |
|
jarofpiss posted:noted dumbass asdf32 forgot about the eminent contemporary leftist sex symbol zizek, too Did I sniff hear shomeone sniff menhsion my main man zhizhek sniff
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 04:52 |
|
Homework Explainer posted:follow picture link for a festive surprise
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:02 |
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:07 |
|
still no presense for the kids who are going to be in their 60s now enjoying the fruits of their socalist labor as pentioners in russia lamo
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:07 |
|
Never forget 9/11 and 11/9 when Hillary Fell
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:09 |
|
Yes, Marxist Hero Hillary Clinton.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:10 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:In Soviet Union, Christmas was de-emphasized in favor of New Year's, when Grandfather Frost would personally hand out the gifts to good children. Instead of a Christmas tree they had a New Year's Tree, and presents would be placed under it by your family. I went out of my way to explain this and didn't even get so much as a thank you. That'll teach me to humor bourgeois moderation, boy howdy.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:19 |
|
asdf32 posted:Darwin did an amazing job describing evolution in 1859 with 1859 knowledge and no one actually reads Darwin anymore ot tells other people to read Darwin because it was written in 1859 and tons of better stuff exists on the subject. Except for you weird people clinging to it, the same applies to Marx. the funniest thing is this is patently untrue. Many still read On the Origin of Species. There are academic efforts devoted to cataloguing the minutiae of Darwin's writing. Besides, there is a difference between Marxism and Marx, as the man himself infamously stated.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:46 |
|
im half way convinced you guys are still huffing marx's farts just cause his name is so cool "Marx"
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:51 |
|
says the guy huffing trump farts while posting "TRUMP!!!"
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:52 |
|
im TRYING to complement you commie cucks jesus gently caress you dog
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 05:54 |
|
lamo ive seen a fatberg bigger than my car
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 06:42 |
|
Baloogan posted:Yes, Marxist Hero Hillary Clinton. courtesy of an unironic geocities page:
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 06:43 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:06 |
|
and ya dont break em up, that poo poo is someone else's problem lol just file that poo poo like DA or DAGS or OBZ then RM lamo then FH
|
# ? Dec 10, 2016 06:45 |