|
lmfao
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
RoboRodent posted:Man, Hitler sure was great!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
John Big Booty posted:He had his faults, to be sure, but he did kill Hitler. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
But he also killed the man who killed Hitler.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
He also undermined the (nonexistent) legitimacy of nazism for decades. Too bad the effect seems to have worn off.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
I've noticed the trains seem to be running more on schedule this winter than usual. Uh-oh
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:The sad thing with Eastwood is just how much his filmmaking dropped in quality during his talking to the chair moments. Gran Torino was legitimately brilliant, then we've had the dreadful American Sniper and the 'only Ron Howard should have made this' bore that was Sully which was based around a narrative that existed only in Clint's head. I saw Changeling, a film he directed about a historical incident in the '20s where an LA woman's son is kidnapped, and the police so half-rear end the job looking for him, they bring home a random kid from Illinois who wanted to go to Hollywood. Then when the woman said "hey, this isn't my kid!", the cops put her in an insane asylum, more or less for back-talk. And it turned out her kid and a bunch of others were murdered by a serial killer. It was a surprisingly sober and sympathetic work from Eastwood, much more in line with Gran Torino (which was excellent, agreed) than what I'd expect given how he was ranting against Obama. I was just disappointed because the title lied to me and it didn't turn out to be about the Fae kidnapping this woman's child and replacing it with a doll made from rags and a coyote's head that slowly drives her insane.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
most of Eastwood's movies are about the establishment being inept or corrupt because he is an embarrassing libertarian
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Yawgmoth posted:Not that we needed yet more proof that republicans are embarrassingly easy to con into voting against their own interests/lives, but god drat. Republican bad democrat good  Poor people are morally inferior Hillary '16 baby! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
canpakes posted:Republican bad democrat good This but unironically except for the part about the poors.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
Krabboss posted:most of Eastwood's movies are about the establishment being inept or corrupt because he is an embarrassing libertarian Where does Firefox fit in this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
canpakes posted:Republican bad democrat good Baby got butthurt
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
I liked Sully. It can't be easy making an exciting movie out of an event that took all of 200 seconds. Kind of like making a 3 movie trilogy out of the Hobbit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
canpakes posted:Republican bad democrat good
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
canpakes posted:Republican bad democrat good Yeah!! When Democrats build the largest surveillance state in world history, it's protecting America. That is, until those mean old Republicans get their hands on it. WELP!
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Krispy Kareem posted:I liked Sully. It can't be easy making an exciting movie out of an event that took all of 200 seconds. It wasn't a movie that needed to be made, but Hollywood eh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
What movies need to be made?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
I'll tell you. More marvel and Star Wars movies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
oldpainless posted:I'll tell you. More marvel and Star Wars movies. More like oldfranchiseless.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:19
|
|
oldpainless posted:What movies need to be made? Another Resident Evil, apparently.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
Poetry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:32
|
|
|
I don't know, sounds to me like they're already married.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
Someone was ready to take a screenshot pretty much the second that guy posted? Not buying that one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:43
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Someone was ready to take a screenshot pretty much the second that guy posted? Not buying that one. Maybe he did it himself to show off to his skyrim buddies? I want to believe
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
Oh so this is unpopular now to Imgur? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 03:55
|
|
|
Ularg posted:Oh so this is unpopular now to Imgur? Well if they liked traditional gender roles, would they be spending most of their time on a website complaining about woman and the black guys they're having sex with instead of them?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 05:49
|
|
|
Pesticide20 posted:Where does Firefox fit in this? In a dumpster.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
 But nobody will share this
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
Zephyrine posted:Oh I see. This all gets odd for me because I'm Swedish and the age of consent here is 15 with even 14 accepted in rare cases. So whenever I see Americans losing their mind over some 17 year old girl I usually jot it down to their puritan heritage. you are a pedophile
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 07:52
|
|
|
same, but for that missing waitress
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 08:00
|
|
|
I love traditional gender rolls. And if you know the age of consent you're weird. Just a big creep.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 08:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 08:37
|
|
|
BROCK LESBIAN posted:And if you know the age of consent you're weird. Just a big creep. It should be a honeypot question.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 08:38
|
|
|
Ahh yes, the great "I'm technically not committing statutory rape" scene in a big-budget action movie. Truly a cinematic masterpiece.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 08:46
|
|
|
Fashionable Jorts posted:Ahh yes, the great "I'm technically not committing statutory rape" scene in a big-budget action movie. Truly a cinematic masterpiece. When 80 minute animated toy commercial is legit better than your 4 attempts to make a live action big budget film of the same material , you've got some problems. It just shouldn't be that hard to make a big dumb movie about giant robots smashing stuff up real good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 12:05
|
|
|
Fashionable Jorts posted:Ahh yes, the great "I'm technically not committing statutory rape" scene in a big-budget action movie. Truly a cinematic masterpiece. It was also great how they put the underage girl in super short shorts and kept the camera on her rear end nice and long...
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 12:51
|
|
|
Shai-Hulud posted:It was also great how they put the underage girl in super short shorts and kept the camera on her rear end nice and long... It's okay, she was 18 or 19 during filming so all the gratuitous sexualization of an underage high schooler was really legal!
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
Hogge Wild posted:you are a pedophile
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.22.htm quote:(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2):
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2017 15:38
|
|