|
Random Stranger posted:
The Phoenix Wright movie was kinda forgettable (or I was way too high watching it), but yeah the Yakuza movie is goddamn amazing. The plot is a pretty decent adaptation of the first game, which had a reasonably simple plot,and the actors were more or less Miike's usual people doing another movie about weird-rear end Yakuza guys.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 21:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 02:21 |
|
Josef bugman posted:How much money does Jeremy Irons get out of this sort of crap. Well, put it this way: he owns a castle.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 21:49 |
|
This and Hateful 8 are the only movies Ive had to turn off and walk away from halfway through.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 21:59 |
|
a sexual elk posted:This and Hateful 8 are the only movies Ive had to turn off and walk away from halfway through. The Hateful 8 was awesome though.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:03 |
|
RCarr posted:The Hateful 8 was awesome though. Yeah, I honestly thought it was one of Tarantino's best movies. It's set up almost like a play, with most of the action in one room and tons of great dialog. Shame about that guitar, though
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:06 |
|
minato posted:Well, put it this way: he owns a castle. Jesus titfucking Christ. Well fair play to old Jeremy, he might be a crackpot but he's got style to it.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:07 |
|
RCarr posted:The Hateful 8 was awesome though. You're thinking of Ridiculous 6 which was awesome. Hateful 8 was stupid.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:19 |
|
Josef bugman posted:How much money does Jeremy Irons get out of this sort of crap. Not much. Most of his salary went to an outrageous dental bill because he was chewing so much scenery.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:22 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:You're thinking of Ridiculous 6 which was awesome. Hateful 8 was stupid. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_ridiculous_six/?search=Ridiculous%20six "All critics agree! Unanimous and overwhelming media coverage!"
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:24 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:You're thinking of Ridiculous 6 which was awesome. Hateful 8 was stupid. 0/10 too unbelievable to be a genuine opinion.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:25 |
|
Mierenneuker posted:Not much. Most of his salary went to an outrageous dental bill because he was chewing so much scenery. If they ever made a bad guy version of the Expendables, Jeremy Irons would have to be their leader. Either him or Malcolm McDowell. (Should have been Alan Rickman, but, well... )
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:31 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:If they ever made a bad guy version of the Expendables, Jeremy Irons would have to be their leader. Either him or Malcolm McDowell. Oh come on leader of the deplorables should be Willem Dafoe. Its in his goddamn name Hes the foe
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 22:37 |
|
Rigged Death Trap posted:Oh come on leader of the deplorables should be Willem Dafoe. Please suggest this to Stallone. I will promise to buy a DVD.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:10 |
|
sirbeefalot posted:0/10 too unbelievable to be a genuine opinion. While it was a joke, I don't think Ridiculous 6 was too bad. I've certainly seen worse Sandler movies. Plus Vanilla Ice played Mark Twain and that was funny.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:24 |
|
Few pages back, sorry. Neither funny nor fun, but enjoyable none the less. So thanks.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:25 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:While it was a joke, I don't think Ridiculous 6 was too bad. I've certainly seen worse Sandler movies. Plus Vanilla Ice played Mark Twain and that was funny. Sandler keeps trying to do Tough Guy roles and is less and less plausible with each one.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:33 |
|
What a lousy card
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:47 |
|
Your Gay Uncle posted:What a lousy card
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:50 |
|
Your Gay Uncle posted:What a lousy card *nods head
|
# ? Jan 12, 2017 23:54 |
|
minato posted:Well, put it this way: he owns a castle. So does Jane Seymour. Radiohead rented it to record OK Computer
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:03 |
|
Don't get crabby, mister.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:12 |
|
Sormus posted:Don't get crabby, mister. The claws are really coming out now.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:16 |
|
But what's your favourite movie?
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:21 |
|
loving derails.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:22 |
|
Seems pricey for rear end biscuits.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 00:58 |
|
Kwyndig posted:You walked out on The Other Guys? I think it is you who is loving garbage. Haha maybe... it is still garbage and not funny.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:00 |
|
Sormus posted:Don't get crabby, mister. I'll get as snippy as I want to be!
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:05 |
|
Say Nothing posted:loving derails. You think you're better than me? You're not better than me. You eat my rear end biscuits every day. All of you! You all eat my rear end biscuits! I'll laugh at you before you'll laugh at me, because your biscuits have been in my rear end.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:10 |
|
TinTower posted:The best video game has to be Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, simply because it gave us what is now known as The Worst Line In Scriptwriting History. Excuse me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0yKSNq-oLg
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:13 |
|
That's not a terrible line, just terrible direction and delivery. If she said "do you know what happens to a toad when it gets struck by lighting?" then struck him with lightning, and then turned around and did a little shrug and said casually, "same thing that happens to everything else", it'd be fine.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:16 |
|
Guy Goodbody posted:That's not a terrible line, just terrible direction and delivery. If she said "do you know what happens to a toad when it gets struck by lighting?" then struck him with lightning, and then turned around and did a little shrug and said casually, "same thing that happens to everything else", it'd be fine. "It croaks," probably would've been a better choice. In an earlier version of the script, there was going to be a running joke where Toad would ask, "Want to know what happens when a toad does X?" but it was removed from the final draft where Toad is a non-speaking character; that was meant to be the payoff.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:35 |
|
Guy Goodbody posted:That's not a terrible line, just terrible direction and delivery. If she said "do you know what happens to a toad when it gets struck by lighting?" then struck him with lightning, and then turned around and did a little shrug and said casually, "same thing that happens to everything else", it'd be fine. No it's an awful loving line. Even once you get passed all the awful superhero cheesiness, it doesn't even make sense, because things do in fact respond differently to lightning strikes.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:41 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1XOfHax6Q8 :nsfw: audio
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:47 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:"It croaks," probably would've been a better choice. I think the main point is that it's a super powerful character easily destroying a joke character, so it should be played out like a humorous moment, not a badass moment
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:50 |
|
Barrowman
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:50 |
|
TinTower posted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6keZIUJBsQ
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 01:54 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA_4dJb-nQg
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 02:12 |
|
Say Nothing posted:loving derails.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 02:49 |
|
Apparently the line wasn't in the script and Barrowman just said it to get a reaction from McShane. I'm guessing he didn't think it would actually make it into the film.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 03:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 02:21 |
|
Aleph Null posted:Her incredible English accent? Well, to be honest the original title Tomb Raider: The Uterus didn't do well with test audiences.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2017 04:04 |