|
Xeiros posted:Normies getting bent out of shape over Maid Dragon continues to be both sad and amusing. All of things they find offensive, creepy, off-putting, etc in fiction I either enjoy or am indifferent to. I'd already encountered them in far more explicit circumstances in other forms of fiction and they didn't bother me then. It was always sort of oh that's a thing or I never knew that existed type deal. This is not even a case of desensitization. Like say you walk into your relatives house with their floors soaked with dog piss and the smell is so awful you can barely stand it, but over time you just got used to it. Nothing like that.
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:30 |
|
|
it sure didn't take long to see something worse than episode 6 of maidragon
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
source your quotes
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Nice Meltdown?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
This season's Bad KyoAni Discourse is particularly bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
*Innocent ADTRW poster, chatting about Maidragon*: Anyways, while I'm not entirely comfortable with- *Xeiros, clicking "New Reply"*: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
drat... I agree with the general conceit that fiction is fiction but I think you should try to argue that point without being an rear end in a top hat. I mean I certainly don't think Cool Kyoushinsha or Kyoani should be punished for anything they do with fictional characters, but you also seem to be saying that they should be immune to criticism over these specific things which is just dumb. "The simulation works so well it invokes real emotions. We cry and feel awful when a character dies as if a real person had passed away." Disgust is a human emotion, so it should be no surprise to you that some people have that reaction.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
Xeiros posted:snip Just because it's not real doesn't mean it's not weird and creepy
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:53
|
|
|
Let's talk about something better, like whether Fafnir would be a good boyfriend or whether he'd leave his dirty socks out and refuse to cuddle.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:59
|
|
|
Brainiac Five posted:Let's talk about something better, like whether Fafnir would be a good boyfriend or whether he'd leave his dirty socks out and refuse to cuddle. Fucker doesn't even have a job and spends 21 hours a day on WoW. I think it's clear who the better half is in that relationship
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
Brainiac Five posted:Let's talk about something better, like whether Fafnir would be a good boyfriend or whether he'd leave his dirty socks out and refuse to cuddle. He'd definitely refuse to cuddle, but he's a dragon who creates clothes through magic as part of an advanced transformation spell. So I don't know if he can even have dirty socks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
SyntheticPolygon posted:He'd definitely refuse to cuddle, but he's a dragon who creates clothes through magic as part of an advanced transformation spell. So I don't know if he can even have dirty socks. Molting, dawg, molting. You need to get your freak/fantasy reader (but I repeat myself) levels up a bit. Spiritus Nox posted:Fucker doesn't even have a job and spends 21 hours a day on WoW. I think it's clear who the better half is in that relationship I bet his taste in beer sucks too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:03
|
|
|
fafnir is a top
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
I like the part of your post with the pro-perv words I didn't read. 
FanofPortals fucked around with this message at 06:07 on Feb 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
Stairmaster posted:fafnir is a top disagree
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
Stairmaster posted:fafnir is a top Guy Goodbody posted:disagree both of you present your reasoning please
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:23
|
|
|
Brainiac Five posted:whether Fafnir would be a good boyfriend Yes Stairmaster posted:fafnir is a top no
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:27
|
|
|
Guy is obviously correct, that fringe is for looking through demurely. Also Fafnir is clearly fine with being hosed by MMO developers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
First of all, would Fafnir understand what they're doing?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Would Fafnir buy microtransaction stuff?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:29
|
|
|
chumbler posted:Would Fafnir buy microtransaction stuff? Prides himself on grinding it legit
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:31
|
|
|
He'd be a sucker for anything that's a limited edition.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
chumbler posted:Would Fafnir buy microtransaction stuff? He has no money.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
Stairmaster posted:fafnir is a top Fafnir is 100% a powerbottom how is this even up for debate????
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/GigglePox/status/832263961483542530
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Fafnir is 100% a
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
I think Takiya would definitely take the lead but I could see Faf service topping
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
There's not enough assertive bottoms in 'me so I'm going with this interpretation now
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:41
|
|
|
Important reminder to us all.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:15
|
|
|
I hope they lewd only the male dragons from this point on 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:26
|
|
|
Don't lewd Kanna. I don't give a gently caress about the rest. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:26
|
|
|
Spiritus Nox posted:Fucker doesn't even have a job and spends 21 hours a day on WoW. I think it's clear who the better half is in that relationship Hey, he's just one step away from a Twitch partnership
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:29
|
|
|
Comrade Kirov posted:Important reminder to us all. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:29
|
|
|
DisDisDis posted:I hope they lewd only the male dragons from this point on 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:33
|
|
|
I'm the frog and I'm glad I'm finally getting fanserviced
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:45
|
|
|
Hey Lucoa isn't for lewd, she's an inspiration. One day I hope to have back muscles as strong as hers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:45
|
|
|
Was that a curtain made out of hanging M:tG cards in the nerd's apartment?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:00
|
|
|
Part of the issue is that people want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to come into a show totally blind and unspoiled knowing nothing at all about it. A show that could well contain some elements that put them off, that they don't want any part of. It's fine to not want to experience those unpleasant things in your fictional entertainment, but you can't choose to watch a show that contains them, cry about it, and when asked why you watched a show that had X unpleasant things in it, your only response is that you didn't know better because you didn't do the proper research since you wanted to be spoiler free. Imagine yourself sitting down at a restaurant, menu in hand. How much effort do you go into to ensure you know exactly what's in the meal you plan to order, that you know and are okay with each individual ingredient you're going to be shoving into your body in the next few minutes? You don't just order some random thing of the menu without knowing what you're getting right? Surely not. Not if you don't want to live …. dangerously. Viewer discretion is advised. Everyone here should be familiar with this phrase. This pretty much applies to any rating above G or E for everyone, etc. It is your responsibility to do your due diligence and make sure you are aware of all the ingredients of a work before you consume it. Otherwise you don't get to complain when it has something you didn't want to experience. Problem is you can't do that and be spoiler free at the same time. Pick your poison. The IMDB parental guide section for a piece of work is a great source for this. It details without any context all of the objectionable material in a given work, yes, this includes anime series. Even with no context they still give away the fact certain things are going to happen so they do more or less spoil events. That's the price you pay for knowing exactly what you're going to get. So when you see a show rated TV MA or a movie rated R or a game rate M or again anything above the lowest, safest rating for your country, that's a huge, loud, blaring, warning siren to stop and use discretion before proceeding any further. To make sure you know what you're in for because it is no one's fault but yours should you decide sink your teeth into that pumpkin cake with walnuts when you're allergic to walnuts. I didn't know! I didn't want to be spoiled! That's the price you pay for that fully blind first time experience.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:30 |
|
|
Xeiros posted:stop
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:27
|
|