|
lomzus posted:Matt Reeves is not directing the Batman. Some days you can't get someone to direct a bomb.
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 10:01 |
|
|
My buddies and I have been working our way through the DC Animated movies and, uh, how has no one been talking about how perfect Return of the Caped Crusaders is?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:09
|
|
Gavok posted:Believe it. The movie is absolutely visceral in its action. I lost count of how many times I went Is any of the blood not CG?
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:My buddies and I have been working our way through the DC Animated movies and, uh, how has no one been talking about how perfect Return of the Caped Crusaders is? But... but... Batman is sitting down! In a chair! Who the hell is he supposed to be, Darkseid?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
Big Bad Voodoo Lou posted:Some days you can't get someone to direct a bomb. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:My buddies and I have been working our way through the DC Animated movies and, uh, how has no one been talking about how perfect Return of the Caped Crusaders is? Honestly, this is something that's bugged me for a while. Bruce Wayne could probably do a hell of a lot more good if he ran for mayor.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
Cythereal posted:Honestly, this is something that's bugged me for a while. Bruce Wayne could probably do a hell of a lot more good if he ran for mayor. Well it'd be the one thing that Green Arrow did first and he can't let him have the satisfaction.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:43
|
|
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:My buddies and I have been working our way through the DC Animated movies and, uh, how has no one been talking about how perfect Return of the Caped Crusaders is? I think there was talk of it in the animation thread.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:51
|
|
|
X-O posted:I think there was talk of it in the animation thread. Excellent, I didn't know there was a dedicated thread for that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 05:58
|
|
|
Big Bad Voodoo Lou posted:But... but... Batman is sitting down! In a chair! Who the hell is he supposed to be, Darkseid? I did laugh when they went from "Batman doesn't sit" to "Batman gets superpowers from sitting" over the course of a few years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:14
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Is any of the blood not CG? Probably.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:22
|
|
Gavok posted:Probably. Can't you tell? I mean CG blood is like the most obvious thing this side of Grand Moff Tarkin.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:00
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Can't you tell? I mean CG blood is like the most obvious thing this side of Grand Moff Tarkin. Bad CGI blood is distracting (and it's often done poorly) but it's been done well and has a lot of practical advantages. Doctor Spaceman fucked around with this message at 08:01 on Feb 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:56
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Can't you tell? I mean CG blood is like the most obvious thing this side of Grand Moff Tarkin. Like many CGI things, you only notice the times it is done poorly and never actually think about the times it is done well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:58
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Like many CGI things, you only notice the times it is done poorly and never actually think about the times it is done well. The only times I've seen it done well is when it's deliberately done so they can do something artsy with it, like in Dredd or some scenes in Hannibal. Every other time it just looks bad.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:05
|
|
|
No one is as artsy as Wolverine, bub.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
Yeah just watch ninja assassin if you want bad cgi blood.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
Gavok posted:Believe it. The movie is absolutely visceral in its action. I lost count of how many times I went IDK the trailer had a lot of wire tomfoolery
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Like many CGI things, you only notice the times it is done poorly and never actually think about the times it is done well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Its kind of funny how Wolverine movie titles have gotten shorter as they've gone on. Start with X-Men Origins: Wolverine, go to The Wolverine and now finally just Logan. If they made a fourth one would it just be called Bub?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:Its kind of funny how Wolverine movie titles have gotten shorter as they've gone on. Start with X-Men Origins: Wolverine, go to The Wolverine and now finally just Logan. If they made a fourth one would it just be called Bub? Bub is the sequel to SNIKT
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Bub is the sequel to SNIKT 
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
Someone else originally posted this, but if they had planned things out better, you would have had Weapon X, The Wolverine, and Logan as the titles of the trilogy tracing his evolution from weapon to super hero, to man. But lol Fox
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:IDK the trailer had a lot of wire tomfoolery I rewatched the trailer and noticed wire tomfoolery three times. One being a quick shot at Laura doing a flip and two being Logan and Laura jumping around in a forest fight. The latter two work due to... spoilery reasons, but those aren't really indicative of the overall action. I'll put this in spoiler text, but here's a basic description of how each character fights for the most part: Logan feels heavier and drunker than his other appearances. Like age and having a metal skeleton have finally weighed him down. He flails around with quasi-god mode, so we know that people are going to get cut up, but it's equal parts badass and sad. Laura is like a small, rabid animal. The kind of creature that would latch onto someone and claw their face apart then leap off onto someone ten feet away and start anew. Unlike Hit-Girl, whose R-rated slaughters were played for laughs, Laura is unnerving and genuinely kind of frightening in action.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
The dumb leap looks terrible in every movie and they should have stopped using it ages ago.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
I concur.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
There is a picture floating around of the action figure for Ares from Wonder Woman, but Imgur won't let me upload it. It's, well a guy in black armor with a goat skull helmet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
Imgur is busted right now. I was trying to upload something just now too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 23:53
|
|
|
Heres an Instagram post of it https://www.instagram.com/p/BQtUITIgsbN/
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
Imgur finally working Front shot of it. It's more demonic than goat like now that I see it more. Wonder Woman is like Thor, I want to see her fight big crazy monsters more than just regular bad guys. People say they want to see Thor fight the Wrecking Crew but that's way less interesting to me than giants, trolls and fire demons with sweaty ball sacks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
They should have made the goat helmet black armor instead of something that was grey like that, because it's very Doomsday-ish.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
That's pretty dope, but I wish the Chiang designs were being adapted.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Gavok, I'm trying to convince a buddy to come see Logan with me but he hasn't seen the first two Wolverine movies (just all the X-Men flicks). Does he need to have seen those others or does it not matter?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
Without presuming to speak for your buddy, if you tried to get me to come along to see Logan but before that sat me down with the first Wolverine movie saying "watch this first", I would never go to a movie with you again and might in fact question us being on speaking terms.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 09:31
|
|
|
The first Wolverine movie literally erases itself at the end with a magic bullet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 14:12
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:The first Wolverine movie literally erases itself at the end with a magic bullet. Too bad it wasn't aimed at the audience
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 15:19
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:Gavok, I'm trying to convince a buddy to come see Logan with me but he hasn't seen the first two Wolverine movies (just all the X-Men flicks). Does he need to have seen those others or does it not matter? All you need to see is the first X-Men movie. That's it. The biggest reference to X-Men Origins is a thematic Easter egg.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
Just curious, what happened to the other X-men, and what continuity is this? If it's the old one where Sentinels purged the mutants I'm kinda fine with it, but if the second future is hosed up as well I'd be slightly peeved.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
McCloud posted:Just curious, what happened to the other X-men, and what continuity is this? If it's the old one where Sentinels purged the mutants I'm kinda fine with it, but if the second future is hosed up as well I'd be slightly peeved. I haven't seen the movie, but it is just A Future, I don't think it is the definitive future. They're kind of playing loose with it, but then again, so is the rest of the X-Men films.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 16:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 10:01 |
|
|
I mean, it's the X-men, possible wacked-out futures is what they're made of.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 16:11
|
|