|
Gringostar posted:an attack by one is an attack by all it is when you protect the racists and still give them power in the party
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:21 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:03 |
|
Condiv posted:just cause they let a minority congressman get attacked by high ranking racists in the dem party doesn''t mean centrists are racists!! "high ranking racists" can i get a list of the dem party ranks? trying to figure out if i should buck for sergeant or major or what before i become (?) a racist
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:22 |
|
Who do Dems love more: racists or lobbyists? (the answer is lobbyists for racist industries)
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:22 |
|
Fyi Clinton absolutely had cultishly devoted followers, a lot of them in D&D for example but if she didn't, that would be a very bad sign for a national-level presidential-candidate-level politician so maybe don't be so braggy when you claim that
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:23 |
|
see also: basically all of my Facebook feed, which I am complaining about ITT constantly because they are insufferable
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:24 |
|
Scent of Worf posted:ITT centrists admit they are completely fine with a status quo where a black or hispanic person can do everything right (go to college, get an in-demand degree, land a well paying job) yet still make less money and have less wealth than a white dude with a high school diploma lmfao can you quote some of this please? because you're responding to my post, and I can quote the loving lol hillary cult posts so I want to see which centrists said these things, or if you've made some sort of fictional poster to argue against who waaaaacky positions are just so easily knocked down by your impeccable assertion i bet there's a term for that, somewhere
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:24 |
|
Former Everything posted:"high ranking racists" if you have tons of money and give a bit of it to dems you're high ranking. that's the only way up. if you reach that point though, dems will happily indulge your islamophobia
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:24 |
|
Former Everything posted:laughing at the assertion... that there is a Hillary Cult hmm
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:25 |
|
loquacius posted:see also: basically all of my Facebook feed, which I am complaining about ITT constantly because they are insufferable well poo poo, I should have known yesterday when I asked you for proof and you pointed me to literally "all of twitter" and today your proof is your facebook feed maybe the problem is your reliance on social media in shaping your worldview wait, that can't be it hillary cult/centrist war on leftists it is
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:25 |
|
loquacius posted:Fyi Clinton absolutely had cultishly devoted followers, a lot of them in D&D for example Revisionism began November 9.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:25 |
|
Remember Clinton's answer to the Muslim community question in the debates? It was basically the same as Trump's, she just stumbled around "I think all Muslims are collaborators" a little more. She was still like "communities need to spy on each other!"
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:26 |
|
Condiv posted:it is when you protect the racists and still give them power in the party you still seem to think i'm not agreeing with you or something
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:26 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Remember Clinton's answer to the Muslim community question in the debates? It was basically the same as Trump's, she just stumbled around "I think all Muslims are collaborators" a little more. She was still like "communities need to spy on each other!" her response to a question about the wall was that american already has a wall
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:27 |
|
Former Everything posted:can you quote some of this please? Your entire post history in this thread, for one
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:27 |
|
loquacius posted:Fyi Clinton absolutely had cultishly devoted followers, a lot of them in D&D for example The people who deny the existence of the Clinton cults of personality are usually the foremost members because a central tenet of the Clinton strain is their """savvy""" and """smartness""" which precludes the acknowledgement of their (extremely white-centric, very priveleged) ideology as ideology.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:27 |
|
Former Everything posted:well poo poo, I should have known Did you not read the post before that one or what "Cults" are good, that is what is called a "base". Hillary absolutely had one, and it would have been bad if she did not. I know you're angry at all the bad Bernie people on the Internet (and I'm sure your internet experience is so much more real than mine, dearie) and "cult" reminds you of them, but for a politician that is absolutely something you want.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:28 |
|
Terror Sweat posted:her response to a question about the wall was that american already has a wall And it's Already Great!
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:28 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Remember Clinton's answer to the Muslim community question in the debates? It was basically the same as Trump's, she just stumbled around "I think all Muslims are collaborators" a little more. She was still like "communities need to spy on each other!" lol centrism
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:30 |
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Remember Clinton's answer to the Muslim community question in the debates? It was basically the same as Trump's, she just stumbled around "I think all Muslims are collaborators" a little more. She was still like "communities need to spy on each other!"
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:32 |
|
Shear Modulus posted:https://twitter.com/StarTribune/status/836030340988719104 I'd like to think Keith Ellison isn't so weak-willed that he'd willingly sell a policy he doesn't believe in. Maybe you feel differently. If all this means is that Ellison books the TV appearances instead of Perez, I'm OK with that. Perez is Real Bad on TV.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:32 |
|
loquacius posted:Did you not read the post before that one or what I'm sorry, I was supposed to add "your experience in loving D&D" to the "twitter" and "facebook" proof of a hillary clinton cult I see how much more persuasive that is now Cults are not a loving base Cults are people who irrationally assign traits to the object or leader of the cult and then use the assigned traits and irrational loyalty to do things like, i.e., assert that people who do not vote in accordance with wishes of the leader (or object) are literally at war with those who did A base is made up of people who range from "eh, I guess it's acceptable even if I'm not particularly happy about it" to "omg this is exactly perfectly all that I ever wanted" and includes all of the in-betweeners
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:35 |
|
Former Everything posted:I'm sorry, I was supposed to add "your experience in loving D&D" to the "twitter" and "facebook" proof of a hillary clinton cult so only people who toe the party line 100% are the base?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:36 |
|
Y'know who didn't have a cult, Jeb loving "didn't win a single state primary" Bush, that's who Even loving Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio had cults. Hell, John Kasich had one, it's just that none of them lived outside Ohio. Martin O'Malley was similar to a cult leader in many ways, but having a cult was not one of them.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:36 |
|
Condiv posted:so only people who toe the party line 100% are the base? close the people that vote the party line 100% are the base
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:38 |
|
Former Everything posted:I'm sorry, I was supposed to add "your experience in loving D&D" to the "twitter" and "facebook" proof of a hillary clinton cult Ok, so you're torturing the definition of "cult" to mean "someone who says a thing the person I'm talking to said last night which made me really mad " because you are literally six years old, whatever, let's move past that one If someone grudgingly accepts you but isn't happy about it, that person is not your "base" in any way shape or form, that's ludicrous. Your base is a group of people who are actually excited at the idea of you succeeding. They will say things that come off a little over-devoted sometimes. That is a byproduct of enthusiasm. If Clinton had none of these, that would have been a death knell. I'm sorry to tell you this, but she did, that was a good thing for her, and you can see them express these views in many places including the Internet
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:39 |
|
Gringostar posted:close there were a lot of people that were "this is not acceptable but i have to vote the lesser evil" that still voted the party 100% of the time. they're not included in his definition of a base, only the people who are ok with everything the dems are doing. i guess this explains why centrists kept ignoring the left all this time. as long as we were unhappy we weren't their base
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:40 |
|
loquacius posted:Y'know who didn't have a cult, Jeb loving "didn't win a single state primary" Bush, that's who i'm not in a cult and there is no bernie cult but there is a hillary cult (check my facebook!) and also there are cults for everyone except Jeb so actually being in a cult is perfectly cool and fine - not a cult member
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:40 |
|
Former Everything posted:i'm not in a cult and there is no bernie cult but there is a hillary cult (check my facebook!) and also there are cults for everyone except Jeb so actually being in a cult is perfectly cool and fine You need a nap
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:41 |
|
this cult argument is pretty stupid even by this thread's standards
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:42 |
|
Alter Ego posted:I'd like to think Keith Ellison isn't so weak-willed that he'd willingly sell a policy he doesn't believe in. Maybe you feel differently. the fact that they even realize perez is a horrible public speaker is a minor improvement
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:43 |
|
UHD posted:this cult argument is pretty stupid even by this thread's standards and yet brilliant by hillary campaign standards
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:43 |
|
Condiv posted:there were a lot of people that were "this is not acceptable but i have to vote the lesser evil" that still voted the party 100% of the time. they're not included in his definition of a base, only the people who are ok with everything the dems are doing. people that vote for a party 100% of the time are it's base regardless if they have disagreements about some of a party's policies what you're thinking of is a shill maybe?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:43 |
|
Former Everything posted:i'm not in a cult and there is no bernie cult but there is a hillary cult (check my facebook!) and also there are cults for everyone except Jeb so actually being in a cult is perfectly cool and fine when the gently caress did I say that first part My stance on this issue is completely internally consistent, you just have a mental block against the idea of people being enthusiastic about politicians for some reason
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:43 |
|
UHD posted:this cult argument is pretty stupid even by this thread's standards Yeah, I instigated it and after the last couple pages, even I want to join an apocalyptic death cult and chug some punch.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:44 |
|
Condiv posted:and yet brilliant by hillary campaign standards not exactly a high bar to clear
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:44 |
|
unbutthurtable posted:Yeah, I instigated it and after the last couple pages, even I want to join an apocalyptic death cult and chug some punch. welcome friend
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:44 |
|
It's my fault for engaging Former Everything on a topic, sorry all, will do better next time
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:44 |
|
unbutthurtable posted:Yeah, I instigated it and after the last couple pages, even I want to join an apocalyptic death cult and chug some punch.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:45 |
|
loquacius posted:when the gently caress did I say that first part His entire posting gimmick for the last 24 hours has been to lop off half of what's been said then hyper-focus on what was left. Like obdicut, but with meltdowns instead of monotony.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:45 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:03 |
|
Shear Modulus posted:https://twitter.com/StarTribune/status/836030340988719104 this is really all that anyone wanted anyways
|
# ? Feb 27, 2017 20:46 |