Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
-Blade
Trump
Doctor
Sex
Cake
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

Crocoswine posted:

Sure, but I've heard far too many people, in my actual day to day life, talk about how they didn't vote/voted third party/wrote in a "real liberal", so I don't think that 8% is entirely because of disenfranchisement. Lotta apathy and a lot of idealistic dumbasses, sadly.

Two things

1) Their willingness to write in a non-Trump/Clinton candidate, while ultimately useless in this election, might suggest good things about millennials - opposition to our lovely parties, commitment to the belief that serious change is needed, open-mindedness, their being informed enough to understand why both candidates wouldn't improve their lives, etc. Obviously it would've been better for them not to hand Republicans control of the whole government, but voting third-party, writing in Bernie, etc doesn't suggest only bad things.

2) Have 18-29 year olds EVER been more likely to vote major party than 45-90 year olds? Are millennials actually any different in that regard from any other generation?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Mr. Belding posted:

Many more said and were repeatedly probated or harassed in D&D for "Hillary is struggling, I'm worried."

Oh lord not a 6er

Dixie Cretin Seaman
Jan 22, 2008

all hat and one catte
Hot Rope Guy

wizard on a water slide posted:

1) Their willingness to write in a non-Trump/Clinton candidate, while ultimately useless in this election, might suggest good things about millennials - opposition to our lovely parties, commitment to the belief that serious change is needed, open-mindedness, their being informed enough to understand why both candidates wouldn't improve their lives, etc. Obviously it would've been better for them not to hand Republicans control of the whole government, but voting third-party, writing in Bernie, etc doesn't suggest only bad things.

actually it suggests the very self-centeredness that boomers are accused of. throwing vulnerable ppl under the bus to maintain your ideological purity bc you won't accept that politics is always going to be about compromises. altho ralph nader proves this is hardly unique to millennials. just frustrating that every generation has to see a crazy rear end in a top hat gently caress poo poo up firsthand before they take elections seriously

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

The Brown Menace posted:

i dont quite know what to make of boomers tbh

i mean the are The Enemy, in the way a force attacking you is, but they lived in just such an absurdly different time

it dawned on my after a grueling job search where i finally found something halfway decent after literally hundreds of applications accompanied by the hectoring of my boomer parents

i asked them how many jobs they had applied to, since they were butting in so much, and the answer was quite sobering: 1 application. not each, but among them, just my dad, the one. while he was walking down the street one day towards the end of his studies, a guy who knew his brother mistook him for his brother and took him to the factory he owned since my dad did not break character. at the factory, he revealed he was not his brother. guy hired him on the spot anyway, with a salary i could only dream of in todays terms. the application was successful but my dad was obviously no longer interested

i mean how do you even explain the current economic situation to a generation which is used to that sort of absurd abundance being the normal

thanks for reading my gayass parent story

if you ever get laid off they will have amnesia regarding the difference again, never forget that, their ignorance is in part willful

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

wizard on a water slide posted:

the strangest part of this like a lot of boomer stuff is how internally inconsistent it is

they think kids who were raised in the 80s and 90s were super coddled, and also that reagan's economic policy ushered in prosperity unprecedented since the 1950s, while never making the connection between the two concepts

like even if they were right about us and right about reaganomics, it never occurs to them to think "maybe kids become coddled, have higher expectations, etc when they grow up in economically prosperous times and cultures, so that this thing we gripe about is an emergent consequence of this thing we love"

at times it feels like their embrace of individualism and selfishness is so radical that they don't understand fundamental social science concepts, or even that you can glean anything meaningful by measuring trends and observing group behavior

we are not a generation that respected the utility of social sciences, aside from economics, of course

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

HorseRenoir posted:

https://twitter.com/Chris_arnade/status/839981897900003328

Expect to see a lot more of this in the coming weeks as Trump starts to do things that gently caress over old white people and not just everyone else

i don't care, no one noticed when i, a republican senator refused to vote for him, death is certain and we will all know this soon enough

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 07:23 on Mar 10, 2017

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



90% of what is attributed to generation is actually an issue of racial divisions

White Millennials voted for Trump by a comfortable margin. Pretty much the only subset of white people in modern history to ever not vote majority Republican were 18-29 in 2008

Every other division you care to find - educated, dumb as poo poo, government job, old, young, all of them - have always voted majority Republican

The reason young people seem more liberal is because we're more diverse than the boomers were and our white bloc can't literally string up black people from trees and take Christmas card pictures in front of it to intimidate them into being inactive anymore (though voterID laws are making ground)

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

"boomers are constantly complaining about millennials" -- every millennial ever, complaining about boomers (i.e. their parents)

"boomers can't understand how things have changed since they were kids!" -- said by millennials who bash bill clinton for supporting DOMA and DADT

boomers normalized women's rights and relaxed the strict sexual mores of the 50s. they ended jim crow and oversaw vast (albeit incomplete) improvements in the cultural inclusivity of US society that are the bedrock for all of today's social justice movements.

so far, millennials have birthed a bumper crop of neo-nazis and the notion that political power can be obtained by not voting.

every generation has problems, and they rarely see their own. let's not get too full of ourselves.

(for the record im in my mid 30s, idk wtf my generation is supposed to be)

gen x, the forgotten children

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



You're pro-weed? Well guess what fucko so is your grandpa in all probability, it's just that when given the choice they prioritized other things the same way white Millennials just did on the same issue and will do forever

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Epic High Five posted:

You're pro-weed? Well guess what fucko so is your grandpa in all probability, it's just that when given the choice they prioritized other things the same way white Millennials just did on the same issue and will do forever

too true

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde

Epic High Five posted:

You're pro-weed? Well guess what fucko so is your grandpa in all probability, it's just that when given the choice they prioritized other things the same way white Millennials just did on the same issue and will do forever

hillary wasn't pro-weed at all and her husband put many many people in jail over exactly that with his tough on crime laws

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

so far, millennials have birthed a bumper crop of neo-nazis and the notion that political power can be obtained by not voting.

every generation has problems, and they rarely see their own. let's not get too full of ourselves.

the thought leaders of that bumper crop of neo-nazis are gen xers and boomers; they're a byproduct of the economic collapse that was set in motion decades ago, what happens when you have a generation of shiftless, underemployed, nihilistic, disenfranchised young men

you're right that every generation has its issues, but it's far easier to analyze the successes and failures of boomers than millennials, because millennials are still in the process of developing a career and a politics in the context of boomers furiously hanging on to their jobs and the reins of political power

in other words, the younger a generation is, the more fair it is to go "let's not pass judgment yet"

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



H.P. Hovercraft posted:

hillary wasn't pro-weed at all and her husband put many many people in jail over exactly that with his tough on crime laws

lol

yeah a lot of white young people voted for Trump on the assumption that "let's just continue Obama's approach" was somehow anti-weed despite seeing multiple states legalize it entirely. Surely they won't take *MY* weed away right? lmao. I guess if you never recognize that the whole point of it is to get free labor out of minorities and strip them of their ability to represent their interests by voting you probably could, if you squint just right, imagine that a Republican would ignore states legalizing or decriminalizing it lmao

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde
c'mon everyone knows that the pro-weed dumdums all voted for dat gary

Slamhound
Mar 27, 2010
If progress were generational, we couldn't conceive, much less have, this conversation.

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 230 days!

Slamhound posted:

If progress were generational, we couldn't conceive, much less have, this conversation.

iirc, there's some good evidence that generational shifts play a big role in shifts in opinion on various subjects (medicine, etc)

Asimo
Sep 23, 2007


Yeah it's not really a big secret that's there's heavy institutional inertia towards keeping traditional ideas and practices that really only begins to get broken once all the old scientists/teachers/doctors/politicans/etc. start dying off and their younger colleagues with different ideas finally get a bigger say in things.

Slamhound
Mar 27, 2010

Hodgepodge posted:

iirc, there's some good evidence that generational shifts play a big role in shifts in opinion on various subjects (medicine, etc)
I'd need to see those generational shifts broken down by race. The New Deal had holes just big enough for Black Americans to slip through.

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Asimo posted:

Yeah it's not really a big secret that's there's heavy institutional inertia towards keeping traditional ideas and practices that really only begins to get broken once all the old scientists/teachers/doctors/politicans/etc. start dying off and their younger colleagues with different ideas finally get a bigger say in things.

since time immemorial, this has been the case, it's just i didn't expect my generation to gently caress up this much first

there has got to be a historical rubric for a generation of fail sons to leave something besides a smoldering pit for their progeny, i just have yet to find it

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

actually it suggests the very self-centeredness that boomers are accused of. throwing vulnerable ppl under the bus to maintain your ideological purity bc you won't accept that politics is always going to be about compromises. altho ralph nader proves this is hardly unique to millennials. just frustrating that every generation has to see a crazy rear end in a top hat gently caress poo poo up firsthand before they take elections seriously

Sanders WAS the compromise

Dixie Cretin Seaman
Jan 22, 2008

all hat and one catte
Hot Rope Guy

Business Gorillas posted:

Sanders WAS the compromise

lol, looks like sometimes in life you need to make more than one compromise! our president thanks you for your principled stand tho

Jedi Knight Luigi
Jul 13, 2009

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

lol, looks like sometimes in life you need to make more than one compromise! our president thanks you for your principled stand tho

A lot if not the vast majority of Sanders die-hards voted Clinton.

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 230 days!
Actually disliking Bernie is probably a good quick sign of sociopathy.

The Brown Menace
Dec 24, 2010

Now comes in all colors.


Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

lol, looks like sometimes in life you need to make more than one compromise!

hey now, you gotta be slow with that kind of thing, i mean the dems havent even made one compromise yet

Mr. Belding
May 19, 2006
^
|
<- IS LAME-O PHOBE ->
|
V

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

lol, looks like sometimes in life you need to make more than one compromise! our president thanks you for your principled stand tho

Donald Trump needed to happen. I say this as a brocialist who voted for Hillary. The absolute wrecking of the democrats that is happening now is much needed chemotherapy that will hopefully destroy the cancer of centrist clintonism and obsessive idpol. And if it doesn't work then we all die.

Mr. Belding
May 19, 2006
^
|
<- IS LAME-O PHOBE ->
|
V

The Brown Menace posted:

hey now, you gotta be slow with that kind of thing, i mean the dems havent even made one compromise yet

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

Jedi Knight Luigi posted:

A lot if not the vast majority of Sanders die-hards voted Clinton.

"Both sides are the same/just as bad" sure didn't do wonders for turnout though

Dixie Cretin Seaman
Jan 22, 2008

all hat and one catte
Hot Rope Guy

Mr. Belding posted:

Donald Trump needed to happen. I say this as a brocialist who voted for Hillary. The absolute wrecking of the democrats that is happening now is much needed chemotherapy that will hopefully destroy the cancer of centrist clintonism and obsessive idpol. And if it doesn't work then we all die.

the same was said of gw bush :(

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Mr. Belding posted:

Donald Trump needed to happen. I say this as a brocialist who voted for Hillary. The absolute wrecking of the democrats that is happening now is much needed chemotherapy that will hopefully destroy the cancer of centrist clintonism and obsessive idpol. And if it doesn't work then we all die.

How did a cracker barrel restaurant learn to use SA

Jedi Knight Luigi
Jul 13, 2009

zegermans posted:

How did a cracker barrel restaurant learn to use SA

I too have come across many Cracker Barrels full of Hillary-votin' brocialists.

Not saying I agree with him but your analogy makes no sense.

Big Fat Iguana
Aug 21, 2016

remember. and never lie.

Mr. Belding posted:

Donald Trump needed to happen. I say this as a brocialist who voted for Hillary. The absolute wrecking of the democrats that is happening now is much needed chemotherapy that will hopefully destroy the cancer of centrist clintonism and obsessive idpol. And if it doesn't work then we all die.

lol look at this idiot

I remember people saying the same poo poo about Bush II

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

lol, looks like sometimes in life you need to make more than one compromise! our president thanks you for your principled stand tho

Just forment a slice of the base whose bottom line is left enough and will abstain imo. Easy to screw around parties with minority blocs.

The Brown Menace posted:

hey now, you gotta be slow with that kind of thing, i mean the dems havent even made one compromise yet

Clinton was the compromise. The compromised candidate.

:smugdon:

Mr. Belding
May 19, 2006
^
|
<- IS LAME-O PHOBE ->
|
V

Big Fat Iguana posted:

lol look at this idiot

I remember people saying the same poo poo about Bush II

dems did not develop a burgeoning socialist faction under bush ii.

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Really the Roman destruction of Jerusalem is needed for people to understand that the People's Front of Judea is the light

Dixie Cretin Seaman
Jan 22, 2008

all hat and one catte
Hot Rope Guy

The Brown Menace posted:

hey now, you gotta be slow with that kind of thing, i mean the dems havent even made one compromise yet

lol, you're not compromising with "the dems" in the general election. you're compromising between the ideal and the realizable. the dems are compromising with voters in a country that elected donald loving trump just 8 years after the disaster of g w bush

understand this basic fact: if a dem candidate loses a vote from a leftist, they lose a vote. if a dem loses a vote from a swing voter, they lose a vote and the republican gains a vote (typically). therefore the smart candidate will prioritize votes from centrists over votes from their own fringe base in a general election.

this won't change under a 2 party system, and the 2 party system won't change under the system of voting enshrined in the US constitution.

change has to happen within the party structure, and that's where we have our voice. bernie understood this-- he joined the democratic party to facilitate his run -- and he ran a really amazing campaign. he didn't win, but he sure as hell set the stage for next time around by proving how much support was out there for his politics. trump understood this, too.

i know this is heresy, but a lot of poo poo that y'all take as evidence of democrats being corrupt and evil, i take as them judging a political situation and making what they believe is the best compromise available. they aren't necessarily right about the judgement-- sometimes they are frustratingly timid-- but that doesn't mean they're perfectly happy with what they got, either.

(by the way, republicans compromise too, when they need to. so if you thought both parties were equally bad, but are at all surprised at how bad trump and the GOP is now with the presidency and congressional majorities, there's your explanation. just wait til they abolish the filibuster and have even more free reign!)

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:

lol, you're not compromising with "the dems" in the general election. you're compromising between the ideal and the realizable. the dems are compromising with voters in a country that elected donald loving trump just 8 years after the disaster of g w bush

understand this basic fact: if a dem candidate loses a vote from a leftist, they lose a vote. if a dem loses a vote from a swing voter, they lose a vote and the republican gains a vote (typically). therefore the smart candidate will prioritize votes from centrists over votes from their own fringe base in a general election.

this won't change under a 2 party system, and the 2 party system won't change under the system of voting enshrined in the US constitution.

change has to happen within the party structure, and that's where we have our voice. bernie understood this-- he joined the democratic party to facilitate his run -- and he ran a really amazing campaign. he didn't win, but he sure as hell set the stage for next time around by proving how much support was out there for his politics. trump understood this, too.

i know this is heresy, but a lot of poo poo that y'all take as evidence of democrats being corrupt and evil, i take as them judging a political situation and making what they believe is the best compromise available. they aren't necessarily right about the judgement-- sometimes they are frustratingly timid-- but that doesn't mean they're perfectly happy with what they got, either.

(by the way, republicans compromise too, when they need to. so if you thought both parties were equally bad, but are at all surprised at how bad trump and the GOP is now with the presidency and congressional majorities, there's your explanation. just wait til they abolish the filibuster and have even more free reign!)

shut up bitch



Big Fat Iguana posted:

lol look at this idiot

I remember people saying the same poo poo about Bush II

this arguably worked (politically, obviously the actual consequences of letting a bunch of fascist neocons run the government for most of a decade were pretty bad) because Democrats won overwhelmingly in 08 and if they had been actual progressives instead of corrupt technocrats we'd be much better off for it today

the bitcoin of weed has issued a correction as of 17:22 on Mar 10, 2017

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



This ain't d&d bitches, gimme some screencaps or :getout:

Dixie Cretin Seaman
Jan 22, 2008

all hat and one catte
Hot Rope Guy

Fullhouse posted:

this arguably worked (politically, obviously the actual consequences of letting a bunch of fascist neocons run the government for most of a decade were pretty bad) because Democrats won overwhelmingly in 08 and if they had been actual progressives instead of corrupt technocrats we'd be much better off for it today

hmm yes, the classical political strategy of "let your opponent win with a string of increasingly fascist crazy assholes", it never fails

*proceeds to excuse the reason it failed last time, offers no ideas for preventing future failures*

E: ill stop now, here's my offering of penitence


Dixie Cretin Seaman has issued a correction as of 18:20 on Mar 10, 2017

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde
https://twitter.com/zumbanegrita2/status/839844521680711681

https://twitter.com/BobKendall10/status/834801229326929920

https://twitter.com/healthcoach365/status/834433455815553024

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde
lol

https://twitter.com/THESTRA75665663/status/839896973436203009

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply