|
FrozenVent posted:Hey guys I think your executive branch might have been compromised by the Russians And their figurehead is a villain from Sesame Street. ded redd fucked around with this message at 01:48 on Mar 19, 2017 |
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 08:09 |
|
|
I'm probably just dumb but when they tell you to start preserving poo poo isn't that just a real strong signal to start deleting incriminating poo poo and get everyone's stories straight?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 02:22
|
|
|
Waroduce posted:I'm probably just dumb but when they tell you to start preserving poo poo isn't that just a real strong signal to start deleting incriminating poo poo and get everyone's stories straight? its usually not as easy as flushing a dimebag down the airport toilet
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
Waroduce posted:I'm probably just dumb but when they tell you to start preserving poo poo isn't that just a real strong signal to start deleting incriminating poo poo and get everyone's stories straight? Yeah but once you're warned like that you also start wracking up charges IF they find out you deleted anything. Whereas if they don't warn you there's nothing illegal about getting rid of stuff. Ideally they warn you after they already have a baseline knowledge of what should be there, so if anythings missing they can start to press you about it. E:^^^^^^^^^^^ Nostalgia4Butts posted:its usually not as easy as flushing a dimebag down the airport toilet Yeah, this. They're not fishing, they're following a trail and likely know roughly what they should find.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 02:27
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffsqy86REIM
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
Trump getting spooked, flying to russia to meet Putin, and simply not coming back, would be the best result.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:Hey guys I think your executive branch might have been compromised by the Russians I'm having lunch with a table full of Russians send help
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:05
|
|
|
Two Finger posted:I'm having lunch with a table full of Russians send help What do they think about Trump?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
They just smirk and wink at each other and while saying he's a formidable opponent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:Richard Spencer: Dumb as gently caress. Richard Spencer still getting punched in the face, I see.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/843258995850858499 What's the word for when the President cites domestic propaganda which is in turn citing foreign propaganda which helped subvert democracy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/843258995850858499 "Two thousand seventeen"
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/843258995850858499 Trump'd
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/843258995850858499 Maga.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
It's really cool being alive in what might be the most insane era of our nation's history.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
Fister Roboto posted:It's really cool being alive in what might be the most insane era of our nation's history. McCarthy era was more insane but we are still living through this. It certainly has time to grow.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:31
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:McCarthy era was more insane but we are still living through this. It certainly has time to grow. all it can do is grow
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Butts posted:all it can do is grow So who do you think is going to stand on the senate floor with a restaurant menu shouting about a list of known Russian sympathizers?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:36
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:McCarthy era was more insane but we are still living through this. It certainly has time to grow. It's been less than two months. Steezo posted:So who do you think is going to stand on the senate floor with a restaurant menu shouting about a list of known Russian sympathizers? John McCain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTdqIlfp8XE
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:39
|
|
|
Godholio posted:It's been less than two months. Thats not a tie its a god damned bib.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 10:55
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/843258995850858499 "Russian dominating us in Information warfare"
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 11:11
|
|
|
so the higher courts might actually uphold trump's ban, so muslim ban 2.0 has a good chance of existing. https://twitter.com/HenryKrinkIe/status/843426521469636608 Funny how I haven't really seen anywhere else talking about this Basically, some conservative judges on the 9th want it to pass for partisan reasons. quote:The problem with Bybee’s opinion is that Mandel is not the last word on this topic. In Kerry v. Din, Justice Kennedy wrote that courts may dig into an executive branch official’s real motives when there is “an affirmative showing of bad faith” on the part of that official — that is, if the official is lying about that real motives. And the fact that Trump spent his presidential campaign bragging about his plans to ban Muslims certainly suggests that his administration is not telling the truth when they claim that his Muslim ban has nothing to do with religion. Hot Karl Marx fucked around with this message at 13:26 on Mar 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 13:22
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 14:02
|
|
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:so the higher courts might actually uphold trump's ban, so muslim ban 2.0 has a good chance of existing. It's the court's conservatives safely grumping about not getting an en banc hearing on a moot issue. It certainly signals the direction that judicial support for Ban II will come from, though, but err already knew that. Hot Karl Marx posted:Basically, some conservative judges on the 9th want it to pass for partisan reasons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
joat mon posted:It's rather speculative. (Which doesn't necessarily mean he'll be shown to have guessed wrong) It's gonna be a looooooong four years.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 15:24
|
|
BigDave posted:It's gonna be a looooooong four years. EIGHT**** 
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
I did a double take. First because it looks like his head is Photoshopped in and second because he appears to have a stump where his hand should be.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
That high top fade lookin 💯 though
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
So I get that the immigration ban is bad, but how exactly do the courts have the power to block it? Is there a law they're citing or something?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:46
|
|
Reverand maynard posted:So I get that the immigration ban is bad, but how exactly do the courts have the power to block it? Is there a law they're citing or something? If the ban is unconstitutional the court can block it. Banning people based on race or religion (which the ban does for all intents and purposes) is against the constitution. Checks and balancessss.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
Reverand maynard posted:So I get that the immigration ban is bad, but how exactly do the courts have the power to block it? Is there a law they're citing or something? In theory, the judicial can block anything either of the other branches do, provided someone raises a legal case about it(the courts couldn't block the EO if no one sued over it) and the can make an effective argument about it being unconstitutional.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Reverand maynard posted:So I get that the immigration ban is bad, but how exactly do the courts have the power to block it? Is there a law they're citing or something? There are several court cases that support striking it down. Largely it centers around intent. In other words if the order is intended to ban someone based on race or religion its unconstitutional, period. The President can not circumvent the constitution based on National Security, despite what they have said since the first ban. The issue the courts face is proving that the intent is to ban muslims. To do that they have to be able to cite campaign and surrogate rhetoric. Which is the sticking point. As long as the executive branch can block the courts from accessing it then the ban is going to win. If they can't then it dies and we see ban 3.1. Immigration bans are loving stupid and don't work. This cluster gently caress is a glaring reason why.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
Yea Trump and Co did it in themselves by publicly speaking that its the same bill but tuned differently than the first. They openly admitted to trying to pull a fast one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
Cugel the Clever posted:I did a double take. First because it looks like his head is Photoshopped in and second because he appears to have a stump where his hand should be. He has discovered Kid and/or Play
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/18/hillary-clinton-says-shes-ready-come-out-woods/99346698/quote:SCRANTON, Pa. - Hillary Clinton said Friday she’s “ready to come out of the woods” and help Americans find common ground. https://twitter.com/AFP/status/843459375746420736
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/simondenyer/status/843501304957739008 I think Tillerson is pretty good at this, guys.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
Just remember, Donnie is really, really unpopular. https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/843507898860888065 https://twitter.com/ForecasterEnten/status/843510772579926021 By the way that quote earlier was regarding Nunes (Republican) and the "no collusion with Trump/Russians", the committee Democrat is saying "There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence, I think, of deception and that's where we begin the investigation."
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/simondenyer/status/843501304957739008 I am skeptical of that assessment. It reminds me of people screenshotting text logs and showings friends for help with divining someone's true attitude when the reality is that everyone is retarded and should die.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
Zeris posted:everyone is retarded and should die.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 08:09 |
|
|
Third World Reggin posted:http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/18/hillary-clinton-says-shes-ready-come-out-woods/99346698/ If she wants to help, she can work behind the scenes, donate money, ect. She should never show her face in public in any political form ever again, except maybe to sell books. Her name, like the Bush name, is politically too toxic but lol the Democrats might be stupid enough to not understand that. And I say this as someone who likes her and thinks she would have made a good president.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 19:40
|
|